Research Article

Unraveling the Tree Diversity of Torghar District to Provide a Baseline for Future Scientific Studies

Wadood Shah*, Muhammad Ilyas and Sanam Zarif Satti

Biological Sciences Research Division, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Abstract | A study on tree diversity was conducted in Torghar District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The study aimed to identify and document the region’s tree diversity, which is essential for providing basis for future scientific research. In August 2024, a research team from the Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar, conducted an extensive field survey, collecting tree specimens from diverse localities across the district. The collected samples and associated data were subsequently analyzed at the institute. The findings revealed a remarkable diversity of 95 tree species, representing 57 genera and 31 plant families. Notably, 8 species were identified from gymnosperms (cone-bearing plants), and 87 species from angiosperms (Flowering plants) representing 51 genera and 28 families. The study highlighted the dominance of families Rosaceae, Fabaceae, Moraceae, and Pinaceae, which collectively contribute to the region’s unique botanical heritage. This initial botanical survey aimed to identify and document the area’s tree species, providing a crucial baseline for future research in forestry, conservation, and ecological studies. The data will support informed decisions for sustainable forest management, trees’ diversity conservation and environmental planning.


Received | April 16, 2025; Accepted | May 20, 2025; Published | June 18, 2025

*Correspondence | Wadood Shah, Biological Sciences Research Division, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Shah, W., M. Ilyas and S.Z. Satti. 2025. Unraveling the tree diversity of Torghar district to provide a baseline for future scientific studies. Pakistan Journal of Forestry, 75(1): 35-42.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.PJF/2025/75.1.35.42

Keywords | Trees diversity, Torghar, Himalayas range, Baseline, Conservation

Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

District Torghar, formerly known as Kala Dhaka, is a newly established district in the Hazara division of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. It was officially separated from Mansehra district and declared the 25th district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on January 28, 2011, under article 246 of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Torghar is characterized by blue pine forests, dominated by Kail, Fir and Spruce trees. Despite extensive botanical exploration in Pakistan, certain regions, including Torghar, remain unexplored. Therefore, it is essential to identify and document the region’s tree diversity as a basis for future scientific studies. Torghar is one of the most neglected and deprived region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province where people lack basic needs of life (Mehmood et al., 2015). People of the area are mostly illiterate and not aware of loss of biodiversity and its implications. They are using natural resources ruthlessly. They use livestock for milk, meat, transportation and farming. Enlisting tree diversity helps in species nomenclature and identification (Ilyas et al., 2013). A thorough floristic description of the area based on collections and accurate identification is necessary to design conservation plans and assess the changes occurring in the vegetation patterns of any given area (Manikandan and Lakshminarasimhan, 2012; Khan and Ahmad, 2014). Pakistan has a rich tree diversity and a strategic location. There have been reports of about 6000 vascular plants in the area (Stewart, 1972). Pakistan’s northern and western mountains are home to over 80% of the country’s endemic plants (Ali and Qaiser, 1986).

The majority of Pakistan’s natural forest resources are found in the Himalayan Mountain range. One of the uncharted regions is Torghar district, which is located in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. In terms of flora, it belongs to the Irano Turanian Region’s Western Himalayan Province (Takhtadzhian and Cronquist, 1986). Extensive legal and illegal cuttings have severely damaged the forests, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable resource management. Deforestation and overgrazing on steep slopes have led to soil erosion and frequent landslides. The area’s climate is subtropical at lower elevations, gradually transitioning to moist temperate and subalpine types at higher altitudes (Mehmood et al., 2015). Although most regions of Pakistan have been explored by botanists and foresters, some areas, including the study site in District Torghar, remained unexplored for its trees’ diversity until this study. The lack of prior data and various social, administrative, and communication challenges hindered earlier research. Given the significance of this first exploration, the study aimed to identify and document the area’s tree species, providing a foundation for future forestry research and other aligned disciplines.

