Anthocyanins, Intestinal Health and Productive Response in Broiler Chickens
José Arteaga1,2, Juan José Toro-Letelier3 and Sixto Reyna2*
1Maestría en Agroecología, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Código postal 170517, Quito, Ecuador; 2Departamento de Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Manabí, Ecuador; 3Dirección de Extensión y vinculación con el medio, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Código postal 8820000.
Abstract | Broilers are the main source of animal protein for human consumption, and since the mid-twentieth century, their productive efficiency has been supported by the inclusion of sub-therapeutic doses of antibiotics as growth promoters (AGPs) in their diets. However, concerns regarding the environmental impact of AGPs and their contribution to bacterial resistance have led to increased interest in evaluating alternative strategies to sustain productivity under intensive rearing conditions without the adverse effects associated with AGPs. In this context, various plant species and their extracts contain bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, particularly anthocyanins. Due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, anthocyanins positively influence the morphology and physiology of the intestinal mucosa while modulating the composition of its microbiota. These effects further contribute to intestinal health through the production of short-chain fatty acids or anthocyanin -derived metabolites, ultimately impacting the bird’s overall health and productive performance. Based on this, the present review explores several mechanisms of action underlying the potential of anthocyanins as an alternative to AGPs, as recently described.
Received | Sepctember 22, 2023; Accepted | April 12, 2025; Published | May 13, 2025
*Correspondence | Sixto Reyna, Departamento de Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Manabí, Ecuador; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Arteaga, J., J.J.T. Letelier and S. Reyna. 2025. Anthocyanins, intestinal health and productive response in broiler chickens. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 39(Special issue 2): 173-188.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2023/39/s2.173.188
Keywords | Microbiota. Anthocyanins. Antibiotic alternatives. Broilers. Poultry production
Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Due to their high growth rate and productivity, broiler chickens have become the most important and efficient source of animal protein for human nutrition (Paul et al., 2022), driving the poultry industry to adopt intensive rearing systems. Unfortunately, these systems increase the likelihood of infectious outbreaks in flocks (Diaz et al., 2019). In this context, the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of broilers is continuously exposed to pathogens and environmental factors that disrupt intestinal homeostasis, compromising their health and productivity (Yegani and Korver, 2008; Akinyemi and Adewole, 2021).
Antibiotics, owing to their ability to inhibit or eliminate microbial growth, have been widely used to treat infectious diseases-primarily intestinal infections-and, at subtherapeutic doses, as antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) (Díaz-Sánchez et al., 2015; Lauridsen, 2019; Rahman et al., 2022). AGPs modify the gut microbiota, reduce bacterial toxin production, lower the incidence of subclinical enteric infections, stimulate the immune system, and enhance nutrient absorption and bioavailability, thereby improving the birds’ productive performance (Paul et al., 2022; Fernández Miyakawa et al., 2024).
However, the growing demand for AGP-free animal products (Ghimpețeanu et al., 2022), environmental concerns over antibiotic residues in livestock and their ecotoxicological effects (O’Neill, 2016; Tian et al., 2021) and the global threat of antibiotic resistance-linked to an estimated 1.27 million deaths in 2019 and projected to reach 10 million by 2050-have driven the progressive elimination of AGPs from the poultry industry in developed countries (O’Neill, 2016; Rahman et al., 2022).
In contrast, in less developed countries where AGPs are still in use, rising demand for animal protein is expected to increase antibiotic consumption from 63,151 tons in 2010 to over 105,000 tons by 2030 (Van Boeckel et al., 2015; Ghimpețeanu et al., 2022). Furthermore, the removal of AGPs from poultry diets has significantly increased the incidence of enteric diseases leading to greater reliance on therapeutic antibiotics (Redondo et al., 2014; Hasted et al., 2021).
In this context, investigating the effects of different nutritional strategies on intestinal morphology, gut health, and productive performance is essential for developing viable alternatives to AGPs (Amer et al., 2022). Among these alternatives, phytogenics (also referred to as phytobiotics or phytochemicals) have gained interest. These compounds are classified into terpenoids, organosulfur compounds, phytosterols, alkaloids, and polyphenols (Lillehoj et al., 2018; Al-Mnaser et al., 2022), the latter being secondary plant metabolites characterized by an aromatic ring with at least one hydroxyl group. Of the 8,000 phenolic compounds identified, at least half belong to the flavonoid group (Lillehoj et al., 2018; Tungmunnithum et al., 2018; Hasted et al., 2021; Salamon et al., 2021). Through their antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties-along with their ability to modulate the immune system and intestinal microbiota- flavonoids inhibit pathogen colonization in the GIT, thereby promoting intestinal health and enhancing nutrient absorption capacity (Lillehoj et al., 2018; Ayalew et al., 2022; Pliego et al., 2022).
Anthocyanins are water-soluble pigments belonging to the flavonoid family, widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom, and responsible for the red, purple, or blue coloration of various fruits (Sun et al., 2018; Csernus et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2022). Although antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties of anthocyanins have been documented in various animal species-improving intestinal health by promoting mucosal integrity and modulating the microbiota-information on their use as feed additives in broiler chickens remains limited. In particular, few studies have evaluated their specific effects on intestinal health and productive responses in birds reared without AGPs (Changxing et al., 2018; Amer et al., 2022).
Since intestinal health depends a balanced gut microbiota composition, proper intestinal barrier functionality, and equilibrium between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses (Ducatelle et al., 2018; Wickramasuriya et al., 2022), this review will examine the effects of anthocyanins on the intestinal morphology and physiology of broiler chickens. Additionally, it will explore their potential impact on gut microbiota composition, implications for productive performance, and the underlying mechanisms of action.
Morphology, Physiology and Gut Health in Broilers
The GIT of broilers consists of the esophagus, crop, glandular stomach (proventriculus), gizzard, small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), cecum, colon, and cloaca (Pan and Yu, 2014; Alshamy et al., 2018). Compared to mammals, broilers have a relatively shorter small intestine, which reduces food retention time and digestive capacity (Pan and Yu, 2014; Wickramasuriya et al., 2022). Beyond its primary role in nutrient absorption, the intestine functions as a protective barrier against pathogens and toxins and hosts a complex microbiota (Mishra and Jha, 2019; Alyileili et al., 2020). In the small intestine, dietary components are enzymatically hydrolyzed into simpler molecules such as peptides, amino acids, fatty acids, and monosaccharides. These nutrients are efficiently transported from the intestinal lumen to various tissues due to the extensive intestinal absorption surface (Alshamy et al., 2018; Bedford and Apajalahti, 2022).
