Special Issue:
Veterinary Medicine between Sustainable Development and Public Health to Confront Global Changes
The Impact of Dietary Linseed Oil Supplementation on the
Performance of Broiler Chicks
El-Sayed I. Hassanein1, Abdallah E. Metwally1, Hossam Eldin M. Abd Elbaky1*, Walaa Fathy Saad Eldin2
1Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; 2Educational Veterinary Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Abstract | The aim of the current research was to evaluate the effects of linseed oil (LO) nutritional supplementation on the growth performance of broiler chicks, in addition, their effects on immunological and biochemical parameters of serum, total antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, mortality percentage, and estimates of economic efficiency. Over the course of the five-week trial period, 150 (Ross 308) one-day-old chicks were separated into five groups, each consisting of three replicates (10 chicks/replicate). The chicks were fed five different experimental diets with varying quantities of oil (0% oil, 1 (SBO and 1% LO), 2% LO, and 3% LO, respectively). For assessment, four chicks from each replication were randomly used. The findings showed that while there was no discernible variation in feed intake across all groups, broiler chicks’ body weight (Bw) increased (P<0.05) when linseed oil was added to their feeds. Supplementing linseed oil resulted in a significant (P<0.05) improvement in dressing % and carcass attributes. The breast muscle of broilers fed linseed oil had considerably (P<0.05) greater values of poly unsaturated fatty acids and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids than that of the control groups. Additionally, there was a significant (P<0.05) decrease in the amounts of triglycerides, cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, and TAC. Nevertheless, consuming meals containing linseed oil led to a significant (P<0.05) increase in serum levels of HDL-c, total protein (TP), globulin (GL), and GSH-Px. Additionally, giving broiler chickens linseed oil enhances their immunological response to the Newcastle vaccine. The current study showed that adding linseed oil to chick feeds increases immunological response, body composition, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology and growth performance beside decreasing mortality ratio. However, it is not economically feasible when matched with control groups (0% oiland 1% SBO).
Keywords: Broiler, Linseed oil, Performance, Immunity, Gut, Economic efficiency
Received | September 06, 2024; Accepted | October 15, 2024; Published | November 13, 2024
*Correspondence | Hossam Eldin M. Abd Elbaky, Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Hassanein EI, Metwally AE, Elbaky HEMA, Eldin WFS (2024). The impact of dietary linseed oil supplementation on the performance of broiler chicks. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 12(s1): 447-457.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.s1.447.457
ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331
Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
The production process of poultry meat has steadily grown over the years, and this trend is projected to continue to operate. Otherwise, modifications to genes in avian strains and greater understanding of nutrition allow chickens achieve an acceptable selling weight of 2 kg at 35 days of age, and the efficiency of turning feed into poultry products further improves (Ravindran, 2013). Also, Gous (2010) recommended that genetic modifications have been very successful in improving possible growth of broilers over the past fifty years, and it is likely that more genetic advancement is possible. So that it will be necessary for nutritionists to review the techniques in which these fast growing strains are fed. Also, Hassanein et al. (2023) reviewed nutritional strategies to meet fast growth of new genetic modification of Ross broiler chicks.
The supplementary use of various oils results in meat enhanced with bioactive n-3 PUFA. As a result, chicken meat is now advised for eating by anybody concerned with their health and their food choices. Also, provide the added benefit of enhancing the bird’s health (Kralik et al., 2018). The vast majority vegetable oils include a high omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid percent. Soybean oil ranks in the middle of the omega-6 to omega-3 ratios (Doppenberg and Van der Aar, 2017).
Broilers’ diets also can be supplemented with a variety of n-3 PUFA sources, including fish oil; linseed meal, marine algae, and canola oil (Coorey et al., 2015). ALA has a lower reported favorable effect on human health than EPA and DHA, and its metabolism efficiency to EPA and DHA in the human body is only 2-10% or less. The primary source of EPA and DHA is seafood, especially fatty fish, which may not be sustainable. ALA and SDA are synthesised in plants and represent more sustainable sources of ω-3 PUFAs Gillingham (2013). LNA is a precursor for the synthesis of EPA and DHA. N-3 PUFA and the ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids in the human diet (about 2:1) are critical in lowering the occurrence of lifestyle illnesses such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, peripheral artery disease, Alzheimer’s disease, arthritis, cancer, and diabetes. In addition to several autoimmune and inflammatory health problems Chiu et al. (2008). Omega-3 PUFAs appear to be universally acknowledged as a part of modern-day dietary habits because of their favorable effects on metabolism (Gogus and Smith, 2010).
The study piloted by Konieczka et al. (2018) recognized that broilers were given varying amounts of fish/linseed and maize oil to produce distinct n-6:n-3 ratios. A great deal of study has looked at the consequences of linseed oil intake on broiler growth performance. For example, Smith et al. (2018) observed an important boost in body weight growth and feed conversion ratio (FCR), as well as raised levels of immunoglobulins, such as IgG and IgM, in broilers given a diet enriched with linseed oil corresponding to the control group. More importantly, Jones et al. (2018) found that broilers given a diet high in linseed oil had much better growth performance than the control group. The identical results were presented by Patel et al. (2021), who found that broilers that get linseed oil supplementation had an enormous boost in FCR relative to the control group, as well as greater dressed carcass weight and breast meat output. Aziza et al. (2014) found that the kind of fat and quantity of feed ingested both had a positive impact on the GI tract’s morphology.
