Influence of Cannon Bone Circumference on Some Body Size Traits in Harnai Sheep Breed of Balochistan
Bakhtawar Korai*, Hubdar Ali Kaleri, Shahrukh Khan Korai*, Zeenat Korai, Safeer Ahmed, Zaheer Ahmed Nizamani and Akeel Ahmed Memon
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agricultural University, Tandojam 70060, Sindh, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
The excessive increase in demand for small ruminant meat is a result of both population growth and depletion of natural resources. One of the most significant economic characteristics that enhances an animal’s capacity to withstand excessive body weight, strenuous activity, wounds, and injuries is the cannon bone circumference. It also influences the characteristics of body size, which ultimately affects body weight and carcass production. This study examined the relationship between the cannon bone circumference and several dimensions of the body, such as live body weight, body height, and body length Balochistani sheep breeds. Eight months old Harnai sheep, 40 male and 40 female, were chosen at random from the Langove Sheep Farm District in Naseerabad, Balochistan, for this purpose. The result showed that the average cannon bone circumference in Harnai male was 8.12cm and 7.30cm in female, statistically significant between male and female of Harnai breed. The body weight was higher (P<0.05) in male (28.50kg) compared to female (23.10kg). The average body height was 69.34cm and 61.46cm in male and female, which was significantly higher in male compared to female. The body length was 73.91cm and 64.51cm in male and female respectively. The Harnai male had larger (P<0.05) body length compared the female. The cannon bone circumference has strong positive influence on body weight, body height and body length of Harnai sheep (P<0.05). The genetic correlation in Harnai male for cannon bone circumference vs body weight, cannon bone circumference vs body height, cannon bone circumference vs body length was 0.725, 0.615, 0.657 and for body weight vs body height, body weight vs body length, it was 0.713, 0.541 whereas 0.497 for body height vs body length; In contrast, the Harnai female showed values of 0.685, 0.585, 0.515 for the cannon bone circumference in relation to body weight, 0.625, 0.546, and 0.435 for the cannon bone circumference in relation to body height, and 0.685, 0.585, 0.515 for the cannon bone circumference in relation to body length. In conclusion, the body weight, body height, and body length of the Balochistani Harnai sheep breed are considerably influenced by the males’ significantly larger cannon bone circumference.
Article Information
Received 28 November 2023
Revised 20 December 2023
Accepted 11 January 2024
Available online 01 April 2024
(early access)
Published 03 June 2025
Authors’ Contribution
HAK, BK and SKK: Conceptualization; BK: methodology and investigation; SKK: software; BK and ZK: validation; ZAN: formal analysis; HAK: resources and supervision; AAM and HAK: data curation; BK and SKK: writing—original draft preparation; HAK and BK: writing—review and editing; SA, BK and HAK: visualization.
Key words
Cannon bone, Genetic correlation, Harnai, Body length, Traits, Balochistan
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20231128090338
* Corresponding author: [email protected], [email protected]
0030-9923/2025/0004-1559 $ 9.00/00
Copyright 2025 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Sheep are one of the most important species of livestock kept by rural families for their livelihood in the majority of traditional agricultural production systems. Sheep are raised as livestock so that their meat, milk, and various dairy products, including yoghurt, cheese, and butter, can be harvested. A person’s ability to support a substantial amount of weight is significantly influenced by the size of their cannon bones. Live body weight (LBW), commonly known as an animal’s weight while it is still alive, has a substantial impact on a variety of traits, particularly those that are important from a commercial standpoint (Ambhore et al., 2003). In remote places with little access to resources for breeders, it is feasible, more effective, simpler, and less expensive to estimate an animal’s live weight based on its body measurements (Nsoso et al., 2003). Unfortunately, farmers often overlook this important information about body weight assessment since there are not enough scales available. Subsequently, farmers are forced to rely their judgements on subjective evaluations of the physical well-being of their livestock, which may result in errors in judgement and animal care (Moaeen-ud-Din et al., 2006).