Structurally, the intestine comprises four interrelated barriers (Figure 1): (1) the microbiological barrier, formed by commensal microorganisms that prevent pathogen colonization; (2) the chemical barrier, consisting of a mucus layer primarily composed of mucins (high -molecular- weight glycoproteins) produced by goblet cells, which protects against pathogen invasion and inhibits bacterial proliferation; (3) the mechanical barrier, maintained by intestinal permeability regulated by stem cells, epithelial cells, goblet cells, and Paneth cells; and (4) the immunological barrier, located beneath and between epithelial cells and composed of dendritic cells, B cells, T cells, and macrophages. These barriers collectively ensure intestinal homeostasis and defense (Duangnumsawang et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Wickramasuriya et al., 2022).
Dysbiosis, defined as an alteration in gut microbiota composition, can be triggered by factors such as microbial activity, environmental and nutritional influences, and a high metabolic rate. This imbalance leads to an increase in opportunistic pathogens, which has been associated with inflammatory processes, intestinal barrier deterioration, and oxidative stress-caused by an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS)-in the GIT of birds (Awad et al., 2017; Ducatelle et al., 2018; Mishra and Jha, 2019; Fancher et al., 2020).
Oxidative stress arises when the overproduction of ROS exceeds the capacity of the endogenous antioxidant system (Mishra and Jha, 2019). This system includes key enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT), which are responsible for neutralizing free radicals in early stages (Mishra and Jha, 2019). Under physiological conditions, these systems regulate ROS levels and prevent oxidative damage (Lauridsen, 2019). However, during oxidative stress, the resulting imbalance promotes cellular damage and intestinal dysbiosis. ROS modulate transcription factors such as Nuclear Factor Kappa beta (NF-κB), Activator Protein 1 (AP-1), and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) -this latter has a different role depending on the cell context-. Although Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) is primarily activated under hypoxic conditions, its stabilization can be indirectly enhanced by ROS through the inhibition of prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) (Chatterjee, 2016; Zheng et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2023).
The inflammatory response is initiated when Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), triggering signaling cascades that include mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), NF-κB, and (AP-1. These pathways stimulate the transcription of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-8/CXCL8, and antimicrobial peptides, promoting the recruitment of immune cells-including neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes—to the site of inflammation. This response contributing to tissue damage through the release of enzymes and chemical mediators. Concurrently, the inflammatory processes promote the generation of ROS, triggering oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and alterations in cellular signaling (Biswas, 2016; Chen et al., 2018; Mishra and Jha, 2019; Surai et al., 2019; Tarradas et al., 2020).
In birds, intestinal dysbiosis, closely linked to oxidative stress, exacerbates this inflammatory cascade, intensifying tissue damage (Li et al., 2024; Wickramasuriya et al., 2022). Thus, inflammation and oxidative stress are intimately connected and can negatively affect productivity, as prolonged inflammatory leads to tissue damage and diverts nutrients away from growth and production (Chatterjee, 2016; Broom and Kogut, 2018).
Additionally, various pathogenic bacteria and their toxins have been reported to alter the structure and function of tight junction proteins, thereby increasing intestinal permeability (Awad et al., 2017), leading to GIT hyperpermeability, facilitating the translocation of microorganisms and toxins, from the intestinal lumen into the circulatory system, ultimately causing systemic conditions that impair the productive performance of birds (Akbarian et al., 2016; Lillehoj et al., 2018; Mishra and Jha, 2019; Luo et al., 2022).
Anthocyanins
Structure and Sources
In nature, anthocyanins exist as O-glycosides, in which the anthocyanidin (aglycone) is bound to a sugar via a β-glycosidic bond. Anthocyanidins contain a flavylium cation, whose structure can exhibit hydroxylations primarily on carbons C3, C5, C7 of ring A and C3’, C4’, C5’ of ring B (Mattioli et al., 2020), giving rise to different types of anthocyanidins (Figure 2). To date, 17 types of anthocyanidins have been identified, although the most abundant are delphinidin, cyanidin, peonidin, petunidin, pelargonidin, and malvidin (Mattioli et al., 2020; Salamon et al., 2021). The biological activities of anthocyanins depend on their bioavailability, chemical structure, stability, origin of the food matrix, interaction with other phytonutrients, and intrinsic factors of the organism (Changxing et al., 2018; Garg et al., 2019).
Anthocyanins are widely distributed in nature, with major dietary sources including berries, purple corn, red cabbage, black rice, and Hibiscus sabdariffa, among others. These natural pigments contribute to the coloration of plant tissues and have been extensively studied for their health benefits (Mattioli et al., 2020; Verediano et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2023). A detailed summary of the main anthocyanin-rich sources and their respective compositions is presented in Table 1.
Digestion, Absorption, and Metabolism of Anthocyanins
In the oral cavity, non-acetylated anthocyanins are hydrolyzed into aglycones primarily by the β-glucosidase activity of the oral microbiota (e.g., Streptococcus spp.) (Tian et al., 2019; Jokioja et al., 2021). In the stomach, the acidic pH induces partial degradation- more pronounced in non-acetylated anthocyanins. Although their absorption is limited at this stage, most anthocyanins reach the small intestine (Tian et al., 2019).
In the small intestine, anthocyanins absorption-particularly that of non-acetylated compounds-occurs mainly in the jejunum, followed by the duodenum (Chen et al., 2022). Non-acetylated glycosides enter enterocytes via transporters such as GLUT2 and SGLT1, while acetylated anthocyanins are metabolized by gut microbiota, specifically by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains with β-glucosidase activity (Tian et al., 2019; Jokioja et al., 2021). Absorption efficiency depends on physicochemical properties such as polarity, molecular size, and hydrophobicity, favoring small, polar molecules (Chen et al., 2022).
Once absorbed, anthocyanins undergo metabolism in the intestinal epithelium, liver, and kidneys, leading to the formation of glucuronides, sulfates, and methylated derivatives. In the GIT, they may undergo enterohepatic recycling via the bile duct to the jejunum due to their enterohepatic persistence (Fang, 2014; Changxing et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2019) or enter systemic circulation, appearing rapidly in the bloodstream. Undigested anthocyanins are excreted via urine, feces, and breath (Jokioja et al., 2021).
