<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<head>
		<meta charset="utf-8" />
		<title>AAVS_MH20141020091053 Sharma</title>
		<link href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/cssfiles/AAVS_MH20141020091053 Sharma.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
	</head>
    
    <style> 
.pt{
	background-color:#BDF;
	border-top-style:solid;
	
	border-top-color:#d3d1d1;
	border-top-width: 1px;
	border-bottom-style: solid;
	
	border-bottom-color:#d3d1d1;
	border-bottom-width: 1px;
	height:90px;
	}
	  
.img_display{
	float:left;
	padding:5px;
	
	}
	.img_text{ padding:10px;
		
		}
		
		.Txt_Dis{
			padding-right:20px;
			}
</style>


<body id="AAVS_MH20141020091053-Sharma" lang="en-GB">
		<div class="Basic-Text-Frame">
			<p class="Type-of-Article">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Type-of-Article"><span class="CharOverride-1">Research Article</span></p>
	</div>
		<div class="Basic-Text-Frame">
			<p class="title- ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="title- ParaOverride-1">PCR Amplification Protocol for GC Rich Protamine Gene from Chicken Testis cDNA</p>
		</div>
		<div class="Basic-Text-Frame">
			<p class="Normal ParaOverride-2" lang="en-US">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Normal ParaOverride-2" lang="en-US"><span class="CharOverride-2" lang="en-GB">Sanjeev Kumar Sharma</span><span class="CharOverride-3" lang="en-GB">1</span><span class="CharOverride-2" lang="en-GB">, Chathathayil Muhammedali Shafeeque</span><span class="CharOverride-3" lang="en-GB">2</span><span class="CharOverride-2" lang="en-GB">, Jag Mohan</span><span class="CharOverride-3" lang="en-GB">1</span><span class="CharOverride-2" lang="en-GB">, Parappurath Abdul Azeez</span><span class="CharOverride-3" lang="en-GB">2</span><span class="CharOverride-2" lang="en-GB">, Ram Pratap Singh</span><span class="CharOverride-3" lang="en-GB">2</span></p>
		</div>
		<div class="Basic-Text-Frame">
			<p class="Affiliations ParaOverride-1"><span class="CharOverride-4">1</span>Physiology and Reproduction Division, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243122, Bareilly, India; <span class="CharOverride-4">2</span>Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History Anaikatty 641108, Coimbatore, India. </p>
		</div>
		<div>
			<p class="Abstract ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Abstract ParaOverride-1"><span class="CharOverride-5">Abstract</span> | Amplification of GC rich templates using PCR is usually difficult compared to non-GC-rich targets. GC rich regions produce complex inter and intra strand folding (hairpins and loops) due to higher hydrogen bonding with neighbouring cytosine and guanine. These secondary structures in DNA are resistant to melting and cause Taq DNA polymerases to stall; they also hamper primer annealing, resulting in incomplete or non-specific amplifications. The aim of this study was to develop an easy PCR protocol to amplify very high GC rich (88% in the coding region) protamine gene of chicken. The cDNA used for amplification was synthesised from testis RNA and PCR products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Protamine amplicon successfully amplified only with Go Taq DNA polymerase in the presence of DMSO. Optimization of MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentration, buffer strength, annealing temperature, DMSO and the DNA template concentration, were important in the PCR reaction resulting in successful amplification. In addition, PCR started directly at hot plate is also important to get rid of primer-dimer formation.</p>
		  <p class="Abstract ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Abstract ParaOverride-1"><span class="CharOverride-5">Keywords </span>| <span class="CharOverride-8">PCR, GC rich gene, DMSO</span></p>
		  <p class="Abstract ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
		</div>
		<div class="Basic-Text-Frame">
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="CharOverride-9">Edito</span><span class="CharOverride-5">r</span> | Kuldeep Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Uttar Pradesh, India.</p>
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="CharOverride-5">Received</span> | October 20, 2014; <span class="CharOverride-5">Revised</span> | November 15, 2014; <span class="CharOverride-5">Accepted</span> | November 18, 2014; <span class="CharOverride-5">Published</span> | November 20, 2014&#9;&#9;</p>
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="CharOverride-5">*Correspondence</span> | Ram Pratap Singh, Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History Anaikatty, India; <span class="CharOverride-5">Email:</span> rampratapsingh81@gmail.com</p>
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="CharOverride-5">Citation</span> | Sharma SK, Shafeeque CM, Mohan J, Azeez PA, Singh RP (2014). PCR amplification protocol for GC rich Protamine Gene from chicken testis cDNA. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2 (11): 599-605.  </p>
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="CharOverride-5">DOI</span> | <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.11.599.605"><span class="Hyperlink">http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.11.599.605</span></a></p>