Body measurements and live weights taken from moving animals have been used extensively for a wide range of purposes, including experimental work and selection methods. These measurements were made while the animals were still alive (Cam et al., 2010). Due to the precision of functions that predict liveweight or growth characteristics based on live animal data, businesses that deal in livestock production may gain a sizable financial advantage (Afolayan et al., 2006). Knowing an animal’s live weight is crucial, especially in large-scale production systems, for both financial and genetic reasons Wool-producing sheep are the most common breed of sheep kept as livestock on large farms. Determining weight is an important issue, both from the viewpoint of those who breed sheep and those who purchase them from the market. On the other hand, sheep breeders keep a steady number of sheep in their flocks by occasionally selling off their older animals and getting new male and female lambs from different breeds. The practice of letting a merchant set a price range for an animal is problematic because, in the lack of more comprehensive information, breeders are unable to determine the value of their animals. There is a clear correlation between an animal’s mass and its physical size. After calculating the live weight to the closest kilogramme from this vantage point, it is possible to assess whether or not it should be put up for sale. However, various phenotypic metrics can be applied to evaluate the cattle industry’s productivity. It is useful to define performance in terms of physical metrics in a variety of contexts. Studies in the scientific literature have proposed connections between physical characteristics and performance features (Janssens and Vandepitte, 2004; Atta and El-Khidir, 2004).
The Harnai breed of lambs is renowned for their thick, meaty tails, premium meat, and luxurious wool. In various areas of the Balochistan province’s districts of Loralai, Quetta, Sibi, and Zhob, they can be found. Their bodies are completely white in color, while their heads and ears are either black or brown with a few white spots. A medium (32.5 micron) diameter of wool yields 2.6 kilogram. Their tails are rather short but quite rounded, and their bodies are quite little and closely packed. These farms are accumulating data to be utilized in developing selection procedures with which to assess the growth, reproduction, and wool performance of Harnai lambs as well as to create selection methods with the intention of using genetic modification to increase the productivity (yield quality) of Harnai breeds (Afzal and Naqvi, 2004). The use of body measurements that are linear in nature to determine the live body weight of sheep, goats, and cattle has been the subject of numerous published studies. The length of the fore cannon bone was included in the linear measurements, which was a first for any sheep inquiry; in contrast, the great majority of the other authors were not given nearly as many linear measures to handle as this one did additionally (Mekonnen and Biruk, 2004; Abdelhadi and Babiker, 2009; Oke and Ogbonaya, 2011; Mahieu et al., 2011). This study was conducted to verify whether other variables used in determining live body weight in the Balochistan Harnai sheep breed as well as to demonstrate the utilization of cannon bone circumference as a linear measurement of the body.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Study site and animal management
This study focused on the Harnai breed growing regions in the Balochistan province’s Naseerabad division. In this area, sheep are most frequently raised using a semi-intensive technique. Animals were fed during the day in plains for natural pasture feeding and were kept overnight. In terms of what the sheep need in terms of nutrients, the natural grass is insufficient. Additionally, seasonal green feed, wheat straw, and concentrates were given to the animals.
Experimental design
The 80 animals came from the Langove Sheep Farm in the Naseerabad district. The 40 male and 40 female Harnai sheep were chosen at random. The Harnai breed animals were sorted into two groups, A and B, with the age of the chosen animals being 8 months. Age was calculated using the dental formula proposed by Abegaz and Awgichew (2009). The data was gathered for body weight in kilograms (kg), front limb cannon bone circumference in centimeters (cm), height in centimeters (cm), and length in centimeters (cm).
The cannon bone circumference (cm) was measured from the place at the rear of the knee to the ergot in the sheep. Body weight was taken using digital weighing machine. For body height (cm): It is ideal to use a specialized measuring stick with two arms, one of which is held vertically and the other at a right angle to it, to take measurements of body height (in cm). The first thoracic vertebra at the base of the neck, the front of the chest, or the point of the nose was used to measure body length.
Statistical analysis
Using software on a computer known as Statistics for Students Edition (SXW), Version 8.1, the data so gathered was tabulated and statistically analyzed after the study is over (Copyright 2005, Analytical Software, USA). Using Becker’s recommended methodology, the genetic correlation between cannon bone circumference and body size traits was calculated using the formula as suggested by (Becker, 1985).
RESULTS
In terms of their body weight, height, length, and cannon bone circumference, Harnai ram and ewe differ significantly from one another, according to the study’s findings (Table II).