Approximately 65% of anthocyanins are not absorbed and reach the colon, where microbiota-mediated β-glucosidase activity-particularly from Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp.-facilitates their degradation, generating bioactive metabolites. In humans, the primary metabolites derived from pelargonidin, cyanidin, delphinidin, peonidin, and malvidin are 4-hidroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid (PCA), gallic acid, vanillic acid, and syringic acid, respectively (Tian et al., 2019; Csernus et al., 2020; Hasted et al., 2021; Luo et al., 2022).
Anthocyanins and Gut Health
Anthocyanins, Antimicrobial Activity, and Microbiota Modulation
The GIT of broiler chickens hosts a complex microbiota composed of symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, archaea, protozoa, and viruses, with bacteria being the most abundant components. Colonization begins at hatching, primarily through the ingestion of bedding material, a process crucial for nutrient absorption, intestinal
Table 1: Sources of Anthocyanins and Representative Examples.
|
Category |
Source |
Scientific Name |
|
Fruits |
||
|
Grapes |
Vitis vinifera |
|
|
Apples |
Malus domestica |
|
|
Plums |
Prunus domestica |
|
|
Aronia (chokeberry) |
Aronia melanocarpa |
|
|
Blackberry |
Rubus fruticosus |
|
|
Blueberry |
Vaccinium corymbosum |
|
|
Cranberry |
Vaccinium macrocarpon |
|
|
Raspberry |
Rubus idaeus |
|
|
Black mulberry |
Morus nigra |
|
|
Cornelian cherry |
Cornus mas |
|
|
Black currant |
Ribes nigrum |
|
|
Plum |
Prunus domestica |
|
|
Maqui |
Aristotelia chilensis |
|
|
Açai |
Euterpe oleracea |
|
|
Eggplant |
Solanum melongena |
|
|
Cherry |
Prunus avium |
|
|
Strawberry |
Fragaria × ananassa |
|
|
Jabuticaba |
Myrciaria jaboticaba |
|
|
Bilberry |
Vaccinium myrtillus |
|
|
Blood orange |
Citrus × sinensis |
|
|
Vegetables |
Purple cabbage |
Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra |
|
Radish |
Raphanus sativus |
|
|
Black carrot |
Daucus carota subsp. sativus var. atrorubens |
|
|
Tubers and root crops |
Red potato |
Solanum tuberosum |
|
Purple sweet potato |
Ipomoea batatas |
|
|
Beetroot |
Beta vulgaris |
|
|
Legumes |
Black beans |
Phaseolus vulgaris |
|
Black soybean |
Glycine max (L.) Merr. |
|
|
Grains |
Purple corn |
Zea mays |
|
Black rice |
Oryza sativa |
|
|
By-products |
Grape skins |
Vitis vinifera |
|
Flowers/calyxes |
Roselle |
Hibiscus sabdariffa |
health, and productivity (Iqbal et al., 2020; Vera et al., 2023). At the taxonomic level, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the dominant phyla, followed by Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, collectively accounting for over 90% of the gut microbiota. The most prevalent genera include Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Ruminococcus, and Bifidobacterium, with relative abundances varying according to intestinal region, diet, and environmental factors (Ding et al., 2023; Vera et al., 2023).
Microbial composition differs across GIT regions. In the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), Firmicutes and Lactobacillus-facultative and acid-tolerant bacteria-predominate. In contrast, the cecum exhibits greater diversity, dominated by Bacteroidetes and strict anaerobic genera such as Clostridium, Ruminococcus, and Bacteroides. In healthy birds, a dynamic equilibrium is maintained, where Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., Firmicutes) comprising over 85% of the population. This balance is essential for digestion, nutrient absorption, immune system development, and disease resistance. However, environmental factors, heat stress, and housing conditions can disrupt this equilibrium, leading to dysbiosis. This condition is characterized by microbial imbalances, inflammation, and impaired intestinal functions, which compromise mucosal barrier integrity, promote pathogen translocation, and ultimately reduce productive efficiency (Iqbal et al., 2020; Fang et al., 2023; Vera et al., 2023).
In addition to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, anthocyanins exhibit antimicrobial activity against Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and other bacteria (Sun et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2019; Dong et al., 2022). Although the precise mechanisms underlying bacterial inhibition remain unclear, anthocyanins have been reported to increase the hydrophobicity of the bacterial cell surface (Sun et al., 2018; Dong et al., 2022), thereby affecting both cell-cell and cell-surface interactions (Danchik and Casadevall, 2021). This increase in hydrophobicity has been associated to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) neutralization, membrane permeabilization, and enhanced bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial peptides (Zhang et al., 2023). Additionally, anthocyanins disrupt the bacterial cell wall, leading to leakage of intracellular ions and cytoplasmic content. They also reduce the activity of alkaline phosphatase, adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), and SOD in various pathogenic bacteria, inducing metabolic alterations (Sun et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2019).
Beyond their antimicrobial effects, anthocyanins modulate the intestinal microbiota. Although their mechanisms of action are not fully elucidated, most anthocyanins reach the colon, where they are metabolized by bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp., promoting their proliferation (Tian et al., 2019). For instance, supplementation with black corn anthocyanin extract in broiler chickens has been shown to favorably alter the cecal microbiome by increasing Bifidobacterium and Clostridium populations while reducing E. coli abundance. It has been proposed that Bifidobacterium, through β-glucosidase activity, hydrolyzes anthocyanins into aglycones and phenolic compounds that support its growth. Likewise, several Lactobacillus strains ferment phenolic compounds, utilizing them as carbon sources (Verediano et al., 2022).
A key bacterial metabolite of anthocyanins, PCA, may contribute to intestinal health in broilers. Supplementation with 300 mg/kg of PCA has been shown to reduce jejunal inflammation, improve intestinal barrier integrity, and modulate microbiota composition (Wang et al., 2019). Additionally, in broilers challenged with LPS, PCA supplementation enhanced antioxidant status, mitigated LPS-induced intestinal barrier damage, and restored plasma levels of immunoglobulins A, M, and γ (Jiang et al., 2023).
Both anthocyanins and PCA also modulate the intestinal microbiota, promoting the growth of bacteria that produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Tian et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Verediano et al., 2022). These SCFAs serve as energy substrates for enterocytes and acidify the intestinal environment, thereby reducing the risk of pathogen colonization (Liu et al., 2021). Additionally, polyphenols exhibit prebiotic activity by enhancing Lactobacillus populations. In turn, Lactobacillus exerts probiotic effects through immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory actions, inhibition of bacterial toxins, and competitive exclusion of pathogens (Verediano et al., 2022).
Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of anthocyanins
The excessive production of ROS, triggered by various stimuli that disrupt redox homeostasis, leads to the activation of multiple transcription factors (NF-κB, AP-1, HIF-1α, and PPAR-γ). Upon translocation to the nucleus, these factors induce the expression of genes involved in the inflammatory response, further contributing to ROS generation (Chatterjee, 2016; Rahman et al., 2021). In this context, polyphenols in general-and anthocyanins in particular-exert antioxidant activity by scavenging free radicals through the formation of ionic metal complexes and inhibiting singlet oxygen formation. This process is mediated by hydrogen atoms from hydroxyl groups located in the aromatic rings of anthocyanins, thereby preventing oxidative damage to biomolecules, inhibiting oxidase enzymes, and activating antioxidant enzymes (Cásedas et al., 2017; Bendokas et al., 2020; Amer et al., 2022; Luo et al., 2022).
Additionally, anthocyanins have the potential to modulate ROS-regulated transcription factors. In humans with metabolic syndrome, a daily supplementation with 320 mg of anthocyanins for four weeks reduced the expression of NF-κB- dependent genes, including those encoding tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1A (IL-1A), IL-6, and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) (Aboonabi and Aboonabi, 2020). Likewise, in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that cyanidin-3-glycoside inhibits NF-κB signaling while promoting the expression and translocation to the nucleus of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a transcription factor that mediates the antioxidant response by upregulating the expression of CAT, GPx, and SOD (Aboonabi and Aboonabi, 2020; Rahman et al., 2021). In broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella typhimuriumγ, anthocyanin supplementation attenuated the inflammatory response by reducing the production of ileal cytokines, including interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, interferon beta (IFN-β) and IFN- γ (Zhang et al., 2023).
At the systemic level, the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of anthocyanins have also been demonstrated. For instance, supplementation with purple corn as a source of anthocyanins increased the expression and activity of SOD, GPx, and CAT, as well as the total antioxidant capacity in the plasma of Chishui chickens (Luo et al., 2022). Similarly, supplementation with a Hibiscus sabdariffa (Jamaica flower) extract enhanced serum CAT and SOD levels, reduced malondialdehyde concentrations, and improved oxidative stress defense mechanisms in Ross 308 chickens. Additionally, this extract exhibited anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties by increasing serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) and enhancing Ig γ in the spleen (Amer et al., 2022).
Furthermore, supplementation with anthocyanins from Hungarian cherries reduced IL-1β concentrations in the spleen, although it did not significantly alter IL-6, IFN-α, IFN-γ, TLR-4, or TLR-5 levels (Csernus et al., 2020). In broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella typhimurium, anthocyanin supplementation reduced plasma nitric oxide (NO) levels-a molecule involved in inflammatory responses, lipid peroxidation of cell membrane, and DNA damage-suggesting anthocyanins may attenuate immune responses induced by this pathogen (Zhang et al., 2023).
Intestinal Morphology and Integrity
Anthocyanins also have the potential to improve intestinal morphology. For instance, in Ross 308 broiler chickens, supplementation with varying doses (50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. extract as a source of anthocyanins for 35 days enhanced small intestinal villus height, reduced crypt depth, and increased the villus height-to-crypt depth (VH:CD) ratio. Additionally, it elevated the number of goblet cells in the small intestine (Amer et al., 2022). Notably, villus height and the VH:CD ratio are key indicators of intestinal health (Ducatelle et al., 2018), while a higher number of goblet cells promotes mucin production, which in turn inhibits intestinal pathogen colonization (Duangnumsawang et al., 2021).
However, under inflammatory conditions-as in broilers intramuscularly inoculated with LPS-the relative expression of genes encoding intestinal tight junction proteins-occludin (OCLN), Zonula Occludens-1 (ZO-1), junctional adhesion molecule-2 (JAM-2), as well as mucin-2 (MUC-2), decreased, while malondialdehyde levels (a lipid peroxidation marker) increased. Simultaneously, total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activity and the expression of T-SOD, CAT, and GPx in the jejunal mucosa were reduced. However, dietary supplementation with 100 and 400 mg/kg of anthocyanins upregulated the relative expression of ZO-1, JAM-2, and OCLN, counteracted the LPS-induced suppression of antioxidant enzymes, and mitigated jejunal mucosal damage, thereby improving absorptive capacity and intestinal integrity (Wang et al., 2023).
Similarly, in broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium, a reduction in intestinal villus height, an increase in crypt depth, and a deteriorated VH:CD ratio were observed, compromising intestinal barrier integrity. However, after 60 days of supplementation with blueberry anthocyanins (100 and 400 mg/kg), these effects were reversed. This improvement was attributed to their antimicrobial activity-including LPS degradation in Gram-negative pathogens-and the upregulation of tight junction proteins (ZO-1, claudin-1, and OCLN) (Zhang et al., 2023). Additionally, in birds intraperitoneally inoculated with E. coli LPS, supplementation with Hungarian cherry anthocyanins not only reduced inflammatory responses but also increased ileal villus height and improved the VH:CD ratio, ultimately enhancing nutrient absorption (Csernus et al., 2020). These findings highlight the critical role of anthocyanins in avian intestinal health, as summarized in Figure 3.
Anthocyanins help counteract the effects of environmental and microbiological stimuli by reducing dysbiosis, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses, ultimately promoting intestinal health and overall performance in broiler chickens. Blue arrows indicate the influence of environmental and microbiological stimuli, while the red inhibition line represents the direct suppressive effects of anthocyanins on dysbiosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and their underlying triggers. The dotted line illustrates the potential indirect effects of anthocyanins on gut health in broilers.
Anthocyanins and Productive Performance in Broilers
The majority of evidence suggests that the inclusion of flavonoids, including anthocyanins, exerts positive effects on both the health and productive performance of broiler chickens (Changxing et al., 2018; Kamboh et al., 2019). These benefits are attributed to various mechanisms of action, such as their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, which contribute to improved intestinal morphology and integrity, modulation of gut microbiota, reduced peristalsis, and slower chyme transit time. These effects enhance nutrient absorption, leading to increased weight gain and improved feed conversion efficiency (Csernus et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2022; Tan et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023).