As a result, the present investigation was taken to investigate the effects of linseed oil supplementation on the growth performance, carcass traits, biochemical and histopathological parameters on Ross chicks. Also, because linseed oil is an available and cheap source of PUSFA in Egypt. Additional the high content of PUFA Ibrahim et al. (2018).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research project was conducted at the Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University in Egypt.
Experimental birds, accommodation and management
A hatchery provided a total of 308 unsexed one-day-old broiler chicks (Ross). Whenever the chicks arrived, they were each individual weighed (the first mean body weight was identical), and then on random basis assigned to five identical groups, each with three replicates of ten birds. The feeding study extended 5 weeks. The entire chicks received a crumble meal throughout the starter and grower stages, followed by a pellet diet until the end of the study period, when they were fed ad libitum. The chicks were immunized according to vaccination schedules. Five exploratory (isocaloric and isonitrogenous) meals separated into three stages were created to contain 0 oil, 1% SBO, 1% LO, 2% LO, and 3% LO to match the nutritional needs for broiler chicks as specified by Aviagen (2019) and to have a varied ratio of n-3 to n-6 fatty acids, as indicated in Table 1. The typical sample of all feed components was tested using SupNIR-2700. Metabolic energy was computed in accordance with Janssen (1989). In order to avoid oxidative rancidity, the diets were stored in a cool, dry environment.
Growth performance and carcass traits
Growth performance was determined by assessing daily feed consumption and body weight inside each cage after a 5-week duration. At the end of the feeding trials, the overall feed intake, weight gain, and feed-to-gain ratios were determined. Added to that, four 5-week-old chicks from each duplicate were weighed, slaughtered, subsequently eviscerated without any feed withdrawal period, as suggested by Brake et al. (1997). The eviscerated carcass, liver, heart, gizzard, spleen, bursa, thymus gland, breast, thigh, abdominal fat yields, and complete evacuated intestinal tract were all weighed to determine the dressing ratio.
The weight of the lymphoid organs (bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus) were obtained at the end of the experiment from the slaughtered birds of each group to compute the ratio of organ weight. According to Anon. (1971), the Hemagglutination inhibition for Newcastle vaccination antibody titer was used to test the humoral immune response to Newcastle virus antibodies.
At the end of the experiment, an automated blood analyzer was used to determine the total leukocyte count of non-coagulated blood samples.
Serum biochemical parameters
The serum samples were tested for total cholesterol levels as recommended by Naito and Kaplan (1984), triglycerides in accordance to Wahlefeld and Bergmeyer (1974), serum high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) corresponding to Burstein and Scholnick (1973), serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in relation to Friedewald et al. (1972), serum very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), total serum protein corresponding to Grant et al. (1987), albumin in regards to Doumas and Biggs (1971). Koracevic et al. (2001) techniques were used to measure serum Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px).
The fatty acid content of homogenized freeze-dried breast flesh was determined using Folch et al. (1957) technique, and fatty acid methyl esters were produced using gas chromatography (GC) as reported by Ichihara and Fukubayashi (2010).
Histopathological examination
The typical samples from jejunum were obtained according to the procedure of Drury and Wallington (1967) for histopathological investigation of intestine to study wall thickness of intestine (MT), villous height, crypts depth CD, villous height: Crypt depth ratio, goblet cell proliferation, villus width (VW), villus perimeter calculated as (2π × (average villi width/2) × VH) and villus surface area (VA) calculated as villus perimeter× VH. samples from jejunum of slaughtered birds were fixed in 10% formalin and processed using standard paraffin embedding histopathology techniques, cut into 5 μm thick sections, and processed for hematoxylin and eosin staining, according to methods described by (Bancroft and Gamble, 2008). Morphometric examination of the tissue sections was done using a computer-assisted microscopic image analysis system. Throughout the trial, the mortality ratios for each trial were computed.
Economic study
In accordance with El-Kerdawy (1997), an economic study was done to assess the live cost of production of birds raised through different experimental protocols, where an economic efficiency (EE) was calculated according to the following equation: Y= (A-B)/B x 100 where A is the selling cost of the obtained gain and B is the feeding cost of this gain.
Statistical analysis
The prior data’s mean, standard error, and coefficient of variation will be determined using Snedecor and Cochran’s (1994) standard statistical formula. The data will be evaluated using ANOVA one-way classification in a totally randomized manner to determine the significance of differences between treatment groups followed by the Duncan’s test as a post hoc analysis then descriptive option.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of linseed oil dietary supplement on growth performance
The main effect of dietary linseed oil on growth response of the broiler chicks is presented in Table 2. The final live weight and weight gain (P<0.05) increased with dietary linseed oil treated groups but the best BW and BWG was recorded in group 1% and 2% LO, then 1% SBO. These results agree with Jones et al. (2018) who demonstrated that broilers fed a diet enriched with linseed oil exhibited significantly improved growth performance compared to the control group. Also, Smith et al. (2018) results showed that the inclusion of linseed oil in the diet significantly improved the growth rate of broilers compared to the control group. The mechanisms by which dietary linseed oil improves broiler body weight are not fully understood. However, some studies have suggested that increased growth rate due to the higher availability of omega-3 fatty acids, which play a crucial role in promoting muscle development and protein synthesis (Sakomura and Rostagno, 2019).