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="Editor---Citation CharOverride-5" lang="en-US">ISSN </span><span class="Editor---Citation CharOverride-5" lang="en-US">(</span><span class="Editor---Citation CharOverride-5" lang="en-US">Online</span> | 2307-8316; <span class="Editor---Citation CharOverride-5" lang="en-US">ISSN </span><span class="Editor---Citation CharOverride-5" lang="en-US">(Print) </span>| 2309-3331</p>
			<p class="Editor----Citation"><span class="CharOverride-5">Copyright </span>© 2014 Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p>
		</div>
		<div class="Basic-Text-Frame">
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">INTRODUCTION</p>
			<p class="Caps-on-First-Para ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Caps-on-First-Para ParaOverride-1"><span class="_idGenDropcap-1">P</span>olymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique enables researchers to produce millions of copies of a specific DNA or RNA sequence within a very short time period, and thereby has become one of the widely used techniques in the diagnostics and molecular biology laboratories. However, amplification of GC rich templates using PCR is usually difficult compared to non-GC-rich targets (McDowell et al., 1998). GC rich regions produce complex inter and intra strand folding (hairpins and loops) due to increased hydrogen bonding with neighbouring cytosine and guanine (Musso et al., 2006). These secondary structures in DNA are resistant to melting and cause Taq DNA polymerases to stall and they also hampers primer annealing, resulting in incomplete or non-specific amplification (Shore and Paul, 2010; Hubé et al., 2005). As a result of this, several approaches have been tried to amplify GC rich templates by adding dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, polyethylene glycol, formamide, betaine, 7-deaza-dGTP, and dUTP in the reaction mixture  (Baskaran et al., 1996; Chakrabarti and Schutt, 2001; Henke et al., 1997; Kang et al., 2005; Musso et al., 2006; Mutter and Boynton, 1995; Pomp and Medrano, 1991; Sidhu et al., 1996; Sun et al., 1993; Turner and Jenkins, 1995; Weissensteiner and Lanchbury, 1996). These additives either alone or in combination with others resolve the complex secondary structure formation at GC-rich regions (Henke et al., 1997; Musso et al., 2006; Ralser et al., 2006), or they enhanced the amplification possibilities of GC-rich templates. It was also shown that template denaturation with NaOH, hot start PCR, step-down PCR, and primer modification can improve PCR amplification of highly GC-rich regions of DNA (Agarwal and Perl, 1993; Sahdev et al., 2007). These efforts to amplify GC-rich regions are found useful in some but not in all the cases (Mamedov et al., 2008) and highlight the need to standardize GC-rich gene specific protocol to overcome the problem.</p>
		  <p class="Caps-on-First-Para ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">Protamine (PRM) is one of the genes having very high GC content (88% in the coding region) in chicken (Oliva and Dixon, 1989). The chicken PRM gene is intron less (Oliva and Dixon, 1989), strikingly similar to mammalian protamines (Nakano et al.,<span class="CharOverride-12"> </span>1976). Most recently, PRM transcripts in sperm has emerged as fertility/infertility biomarkers (Miller, 2011; Shafeeque et al., 2014a). However, their role in avian sperm is not studied in detail (Shafeeque et al., 2014b), most probably because of difficulties in amplifying avian protamine gene due to its high GC content. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an easy PCR protocol to amplify the GC rich PRM. </p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">MATERIALS AND METHODS</p>
		  <p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">The protocols involving the care and use of animals for these experiments were in accordance with the rules of the ‘Animal Ethics Monitoring Committee of the Central Avian Research Institute’.</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-2--History-in-MM-">Experimental Birds</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">In the current study, adult male (35 weeks old) broiler breeders (IC 3) from the same hatch were used. The birds were housed in individual cages and were maintained under uniform standard management conditions with 14 h light: 10 h dark.</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-2--History-in-MM-">Sample Collection</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">Four birds were sacrificed and a small piece (approx 1cm long) of testes from each bird was collected aseptically and washed in chilled RNase free PBS. Special care was taken to remove blood from the samples. Each collected sample was divided into 2 parts: the first part was used immediately for RNA isolation while the second part was immersed in RNAlater and stored at –4°C.</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-2--History-in-MM-">RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">Total RNA from individual sample was extracted by RNAzol® RT (Molecular Research Centre, Inc., Cincinnati, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 25mg tissue samples were used for RNA isolation. An optional phase separation step by using 4-bromoanisole was performed during total RNA isolation to eliminate gDNA contamination. The concentrations and purities of isolated RNA samples were determined spectrophotometrically at A260 and A280nm. For all samples, the RNA 260/280nm absorbance ratio was ≥2.0, and concentration was approx 4500ng/µl. Further, all the RNA samples were used for PCR with <span class="CharOverride-15">β</span>-actin primer to check DNA contamination. DNA free total RNA samples (1µg) were reverse transcribed using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI Fermentas, Hanover, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resultant cDNA was stored frozen at –20°C until used. </p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-2--History-in-MM-">Protamine Amplification by PCR</p>