At the systemic level, anthocyanins have been shown to reduce the activity of cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2), inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, and increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes like SOD and GPx. These anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties help maintain cellular integrity and optimize metabolic function, increasing energy availability and, consequently, improving productive performance (Changxing et al., 2018; Verediano et al., 2021; Saltos et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023).
Furthermore, anthocyanins have been reported to stimulate thyroid function by increasing serum thyroxine (T4) concentrations and growth hormone secretion (GH), which may positively influence metabolism and, thereby, growth parameters in broilers (Amer et al., 2022). On the other hand, the anti-adipogenic activity of anthocyanins-through inhibition of lipogenesis and stimulation of hepatic β-oxidation-may support liver health and enhance metabolic efficiency (Amnueysit et al., 2010; Reyna et al., 2018; Saltos et al., 2021).
Regarding the beneficial effects of anthocyanins on the productive performance, supplementation with 0.15% and 0.75% purple corn extract (equivalent to 66 and 330.8 mg anthocyanins/kg diet, respectively) significantly improved final weight in Cobb 500 chickens raised under tropical conditions, while also reducing hepatic steatosis (Saltos et al., 2021). Additionally, supplementation with PCA enhanced feed intake, feed efficiency, and final weight in broilers (Wang et al., 2019). In LPS-inoculated chickens, an ethanolic blueberry extract rich in anthocyanins mitigated declines in final weight and feed intake, an effect linked to improved intestinal antioxidant status and upregulated expression of intestinal tight junction proteins (Wang et al., 2023).
Concerning carcass traits in broilers, the partial replacement of yellow corn with anthocyanin-rich purple corn significantly reduced abdominal fat (Amnueysit et al., 2010). Additionally, supplementation with 80 mg/kg of purple corn extract enriched in anthocyanins improved the amino acid profile and increased polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content in the muscle tissue of Chishui chickens, while also enhancing productive performance at doses of 80 and 160 mg/kg feed. These effects may be attributed to the antioxidant properties of anthocyanins, which, at low doses, prevent oxidative peroxidation and mitigate free radical damage in tissues, thereby increasing energy availability and improving productive outcomes. However, the lack of effects with 240 mg/kg of purple corn extract is likely due to the pro-oxidant effects of these compounds at high doses (Luo et al., 2022). Similarly, other studies have reported improvements in meat quality and muscle composition, including elevated n-3 PUFA levels and antioxidant capacity (Wang et al., 2021; Amer et al., 2022).
Table 2: Summary of the effects of various anthocyanin sources on the productive performance of broiler chickens.
Abbreviations. ADFI: Average Daily Feed Intake; ADG: Average Daily Gain; BWC: Body Weight Change; SOD: Superoxide Dismutase; GPx: Glutathione Peroxidase; CAT: Catalase; MDA: Malondialdehyde; PUFAs: Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids; FCR: Feed Conversion Ratio; PCE: Purple Corn Extract; BW: Body Weight; PCE: Purple Corn Extract; FCR: Feed Conversion Ratio; TAG: Triacylglycerols; TC: Total Cholesterol; LDL-c: Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; HDL-c: High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; ARRE: Anthocyanin-Rich Roselle Extract; TAC: total antioxidant capacity; FCUs: Forming Colony Units.
Current evidence suggests that anthocyanins exert predominantly beneficial effects on broiler chicken health. In in vitro studies and animal models, minimal or no adverse effects have been reported (Alam 2021). wever, in broilers, some studies have shown variable outcomes, including increased feed intake without proportional weight gain, alterations in gut microbiota-such as reduced Lactobacillus and increased Campylobacter jejuni and a tendency toward lower body weight, albeit without adverse clinical manifestations (Csernus et al., 2020; Saltos et al., 2021; Tolnai et al., 2021).
These variations do not result from intrinsic side effects of anthocyanins but rather from factors such as the botanical source of extraction, the concentration used, the presence of co-occurring bioactive compounds in the plant matrix, and interactions with dietary or environmental components (Changxing et al., 2018; Saltos et al., 2021; Tolnai et al., 2021; Predescu et al., 2024). Therefore, these differences represent practical limitations for their application, rather than inherent side effects associated with consumption. However, few studies address the potential toxicity or side effects of prolonged or high-dose exposure to these herbal bioactive compounds in vivo (Li et al., 2024). The following table summarizes key findings from the literature on the use of various anthocyanin sources in broiler chicken nutrition, (Table 2).
Conclusions and Recommendations
Following the ban on antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in animal production, various alternatives have been explored to maintain productivity. In this context, anthocyanins-flavonoids with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties-enhance intestinal absorption, strengthen the mucosal barrier, modulate the gut microbiota, and promote the production of metabolites that inhibit pathogenic bacteria while supporting intestinal health.
At a systemic level, anthocyanins prevent bacterial and toxin translocation, enhance immune function, and contribute to poultry productivity. However, despite their health benefits, their effects on growth performance remain inconsistent, underscoring the need to select sources based on composition, bioavailability, and interactions with other dietary components.
Further research is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying anthocyanins’ effects, their interactions with the gut microbiota, the formation of bioactive metabolites, and their synergy with intestinal mucosal pathways. A deeper understanding of these aspects would enable the optimization of supplementation strategies through precise combinations, dosages, and co-administration with other phytogenic compounds. Additionally, evaluating the efficacy of microencapsulated anthocyanins and their activity at the cecal level, as well as characterizing anthocyanin-rich plant sources and food industry byproducts, could further advance their use as a sustainable alternative to AGPs.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dra. María Elena Villanueva Espinoza, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina-Peru, for his valuable review and insights.
Novelty Statement
The manuscript examines the effect of anthocyanins on the intestinal health of broiler chickens and their subsequent impact on productive performance. It also explores the potential mechanisms of action that make these bioactive compounds a promising alternative to growth-promoting antibiotics.
Authors’ Contribution
José Arteaga; Participated in drafting and critical revision of the paper.
Juan José Toro-Letelier; Participated in literature search, and critical revision of the data.
Sixto Reyna; Conceived and drafted the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article”.