No significant difference observed in FI between control and LO treated groups and the highest value recorded in SBO group. Likewise, Wang et al. (2019) found no significant effects on feed intake. This may be due to the five exploratory meals were isocaloric and isonitrogenous and the study of Abdel-Hafeez et al. (2016) mentioned that many authors for example, (Peterson et al., 1954; Mraz et al., 1957; Golian and Maurice, 1992; Lesson et al., 1993; Kamran et al., 2008) showed that chicks attempt to eat to satisfy their energy requirements but are unsuccessful
Table 2: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks diets on growth performance.
|
Growth performance |
Dietary linseed oil supplementation% |
||||
|
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
|
BW/ g bird |
2253.15b±88.10 |
2355.89ab±63.32 |
2445.42ab±11.31 |
2504.54a±66.39 |
2337.17ab±41.00 |
|
BWG, g bird |
2209.68b ± 88.02 |
2312.42ab ± 63.33 |
2402.17ab ± 11.36 |
2461.13a ± 66.44 |
2293.81ab ± 40.93 |
|
FI/ g bird |
3247.15 ± 143.90 |
3341.94 ± 88.50 |
3317.95 ± 72.62 |
3234.85 ± 18.32 |
3121.84 ± 40.13 |
|
FCR |
1.47a ± 0.03 |
1.45ab ± 0.00 |
1.38bc ± 0.03 |
1.32c ± 0.03 |
1.36c ± 0.01 |
a, b, c means ± standard error in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05). BW=body weight, BWG=body weight gain, FI=feed intake, FCR=feed conversion ratio.
at low dietary ME concentrations. Our results about FCR showed that all treatments containing linseed oil significantly reduced FCR compared to control treatment which does not have and the best results in group fed 2% then 3% then 1% inclusion rate.
Studies with similar results, as Shawn by Silva et al. (2020) who found that dietary supplementation with linseed oil can improve the FCR in broilers. Other studies have shown similar results that dietary linseed oil has positive effects on broiler FCR, including reducing FCR and improving efficiency of nutrient utilization for instance study conducted by Wang et al. (2019). The enhanced FCR can be attributed to the improved nutrient utilization and digestion efficiency associated with linseed oil supplementation. Also, the higher bioavailability of omega-3 fatty acids which may enhance nutrient utilization and metabolism, leading to reduced feed wastage and improved FCR (Khatun et al., 2021).
Effect of linseed oil dietary supplement on carcass composition
Table 3 revealed that the dressing percentages were the highest (P<0.05) in the linseed oil-treated groups than control. Thigh yield percentage was significantly the highest in the 1% LO with no significant difference observed in breast yield percentage. Also, significant (P<0.05) reduced abdominal fat percent in the linseed oil than control groups. Also, improvement of thymus weight with linseed oil groups than control groups and bursa improved with linseed oil supplement but spleen weight didn’t reveal any improvement with linseed oil addition. This agreed with Ibrahim et al. (2018) and El-Zobier et al. (2016) who presented that the use of oil or fat in diets for broilers may alter both the composition and the quality of the carcass. This may be due to the dietary fortification of omega-3 fatty acids that improves carcass by modulating lipid metabolism, resulting in the improved deposition of lean muscle tissue and a healthier carcass composition (Hosseini-Vashan et al., 2022). Also, reducing the abdominal fat installation in broilers (Nafees and Pagthinathan, 2017). In addition, PUFA-enriched diet also may provide higher energy availability for muscle growth and the decrease in abdominal fat in these groups due to the shift in energy use for muscle growth rather than deposition in the abdominal cavity Alagawany et al. (2019).
Effect of linseed oil dietary supplement on meat quality
Supplementation with linseed oil (n-3 PUFA’s) significantly increased levels of both USFA and N-3 matched to control diet as Shawn in Table 4. This result agreed with Newman (2000) and Baiao and Lara (2005) who mentioned that in birds, body fat composition is related to the composition of the fat from the diet. More studies for instance, linseed oil supplementation has been found to enhance the meat’s nutritional value by increasing omega-3 fatty acid content (Kralik et al., 2018). These results may be due to altering the n-6/n-3 FA ratios in the diets may augment the concentrations of long chain n-3 PUFA and modify the n-6/n-3 FA ratio in chicken meat resulting in healthy meat products Mandal et al. (2014). Also, feeding broiler chickens high concentrations of n-3 PUFA can boost accumulation of these fatty acids in the meat tissues (Al-Khalifa, 2017). So, the improved omega-3 fatty acid profile can contribute to healthier meat products with potential human health benefits, including cardiovascular protection and anti-inflammatory properties.
Table 3: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks’ diets on carcass traits.
|
Carcass traits |
Dietary linseed oil supplementation% |
||||
|
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
|
Body weight/g |
2241.67±7.26 |
2358.33± 4.41 |
2470.0 ±11.55 |
2606.67±17.64 |
2525.00±58.38 |
|
Carcass weigh/g |
1520.00± 2.89 |
1614.33 ±2.33 |
1806.33 ± 5.93 |
1916.00±35.64 |
1843.33±56.00 |
|
Carcass % |
67.81b ± 0.18 |
68.45b ± 0.08 |
73.13a ± 0.25 |
73.52a ± 1.71 |
72.98a ± 0.55 |
|
Liver % |
2.06a ± 0.05 |
2.36b ± 0.04 |
2.38b ± 0.05 |
2.39b ± 0.06 |
2.35b ± 0.09 |
|
Heart weight, % |
0.44 ± 0.06 |
0.47 ± 0.03 |
0.44 ± 0.04 |
0.43 ± 0.01 |
0.43 ± 0.05 |
|
Spleen % |
0.14 ± 0.00 |
0.17 ± 0.06 |
0.10 ± 0.00 |
0.12 ± 0.00 |
0.13 ± 0.00 |
|
Gizzard weight % |
1.46a ± 0.10 |
1.15c ± 0.05 |
1.39ab ± 0.03 |
1.28abc ± 0.02 |
1.25bc ± 0.07 |
|
Total fat weight % |
2.89a ± 0.12 |
2.80ab ± 0.40 |
2.05c ± 0.10 |
1.70c ± 0.07 |
2.15bc ± 0.16 |
|
Bursa weight % |
0.04b ± 0.00 |
0.04b ± 0.00 |
0.04b ± 0.00 |
0.05a ± 0.00 |
0.04b ± 0.00 |
|
Thymus weight % |
0.26b ± 0.04 |
0.28b ± 0.01 |
0.36a ± 0.01 |
0.37a ± 0.02 |
0.31ab ± 0.01 |
|
Intestine weight % |
2.57bc ± 0.19 |
2.50c ± 0.08 |
2.92ab ± 0.09 |
3.08a ± 0.05 |
2.38c ± 0.15 |
|
P. muscle weigh % |
29.07 ± 0.23 |
29.82 ± 0.70 |
29.35 ± 0.13 |
28.78 ± 0.76 |
29.33 ± 0.99 |
|
Thigh, drum weight % |
27.51a ± 0.12 |
27.91a ± 0.35 |
28.54a ± 0.02 |
24.94b ± 0.96 |
25.46b ± 0.75 |
a, b, c Means ± standard error in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Table 4: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks’ diets on breast muscle content of fatty acids (%).