Table I shows that the cannon bone circumference of male Harnai sheep was non-significantly (8.12 cm) larger than that of their females, which was 7.30 cm on average. The cannon bone circumference of Harnai male and female sheep differed substantially (P<0.05). This indicated that male Harnai sheep are heavier than their female counterparts.
Table I. Body measurements of Harnai sheep.
|
Body measurements |
Mean±SEM |
P-value |
|
Cannon bone circumference (cm) |
||
|
Male |
8.12±0.31 |
0.03 |
|
Female |
7.30±0.17 |
|
|
Body weight (kg) |
||
|
Male |
28.50±0.54 |
0.02 |
|
Female |
23.10±0.30 |
|
|
Body height (cm) |
||
|
Male |
69.34±0.20 |
0.04 |
|
Female |
61.46±0.15 |
|
|
Body length (cm) |
||
|
Male |
73.91±0.33 |
0.04 |
|
Female |
64.51±0.57 |
|
Table II. Genetic correlation among cannon bone circumference and body size traits in Harnai male and female.
|
Genetic correlation |
Body weight |
Body height |
Body length |
|
Male |
|||
|
Cannon bone circumference |
0.725* |
0.615* |
0.657* |
|
Body weight |
0.713* |
0.541* |
|
|
Body height |
0.497* |
||
|
Female |
|||
|
Cannon bone circumference |
0.685* |
0.585* |
0.515* |
|
Body weight |
0.625* |
0.546* |
|
|
Body height |
0.435* |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level P-value.
The body weight of male Harnai sheep was significantly bigger (28.50±0.54kg) than the body weight of their females, i.e., (23.08±0.30kg) on average. The body weight of male and female Harnai sheep varied significantly (P<0.05). This indicated that male Harnai sheep are heavier than their female counterparts.
Male and female Harnai sheep showed significantly different average body heights (P<0.05), with the males’ average body height being 69.34 cm and the females’ average body height being 61.64 cm.
The average body length of male and female Harnai sheep varied significantly (P< 0.05), with male Harnai sheep having a much longer average body length (73.91 cm) than female Harnai sheep (64.51 cm). This suggests that, anatomically speaking, Harnai males were larger than Harnai females.
The genetic correlation in Harnai male for cannon bone circumference vs body weight, cannon bone circumference vs body height, cannon bone circumference vs body length was 0.725, 0.615, 0.657 and for body weight vs body height, body weight vs body length, it was 0.713, 0.541 whereas 0.497 for body height vs body length; However in Harnai female, it was 0.685, 0.585, 0.515 for cannon bone circumference vs body weight, cannon bone circumference vs body height, cannon bone circumference vs body length and for body weight vs body height, body weight vs body length, it was 0.625, 0.546 and 0.435 for body height vs body length. In conclusion, the Harnai male have significantly higher cannon bone circumference hence greatly influence body weight, body height and body length of Harnai sheep breed of Balochistan.
DISCUSSION
The averages of the Harnai breed (cannon bone circumference, body height, body length, and weight) were examined. The differences between the cannon bone circumference (cm), body height (cm), body length (cm), and body weight (kg) were significant (p>0.05). However, even among that group, the male had greater mean body weight values than the female. Although it was not statistically significant in any of the study’s age groups, several earlier studies had found that sex had a substantial impact in body weight (Banerjee, 2016; Barragan, 2017; Afolayan et al., 2006; Chacon et al., 2011; Chiemela et al., 2016; Dauda, 2018). Due to normal hormonal fluctuations, males tend to have larger physical characteristics than females, which may account for the males’ higher mean numerical LBW values (Banerjee, 2016). Use of male sheep for breeding purposes when they are young (1-2 years) and their sale or slaughter during celebrations when they are 2 to 3 years of age may account for the decline the number of male sheep observed on this study as the ages advance. Chiemela et al. (2016) reported a similar outcome in highland sheep of the Tigrey region, North Ethiopia. According to Essien and Adesope (2003), the variation in body weight and linear body measurement between same-sex individuals with different agroecologies may be caused by the non-genetic factors and also location. However, the findings of this study were consistent with those made by Fatanzi et al. (2017) and Goe et al. (2010), who found that location played the largest role in the variation of animals’ linear body measurements and body weight. The better body weight and linear body measurement of “Wenya-dega” compared to “Dega” may be attributable to the sheep’s different dietary, geographic, and