			<p class="Body-Text">Exonic region of PRM gene (187 bp) was amplified using a pair of gene specific primer (F: 5<span class="CharOverride-15">′</span>-CGCAGCAGGACCCGCAGCCG-3<span class="CharOverride-15">′</span> and R: 5<span class="CharOverride-15">′</span>-CGGCGGCGGCGGCTCAGTAG-3<span class="CharOverride-15">′</span>) with available three different Taq DNA Polymerases (Go Taq from Promega, USA; Taq DNA polymerase from Geneaid, Taiwan; and hot start Taq DNA polymerase from Fermentas, Canada). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a total volume of 25 μl containing 4μl of 10 times diluted first strand of cDNA, 1X PCR buffer (Geneaid, Taiwan), 1.5mM MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2 </span>(2.0 mM for Geneaid Taq), 2.5 mM of dNTPs, 5 pM of each primer and 0.625 unit of Taq DNA polymerase for Go Taq and Hot Start Taq (one unit for Geneaid Taq) in presence and absence of 8% DMSO. Gradient PCR methodology was used to ascertain the optimum annealing temperature of protamine primer pair for successful amplification of PRM gene. After the initial denaturation at 96<span class="CharOverride-4">o</span>C for 5 min, the PCR profile consisted of a denaturation step at 97<span class="CharOverride-4">o</span>C for 20sec, an annealing step from 60.6 to 67.5<span class="CharOverride-4">o</span>C for 30sec with and an elongation step at 74<span class="CharOverride-4">o</span>C for 20sec in total for of 34 cycles, followed by a final extension of 5min at 74<span class="CharOverride-4">o</span>C. The PCR product was run on 1.5 % agarose gel including EtBr in 1X TAE buffer. The gel was visualized under UV light and was photographed using automated gel documentation system. The concentration of buffer, MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span>, DMSO, template and hot / normal start were optimised for the Go Taq DNA Polymerase. </p>
			<p class="Body-Text">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text">&nbsp;</p>
            <p class="Heading-2--History-in-MM-">RESULTS</p>
            <p class="Heading-2--History-in-MM-">&nbsp;</p>
            <p class="Body-Text">We have amplified PRM amplicon successfully at all the given temperatures (60.6-67.5) using 1.5mM MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> and Go Taq DNA polymerase only in presence of 8% DMSO (Figure 1.1). However, it could not be amplified productively at any given temperature by using hot-start Taq DNA Polymerase from Fermentas (Figure 1.2) or Taq from Geneaid (Figure 1.3) in presence /absence of DMSO. To find out optimal buffer concentration, separate PCR reactions were setup with addition of 1X, 0.8X, 0.6X, 0.4X, 0.2X buffer and without buffer. Results indicated that 0.8X buffer (Figure 2) concentration was optimum for good amplification. Further, concentration of MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> was optimized in  separate PCR reactions with addition of 1.0mM, 1.4mM, 1.8mM, 2.2mM, 2.6mM and 3.0mM MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span>. Good amplification was achieved at 1.4mM MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> (Figure 3). Additionally DMSO concentration was optimized at optimum buffer and MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentration in a separate PCR reaction with addition of 4.0%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12% and 14% DMSO. Final concentration of 10% DMSO was the only one to provide the desired amplicon yield without nonspecific amplification (Figure 4). Furthermore, concentration of template (1-6µl of 10 time’s diluted cDNA) was also optimized in a new PCR reaction with optimum concentrations of buffer, MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> and DMSO. The optimum template concentration was 5µl (Figure 5) to obtain best PCR efficiency. Finally, effect of hot start and normal start PCR was observed by two separate reactions, one kept at cold PCR block while running the PCR and another kept directly at Hot (96°C) block while running the PCR. Results indicated that product amplified using Hotplate has very less primer dimer (Figure 6). </p><br>
            <div class="pt" > <a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109205556.png" target="new"><img class="img_display" src="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109205556.png" width="80" height="80"></a>
<p class="Txt_Dis" ><span><b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109205556.png" target="new">Figure 1: </a></b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109205556.png"><span>Amplification of PRM with Go Taq (1.1), Hot start Taq (1.2) and gene aid (1.3) (L=100 bp DNA Ladder, A=With DMSO, B= Without DMSO)</a></p>
          </div><br>