|
Fatty acids % of breast muscle |
Dietary linseed oil supplementation% |
||||
|
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
|
SFA |
1.98c±0.16 |
57.84a±4.47 |
40.83b±3.21 |
36.49b±2.97 |
36.78b±2.97 |
|
USFA |
3.04c±0.25 |
48.11b±3.72 |
62.90a±4.95 |
69.96a±5.69 |
69.01a±5.57 |
|
Total n-3 fatty acids |
0.08d±0.01 |
2.16c ± 0.17 |
6.68b ± 0.53 |
8.44b ± 0.69 |
11.03a±0.89 |
|
Total n-6 fatty acids |
1.57c±0.13 |
14.14b±1.09 |
19.22a±1.51 |
22.75a±1.85 |
20.88a±1.68 |
|
n-6:n-3 ratio |
21.79a±1.80 |
6.97b ± 0.54 |
3.00c ±0.24 |
2.88c ± 0.23 |
2.05c±0.17 |
a, b, c Means ± standard error in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05). SFA =saturated fatty acid; UFA = unsaturated fatty acid, n-6=omega 6, n-3=omega 3
.
Table 5: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks diets on serum biochemical parameters and total antioxidant capacity.
|
Serum biochemical parameters |
Dietary linseed oil supplementation% |
||||
|
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
|
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
57.16a ± 1.96 |
48.74b ± 1.40 |
44.78bc ± 1.97 |
42.28c ± 1.38 |
42.20c ± 0.96 |
|
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) |
141.71a ± 6.98 |
131.92a ± 7.93 |
109.79b ± 0.40 |
108.96b±3.87 |
101.63b ± 6.56 |
|
HDL (mg/dl) |
56.26b ± 0.67 |
58.99a ± 0.75 |
54.51b ± 1.03 |
54.74b ± 0.64 |
55.21b ± 0.83 |
|
LDL (mg/dl) |
71.45a ± 7.60 |
60.93ab ± 7.24 |
44.30bc ± 1.70 |
43.76bc ± 3.20 |
36.13c ± 5.68 |
|
VLDL* (mg/dl) |
11.43a ± 0.39 |
9.75b ± 0.28 |
8.96bc ± 0.39 |
8.46c ± 0.28 |
8.44c ± 0.19 |
|
Cholesterol ester (mg/dl) |
2.57a± 0.16 |
2.25ab± 0.12 |
2.03bc± 0.03 |
2.01bc± 0.07 |
1.85c± 0.10 |
|
Total protein (mg/dl) |
3.24 ± 0.10 |
3.28 ± 0.09 |
3.64 ± 0.16 |
3.66 ± 0.22 |
3.47 ± 0.04 |
|
Albumin (mg/dl) |
1.89 ± 0.07 |
1.93 ± 0.04 |
1.79 ± 0.05 |
1.78 ± 0.08 |
1.86 ± 0.09 |
|
Globulin(mg/dl) |
1.35b ± 0.03 |
1.35b ± 0.09 |
1.85a ± 0.13 |
1.89a ± 0.23 |
1.61ab ± 0.05 |
|
TAC (mM/l) |
0.33a ± 0.01 |
0.29ab ± 0.04 |
0.18c ± 0.01 |
0.16c ± 0.03 |
0.26b ± 0.01 |
|
GSH-Px (IU/mg) |
48.99b ± 1.89 |
50.98b ± 4.87 |
72.24a ± 2.76 |
73.96a ± 4.51 |
75.56a ± 3.36 |
a, b, c Means ± standard error in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05). HDL=high density lipoprotein, LDL=low density lipoprotein, VLDL=very low-density lipoprotein, TAC=total antioxidant capacity, GSH-Px= Glutathione peroxidase. *Serum very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) = Triglyceride/5
Effect of linseed oil dietary supplement on serum biochemical parameters
Serum triglycerides, cholesterol, LDL and VLDL concentrations were significantly (P<0.05) reduced with linseed oil treatments, but serum HDL-c concentrations shown no significance with linseed oil treatment and 0 % oil group as shown in Table 5. Different studies conducted about effect of dietary linseed oil. For example, a study by Zhu et al. (2007) demonstrated that broilers fed with linseed oil-supplemented diets had lower levels of serum cholesterol and triglycerides compared to the control group. These results may be related to the role of omega-3 fatty acid in reduction of triglycerides, high elimination of VLDL by liver and higher excretion of bile via feces which can also reduce the serum of cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations Leaf and Weber (1988). Also, significant (P<0.05) increased serum content of total protein (TP) and globulin (GL) concentrations but decreased albumin (A) concentration. On the other hand, the concentration of TAC was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in broiler groups fed diet supplemented with LO when compared with control group. Also, a significant increase (P < 0.05) in GSH-Px values. Ahmed et al. (2019) agreed with the obtained results and reported that improved antioxidant status and reduced oxidative stress markers in broilers receiving linseed oil supplementation. Alike, Bhattacharya et al. (2003) who settled that n-3 PUFA scavenge H2O2 and lipid peroxides and thus can enhance the activities of the hepatic antioxidant enzymes.