Study site description

District Torghar is situated on the western edge of the Himalayas Range at coordinates 34° 36 48.86 N, 72° 47 17.52 E. Elevation-wise, the district ranges from 450 to 3,000 meters above sea level. It is bounded on the south by Tanawal, on the east by Agror Valley (Mansehra), on the north by the River Indus across which lies Thakot of Battagram district, on the northwest by Shangla district, and on the southwest by Buner district. The district is administratively divided into two Tehsils, Judbah and Kandar and one Sub tehsil Karor Madakhel. During our field visit we explored various key locations of the study area as directed by the concerned Divisional Forest Officer (DFO). The study sites include Mangri valley, Shingaldar, Judbah, Panja Gali, Shagai, Machai Sar, Maira Madakhel and their surrounding villages. The aforementioned study sites represent different forest types and ecological zones such as Sub-tropical and Moist Temperate. Climate of Torghar is pleasant in spring and autumn but winter remains very harsh due to heavy snow fall. The snow fall occurs generally between December and February each year. In 2013, the total annual rainfall was 980 mm, with the highest precipitation occurring in early spring and early autumn, particularly in February. Due to the absence of a meteorological station in Torghar, climatic data were sourced from the nearest station in Oghi.

Materials and Methods

The research site was visited in August 2024, during the field survey, branches and leaves from various tree species were collected from multiple locations within the study area. For each sample, the exact coordinates and elevations were carefully recorded using a GPS device to ensure accurate geospatial data. This systematic approach allowed for precise mapping of the plant specimens and their respective environmental contexts across the region (Figure 1).

 

 

 

As part of the preservation process, the collected plant specimens were carefully placed between blotting papers and pressed using a plant pressor to ensure proper drying and preservation. All recorded data, along with the tree specimens gathered from various locations within District Torghar during the field visits, were subsequently transferred to the herbarium at the Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar. There, the specimens were mounted on herbarium sheets for further analysis and long-term storage.

 

After completing the identification process, a visit was made to the Department of Botany at the University of Peshawar, where the botanical names of the collected species were cross-checked with those already cataloged in the department’s herbarium. This comparison with the herbarium’s existing collection allowed for confirmation and accurate identification of the species, with the help of expert plant taxonomist Dr. Ghulam Jelani (Figure 2, 3 and 4).

Additionally, local and regional floras, such as those by Ali and Qaiser (1995-2012), were consulted to aid in the identification of the collected specimens. These resources provided valuable references to cross-check and verify the species identified during the fieldwork. The data gathered from the various field visits across District Torghar were then carefully compiled to create a comprehensive list of tree species. This list includes essential details such as the botanical names, local names, English names, families, and corresponding altitudes of each species, offering a thorough record for further research and conservation efforts.

 

Table 1: Inventory of tree species collected during floristic biodiversity in Torghar district.

No.

Family name

No.

Botanical name

English name

Local name

Locality

Elevation (m)

1

Anacardiaceae

1

Pistacia integerrima

Pistachio

Kangu

Mangri (Neray khur)

1772

2

Schinus molle

Pepper tree

Kali mirch

Maira Madakhel

478

3

Mangifera indica

Mango

Aam

-

-

2

Apocynaceae

4

Alstonia scholaris

Devil tree

Shaitan tree

Judbah

581

3

Arecaceae

5

Phoenix dactylifera

Date

Kajoor

Shagai

491

6

Phoenix sylvestris

Wild date

Jungli kajoor

Judbah

581

4

Aquifoliaceae

7

Ilex diphyrena

Himalayan holly

Chilgoza

Machai Sar

2675

5

Betulaceae

8

Alnus cordata

Indian alder

Suiri

Mangri

1726

9

Alnus nitida

Black alder

Suiri

Mangri (Savi feza)

1898

6

Cannabaceae

10

Celtis australis

Hackberry

Batkar

Mangri (Dawar mera)

721

7

Cornaceae

11

Cornus macrophylla

Large-leaf dogwood

Zallat

Mangri (Savi feza)

1948

8

Cupressaceae

12

Cupressus sempervirens

Cypress tree

Saroo

Judbah

581

9

Ebenaceae

13

Diospyros kaki

Japanese persimmon

Amlook

Mangri

1725

14

Diospyros lotus

Date plum

Jungli Amlook

Mangri (Dawar khwar)

721

10

Euphorbiaceae

15

Mallotus philippensis

Kamala tree

Kamala

-

-

16

Ricinus communis

Castor oil

Arand

Judbah

581

11

Fabaceae

17

Butea monosperma

Bastard teak

Badar/Dhak

Mangri

1725

18

Leucaena leucocephala

Lpil lpil

Subabul

Mangri (Dawar mera)

721

19

Albizia procera

White siris

Sufaid siris

Maira Madakhel

600

20

Acacia nilotica

Arabic Tree

Keekar

-

-

21

Robinia pseudoacacia

Black locust

Gul-i-Shah

Mangri (Bagro feza)