managerial needs. The acquired result is consistent with the findings of Oke and Ogbonnaya (2011) and Hilal et al. (2016), who found that the age and location of an animal’s upbringing had an impact on its linear body measurement (LBM) (Kianzad, 2004). Miserani et al. (2002) revealed that, in contrast to this finding, the location effect had a very low significance in the morphological attributes and had a more significant impact on the flocking effect, which was nested within the location effect. The mature ram and ewe sheep found in the agroecology of “Wenya-dega” weighed 29.38 kg and 25.13 kg, respectively. This outcome is consistent with the body weight of the Menz and Afar sheep breeds (Mwacharo et al., 2006). According to Otoikhanai et al. (2008), a significant variance in growth performance between areas may work to the local sheep’s genetic benefit if long-term selection efforts are made. Rams for the “Wenyadega” agroecology had greater scrotum circumferences than rams for the “Dega” agroecology. The nutritional value of the feed may be to blame for this. In the paper by Putra and Ilham (2019), it was stated that providing high quality and quantity of feed could promote testicular growth, which serves as a measure of scrotum circumference. Two out of six factors in the 13–24-month age group (male and female combined) had a significant correlation. The CD, HG, BDL, and LBW all had very high positive correlations (r (30)= 0.77, p0.01, r (30)= 0.66, p0.01, and r (30)= 0.49, p0.01) with each other. This indicates that sheep between the ages of 13 and 24 months with relatively high CD, HG, or BDL were likely to have high LBW. The CBL (p<0.05; r = 0.17).
In a similar vein, Salako (2006) found that the proportion of female sheep rose with age and that, as a result, females outnumbered males (rams and castrates) in all age groups with the exception of those between 6 and 11 months. This is due to the fact that breeding rams are often chosen after 12 months, when they have reached sexual maturity. Almost all females are retained for breeding, while most rams who have not been selected for breeding are either castrated or slaughtered. All body dimensions increased as the animal grew older, from the 0PPI age group to the 3PPI age group. This is to be expected and has been confirmed by multiple researchers who observed that the size and shape of sheep increased with age, reaching their pinnacle of development or maturity, and that age also had a significant impact on body weight and other linear body dimensions (Salako and Ngere, 2002; Santos et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2009; Sowande and Sobola, 2008). The reported value of BL in sheep from the Jamuna River basin, Barind region, and coastal regions was 41.5, 43.4, and 45.9 cm, respectively (Thiruvenkadan, 2005). According to Vatankhah et al. (2004), the measured BL for rams and ewes from the Jamuna River basin, Barind, and coastal regions of sheep was 64.42, 65.70, and 67.60 cm and 62.67, 62.20, and 63.48 cm, respectively. This investigation revealed an anomaly: Barind ewes were longer than rams despite being lighter. Waldron (2003) discovered that Barind ram and ewes had BLs of 48.70 and 46.38, respectively. Regardless of gender, the mean rump height (RH) was 52.70 ± 2.90 cm, with rams measuring 53.83 ± 1.78 cm and ewes 52.58±2.98 cm.
Conclusions
It was observed that Harnai male have significantly higher Cannon bone circumference than female with significant influence on body weight, body height, and body length. Whereas genetic correlation among Cannon bone circumference and other body size traits was strongly positive.
The similar research on the Harnai sheep breed may be carried out using a different management strategy from infancy to puberty. It is advised that more research be done on the relationship between body size features and cannon bone circumference, as well as the genetics underlying this relationship. In order to enhance the spectrum of expression of carcass traits which affect both the number and quality of carcasses in Harnai and other sheep breeds the breeding system based on cannon bone circumference measurement may be created and implemented.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
IRB approval
Not applicable
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Abdelhadi, O.M.A. and Babiker, S.A., 2009. Prediction of zebu cattle live weight using live animal measurements. Heart, 266: 14-15.
Abegaz, S. and Awgichew, K., 2009. Estimation of weight and age of sheep and goats. ESGPIP (Ethiopia sheep and goat productivity improvement program). Tech. Bull., 23: 1-4.
