Special Issue:
Veterinary Medicine between Sustainable Development and Public Health to Confront Global Changes
Effect of Some Plant Extracts on Some Biological Aspects of Chrysoperla carnea
Abdel Fattah A. Khalaf1, Karam T. Hussein1, Shehta A. Ali2, Doaa K. Barakat2*, Mohamed I. Gad1
1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Egypt; 2Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.
Abstract | Botanical insecticides with quick degradation are safer than persistent synthetic chemical insecticides, less detrimental to the environment, reduce production costs, and are unlikely to induce pesticide resistance in pests. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the fixed oils derived from the seeds of the Croton tiglum and Simmondsia chinensis and the two ethanolic extract (Urtica dioica and Hyoscyamus muticus) on the lifespan, total protein, fat, and total body carbohydrate of Chrysoperla carnea (C. carnea). The lifespan of C. carnea was significantly reduced by all treatments compared to the control group (41.34 days).Fixed oils and ethanolic extracts affected the levels of total protein, fat, and total body carbohydrate. The obtained results concluded that the two fixed oils (Croton tiglum and Simmondsia chinensis) and the two ethanolic extracts (Urtica dioica and Hyoscyamus muticus) can be used as safe alternatives to the chemical insecticides.
Keywords: Plant extracts, Chrysoperla carnea, Biological aspects, Biochemical effects
Received | June 02, 2024; Accepted | July 20, 2024; Published | August 22, 2024
*Correspondence | Doaa K. Abdelaziem Barakat, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Khalaf AFA, Hussein KT, Ali SA, Barakat DA, Gad MI 2024. Effect of some plant extracts on some biological aspects of Chrysoperla carnea. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 12(1): 49-54.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.1.49.54
ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331
Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Chrysoperla carnea is highly renowned predator of insects in several crops and natural environments (Tauber et al., 2000; McEwen et al., 2001; Medina et al., 2003; El-Wakel et al., 2013). The hatchlings mostly consume a variety of phytophagous insects such as aphids, Lepidoptera eggs and hatchlings, thrips, psyllids, white flies, and parasites (McEwen et al., 2001; Golmohammadi and Hejazi 2014).
Involving of insecticides in controlling aphids prompts few issues, not just expanding safe kinds of aphids to those synthetic compounds yet additionally in enlistment of climate contamination and aggravation of normal equilibrium (El-Maghraby 1993; Ail-Catzim et al., 2015). Pesticides have a wide array of harmful effects on human including teratogenic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects (Prowse et al., 2006; Maurya et al., 2009).
Organic insect sprays were utilized as option in contrast to engineered insect sprays for insect control in view of its little harmful effects on the human and environment (Behal, 1998; Isman, 2006). Plant extracts are powerful, safe, modest and simple to process and apply for pest control (Isman 2006; Regnault et al., 2012). Such plant extracts can cause development delay (Rao and Chitra, 2000), morphogenetic surrenders (Kangade and Zambare, 2013) and repellency (Majeed and Abidunnisa, 2011).
In sight of the previous facts, this study aimed at investigation of how ethanolic extracts of urtica (Urtica dioica) and Egyptian henbane (Hyoscyamus muticus) could be used instead of regular insecticides to affect different biological aspects of C. carnea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Rearing of Chrysoperla carnea
Rearing of C. carnea according to Helaly (2021).
Laboratory experiments: The experiments were carried out under Laboratory conditions 23± 1°C and 65±5% to study some biological aspects of the predator.
Feeding capacity of Chrysoperla carnea larva on aphid A. gosspyii treated by plant extracts: Eggs were deposited on their stalks glued on the blak muslin covers, the deposited eggs were collected daily and new black muslin covers were placed. Collected eggs were kept separately in plastic vials 7×2 cm., until hatching. Newly hatched predators larvae C. carnea were put individually in a Petri – dish (10cm in diameter) with a filter paper on its bottom. Twenty replicates from C. carnea were reared on A. gossypii, and treated with plant extracts, two fixed oils (C. tiglum and S. chinensis) and two ethanolic extract (U. dioica and H. muticus). Know surplus numbers of aphids offered and the devoured individuals were replaced daily. Attacked prey individuals were counted and recorded daily throughout the periods of the larval instars. Until each larva was transferred to the pupal stage in the spherical silky cocoon date of cocoons formation was recorded. The cocoons were left until adult emergence. Newly emerged adults were sexed and each pair (one male and female) was placed in a glass chimney cage. Eggs laid by mated every female were collected daily, counted and recorded.