The effect of linseed oil dietary supplement on avian immune function
Table 6 revealed that weight of immune organ differs as a percentage of body weight with different linseed oil supplement as showed where improvement of thymus weight with linseed oil groups than control groups and bursa improved with 2% linseed oil supplement but spleen weight didn’t reveal any improvement. This result agreed with Wang et al. (2000) who finished that at 4 wk, the chicks fed the three PUFA-rich diets (SO, LO, and FO) had significantly developed weights of thymus, bursa, and spleen as a percentage of body weight compared with the chicks fed the diet with a moderate level of PUFA (AO).
Table 6: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks’ diets on Newcastle vaccine antibody titter, total leucocyte counts and mortality rate.
|
Dietary linseed oil supplementation% |
|||||
|
Exp. period (weeks) |
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
Antibody titer1st day |
9.67 ± 0.33 |
9.67 ± 0.33 |
9.67 ± 0.33 |
9.67 ± 0.33 |
9.67 ± 0.33 |
|
Antibody titer at 14-day age |
3.33b ± 0.33 |
3.67ab± 0.67 |
4.33ab ± 0.33 |
5.33a ± 0.67 |
4.00ab ± 0.58 |
|
Antibody titer at 26-day age |
3.00 ± 0.00 |
3.33 ± 0.88 |
4.67 ± 0.88 |
4.33 ± 0.33 |
4.00 ± 0.58 |
|
Antibody titer at 35-day age |
2.33 ± 0.88 |
3.33 ± 0.33 |
3.67 ± 0.88 |
3.33 ± 0.33 |
1.67 ± 0.67 |
|
Total leucocyte count |
166.07c ± 2.46 |
170.87bc ± 3.01 |
180.97ab ± 4.64 |
193.60a ± 3.27 |
177.67bc ± 6.42 |
|
Mortality rate |
13.87 ± 2.79 a |
8.32 ± 4.81 ab |
0.00 ±0.00 b |
0.00±0.00 b |
0.00±0.00 b |
a, b, c Means ± standard error in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Table 7: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks’ diets on intestinal morphology.
|
Intestinal morphology |
Dietary linseed oil supplementation % |
||||
|
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
|
VH at 100X |
823.00 ± 7.51 |
896.00c ± 4.04 |
881.87d ± 1.95 |
1012.73b ± 2.97 |
1154.27a ± 3.46 |
|
CD at 100X |
84.40c ± 2.83 |
93.60b ± 1.85 |
94.23b ± 3.01 |
102.93a ± 1.92 |
108.57a ± 2.45 |
|
VH/CD at 100X |
9.78ab ± 0.42 |
9.58b ± 0.15 |
9.38b ± 0.33 |
9.84ab ± 0.16 |
10.64a ± 0.27 |
|
Mucosa thickness at 40X |
418.50e ± 4.05 |
431.00d ± 2.16 |
943.27c ± 2.79 |
783.53b ± 2.86 |
1045.83a ± 2.74 |
|
wall thickness at 40X |
492.67d ± 2.90 |
472.47e ± 1.55 |
1071.33b ± 2.40 |
1035.00c ± 2.31 |
1390.67a ± 3.48 |
|
VW at 100X |
47.83b ± 1.17 |
73.28a ± 1.09 |
73.70a ± 1.27 |
78.93a ± 5.70 |
77.80a ± 2.46 |
|
Villus perimeter |
12.36d ± 0.19 |
20.63c ± 0.23 |
20.42c ± 0.36 |
25.12b ± 1.83 |
28.22a ± 0.96 |
|
Villus surface area |
101.71d ± 0.83 |
184.79c ± 1.48 |
180.07c ± 3.32 |
254.38b ± 8.63 |
325.75a ± 11.99 |
a, b, c, d means ± standard error in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05). VH= Villous height, CD =Crypt depth, VH/CD= Villous height: Crypt depth, VW= Villous width.
TLC significantly(P<0.05) give best ratio in all linseed oil groups than control groups. This result agreed with a study by Al-Khalifa (2017) who revealed that the consumption of n-3 PUFAs particularly the long chain (>18 carbon atoms) fatty acids have been shown to have a pronounced effect on the health and immune status and rework the phenotypes of immune cells of different species including humans, rats and poultry.
However, dietary PUFA from a variety of sources can be a useful tool for altering immune response (Calder, 2001). Unsaturated FA increases cell flexibility in immune cells and modifies the activity of particular immune cells (Calder, 2007). Numerically antibody titer against Newcastle disease vaccine increased with linseed oil supplement groups than control groups (Table 6). This result agrees with research conducted by Smith et al. (2018) who demonstrated that broilers fed diets enriched with linseed oil exhibited elevated levels of immunoglobulins, such as IgG and IgM, compared to control groups. These findings suggest that linseed oil can enhance humoral immunity in broilers, leading to improved defense against pathogens.