References
Aboonabi, A. and A. Aboonabi. 2020. Anthocyanins reduce inflammation and improve glucose and lipid metabolism associated with inhibiting nuclear factor-kappa B activation and increasing PPAR-γ gene expression in metabolic syndrome subjects. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 150: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.02.004
Akbarian, A., J. Michiels, J. Degroote, M. Majdeddin, A. Golian and S. De Smet. 2016. Association between heat stress and oxidative stress in poultry; mitochondrial dysfunction and dietary interventions with phytochemicals. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 7: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0097-5
Akinyemi, F. and D. Adewole. 2021. Environmental stress in chickens and the potential effectiveness of dietary vitamin supplementation. Front. Vet. Sci., 2: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.775311
Alam, M.A., P. Islam, N. Subhan, M.M. Rahman, F. Khan, G.E. Burrows, L. Nahar and S.D. Sarker. 2021. Potential health benefits of anthocyanins in oxidative stress related disorders. Phytochem. Rev., 20(4): 705-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-021-09757-1
Al-Mnaser, A., M. Dakheel, F. Alkandari and M. Woodward. 2022. Polyphenolic phytochemicals as natural feed additives to control bacterial pathogens in the chicken gut. Arch. Microbiol., 204(5): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02862-5
Alshamy, Z., K.C. Richardson, H. Hünigen, H.M. Hafez, J. Plendl and S. Al Masri. 2018. Comparison of the gastrointestinal tract of a dual-purpose to a broiler chicken line: a qualitative and quantitative macroscopic and microscopic study. PLoS ONE., 13(10): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204921
Alyileili, S.R., K.A. El-Tarabily, I.E.H. Belal, W.H. Ibrahim, M. Sulaiman and A.S. Hussein. 2020. Intestinal development and histomorphometry of broiler chickens fed Trichoderma reesei degraded date seed diets. Front. Vet. Sci., 7: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00349
Amer, S.A., H.S. Al-Khalaifah, A. Gouda, A. Osman, N.I.A. Goda, H.A. Mohammed, M.I.M. Darwish, A.M. Hassan and S.K.A. Mohamed. 2022. Potential effects of anthocyanin-rich roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) extract on the growth, intestinal histomorphology, blood biochemical parameters, and the immune status of broiler chickens. Antioxid., 11(3): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030544
Amnueysit, P., T. Tatakul, N. Chalermsan and K. Amnueysit. 2010. Effects of purple field corn anthocyanins on broiler heart weight. Asian J. Food Agro. Ind., 3: 319-327. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9020060
Awad, W.A., C. Hess and M. Hess. 2017. Enteric pathogens and their toxin-induced disruption of the intestinal barrier through alteration of tight junctions in chickens. Toxins., 9(2): 1-22.
Ayalew, H., H. Zhang, J. Wang, S. Wu, K. Qiu, G. Qi, A. Tekeste, T. Wassie and D. Chanie. 2022. Potential feed additives as antibiotic alternatives in broiler production. Front. Vet. Sci., 9: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.916473
Bedford, M.R. and J.H. Apajalahti. 2022. The role of feed enzymes in maintaining poultry intestinal health. J. Sci. Food Agric., 102(5): 1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11670
Bendokas, V., V. Stanys, I. Mažeikienė, S. Trumbeckaite, R. Baniene and J. Liobikas. 2020. Anthocyanins: from the field to the antioxidants in the body. Antioxid., 9(9): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9090819
Biswas, S.K. 2016. Does the interdependence between oxidative stress and inflammation explain the antioxidant paradox? Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2016(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5698931
Broom, L.J. and M.H. Kogut. 2018. Inflammation: friend or foe for animal production? Poult. Sci., 97(2): 510-514. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex314
Cásedas, G., F. Les, M.P. Gómez-Serranillos, C. Smith and V. López. 2017. Anthocyanin profile, antioxidant activity and enzyme inhibiting properties of blueberry and cranberry juices: a comparative study. Food Funct., 8(11): 4187-4193. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/FO/C7FO01205E https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FO01205E
Changxing, L., M. Chenling, M. Alagawany, L. Jianhua, D. Dongfang, W. Gaichao, Z. Wenyin, S.F. Syed, M.A. Arain, M. Saeed, F.U. Hassan and S. Chao. 2018. Health benefits and potential applications of anthocyanins in poultry feed industry. Poult. Sci. J., 74(2): 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000053
Chatterjee, S. 2016. Chapter Two - Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Disease. In: T. Dziubla and D.A. Butterfield (Eds.), Oxidative Stress and Biomaterials. Academic Press., pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803269-5.00002-4
Chen, L., H. Cao, Q. Huang, J. Xiao and H. Teng. 2022. Absorption, metabolism and bioavailability of flavonoids: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 62(28): 7730-7742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1917508
Chen, L., H. Deng, H. Cui, J. Fang, Z. Zuo, J. Deng, Y. Li, X. Wang and L. Zhao. 2018. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget., 9(6): 7204–7218. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23208
Csernus, B., S. Biró, L. Babinszky, I. Komlósi, A. Jávor, L. Stündl, J. Remenyik, P. Bai, J. Oláh, G. Pesti-Asbóth and L. Czeglédi. 2020. Effect of carotenoids, oligosaccharides and anthocyanins on growth performance, immunological parameters and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Animals, 10(2): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020347
Danchik, C. and A. Casadevall. 2021. Role of cell surface hydrophobicity in the pathogenesis of medically-significant fungi. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 10: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.594973
Diaz Carrasco, J.M., N.A. Casanova and M.E. Fernández Miyakawa. 2019. Microbiota, gut health and chicken productivity: what is the connection? Microorganisms. 7(10): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100374
Díaz-Sánchez, S., S.D. Moscoso, F.S. de los Santos, A. Andino and I. Hanning. 2015. Antibiotic use in poultry: a driving force for organic poultry production. Food Prot. Trends., 35(6): 440-447. https://www.foodprotection.org/publications/food-protection-trends/archive/2015-11-antibiotic-use-in-poultry-a-driving-force-for-organic-poultry-production/