Biochemical Studies.
Total proteins determination: Total proteins were determined by the method of (Bradford, 1976).
Total carbohydrates determination: Total carbohydrates were estimated in acid extract of insect by the phenol-sulphuric acid reaction of (Dubois et al., 1956). Total carbohydrates were extracted and prepared for assay according to (Crompton and Birt, 1967).
Total lipids determination: Total lipids were estimated by the method of (Knight et al., 1972).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for significant differences between values, the means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (CoHort Software, 2004)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of some plant extracts on some biological aspects of Chrysoperla carnea.
Durations of Immature Stages
Incubation period: Period of incubation of C. carnea eggs that were fed on A. gossypii and were given plant extracts had an incubation period of 3.76, 3.5, 3.36, and 3.00 days, respectively, while the control eggs had an incubation period of 3.16 days (Table 1).
Larval stage: The hatchlings of C. carnea raised on A. gossypii treated by C. tiglum the span of first, second and third instars were, 4.33, 5.06 and 7.66 days separately, while, in the event of S. chinensis the term of first, second and third instars were, 4.00, 4.70 and 7.20 days, individually, when C. carnea hatchlings benefited from Aphis gossypii, treated by U. dioica these periods were 3.73, 4.60 and 6.73 days, individually. In the event of H. muticus these periods were 3.53, 4.30 and 6.66 days, while if there should be an occurrence of C. carnea raised on untreated A. gossypii the periods were 3.36, 4.13 and 6.36, days separately (Table 1).
Pupal stage: The pupal time of C. carnea was recorded when hatchlings of C. carnea were benefited from A. gossypii treated by four plant extracts and the recorded time was 8.66, 8.06, 7.86 and 7.80, individually.
Total developmental period: When C. carnea larvae were fed on C. tiglum, S. chinensis, U. dioica, and H. muticus, the total developmental period (from the deposition of the egg until the emergence of the adult) was 25.71, 20.97, 23.46, and 22.29 days, respectively, as shown in Table 1. From this information, obviously the briefest all out formative time of C. carnea (21.18 day) was gotten by taking care of the hatchlings on untreated Aphis gossypii.
Fecundity and Adults, Longevity of C. carnea in Relation to Larval Food
Table 2, shows the most limited pre-oviposition period of H. muticus (5.96 days), yet U. dioica recorded 6.13 days and S. chinensis was 6.36, while C. tiglum was 6.56 days while the control 5.16 days.
Feeding Capacity of C. carnea Larvae on A. gossypii Treated by Plant Extracts
Results recorded in Table 3, shows the utilization time
Table 1: Durations of C. carnea immature stage reared on A. gossypii treated with plant extracts under laboratory conditions (23±1˚C and 65±5% R.H).
|
Biological characteristics |
Incubation period Mean ±SE |
Larval instar |
Larval stage Mean ±SE |
Pupal stage Mean ±SE |
Total immature stages Mean ±SE |
||
|
1st instar Mean ±SE |
2nd instar Mean ±SE |
3rd instar Mean ±SE |
|||||
|
C. tigaium |
3.76e ±015 |
4.33e±0.20 |
5.06e± 0.16 |
7.66d±0.20 |
17.05c±0.53 |
8.66d±0.24 |
25.71a±0.44 |
|
S. chinesis |
3.5d±0.1 |
4.00d±0.1 |
4.70d±0.08 |
7.20c±0.43 |
15.90b±0.57 |
8.06c±0.12 |
20.97a±0.67 |
|
U. dioisa |
3.36d±0.15 |
3.73d±0.11 |
4.60d±0.08 |
6.73c±0.20 |
15.06b±0.16 |
7.86c±0.20 |
23.47a±0.21 |
|
H. mutticus |
3.0f±0.1 |
3.53f±0.15 |
4.30f±0.16 |
6.66e±0.20 |
14.49b±0.28 |
7.80d±0.21 |
22.29a±0.45 |
|
Control |
3.16e±0.21 |
3.36e±0.21 |
4.13e±0.20 |
6.36d±0.36 |
13.85b±0.12 |
7.33d±0.16 |
21.18a±0.20 |
|
F. |
**6.33 |
***16.525 |
***11.87 |
*5.79 |
*5.84 |
**7.34 |
***11.33 |
|
LSD. 0.05 |
0.26 |
0.29 |
0.33 |
0.66 |
1.62 |
0.44 |
1.81 |
Mean followed by the same letter in a column for each plant extracts are not significantly different at the 1% level of probability (Duncan’s Multiple Rang Test), NS: Non significant; *: significant; **: Highly significant.