Linseed oil supplementation significantly (P<0.05) decreased mortality ratio. But Carragher et al. (2015) showed that there was no effect of dietary treatment on the mortality of the broilers during the trial. Overall mortalities were 6.0 % in the Control diet fed broilers and 6.7% in the high ALA fed broilers. This may be due to supplementation of PUFAs, to poultry diets, has been strictly connected with immune regulatory effects on both the innate and adaptive immunity through various mechanisms de Pablo et al. (2002). Also, lower dietary levels of linseed oil may be advantageous for improvements in broiler immunity and recovery from immunological tasks (Kidd, 2004).
Effects of linseed oil dietary supplement on intestinal morphology
The recorded results in Table 7 and Figure 1 showed a significant improvement in intestinal morphology in linseed oil-based diets than control groups through significant improvement of villus height, crypt depth, mucosal thickness, wall thickness, villus width, villus perimeter and villus surface area. Several studies agreed with these results for example, Li et al. (2016) who conducted a trial and found that broilers receiving diets supplemented with linseed oil exhibited improved intestinal morphology, increased villus height, and decreased crypt depth in the jejunum and ileum of broilers. Another study found that dietary linseed oil increased villus height and crypt depth in the duodenum of broilers (Shamliyan et al., 2019). The mechanisms by which dietary linseed oil improves broiler intestinal villi
Table 8: Effect of linseed oil supplementation in chicks’ diets on economic efficiency of 35-days old broiler chickens.
|
Economic efficiency |
Dietary linseed oil supplementation% |
||||
|
0% oil |
1% SBO |
1 % LO |
2% LO |
3% LO |
|
|
Feeding cost of the obtained gain (LE) |
18.52 |
18.93 |
19.18 |
20.40 |
20.68 |
|
Selling price of the obtained gain (LE/kg live weight) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
|
Selling cost of obtained gain (LE) |
50.82 |
53.19 |
50.82 |
53.19 |
55.93 |
|
Economic efficiency (EE) % |
174.41 |
180.92 |
164.95 |
160.77 |
170.44 |
LE= Egyptian pound date of experiment= 1/3//2019.
morphology are not fully understood. However, a study found that dietary linseed oil enhanced immune function in broilers challenged with Salmonella (Shamliyan et al., 2019). Additionally, linseed oil supplementation has been associated with enhanced intestinal barrier function and reduced inflammatory response in broilers (Wang et al., 2000). Also, Xu et al. (2017) demonstrated that linseed oil increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, while decreasing the population of potentially harmful bacteria like Escherichia coli. These alterations in gut microbiota composition have been associated with reduced inflammation and improved gut health. What is more, research by Cheng et al. (2017) indicated that linseed oil supplementation elevated the production of immunoglobulins and cytokines, which are vital components of the immune defense mechanism. In addition, the anti-inflammatory properties of omega-3 PUFAs may help mitigate intestinal inflammation and alleviate stress-related immune responses. One potential mechanism by which dietary linseed oil may improve broiler health is through its anti-inflammatory effects due to decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the serum of broilers. Similarly, Shamliyan et al. (2019) found that dietary linseed oil reduced the expression of inflammatory markers in the intestines of broilers.
The economic evaluation of linseed oil dietary supplement
The results presented in Table 8 showed that feeding and selling cost of the obtained gain had increased by increasing LO use. However, groups that received no oil had the lowest feeding cost. The highest economic efficiency was recorded in the group fed 1% SBO followed by 0% oil, 3% LO, 1% LO, and 2% LO, respectively. Likely, numerous studies had evaluated the influence of linseed oil supplementation on broiler growth performance. For instance, Smith et al. (2018) reported a significant improvement in body weight gain and feed conversion ratio in broilers fed a diet supplemented with linseed oil compared to the control group. The economic evaluation is specific to the study and market conditions at the time of the experiment and may not generalize to different settings.
An economic analysis was calculated according to the following equation: Y= (A-B)/B x 100 where A is the selling cost of the obtained gain and B is the feeding cost of this gain El-Kerdawy (1997).
Conclusions and Recommendations
The supplementation of linseed oil in chick’s diets significantly improved the growth performance, body composition, meat quality, immune response, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, and decreased the mortality rate. The most beneficial inclusion rate is 2% then 1% LO along the breeding period for the best FCR and immune response with improved meat quality. At the same time, the work is promising for practical implications for meat or egg poultry producers and future research in different dosages and durations. future research, including examining different sources of omega-3 fatty acids or varying supplementation levels, would provide a more comprehensive overview and may introduce further explanations and take our paper as a guide, for addition new results and benefits of using linseed oil as a feed supplement.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank the Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University for providing the facilities for carrying out this work.
Novelty Statement
Supplementing chick feed with linseed oil improves growth performance, immunological response, body composition, serum biochemical parameters, and intestinal morphology while decreasing mortality ratio, according to the current study.
Author’s Contribution
All authors contributed equally to the current study.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Abdel-Hafeez H, Saleh ESE, Tawfeek S, Youssef MI, Hemida BMM (2016). Effects of low dietary energy, with low and normal protein levels, on broiler performance and production characteristics. J. Vet. Med. Res., 23(2): 259-274. https://doi.org/10.21608/jvmr.2016.43364
Ahmed ST, Islam MM, Mun HS, Kim YJ, Yang CJ (2019). Effect of dietary flaxseed oil supplementation on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 47(1): 422-426.