1875

22

Prosopis juliflora

Mesquite

Daivi/ Vilayati Kikar

-

-

23

Bauhinia variegata

Camels foot tree

Kachnar

Suri kamar

585

24

Acacia modesta

Acacia

Phulai

-

-

25

Pongamia pinnata

Indian beech

Sukh Chain

Judbah

553

26

Albizia lebbeck

Black Siris

Kala siris

Maira Madakhel

600

27

Dalbergia sissoo

Rose wood

Shesham

Mangri (Dawar khwar)

721

12

Fagaceae

28

Quercus leucotrichophoro

Banj oak

Banj

Mangri

1697

29

Quercus incana

Oak

Spin Banj

Panjagali

2218

30

Quercus dilatata

Holly oak

Barungi

Mangri (Bagro feza)

1966

31

Quercus baloot

Brungi oak

Barungi

-

-

13

Juglandaceae

32

Juglans regia

Walnut

Akhrot

Mangri (Neray khur)

1840

14

Lythraceae

33

Punica granatum

Pomegranate

Anaar

Panjagali

2175

15

Meliaceae

34

Cedrella serrata

The hill toon

Daravi

Maira Madakhel

1200

35

Azadirachta indica

Margosa tree

Neem

-

600

36

Melia azedarach

Persian lilac

Bakain / Dhrek

Mangri (Dawar mera)

729

16

Malvaceae

37

Bombax ceiba

Silk cotton tree

Simbal

-

-

38

Grewia populifolia

Grewia

Ganjar

-

-

39

Grewia optiva

Bhimal

Phalsa

Maira Madakhel

1200

17

Moraceae

40

Ficus carica

Fig

Anjeer

Mangri (Neray khur)

1772

41

Ficus benghalensis

Banyan

Bargad

Judbah

553

42

Ficus nitida

Indian laurel fig

Injeer

-

581

43

Ficus racemosa

Bodhi tree

Gular/Rumbal

Mangri (Dawar khwar)

721

44

Broussonetia papyrifera

Paper Mulberry

Jungli Toot

Shagai

491

45

Ficus elastica

Indian rubber

Rubber tree

Judbah

581

46

Morus nigra

Mullbery

Kala toot

Maira Madakhel

1200

47

Ficus palmata

Wild Fig

Jungli injeer

Panjagali

2218

Table continues on next page.....................

No.

Family name

No.

Botanical name

English name

Local name

Locality

Elevation (m)

48

Morus alba

White mulberry

Shahtoot

Mangri (Neray khur)

1775

18

Myrtaceae

49

Eucalyptus citriodora

Lemon eucalyptus

Safaida

Mangri (Dawar khwar)

721

50

Callistemon viminalis

Bottle Brush

Bottle Brush

Judbah

581

51

Psidium guajava

Guava

Amrood

-

-

52

Euclyptus globulus

Tasmanian blue gum

Sufaida

Panjagali

2175

53

Eucalyptus camaldulensis

Red gum

Surkh Sufaida

-

-

19

Oleaceae

54

Fraxinus angustifolia

Narrow-leaf ash

Simbal

Mangri (Neray khur)

1772

55

Olea ferruginea

Olive

Zaitoon

Panjagali

2150

56

Olea europaea

European Olive

Zaitoon

Mangri (Dawar mera)

729

20

Proteaceae

57

Grevillea robusta

Silver oak

-

Judbah

581

21

Pinaceae

58

Pinus wallichiana

Blue pine

Kail/Biyar

Mangri

1725

59

Pinus roxburghii

Chir pine

Chir

Shingaldar

1621

60

Picea smithiana

Himalayan spruce

Kachal

Mangri (Savi feza)

1948

61

Cedrus deodara

Cedar

Deodar

Panjagali

2175

62

Abies pindrow

Himalayan Fir

Fir

Machaisar

2991

63

Pinus halepensis

Pine

Aleppo pine

Shingaldar

1560

22

Platanaceae

64

Platanus orientalis

Oriental piana tree

Chenar

Mangri

1688

23

Rosaceae

65

Pyrus communis

Common pear

Nashpati

Mangri (Neray khur)