Table 2: Longevity (Mean ± SE.) and fecundity of predators C. carnea adults and their larvae reared on different plant extracts under laboratory conditions at (23 ± 1 ˚C and 65 ± 5 RH %).
|
Types of extracts |
Female longevity |
Male longevity Mean ± SE (day) |
Female fecundity |
||||
|
Pre- oviposition period Mean ± SE(day) |
Oviposition period Mean ± SE (day) |
Post- oviposition period Mean ± SE (day) |
Total Mean ± SE (day) |
Daily Mean ± SE (day) |
Total Mean ± SE (day) |
||
|
Control |
5.16b±0.30 |
30.20a±0.74 |
5.97c±0.49 |
41.34a ± 1.39 |
30.3a ±0.86 |
10.36a ± 0.33 |
312.84a ± 5.02 |
|
C. tiglum |
6.56a±0.38 |
18.96d±1.05 |
9.52a±0.93 |
35.05c ± 0.24 |
24.96b ± 1.23 |
10.00a ± 0.44 |
189.83d ± 16.45 |
|
S. chinensis |
6.36a±0.26 |
22.53c±1.75 |
8.50ab±1.01 |
37.40bc±1.91 |
28.73a±2.02 |
9.93a± 0.12 |
223.69c ± 15.87 |
|
U. dioica |
6.13a±0.16 |
25.76b±0.33 |
7.03bc± 0.12 |
38.93ab ± 0.37 |
29.46a ± 0.61 |
9.60a± 0.08 |
247.35bc±3.43 |
|
H. muticus |
5.96a±0.12 |
27.43b±0.53 |
6.66c±0.12 |
40.06ab±0.51 |
29.4a±0.72 |
9.86a± 0.24 |
270.62b±6.90 |
|
F |
**8.11 |
***36.91 |
**9.50 |
**9.78 |
**6.002 |
1.71ns |
***35.73 |
|
LSD 0.05 |
0.59 |
2.26 |
1.47 |
2.45 |
2.689 |
0.66 |
24.56 |
Mean followed by the same letter in a column for each plant extracts are not significantly different at the 1% level of probability (Duncan’s Multiple Rang Test), NS: Non significant; *: significant; **: Highly significant.
Table 3: Mean number A. gossypii consumed and percentage from different plant extracts during larval instars of predators C. carnea under laboratory conditions (23 ±1 º C and 65±5 RH. %).
|
Types of Extract |
Larval Instar |
Total |
|||||
|
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
Mean ± SE. |
||||
|
Mean ± SE. |
% |
Mean ± SE. |
% |
Mean ± SE. |
% |
||
|
Control |
23.09a ± 3.31 |
9.15 |
47.33a ± 1.10 |
18.91 |
181.33a ± 16.04 |
71.92 |
251.76a ± 17.12 |
|
C. tiglum |
16.76b ± 0.98 |
8.10 |
32.76e ± 1.36 |
15.83 |
158.66a ± 2.05 |
76.22 |
207.86a ± 10.16 |
|
S. chinensis |
18.8ab ± 0.36 |
8.46 |
38.46d ± 1.30 |
17.25 |
165.66a ± 0.93 |
74.12 |
223.33a ± 12.70 |
|
U. dioica |
20.40ab ± 0.80 |
8.87 |
41.40c ± 0.74 |
18.03 |
168.33a ± 1.36 |
73.07 |
230.13a ± 10.53 |
|
H. muticus |
21.63ab ± 2.06 |
9.08 |
44.16b ± 0.98 |
18.62 |
172.00a ± 0.85 |
72.30 |
237.8a ± 15.16 |
|
F |
*3.53 |
0.86ns |
***49.01 |
1.98ns |
0.86ns |
2.67ns |
2.97ns |
|
LSD0.05 |
4.10 |
1.50 |
2.50 |
2.76 |
28.29 |
3.32 |
29.88 |
Mean followed by the same letter in a column for each plant extracts are not significantly different at the 1% level of probability (Duncan’s Multiple Rang Test), NS: Non significant; *: significant; **: Highly significant.
frame pace of C. carnea larval instars when reared on A. gossypii treated by plant extracts, C. tiglum, S. chinensis, U. dioica and H. muticus. A high percentage of 76.22 % of C. tiglum, 74.12 % of S. chinensis, 73.07 % of U. dioica, and 72.30 % of H. muticus were consumed during the larval stage, while the first larval instar consumed 8.10, 8.46, 8.87, and 9.08 respectively.