Alagawany M, Elnesr SS, Farag MR, El-Hack A, Mohamed E, Khafaga AF, Dhama K (2019). Omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in poultry nutrition: Effect on production performance and health. Animals, 9(8): 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080573
Al-Khalifa H (2017). Enrichment of poultry diets with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for human consumption. Science, 80(6): 741-752. https://doi.org/10.31031/APDV.2017.01.000523
Anon Y (1971). Methods for examining poultry biologics and for identification and quantifying avian pathogens. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC., USA, pp. 66.
Aviagen (2019). Ross 308 broiler nutrition specifications. Aviagen Ltd., Newbridge, UK.
Aziza AE, Awadin WF, Quezada N, Cherian G (2014). Gastrointestinal morphology, fatty acid profile, and production performance of broiler chickens fed camelina meal or linseed oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 116(12): 3371-7271. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400019
Baiao NC, Lara LJ (2005). Oil and fat in broiler nutrition. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 7: 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2005000300001
Bancroft JD, Gamble M (2008). Theory and practice of histological techniques. Elsevier health sciences.
Bhattacharya A, Lawrence RA, Krishnan A, Zaman K, Sun D, Fernandes G (2003). Effect of dietary n-3 and n-6 oils with and without food restriction on activity of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in livers of cyclophosphamide treated autoimmune-prone NZB/W female mice. J. Am. Coll. Coll. Nutr., 22(5): 388-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2003.10719322
Brake JD, Brann DE, Griffey CA (1997). Barley without enzyme supplementation in broiler grower and finisher diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 6(4): 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/6.4.422
Burstein M, Scholnick HR (1973). Lipoprotein-polyanion-metal interactions. Adv. Lipid Res., 11: 67-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-024911-4.50009-X
Calder PC (2007). Immunomodulation by omega-3 fatty acids. Prostagland. Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids, 77(5-6): 327-335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.015.
Calder PC (2001). Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and immunity. Lipids, 36(9): 1007-1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-001-0812-7
Carragher JF, Mühlhäusler BS, Geier MS, House JD, Hughes RJ, Gibson RA (2015). Effect of dietary ALA on growth rate, feed conversion ratio, mortality rate and breast meat omega-3 LCPUFA content in broiler chickens. Anim. Prod. Sci., 56(5): 815-823. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14743
Cheng Y, Wang L, Ma Y (2017). Effects of dietary supplementation with linseed oil on the growth performance, carcass traits, and immune function of broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 8: 77.
Chiu CC, Su KP, Cheng TC, Liu HC, Chang CJ, Dewey ME, Huang SY (2008). The effects of omega-3 fatty acids monotherapy in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psych., 32(6): 1538-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.05.015
Coorey R, Novinda A, Williams H, Jayasena V (2015). Omega-3 fatty acid profile of eggs from laying hens fed diets supplemented with chia, fish oil, and flaxseed. J. Food Sci., 80: S180–S187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12735
de Pablo MA, Puertollano MA, de Cienfuegos GA (2002). Biological and clinical significance of lipids as modulators of immune system functions. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 9(5): 945-950. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.9.5.945-950.2002
Doppenberg J, Van Der Aar PJ (2017). Facts about fats: A review of the feeding value of fats and oils in feeds for swine and poultry. Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-861-2
Doumas BT, Watson WA, Biggs HG (1971). Albumin standards and the measurement of serum albumin with bromcresol green. Clin. Chim. Acta, 31(1): 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(71)90365-2
Drury RAB, Wallington EA, Cameron SR (1967). Carleton’s histological technique. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 151, 242–245.
El-Kerdawy DMA (1997). Olive pulp as a new energy source for growing rabbits. Egypt. J. Rabbit Sci., 7: 1-12.
Elzobier M, Ibrahim MTE, Elbashier OM (2016). Effects of dietary inclusion of fish oil on broiler performance and feed utilization. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 5: 77-89.
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GS (1957). A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem., 226(1): 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972). Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem., 18(6): 499-502. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499
Gillingham L (2013). The metabolic fate of alpha linolenic acid (ALA). IHP Mag., 1: 72-79.
Gogus U, Smith C (2010). n‐3 Omega fatty acids: A review of current knowledge. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 45(3): 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02151.x
Golian A, Maurice DV (1992). Dietary poultry fat and gastrointestinal transit time of feed and fat utilization in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 71(8): 1357-1363. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711357
Gous RM (2010). Nutritional limitations on growth and development in poultry. Livest. Sci., 130(1-3): 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.007
Grant GH, Sliverman LM, Christenson RH (1987). Amino acids and proteins. In: Tietz NW, editor. Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. 3rd ed.
Gunstone FD (1996). Fatty acid and lipid chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4131-8
Hassanein II, Metwally AE, Abd Elbaky HE (2023). Effects of dietary nucleotides supplementation on the performance of broiler chicks. Slovenian Vet. Res. (Slovenski Veterinarski Zbornik). 60. https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-1575-2022
Hosseini-Mansoub N, Bahrami Y (2011). Influence of dietary fish oil supplementation on humoral immune response and some selected biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. J. Agrobiol., 28(1): 67-77. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10146-011-0008-5
Hosseini-Vashan SJ, Roshanfekr H, Afzalzadeh A (2022). Effects of dietary flaxseed oil on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and oxidative stability of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 101(4): 1-10.