<div class="pt" > <a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201557.jpg" target="new"><img class="img_display" src="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201557.jpg" width="80" height="80"></a>
<p class="Txt_Dis" ><span><b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201557.jpg" target="new">Figure 2: </a></b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201557.jpg"><span> Amplification of PRM with Go Taq using different buffer concentrations (L= 100 bp DNA Ladder)</a></p>
          </div><br>
			
			<div class="pt" > <a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204657.png" target="new"><img class="img_display" src="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204657.png" width="80" height="80"></a>
<p class="Txt_Dis" ><span><b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204657.png" target="new">Figure 3: </a></b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204657.png"><span> Amplification of PRM with Go Taq using different MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentrations (L= 100 bp DNA Ladder)</a></p>
          </div><br>
          
          <div class="pt" > <a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201258.png" target="new"><img class="img_display" src="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201258.png" width="80" height="80"></a>
<p class="Txt_Dis" ><span><b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201258.png" target="new">Figure 4: </a></b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201258.png"><span> Amplification of PRM with Go Taq using different DMSO concentrations (L= 100 bp DNA Ladder)</a></p>
          </div><br>
         
			
            <div class="pt" > <a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204158.jpg" target="new"><img class="img_display" src="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204158.jpg" width="80" height="80"></a>
<p class="Txt_Dis" ><span><b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204158.jpg" target="new">Figure 5: </a></b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109204158.jpg"><span> Amplification of PRM with Go Taq using different template concentrations (L= 100 bp DNA Ladder)</a></p>
          </div><br>
          
          <div class="pt" > <a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201959.png" target="new"><img class="img_display" src="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201959.png" width="80" height="80"></a>
<p class="Txt_Dis" ><span><b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201959.png" target="new">Figure 6: </a></b><a href="http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/uploads/figures/20150109201959.png"><span> Amplification of PRM with Go Taq using Hot start and normal block (L= 100 bp DNA Ladder)</a></p>
          </div><br>
			
			
            