Table 4: Change of total protein, lipid and carbohydrate levels in the third instar of C. carnea treated with LC50 of the tested compounds for after 48 h.
|
Treatment |
Conc. LC50 Ppm. |
Total protein |
Total lipid |
Total carbohydrate |
|||
|
µg/mg |
% |
µg/mg |
% |
µg/mg |
% |
||
|
C. tiglum |
1244.33 |
25.73d±0.63 |
-30.94 |
172.46a ±3.63 |
54.58 |
24.26e± 0.54 |
-27.43 |
|
S. chinensis |
3584.68 |
32.36b±1.14 |
-13.15 |
143.20b ± 0.81 |
28.36 |
28.50c ± 0.48 |
-14.74 |
|
U. dioica |
1224.11 |
28.16c±1.24 |
-24.42 |
151.80c± 2.7 |
36.07 |
26.30d ± 0.74 |
-21.32 |
|
H. muticus |
2309.26 |
34.17b±0.60 |
-8.29 |
127.73d± 0.81 |
14.49 |
30.20 b ± 0.37 |
-9.66 |
|
Control |
____ |
37.26a±1.11 |
__ |
111.56e± 3.63 |
___ |
33.43a ± 1.06 |
__ |
|
F |
____ |
***43.08 |
____ |
***332.77 |
____ |
***52.69 |
___ |
|
LSD |
_____ |
2.22 |
____ |
14.01 |
____ |
1.76 |
___ |
%: Percent decrease or increase from the control.
Biochemical Examinations on the Third Instar of Chrysoperla carnea
After 48 hours of treatment with the LC50 of the tested compounds, the biochemical response of the third instar of C. carnea was evaluated. The amount of total protein, lipids, and carbohydrates was measured.
The total protein: Data recorded in Table 4, demonstrated that the total protein level of C. carnea treated with C. tiglum, S. chinensis, U. dioica, and H. muticus decreased by -30.94, -13.15, -24.42, and -8.29% relative to control 37.26, respectively.
The lipid content: The acquired information in Table 4, showed that the total lipid content of a normal insect was 111.56 g of fresh body weight per milliliter, while treatments with A. gossypii at sublethal concentrations increased total lipid content by 54.58, 28.36, 36.07, and 14.49 percent for C. tiglum, S. chinensis, U. dioica, and H. muticus, respectively.
The total carbohydrates: The data reported in Table 4, showed that the typical degree of complete carb of C. carnea was 33.43 µg/mg new body weight, while medicines with the sub-lethal fixations cause decline in the absolute carbs content 24.26, 28.50, 26.30 and 30.20 µg/mg new body weight with decrease percent - 27.45, - 14.74, - 21.32 and - 9.66% for C. tiglum, S. chinensis, U. dioica and H. muticus, individually.
The life span of C. carnea is shortened by the treatments compared to the control. Our findings align with the research conducted by Saleh and Ali (2012), which demonstrated that the overall consumption rate per C. carnea larvae raised on A. gossypii was 623.18 ± 41.80. The incubation times of C. carnea larvae eggs fed on Aphis gossypii treated with neem, datura, and confidor were found to be 2.2, 2.5, and 3.6 days, respectively, according to research by Ali et al. (2015). According to the results, the larvae developed over a total of 17.03, 13.3, and 15.09 days. C. carnea pupae lasted 8.82 days on neem, 10.9 days on datura, and 12.33 days on confidor. Conversely, Saleh et al. (2017) demonstrated that C. carnea larvae fed on A. gossypii developed over a total of 23.8±1.36 days from egg hatching to adult eclosion. A total of 367.31±50.28 of the preys were consumed per C. carnea larvae. According to El-Ashram and Salama (2021), there was no discernible difference between the control and C. carnea treated with Azadirachtin indica. For example, the incubation period, larval stage, pupal stage, larval survival percentage, and adult survival percentage for C. carnea were 2, 8.6, 7.6, 69%, and 70% days, respectively, while for the control, they were 2.33, 8, 8, 80%, and 86.7% days, respectively. When C. carnea females fed on A. gossypii and larval instars, Saleh and Ali (2012) reported that the average number of deposited eggs per C. carnea female was 327.73 ± 31.19 eggs. Ali et al. (2015) demonstrated that neem had the highest pupal mortality rate, followed by confidor and datura on C. carnea pre-oviposited 6.35 days on neem, 5.5 days on datura, and 3.6 days on confidor when feeding on Aphis gossypii treated with neem, datura, and confidor. For neem, datura, and confidor, the maximum fecundity per female of C. carnea was 448.38 days, 435.67 days, and 413.67 days, respectively. Comparably, neem had the highest percentage of C. carnea eggs hatching, followed by datura and confidor. On Confidor, however, the highest egg mortality rate of 37.65% was noted. The lowest mortality of larvae in their first, second, and third instars was observed in response to neem leaf extracts, which were followed by datura and confidor. Neem had the highest pupal mortality rate, followed by confidor and datura. Neem had the highest adult death rate, followed by insecticides made of datura and confidor.