Ibrahim D, El-Sayed R, Khater S, Said EN, El-Mandrawy SA (2018). Changing dietary n-6: n-3 ratio using different oil sources affects performance, behavior, cytokines mRNA expression and meat fatty acid profile of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr., 4(1): 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.08.003
Ichihara KI, Fukubayashi Y (2010). Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-liquid chromatography. J. Lipid Res., 51(3): 635-640. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D001065
Janssen WMMA (1989). European table of energy values for poultry feedstuffs. Subcommittee energy of the working group nr. 2. Beekbergen, The Netherlands:
Jones AK, Lamont SJ, Persia ME (2018). Dietary encapsulated fish oil and flaxseed oil supplementation in laying hens: effects on n-3 fatty acids in eggs, lipid metabolism, productivity, and welfare. Poult. Sci., 97(11): 3854-3864.
Kamran Z, Sarwar M, Nisa M, Nadeem MA, Mahmood S, Babar ME, Ahmed S (2008). Effect of low-protein diets having constant energy-to-protein ratio on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens from one to thirty-five days of age. Poult. Sci., 87(3): 468-474. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00180
Khatun M, Pesti GM, Bakalli RI (2021). Dietary fish oil and flaxseed oil supplementation increase eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, and omega-3 index in the blood of laying hens. Poult. Sci., 100(10): 1-9.
Kidd MT (2004). Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers. Poult. Sci., 83(4): 650-657. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.4.650
Konieczka P, Barszcz M, Choct M, Smulikowska S (2018). The interactive effect of dietary n-6: n-3 fatty acid ratio and vitamin E level on tissue lipid peroxidation, DNA damage in intestinal epithelial cells, and gut morphology in chickens of different ages. Poult. Sci., 97(1): 149-158. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex274
Koracevic D, Koracevic G, Djordjevic V, Andrejevic S, Cosic V (2001). Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids. J. Clin. Pathol., 54(5): 356-361. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.54.5.356
Kralik G, Kralik Z, Grčević M, Hanžek D (2018). Quality of chicken meat. Animal husbandry and nutrition, pp. 63. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72865
Leaf A, Weber PC (1988). Cardiovascular effects of n-3 fatty acids. New Eng. J. Med., 318(9): 549-557. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198803033180905
Leeson S, Summers JD, Caston L (1993). Growth response of immature brown-egg strain pullets to varying nutrient density and lysine. Poult. Sci., 72(7): 1349-1358. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721349
Li FJ, Lin X, Lin SM, Chen WY, Guan Y (2016). Effects of dietary fish oil substitution with linseed oil on growth, muscle fatty acid and metabolism of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquacult. Nutr., 22(3): 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12270
Mandal GP, Ghosh TK, Patra AK (2014). Effect of different dietary n-6 to n-3 fatty acid ratios on the performance and fatty acid composition in muscles of broiler chickens. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 27(11): 1608. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14013
Mraz FR, Boucher RV, McCartney MG (1957). The influence of the energy: Volume ratio on growth response in chickens. Poult. Sci., 36(6): 1217-1221. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0361217
Nafees MSM, Pagthinathan M (2017). Dietary enrichment of broiler chicken with omega-3 fatty acids and beneficial role in human cardiovascular health: A review. Agrieast: J. Agric. Sci., 10. https://doi.org/10.4038/agrieast.v10i0.26
Newman RE (2000). Modulation of avian metabolism by dietary fatty acids. PhD. thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.
Naito, H.K. and Kaplan, A.Q., 1984. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Clin. Chem. Toronto. Princeton, pp.1207-1213.
Patel D, Patra A, Pandey S, Patel A (2021). Influence of dietary supplementation of flaxseed oil on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., 21(1): 99-109.
Peterson DW, Grau CR, Peek NF (1954). Growth and food consumption in relation to dietary levels of protein and fibrous bulk. J. Nutr., 52(2): 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/52.2.241
Ravindran V (2013). Poultry feed availability and nutrition in developing countries. Poult. Dev. Rev., 2(11): 60-63.
Sakomura NK, Rostagno HS (2019). Methods to determine the energy value of feedstuffs: A review. Rev. Brasil. Zoot., 48: 1-9.
Shamliyan D, Umarov R, Giniyatullin R (2019). Effect of dietary supplementation with linseed oil on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 98(10): 4355-4361.
Silva LR, Borgatti LM, Geraldo A (2020). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of broilers fed diets supplemented with flaxseed oil. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 22(1): 1-8.
Smith MO, Tilghman RW, Whelan RA (2018). Flaxseed oil as a potential dietary supplement for broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 27(3): 388-395.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1994). Statistical methods, 8th ed, IOWA State University Press, Amer, IOWA, USA, pp. 217-268.
Wahlefeld AW, Bergmeyer HU (1974). Methods of enzymatic analysis. Triglycerides determination after enzymatic hydrolysis. 2nd English ed., Academic Press, Inc, New York, pp. 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-091304-6.50036-7
Wang YH, Liu F, Sun G, Zhang L, Han Y, Liu Y (2019). Effects of dietary flaxseed oil supplementation on carcass traits, meat quality, and fatty acid composition in broilers. Poult. Sci., 98(6): 2413-2419.
Wang YW, Field CJ, Sim JS (2000). Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids alter lymphocyte subset proportion and proliferation, serum immunoglobulin G concentration, and immune tissue development in chicks. Poult. Sci., 79(12): 1741-1748. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1741
Xu C, Zhang H, Gao H, Lu J, Zheng X, Liu H (2017). Effects of dietary linseed oil supplementation on intestinal barrier function and immune responses in broiler chickens. Animal, 11(12): 2144-2151.
Zhu XY, Zhao JP, Liu L, Guo YM, Zhang LY (2007). Effects of dietary supplementation with a-linolenic acid-rich flaxseed oil on growth performance, carcass traits, fatty acid composition, and oxidative stability of meat in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 86(4): 768-775.