1772

66

Prunus persica

Peach

Aaroo

-

-

67

Cydonia oblonga

Quince

Pub

Panjagali

2088

68

Pyrus pyrifolia

Asian pear

Nashpati

-

-

69

Pyrus pashia

Wild pear

Batang

-

-

70

Pyrus pseudopashia

Wild pear

Tangi

-

-

71

Eriobotrya japonica

Loquat

Loquat

Maira Madakhel

600

72

Pyrus malus

Apple

Saib

-

-

73

Prunus persica

Peach

Aaroo

-

1200

74

Prunus domestic

European Plum

Aloo Bukhara

Mangri (Neray khur)

1796

75

Prunus avium

Wild cherry

Shereen cherry

Mangri (Dawar mera)

729

76

Malus hupehensis

Chinese crabapple

Seb (wild)

Mangri (Bagro feza)

1966

77

Prunus armeniaca

Apricot

Khubani

-

1875

24

Rhamnaceae

78

Ziziphus mauritiana

Indian jujube

Beer

Shagai

491

79

Ziziphus jujuba

Chinese jujube

Ber

Panjagali

2175

25

Rutaceae

80

Citrus sinensis

Sweet orange

Malta

Maira Madakhel

478

81

Zanthoxylum armatum

Prickly Ash

Tambar

-

1226

82

Citrus reticulata

Mandarin Orange

Kenoo

-

600

26

Salicaceae

83

Salix denticulate

Toothed willow

Bara chenar

Mangri

1688

84

Salix caprea

Pussy Willow

walla

Panjagali

2175

85

Populus alba

White poplar

Safeda

-

-

86

Populus nigra

Blake Popular

Sufiada

Mangri (Dawar mera)

729

87

Salix tetrasperma

Indian willow

Baid liala

Mangri (Neray khur)

1840

27

Sapindaceae

88

Aesculus indica

Indian horse chestnut

Bankhor

-

-

89

Sapindus mukorossi

Indian soap berry

Rita

Maira Madakhel

900

90

Aesculus indica

Horse chestnut

Ashanr

Machaisar

2675

91

Acer caesium

Maple

Trekhan

-

-

28

Simaroubaceae

92

Ailanthus altissima

Tree of Heaven

Barg Raiz Darakht

Maira Madakhel

600

29

Taxaceae

93

Taxus wallichiana

Himalayan yew

Barmi

Machaisar

2612

30

Urticaceae

94

Debregeasia salicifolia

-

Ajali

Panjagali

2150

31

Ulmaceae

95

Ulmus laevis

Elm

Elm

Machaisar

2675

 

Results

During this study, a total of 95 tree species representing 57 genera and 31 families were documented (Table 1). Among these, gymnosperms (cone-bearing plants) accounted for 8 species from 6 genera across 3 families: Cupressaceae, Pinaceae, and Taxaceae. The remaining 87 species belonged to the angiosperms (flowering plants), which were further categorized into monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Monocots were represented solely by the family Arecaceae, comprising one genus (Phoenix) and two species. The majority, however, were dicotyledons, with 30 families comprising 56 genera and 93 species.

The most species-rich family was Rosaceae, contributing 13.68% of the total species, followed by Fabaceae (11.57%), Moraceae (9.47%), and Pinaceae (6.31%). Myrtaceae and Salicaceae each made up 5.26%, while Fagaceae and Sapindaceae contributed 4.21% each. These eight dominant families together accounted for 60% of all recorded species, indicating their significant ecological presence in the region. The remaining families were represented by three or fewer species, highlighting a more limited distribution or specialization within the study area. This diversity reflects a rich and varied tree flora, underscoring the ecological significance of the region and the need for its continued documentation and conservation. All plant names were family wise alphabetically arranged and presented in Table 1.

Discussions

The earliest comprehensive botanical exploration of Pakistan is documented in Hooker’s Flora of British India (1872–1897), which covered much of the region. Subsequently, R.R. Stewart conducted extensive plant collection across nearly all parts of the country, contributing around 6,000 species to the Herbarium at Gardon College, Rawalpindi. The Flora of Pakistan is a comprehensive inventory of the country’s plant biodiversity, with contributions from approximately 47 botanists. Fazal et al. (2010) documented 211 species across 170 genera and 66 families in District Haripur. In Siran Valley, Mansehra, Shah and Khan (2006) recorded 80 plant species from 49 families, many of which are traditionally used for medicinal purposes. Several regions have recently gained attention in floristic studies. For instance, Haq et al. (2010) reported 402 vascular plant species from 110 families in Nandiar Valley, located in the western Himalayas. Additionally, Khan et al. (2013) conducted a research project focusing on ecosystem services in Naran Valley.