Afolayan, R.A., Adeyinka, I.A. and Lakpini, C.A.M., 2006. The estimation of live weight from body measurements in Yankasa sheep. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51: 343. https://doi.org/10.17221/3948-CJAS
Afolayan, R.A., Adeyinka, I.A. and Lakpini, C.A.M., 2006. Prediction of live weight from objective live-dimentional trais in Yankassa sheep. Proceeding of the 31st Annual Conference of the Nigerian Society for Animal Production. March 12th-15th 2006, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Afolayan, R.A., Pitchford, W.S., Weatherly, A.W. and Bottema, C.D.K., 2002a. Genetic variation in growth and body dimensions of Jersey and Limousin cross cattle. Pre-weaning performance. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 15: 1371-1377. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1371
Afolayan, R.A., Pitchford, W.S., Weatherly, A.W. and Bottema, C.D.K., 2002b. Genetic variation in growth and body dimensions of Jersey and Limousin cross cattle. Postweaning dry and wet season performance. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 15: 1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1378
Afzal, M. and Naqvi, A.N., 2004. Livestock resources of Pakistan: Present status and future trends. Sci. Vis., 9: 3-4.
Ambhore, G.S., Sirothia, A.R., Gokhale, S.B., Sirothia, K.A. and Kamble, S.W., 2003. Association of body weight, body measurements and carcass characteristics of Berari male goat of Nagpur region. Indian J. Anim. Sci.,73: 657-659.
Atta, M. and El Khidir, O.A. 2004. Use of heart girth, wither height and scapuloischial length for prediction of live weight of Nilotic sheep. J. Small Rumin. Res., 55: 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.01.005
Banerjee, S., 2016. Body indices of Garole sheep reared in West Bengal (India). Proceedings of the zoological society. Springer India, pp. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-015-0162-7
Barragan, R.M., 2017. Zoometry: A useful tool for determining the productive aptitude of domestic zoometry: A useful tool for determining the productive aptitude of domestic ruminants. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res., 5: 5–7. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2017.05.00140
Becker, W.A., 1985. Mannual of quantization genetics academic enterprises. Pullman, WA, USA, pp. 48-50.
Birteeb, P.T., Peters, S.O., Yakubu, A., Adeleke, M.A. and Ozoje, M.O., 2012. Multivariate characterisation of the phenotypic traits of Djallonke and Sahel sheep in Northern Ghana. Trop. J. Anim. Hlth. Prod., 45: 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0211-4
Cam, M.A., Olfaz, M. and Soydan, E., 2010. Body measurements reflect body weights and carcass yields in Karayaka sheep. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5: 120-127. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2010.120.127
Chacon, E., Macedo, F., Velazquez, F., Paiva, S.R., Pineda, E. and McManus, C., 2011. Morphological measurements and body indices for Cuban Creole goats and their crossbreds. Rev. J. Anim. Sci., 40: 1671-1679. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000800007
Chiemela, P.N., Sandip, B., Mestawet, T.A., Egbu, C.F., Ugbo, E.H., Akpolu, E.S. and Umanah, I.J., 2016. Structural indices of Boer, Central highland and their F1 crossbred goats reared at Ataye farm, Ethiopia. J. agric. Res., 2: 1-19.
Dauda, A., 2018. Morphological indices and stepwise regression for assessment of function and type of Uda sheep. J. Res. Genet., 2: 1–14.
Essien, A. and Adesope, O.M., 2003. Linear body measurements of N’dama calves at 12 months in a South Western zone of Nigeria. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 15: 441-456.
Fatanzi, K., Tolone, M. and Amato, B., 2017. Characterization of morphological traits in Algerian indigenous goats by multivariate analysis. Genet. Biodiv. J., 1: 20-30. https://doi.org/10.46325/gabj.v1i2.93
Goe, M.R., Alldredge, J.R. and Light, D., 2010. Use of heart girth to predict body weight of working oxen in the Ethiopian highland. Livest. Prod. Sci., 69: 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00257-8
Hilal, B., El-Otmani, S. and Chentouf, M., 2016. Multivariate analysis for morphological traits of the Hamra goat population in two regions of Morocco. Anim. J. Genet. Resour., 59: 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633616000114
Janssens, S. and Vandepitte, W., 2004. Genetic parameters for body measurements and linear type traits in Belgian Blue du Maine, Suffolk and Texel sheep. Small Rumin. Res., 54: 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.10.008
Kianzad, M., 2004. Estimating physical and chemical composition of carcass of Moghani and Makoyi sheep (Body measurements and carcass characteristics). Pazhohesh Sazandegi, 64: 23-30.