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">DISCUSSION </p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">Determining the most suitable direct PCR DNA polymerase for detecting a high GC rich target is time-consuming and costly. However, our data highlight the importance of comparing the performance of three DNA polymerases prior to establishing PCR conditions. The results indicated that among the commercially available polymerases we tested; only Go Taq DNA polymerase has the potential for the amplification of more than 80 percentage GC rich region. We optimised different PCR conditions for Go Taq DNA polymerase, which are as follows.</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">To optimize the PCR thermal cycling conditions, one has to determine the optimal temperature and length of each of the program segments, as well as the number of cycles. Of those, the most important parameter seems to be the temperature of primer annealing, as even the smallest deviation of 1°C or 2°C could make a significant difference between specific and nonspecific amplification (Roux, 2009; Lo<span class="CharOverride-5"> </span>and Chan, 2006). The optimal primer annealing temperature for a particular PCR amplification depends on the base composition, nucleotide sequence, length and concentration of the primers (Saiki, 1989). A typical primer annealing temperature is 5°C below the calculated Tm of the primers. Increasing the annealing temperature enhances discrimination against incorrectly annealed primers and reduces mis-extension of incorrect nucleotides at the 3<span class="CharOverride-15">′</span> end of primers. Therefore, a higher annealing temperature increases amplification specificity. In general, the annealing temperatures usually range between 55°C and 72°C. However, since the G–C pair is bound by three hydrogen bonds, while A–T pairs is bound by only two, high GC content corresponds to higher melting temperature and requires higher temperature for primer annealing (Kramer and Coen 2001; Mamedov et al., 2008). In the present study, the annealing temperature was determined to 67.5°C in presence of DMSO. Gradient PCR reaction showed that the optimal annealing temperature for our PCR reaction was between 60.6°C to 67.5°C. </p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">We optimised the strength of the PCR buffer supplied with the Taq DNA polymerase and found that 0.8 buffer strength was good for best amplification of PRM amplicon instead of the recommended buffer strength. Reason behind this may be that the melting temperature of DNA increases with higher ionic strength.</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">In the present study, the MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentration tested was within the range of 1.0 to 3.0mM, and the optimum observed was 1.4mM. Yet, up to 2.2mM MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> also resulted in satisfactory amplification, which gave best results when performed on PCR products obtained with 1.4mM MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentration. The observed range of acceptable molarities was broad most probably due to the presence of enhancer DMSO, known to improve the success of PCR reaction even at different MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentrations (Kramer and Coen, 2001).</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">Addition of DMSO to the reaction mixture turned out to be essential for successful amplification, and none of the previously described optimization strategies could have been implemented without its presence. Optimal concentration of 10% was determined after testing three different options, which was within the recommended range of 1–10% (Grunenwald, 2003; Kolmodin and Birch, 2002).</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">The quality and concentration of DNA templates can directly affect the outcome of PCR amplifications. To achieve satisfactory amplification, certain baseline conditions may be used as a starting point for optimizing PCR amplification. For a typical PCR, 104 to 107 molecules/100 to 500ng of template DNA is recommended. There are several methods for purifying DNA for PCR amplification, including commercially available kits, as well as standard methods (Sambrook<span class="CharOverride-5"> </span>et al., 1989). Analysis by pulsed-field agarose gel electrophoresis is typically recommended for template DNA used in long PCR to assure its purity and integrity. </p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">In the present study, all PCR components was mixed at a lower temperature on ice and then PCR block was heated to 96°C;  PCR reaction tubes  transferred directly to hot block from ice. Adopting this procedure we observed a significant decline in primer dimer formation in comparison to PCR run as usual.</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">CONCLUSION </p>
		  <p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">PRM amplicon successfully amplified only with Go Taq DNA polymerase in presence of DMSO. The optimization of the PCR conditions included determination of optimal MgCl<span class="CharOverride-6">2</span> concentration, buffer strength and annealing temperature, in presence of 10% DMSO and the DNA template of acceptable concentration, resulted in successful amplification. In addition, PCR started directly at hot plate is also important to get rid of primer-dimer formation.</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">ACKNOWLEDGEMENT </p>
		  <p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">The authors gratefully acknowledge the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for supporting this research program (SERB/FT/LS–147/2011).</p>
			<p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
		  <p class="Body-Text ParaOverride-1">&nbsp;</p>
			<p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">REFERENCES</p>
		  <p class="Heading-1--Introduction----">&nbsp;</p>
			