According to El-Ashram and Salama (2021), there was no discernible difference between the control and C. carnea treated with Azadirachtin indica, with the pre-oviposition, oviposition, and post-oviposition periods being 3.66, 13.66, and 5 days for the former and 7.26, 16.66, and 5.3 days for the latter. In the case of C. carnea, each female laid 6.3 eggs, compared to 7.2 eggs in the control group.
Muhammad (2014) showed that the hatchlings of C. carnea hunter first instar followed by second and third larval instars were powerful in decreasing aphids’ populace on Canola crop. Saleh et al. (2017) showed the utilization time frame pace of C. carnea larval instars when raised on three prey species; S. cerealella, E. kuehniella and A. gossypii. The typical number consumed during the larval stage were 632.93± 50.26, 444.08±34.40 and 367.31±50.28 of S. cerealella, E. kuehniella and A. gossypii individually consumed a high rate 70.57% of S. cerelella, 68.62% of E. kuehniella and 69.16% of A. gossypii then the main instar hatchlings 4.68%, 5.21% and 5.67% of S. cerealella, E. kuehniella and A. gossypii, separately. El-Wakeil et al. (2006) demonstrated that synthetic items were innocuous to grown-up of C. carnea. Muhammad et al. (2013) expressed that neem oil somewhat protected to beneficial bugs and reasonable for use in coordinated bug the board of aphids with no impact on C. carnea in Canola. In a similar vein, Abd-Allah and Youssif (2020) demonstrated that the predator C. carnea was unharmed by the active ingredient, cinnamaldehyde, in cinnamon oil. The decrease in all out protein concur with Sammour et al. (2011), Shoukry et al. (2013) and Gad (2019), who reported that plant extracts decreased protein concentration. Contrariwise a few reports demonstrated that plant separates expanded protein level by Younes et al. (2011) demonstrated that onion Allium cepa, garlic Allium sativum, rosemary Rosmarinus officinalis L., olive Olra europaea, peppermint Mentha piperita, Eucalypyue Eucalyptus globulus and sunflower Helianthus annuus on the fourth instar hatchlings of Trogoderma granarium, caused expansion in protein content than control people. Khalaf et al. (2022) concentrated on the impact of five plant oils cumin, dark seed, clove, Ginger and Garlic against biochemical of Ephestia cautella and all oils treatment expanded protein level and lipid content while, decrease in the sugar content. The ascent in absolute lipids concurs with the finding of Mostafa (1993), who showed that the complete lipid content in Trogoderma granarium expanded because of the treatment with plant extracts. Abou El-Ela et al. (1995) found a similar outcome on Musca domestica after treatment with water concentrates of certain plants. Few reports demonstrated that plant extracts diminished lipid level as Abo El-Maaty (2003) showed that as L. pruinosum and C. procera declined the absolute lipids content of the third instar hatchlings of M. domestica. The current examinations are equivalent with the findings of Khalaf (1998) who showed that treatment of the second larval instar of Muscina stabulans with two plant oils of Rosmarinus efficinalis and Cymbopogon citratus caused a critical decrease in the carbohydrate content of the entire pupal period and Medhini et al. (2012) reasoned that the plant extracts decreased carbohydrate in Spodoptera litturalis.
CONCLUSIONS And RECOMMENDATIONS
The two fixed oils (Corton tiglum and Simmondsia chinensis) and the two ethanolic extract (Urtica dioica and Hyoscyamus muticus) showed significant alterations on the biological activities of C. carnea and can be regarded as safe alternatives to the chemical insecticides. Future studies are still needed to find other ecofriendly natural insecticides.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank our colleagues at the Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Egypt, and Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt for their contributions to the study.
AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION
All authors contributed equally in the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Abd-Allah, E.G., Youssef, M.N. (2020). Efficacy of cinnamon oil and its active ingredient (cinnamaldehyde) on the cotton mealy bug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and predator Chrysoperla carnea. Bull. Nat. Res. Center, 44: 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00404-x
Abo El Maaty, M.M. (2003). The infelunce of ndigenus bacteria and two plant extracts on the biology of house fly, Musca domestica. Msc. Thesis, Sci. Zagazige Univ., Egypt.
Abou El-Ela, R.G., Helmy, N.M., El-Monairy, O.M., Salah, H. (1995). Effect of certain plant extracts on some biological aspects of the house fly larvae Musca domestica (Diptera- Muscidae). Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt, 22: 17-25.
Ail-Catzim, C.E., Garcia, A.M., Troncoso, R., Gonzalez, R.E., Sanchez, Y. (2015). Insecticidal and repellent effect of extracts of Pluchea sericea (Nutt.) on adults of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.). Revista Chapingo. Serie Horticultura, 21(1): 33-41 https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2014.09.038
Ali, S.S., Khaskheli, M.Y., Ahmed, S.S., Huma, R., Aslam, B., Gulzar, T., Nahyo, S.A., Rattar, I., Safraz, A. (2015). Effect of bio-pesticides on biology of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.). (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J. Basic Appl. Sci., 11: 559-566. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.74
Behal, S.R. (1998). Effect of some plant oils on the olfactory responses of rice moth Corcyra cephalonica stainton. Annal. Plant Prot. Sci., 6(2): 146-150.
Bradford, M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitatation of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analitical Biochem., 72:248-254. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
CoHort Software. (2004). Co. Stat. www.CoHort.Com. Monterey, California, USA.
Crompton, M., Birt, L.M. 1976. Changes in the amounts of carbohydrates, phosphagen and related compounds during the metamorphosis of the blowfly, Luciliacuprina. J. Insect Physiol., 13: 1575-1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(67)90180-1
Dubois, M., Giles, K., Hamilton, J.K., Rebvs, P.A., Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related compounds. Analytical Chem., 28: 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
El-Maghraby, M.M.A. (1993). Seasonal abundance of the cruciferous aphid Brevicoryne brassiae L. (Homoptera, Aphididae) in relation to the primary and hyperparasitoids on cauliflower in Zagazig Region, Egypt. Zagazig J. Agric. Res., 20(5): 1627-1639.
El-Ashram, D., Salama, K.H.R. (2021). Impact of pesticides, spinosad, azadirachtin and abamactin on Chysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Egypt. J. Plant Prot. Res., 4(3): 473-479.
El-Wakeil, N.E., Gaafar, N.M., Vidal, S. (2006). Side effects of some neem products on natural enemies of Helicoverpa (Trichogramma spp.) and Chrysoperla carna. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prod., 39: 445- 455. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400500356160
El-Wakeil, N., Gaafar, N., Sallam, A., Volkmar, C. (2013). Side effects of insecticides on natural enemies and possibility of their integration in plant protection strategies. Insecticides-Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies. EUA. https://doi.org/10.5772/54199
Gad, M.I.A. 2019. The toxic and toxic and growth disturping activity of some natural and synthetic compounds on the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (oliver) (Curculionidae: Cleoptera) Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. Sci. Zag. Univ. pp. 134.
Golmohammadi, G.H., Hejazi, M. (2014). Toxicity and side effects of threeinsecticides on adult Chrysoperla carnea (Neu.: Crhysopidae) under laboratory conditions. J. Entomol. Soc. Iran, 33: 23-28.
Isman, M.B. (2006). Botonical insecticides, deterrents and repellents in modern agriculture and increasingly regulated World. Ann. Rev. Entmol., 51: 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146
Kangade, Y.P., Zambare, S.P. (2013). Effect of extracts of Argemone Mexicana leaves on development of Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) for the protection of the stored grains. Indian J. Appl. Res., 3: 20-22. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/APR2013/6
Khalaf, A.A. (1998). Biochemical and physiological impacts of two volatile plants oils on Muscina stabulans (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Egypt. German Zool., 27: 315-329.