Mahieu, M., Navès, M. and Arquet, R., 2011. Predicting the body mass of goats from body measurements. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 23: Article 192; http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/9/mahi 23192.html. Accessed on 22 February 2014.
Mekonnen, H.M. and Biruk, T., 2004. Hearth girth-body weight relationship in two Ethiopan zebu breeds. Rev. Med. Vet., 155: 512-515.
Miserani, M.G., McManus, C., Santos, S.A., Silva, J.A.D., Mariante, A.D.S. and Abreu, U.G.P.D., 2002. Avaliação dos fatores que influem nas medidas lineares do cavalo Pantaneiro. Rev. Brasil. Zoot., 31: 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982002000200007
Moaeen-ud-Din, M., Ahmad, N., Iqbal, A. and Abdullah, M. 2006. Evaluation of different formulas for weight estimation in Beetal, Teddi and crossbred (Beetal x Teddi) goats. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 16: 74-77.
Mwacharo, J.M., Okeyo, A.M., Kamande, G.K. and Rege, J.E.O., 2006. The small East African shorthorn zebu cows in Kenya. I: Linear body measurements. Trop. Anim. Hlth. Prod., 38: 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4266-y
Nsoso, S.J., Aganga, A.A., Moganetsi, B.P. and Tshwenyane, S.O., 2003. Body weight, body condition score and heart girth in indigenous Tswana goats during the dry and wet seasons in southeast Botswana. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 15: 27-34.
Oke, U.K. and Ogbonnaya, E.O., 2011. Application of physical body traits in the assessment of breed and performance of WAD sheep in a humid tropical environment. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 23: 56-65.
Otoikhanai, A.M., Akporhuarho, O.P. and Isidahomen, C., 2008. Correlation of body weight and some body measurement parameters in Ouda sheep under extensive management system. Afr. J. Gen. Agric., 4: 27-32.
Pesmen, G. and Yardimci, M., 2008. Estimating the live weight using some body measurements in Saanen goats. Arch. Zoot., 11: 30-40.
Putra, W.P.B. and Ilham, F., 2019. Principal component analysis of body measurements and body indices and their correlation with body weight in Katjang does of Indonesia. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res., 8: 124-134. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2019.08.00254
Salako, A.E., 2006. Application of morphological indices in the assessment of type and function in sheep. Int. J. Morphol., 24: 13-18. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022006000100003
Salako, A.E. and Ngere, L.O., 2002. Application of multifactorial discriminant analysis in the morphometric structural differentiation of West African Dwarf (WAD) and Yankasa Sheep in South West. Niger. J. Anim. Prod., 29: 163-167. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v29i2.1553
Santos, V.A.C., Silva, J.A., Silvestre, A.M.D., Silva, S.R. and Azevedo, J.M.T.D., 2008. The use of multivariate analysis to characterize carcass and meat quality of goat kids protected by the PGI Cabrito de Barroso. Livest. Sci., 116: 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.016
Singh, M.K., Rai, B., Kumar, A., Sisodiya, H.S. and Singh, N.P., 2009. Production performance of Gohilwadi goats under range conditions. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 79: 587.
Sowande, O.S. and Sobola, O.S., 2008. Body measurements of West African dwarf sheep as parameters for estimation of live weight. Trop. Anim. Hlth. Prod., 40: 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9116-z
Thiruvenkadan, A.K., 2005. Determination of best-fitted regression model for estimation of body weight in Kanni Adu kids under farmer’s management system. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 17: 1-11.
Vatankhah, M., Babak, M.M.S., Javaremi, A.N., Ashtiani, S.M. and Torshizi, R.V., 2004. Relation between body measurements with live weight, warm carcass, warm carcarr without fat-tail in Lori Bakhtiari sheep. Pazhohesh Sazandegi, 65: 7-15.
Waldron, D.F., 2003. Strategies for genetic improvement of carcass value in lambs. J. Sheep Goat Res., 10: 15-23.