			  <li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Agarwal RK, Perl A (1993). PCR amplification of highly GC-rich DNA template after denaturation by NaOH. Nucleic Acids Res. 21(22): 5283–5284. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.22.5283"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.22.5283</span></a></li>
              <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Baskaran N, Kandpal RP, Bhargava AK, Glynn MW, Bale A, Weissman SM (1996). Uniform amplification of a mixture of deoxyribonucleic acids with varying GC content”. Genome Res. 6(7): 633–638. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.6.7.633"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.6.7.633</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Chakrabarti R, Schutt C E (2001). The enhancement of PCR amplification by low molecular weight sulfones. Gene. 274(1-2): 293–298. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00621-7"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00621-7</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">McDowell DG, Burns N A, Parkes H C (1998). Localized sequence regions possessing high melting temperature prevent the amplification of a DNA mimic in competitive PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 26(14):3340–3347. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.14.3340"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.14.3340</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Grunenwald H (2003). Optimization of polymerase chain reactions”. In: Bartlett JMS, Stirling D, editors. Methods in Molecular Biology. PCR Protocols, second edition, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0055-0_20"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0055-0_20</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Henke W, Herdel K, Jung K, Schnorr D, Loening SA (1997). Betaine improves the PCR amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(29): 3957–3958. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.19.3957"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.19.3957</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Hubé F, Reverdiau P, Iochmann S, Gruel Y (2005). Improved PCR method for amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. Mol. Biotechnol. 31(1): 81–84. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/MB:31:1:081"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/MB:31:1:081</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Kang J, Lee MS, Gorenstein DG (2005). The enhancement of PCR amplification of a random sequence DNA library by DMSO and betaine: application to </span><span class="CharOverride-12" lang="en-GB">in vitro</span><span lang="en-GB"> combinatorial selection of aptamers. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 64(2):147–151. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.06.003"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.06.003</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Kolmodin LA, Birch DE (2002). “Polymerase chain reaction. Basic principles and routine practice. Methods Mol. Biol. 192(1): 3–18.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Kramer MF, Coen DM (001). Enzymatic amplification of DNA by PCR: Standard procedures and optimization. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Chapter 15: Unit 11.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Lo YMD, Chan KCA (2006). Introduction to the polymerase chain re-action. In: Lo YMD, Chiu RWK, Chan KCA, editors. Clinical Applications of PCR, second edition, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.  </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-074-X:1 "><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-074-X:1</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Mamedov TG, Pienaar E, Whitney SE, TerMaat JR, Carvill G, Goliath R, Subramanian A, Viljoen HJ (2008). A fundamental study of the PCR amplification of GC-rich DNA templates. Comput. Biol. Chem. 32: 452–457. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2008.07.021"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2008.07.021</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US">Miller D (2011). Sperm RNA: Reading the Hidden Message. Chapter in, “Epigenetics and Human Reproduction” . Pp.329-353. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14773-9_15"><span class="Hyperlink">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14773-9_15</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Musso M, Bocciardi R, Parodi S, Ravazzolo R, Ceccherini I (2006). Betaine, dimethyl sulfoxide, and 7-deaza-dGTP, a powerful mixture for amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. J. Mol. Diagn. 8(5): 544–50. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060058"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060058</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Mutter GL, Boynton KA (1995). PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 23(8): 1411–1418. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.8.1411"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.8.1411</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Nakano M, Tobita T, Ando T (1976). Studies on a protamine (Galline) from fowl sperm. Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res.&#160; 8(6</span><span lang="en-GB">): 565–578.&#160;</span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3011.1976.tb02537.x"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3011.1976.tb02537.x</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Oliva RR, Dixon GH (1989). Chicken protamine genes are intronless. J. Biol. Chem. 264(21): 12472–12481.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Pomp D, Medrano JF (1991). Organic solvents as facilitators of polymerase chain reaction. Biotechniques 10(1): 58–59.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Ralser M, Querfurth R, Warnatz HJ, Lehrach H, Yaspo ML, Krobitsch S (2006). An efficient and economic enhancer mix for PCR,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 347(3): 747–751. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.151"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.151</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Roux KH (2009). Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (4)pdb.ip66. doi: 10.1101/pdb.ip66. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.ip66"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.ip66</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Sahdev S, Saini S, Tiwari P, Saxena S, Singh SK (2007). Amplification of GC-rich genes by following a combination strategy of primer design, enhancers and modified PCR cycle conditions. Mol. Cell. Probes. 21(4): 303–307. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2007.03.004"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2007.03.004</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Saiki RK (1989). The design and optimization of the PCR,” in PCR Technology (Erlich, H. A., ed.), Stockton Press, New York. Pp. 7–16.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US">Shafeeque CM, Singh RP, Sharma SK, Mohan J, Sastry KVH, Kolluri G, Saxena VK, Tyagi JS, Kataria JM, Azeez PA (2014a). Development of a new method for sperm RNA purification in the chicken. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 149(3-4): 259-65. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.032"><span class="Hyperlink">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.032</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Shafeeque CM, Sharma SK, Sastry KVH, Mohan J, Singh RP (2014b). Sperm RNA: a new class of fertility biomarkers for birds. Adv. Anim.Vet. Sci. 2 (3): 155–158. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.3.155.158 "><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.3.155.158</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Shore R, Paul N (2010). Robust PCR amplification of GC-rich targets with hot start 7-deaza-dGTP. Biotechniques 49(5): 841–843. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/000113552"><span class="Hyperlink" lang="en-GB">http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/000113552</span></a></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Sidhu M K, Liao M J, Rashidbaigi A (1996). Dimethyl sulfoxide improves RNA amplification. Biotechniques. 21(1): 44–47.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Sun Y, Hegamyer G, Colburn NH (1993). PCR-direct sequencing of a GC-rich region by inclusion of 10% DMSO: application to c-jun. Biotechniques. 15(3): 372–374. </span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Turner SL, Jenkins FJ (1995). Use of deoxyinosine in PCR to improve amplification of GC-rich DNA. Biotechniques. 19(4): 48–52.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
				<li class="References ParaOverride-3" lang="en-US"><span lang="en-GB">Weissensteiner T, Lanchbury JS (1996). Strategy for controlling preferential amplification and avoiding false negatives in PCR typing. Biotechniques. 21(6): 1102–1108.</span></li>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
                <p>&nbsp;</p>
			
		</div>
	</body>
</html>