Khalaf, A.A., Ghareeb, M.S., Nasr, E.E., Eldahrawy, T.M. (2022). Toxicological effect of five plant oils against the tropical waterhouse Moth, Ephestia cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Neuro Quantol., 20.
Knight, J.A., Anderson, S., Rawel, J.M. (1972). Chemical basis of the sulfophospho-vanillin reaction for estimating total serum lipids. Clin. Chem., 18: 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/18.3.199
Majeed, A.S., Abidunnisa, T. (2011). Study of repellent activity of Argemone mexicana on Triboluim castaneum and Sitophilus oryzea. Int. J. Pharmacol. Res. Dev., 3: 206.
Maurya, P., Sharma, P., Mohan, L., Batabyal, L., Srivastava, C.N. (2009). Evaluation of the toxicity of different phytoextract of Ocimum basilicum against Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquie fasciatus. J. Asia Pacific Entomol., 12:113-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2009.02.004
McEwen, P.K., New, T.R.R., Whittington, A. (2001). Lacewings in the Crop Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666117
Medhini, N., Divakar, Y.C., Manjulakumari, D. (2012). Effect of Calendula officinalis extracts on the nutrient components of different tissues of tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius. J. Biopest, 5: 139-144.
Medina, P., Smagghe, G., Budia, F., Tirry, L., Vinuela, E. (2003). Toxicity and absorption of azadirachtin, diflubenzuron, pyriproxyfen and tebufenozide after direct spray in predatory larvae of Chrysoperla carnea. Environ. Entomol., 32:196- 203 https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.1.196
Mostafa, T.S. (1993). Effect of certain plant extracts on the weight and some biochemical; aspects of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granariumi Everts. Bull. Entomol. Egypt. Econ. Series, 20: 77-85.
Muhammad, H.K., Nazir, A., Masoom, S., Rashi, S.M., Ismail, M. (2013). Studies on the compatibility of neem oil with predator Chysoperla canea for the management of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) in canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Cereals Oilseed, 4(6): 85-88. https://doi.org/10.5897/JCO2013.0113
Muhammad, S. (2014). The propensity of different larval stages of lacewing Chysoperla canea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to control aphid Myzus persicae (Ssulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) evaluated on Canola Brassia napus L. Songklanakarin. J. Sci. Technol., 36(2): 143-148.
Prowse, G.M., Galloway, T.S., Foggo, A. (2006). Insecticidal activity of monoterpenes against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) and Triboliumca staneum (Herbst). J. Stored Prod. Res., 34: 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(98)00005-8
Rao, S.R.K., Chitra, K.C. (2000). Effect of plant extract on larval weigh and duration of Spodoptera litura. J. Appl. Zool. Res., 11: 98-100.
Regnault, R.C., Vincent, C., Anasan, J.T. (2012). Essential oil in insect control: low-risk products in a high. Stakes world. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 57: 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100554
Saleh, A.A.A., El-Sharkaw, H.M., El-Santel, F.S., Abd El-Salam, R.A. (2017). Studies on the predator Chysoperla canea (Stephens) in Egypt. Int. J. Environ., 6(2): 70-77.
Saleh, A.A.A., Ali, S.H. (2012). Biologicalaspects of twopredators as affected by feeding on two aphid species Aphis gossypii Gloved and Hyalopteruis puni (Geoffroy) under laboratory conditions. J. Agric., 90(40): 1531-1542. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2012.164018
Sammour, E.A., El-Hawary, F.M.A., Abdel-Aziz, N.F. (2011). Comparative study on the efficacy of neemix and basil oil formulations on the cowpea aphid Aphis craccivora Koch. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 44(7): 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400903266495
Shoukry, I.F., Hussein, K.T., Ahmed, F.A., Gad, M.I.A. (2013). Effect of some plant oils on certain biochemical aspects in the Red Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Oliver.) (Curculionidae: Coleoptera). The English Inter. Environ. Conf., Fac. Sci. Zagazige. Univ., 240-258.
Tauber, M.J., Tauber, C.A., Daane, K.M., Hagen, K.S. (2000). Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings Chrysoperla carnea. Entomol. Am., 46: 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/46.1.26
Younes, M.W.F., El. Othman, S., Elkersh, M., Youssef, N.S., Omar, G.A. (2011). Effect of seven plant oils on some biochemical parameters in Khaprabettle Trogodermagrana riumeverts (Coleptera: Dermestidae). Egypt. J. Exp. Biol., 7(1): 53-61.