Ding, X., I. Giannenas, I. Skoufos, J. Wang and W. Zhu. 2023. The effects of plant extracts on lipid metabolism of chickens - A rev. Anim. Biosci., 36(5): 679-691. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0272
Dong, Y., C. Yang, W. Zhong, Y. Shu, Y. Zhang and D. Yang. 2022. Antibacterial effect and mechanism of anthocyanin from Lycium ruthenicum Murr. Front. Microbiol., 13: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.974602
Duangnumsawang, Y., J. Zentek and F. Goodarzi Boroojeni. 2021. Development and functional properties of intestinal mucus layer in poultry. Front. Immunol., 12: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.745849
Ducatelle, R., E. Goossens, F. De Meyer, V. Eeckhaut, G. Antonissen, F. Haesebrouck and F. Van Immerseel. 2018. Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives. Vet. Res., 49(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0538-6
Fancher, C.A., L. Zhang, A.S. Kiess, P.A. Adhikari, T.T.N. Dinh and A.T. Sukumaran. 2020. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens: challenges in no antibiotics ever broiler production and potential solutions. Microorganisms, 8(10): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101533
Fang, J. 2014. Bioavailability of anthocyanins. Drug Metab. Rev., 46(4): 508-520. https://doi.org/10.3109/03602532.2014.978080
Fang, X., K. Nong, X. Qin, Z. Liu, F. Gao, Y. Jing, H. Fan, Z. Wang, X. Wang and H. Zhang. 2023. Effect of purple sweet potato-derived anthocyanins on heat stress response in Wenchang chickens and preliminary mechanism study. Poult. Sci., 102(9): 102861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102861
Fernández Miyakawa, M.E., N.A. Casanova and M.H. Kogut. 2024. How did antibiotic growth promoters increase growth and feed efficiency in poultry? Poult. Sci., 103(2): 103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103278
Garg, S.K., A. Shukla and S. Choudhury. 2019. Polyphenols and flavonoids. In: R.C. Gupta, A. Srivastava and R. Lall (Eds), Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine. Springer., pp. 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04624-8_13
Ghimpețeanu, O.M., E.N. Pogurschi, D.C. Popa, N. Dragomir, T. Drăgotoiu, O.D. Mihai and C.D. Petcu. 2022. Antibiotic use in livestock and residues in food-a public health threat: A rev. Foods., 11(10): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11101430
Hasted, T.L., S. Sharif, P. Boerlin and M.S. Diarra. 2021. Immunostimulatory potential of fruits and their extracts in poultry. Front. Immunol., 12: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.641696
Hu, L., J. Hu, Y. Huang, S. Zheng, J. Yin, X. Li, D. Li, C. Lv, S. Li and W. Hu. 2023. Hypoxia-mediated activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A rev. Med., 102(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032533
Iqbal, Y., J.J. Cottrell, H.A.R. Suleria and F.R. Dunshea. 2020. Gut microbiota-polyphenol interactions in chicken: A rev. Anim., 10(8): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081391
Jiang, S.Q., Z.L. Chen, S. Zhang, J.L. Ye and Y.B. Wang. 2023. Protective effects of protocatechuic acid on growth performance, intestinal barrier and antioxidant capacity in broilers challenged with lipopolysaccharide. Anim., 17(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100693
Jokioja, J., B. Yang and K.M. Linderborg. 2021. Acylated anthocyanins: a review on their bioavailability and effects on postprandial carbohydrate metabolism and inflammation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 20(6): 5570-5615. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12836
Kalt, W. 2019. Anthocyanins and their C6-C3-C6 metabolites in humans and animals. Molecules, 24 (22): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224024
Kamboh, A.A., R.A. Leghari, M.A. Khan, U. Kaka, M. Naseer, A.Q. Sazili and K.K. Malhi. 2019. Flavonoids supplementation—an ideal approach to improve quality of poultry products. Poult. Sci. J., 75(1): 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000703
Lauridsen, C. 2019. From oxidative stress to inflammation: redox balance and immune system. Poult. Sci., 98(10): 4240-4246. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey407
Li, J., D. Zhou, H. Li, Q. Luo, X. Wang, J. Qin, Y. Xu, Q. Lu and X. Tian. 2023. Effect of purple corn extract on performance, antioxidant activity, egg quality, egg amino acid, and fatty acid profiles of laying hen. Front. Vet. Sci., 9: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1083842
Li, Y., K. Wang and C. Li. 2024. Oxidative stress in poultry and the therapeutic role of herbal medicine in intestinal health. Antioxid., 13(11): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13111375
Lillehoj, H., Y. Liu, S. Calsamiglia, M.E. Fernández-Miyakawa, F. Chi, R.L. Cravens, S. Oh and C.G. Gay. 2018. Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Vet. Res., 49(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0562-6
Liu, L., Q. Li, Y. Yang and A. Guo. 2021. Biological function of short-chain fatty acids and its regulation on intestinal health of poultry. Front. Vet. Sci., 8: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.736739
Luo, Q., J. Li, H. Li, D. Zhou, X. Wang, Y. Tian, J. Qin, X. Tian and Q. Lu. 2022. The effects of purple corn pigment on growth performance, blood biochemical indices, meat quality, muscle amino acids, and fatty acids of growing chickens. Foods., 11(13): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131870
Ma, Y., S. Ding, Y. Fei, G. Liu, H. Jang and J. Fang. 2019. Antimicrobial activity of anthocyanins and catechins against foodborne pathogens Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Food Control., 106: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106712
Mattioli, R., A. Francioso, L. Mosca and P. Silva. 2020. Anthocyanins: a comprehensive review of their chemical properties and health effects on cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules., 25(17): 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173809
Mishra, B. and R. Jha. 2019. Oxidative stress in the poultry gut: potential challenges and interventions. Front. Vet. Sci., 6: 1-5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00060
O’Neill, J., 2016. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Government of the United Kingdom. 2016. Landmark report that analysed the impact of antimicrobial resistance from an economic perspective, which is the source of the highly quoted figure that antimicrobial resistance will cause, 10.
Pan, D. and Z. Yu. 2014. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes., 5(1): 108-119. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.26945
Paul, S.S., S.V. Rama Rao, N. Hegde, N.J. Williams, R.N. Chatterjee, M. Raju, G.N. Reddy, V. Kumar, P.S. Phani Kumar, S. Mallick and M. Gargi. 2022. Effects of dietary antimicrobial growth promoters on performance parameters and abundance and diversity of broiler chicken gut microbiome and selection of antibiotic resistance genes. Front. Microbiol., 13: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.905050
Pliego, A.B., M. Tavakoli, A. Khusro, A. Seidavi, M.M.M.Y. Elghandour, A.Z.M. Salem, O. Márquez-Molina and R.R. Rivas-Caceres. 2022. Beneficial and adverse effects of medicinal plants as feed supplements in poultry nutrition: A rev. Anim. Biotechnol., 33(2): 369-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2020.1798973
Predescu, N.C., G. Stefan, M.P. Rosu and C. Papuc. 2024. Fermented feed in broiler diets reduces the antinutritional factors, improves productive performances and modulates gut microbiome-A rev. Agric., 14(10): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101752
Rahman, M.R.T., I. Fliss and E. Biron. 2022. Insights in the development and uses of alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry and swine production. Antibiot., 11(6): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060766
Rahman, S., S. Mathew, P. Nair, W.S. Ramadan and C.G. Vazhappilly. 2021. Health benefits of cyanidin-3-glucoside as a potent modulator of Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress. Inflammopharmacol., 29: 907-923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-021-00799-7
Redondo, L.M., P.A. Chacana, J.E. Dominguez and M.E. Fernández Miyakawa. 2014. Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry. Front. Microbiol., 5: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00118
Reyna, S., Torres Arrunátegui, R. Valenzuela, M.Á. Rincón-Cervera and M.E. Villanueva Espinoza. 2018. Adding a purple corn extract in rats supplemented with chia oil decreases gene expression of SREBP-1c and retains Δ5 and Δ6 hepatic desaturase activity, unmodified the hepatic lipid profile. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids., 132 :1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2018.03.005
Salamon, I., E.N. Şimşek Sezer, M. Kryvtsova and P. Labun. 2021. Antiproliferative and antimicrobial activity of anthocyanins from berry fruits after their isolation and freeze-drying. Appl. Sci., 11(5): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052096
Saltos, D., M. Sancán, J. Arteaga, C. Gonzáles, C. Bulnes, M.E. Villanueva and S. Reyna. 2021. Dietary supplementation with an extract of purple corn (Zea mays L) reduces vascular risk and hepatic steatosis in broilers. Rev. Investig. Vet. Perú., 32(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v32i1.17634
Sun, X., T., Zhou, C. Wei, W. Lan, Y. Zhao, Y. Pan and V.C.H. Wu. 2018. Antibacterial effect and mechanism of anthocyanin-rich Chinese wild blueberry extract on various foodborne pathogens. Food Control., 94: 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.012
Surai, P.F., II Kochish, V.I. Fisinin and M.T. Kidd. 2019. Antioxidant defence systems and oxidative stress in poultry biology: an update. Antioxid., 8(7): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8070235
Tan, Z., B. Halter, D. Liu, E.R. Gilbert and M.A. Cline. 2022. Dietary flavonoids as modulators of lipid metabolism in poultry. Front. Physiol., 13: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.863860
Tarradas, J., N. Tous, E. Esteve-Garcia and A.J. Brufau. 2020. The control of intestinal inflammation: a major objective in the research of probiotic strains as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry. Microorganisms., 8(2): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020148
Tian, L., Y. Tan, G. Chen, G. Wang, J. Sun, S. Ou, W. Chen and W. Bai. 2019. Metabolism of anthocyanins and consequent effects on the gut microbiota. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 59(6): 982-991. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1533517
Tian, M., X. He, Y. Feng, W. Wang, H. Chen, M. Gong, D. Liu, J.L. Clarke and A. van Eerde. 2021. Pollution by antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in livestock and poultry manure in China, and countermeasures. Antibiot., 10(5): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050539
Tolnai, E., P. Fauszt, G. Fidler, G. Pesti-Asbóth, E. Szilagyi, A. Stagel, J. Konya, J. Szabo, L. Stündl, L. Babinszky, J. Remenyik, S. Biró and M. Paholcsek. 2021. Nutraceuticals induced changes in the broiler gastrointestinal tract microbiota. M Syst., 6(2): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01124-20
Tungmunnithum, D., A. Thongboonyou, A. Pholboon and A. Yangsabai. 2018. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds from medicinal plants for pharmaceutical and medical aspects: an overview. Medicines., 5(3): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030093
Van Boeckel, T.P., C. Brower, M. Gilbert, B.T. Grenfell, S.A. Levin, T.P. Robinson, A. Teillant and R. Laxminarayan. 2015. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112: 5649-5654. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112
Vera-Álava, J.O., J. Arteaga and S. Reyna. 2023. Organic acids, microbiota, gut health and productive response in broiler chickens. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Anim., 15(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v15.n2.2023.1019
Verediano, T.A., N. Agarwal, H. Stampini Duarte Martino, N. Kolba, M. Grancieri, M.C. Dias Paes and E. Tako. 2022. Effect of black corn anthocyanin-rich extract (Zea mays L.) on cecal microbial populations in vivo (Gallus gallus). Nu., 14(21): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214679
Verediano, T.A., H. Stampini Duarte Martino, M.C. Dias Paes and E. Tako. 2021. Effects of anthocyanin on intestinal health: A syst. rev. Nut., 13(4): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041331
Wang, Y., X. Ma, J. Ye, S. Zhang, Z. Chen and S. Jiang. 2021. Effects of dietary supplementation with bilberry extract on growth performance, immune function, antioxidant capacity, and meat quality of yellow-feathered chickens. Anim., 11(7): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071989
Wang, Y., Y. Wang, B. Wang, X. Mei, S. Jiang and W. Li. 2019. Protocatechuic acid improved growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal health of Chinese yellow-feathered broilers. Poult. Sci., 98(8): 3138-3149. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez124
Wang, Y., J. Ye, S. Zhang, Z. Chen, Q. Fan and S. Jiang. 2023. Dietary supplementation with anthocyanin attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal damage through antioxidant effects in yellow-feathered broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 102(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102325
Wickramasuriya, S.S., I. Park, K. Lee, Y. Lee, W.H. Kim, H. Nam and H.S. Lillehoj. 2022. Role of physiology, immunity, microbiota, and infectious diseases in the gut health of poultry. Vaccines., 10(2): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020172
Yegani, M. and D.R. Korver. 2008. Factors affecting intestinal health in poultry. Poult. Sci., 87(10): 2052-2063. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00091
Zhang, S., Y. Wang, J. Ye, Q. Fan, X. Lin, Z. Gou and S. Jiang. 2023. Dietary supplementation of bilberry anthocyanin on growth performance, intestinal mucosal barrier and cecal microbes of chickens challenged with Salmonella typhimurium. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 14(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00799-9
Zheng, X., S. Narayanan, C. Xu, S. Eliasson Angelstig, J. Grünler, A. Zhao, A. Di Toro, L. Bernardi, M. Mazzone, P. Carmeliet, M. Del Sole, G. Solaini, E.A. Forsberg, A. Zhang, K. Brismar, T.A. Schiffer, N. Rajamand Ekberg, I.R. Botusan, F. Palm and S.-B. Catrina. 2022. Repression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 contributes to increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production in diabetes. E Life., 11: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70714