They identified 101 plant species from 52 families that local inhabitants use for various medicinal purposes. Haq et al. (2015) reported 157 plant species from the subtropical zone of the Nandiar Khuwar catchment area in the Western Himalayas, noting that nanophytes were the dominant life form, followed by therophytes. Urooj et al. (2015) conducted a study on the herbaceous flora surrounding Mangla Dam, identifying 37 species across 17 families. A thorough review of existing literature revealed that, prior to this study, no plant specimens had been recorded or collected from District Torghar.

Previously known as Kala Dhaka, this region remained largely unexplored in terms of its plant biodiversity. With this gap in knowledge, the present study was undertaken to explore and document the area’s tree diversity in specific. The findings aim to serve as a valuable baseline for future ecological, ethnobotanical, and conservation research. Our results reveal that the region boasts a rich and varied ecological landscape, supporting a high level of tree diversity. Despite its generally harsh climate, the area hosts a number of tree species, highlighting its significant biodiversity. The vegetation reflects a mix of subtropical, moist temperate, and subalpine ecological zones. Key timber-yielding species in the region include Abies pindrow, Aesculus indica, Acacia modesta, Juglans regia, Picea smithiana, Pinus roxburghii, Pinus wallichiana, and Taxus wallichiana (Haq et al., 2010; Awan et al., 2013).

This checklist of tree species from District Torghar is believed to be the first comprehensive documentation of the area’s tree diversity. It offers valuable baseline data that can serve as a reference for future scientific research. Similar checklists for previously unexplored regions have been published by various researchers and are available in the literature, including works by Zaheer and Sardar (2008), Fazal et al. (2010), Ilyas et al. (2013), and Waris et al. (2013). Badshah et al. (2013) identified Poaceae, Papilionaceae, and Asteraceae as the dominant families in District Tank, Pakistan a pattern also observed by other botanists such as Marwat and Qureshi (2000) and Durrani et al. (2005) in their respective study areas. The dominance of Asteraceae and Poaceae has been further supported by studies from Saima et al. (2010), Hussain et al. (2015), indicating a recurring trend across different ecological zones of Pakistan.

Our findings also highlight the dominance of Rosaceae, Fabaceae, Moraceae, and Pinaceae as the major plant families in the study area. Further research will be valuable in exploring the potential uses of these species for various purposes.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Recognizing the importance of this initial trees’ diversity exploration, the study was designed to identify, record, and classify the tree species present in the study area. By documenting this previously unexplored tree species, the research aims to establish a foundational reference for future studies in forestry, biodiversity conservation, ecological assessment, and other related scientific fields. This baseline data will support informed decision-making for sustainable forest management and environmental planning in the region. Additionally, it is crucial to educate and raise public awareness about the significance of natural resources and plant biodiversity. Conserving the biodiversity of this specific area is essential to prevent its gradual loss and to avoid further environmental challenges, including climate change and its far-reaching consequences.

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our immense gratitude to the worthy Secretary Climate Change, Forestry, Environment and Wildlife and Director General Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar, who trusted in our professional capabilities and assigned this task to our division. In addition, we are highly thankful to the concerned Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) and his team for their unwavering support and facilitation throughout our field visits. Furthermore, we are thankful to our supporting staff including Muhammad Asif Khan who helped us a great deal during field visits.

Novelty Statement

The present study is novel because no such study has been conducted before to solely identify and document the area’s tree species diversity, providing a foundation for future forestry research and other aligned disciplines.

Author’s Contribution

Wadood Shah: Conceptualization and writing original draft.

Muhammad Ilyas: Critical analysis, review and editing.

Sanam Zarif Satti: Provided resources.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Ali, S.I. and M. Qaiser, 1986. A phytogeographic analysis of the phanerogams of Pakistan and Kashmir. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 89B: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269727000008939

Ali, S.I. and M. Qaiser. 1995-2012. Flora of Pakistan. Department of Botany, University of Karachi.

Awan, M.R., Z. Jamal and A. Khan. 2013. Ethnobotanical studies of economically important plants from mountainous region of Gilgit- Baltistan, Pakistan. Sci. Tech. Dev., 32(4): 308-318.

Badshah, L., F. Hussain and Z. Sher. 2013. Floristic inventory, ecological characteristics and biological spectrum of rangeland, District Tank, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 45(4): 1159-1168.

Durrani, M.J., F. Hussain and S.U. Rehman. 2005. Ecological characteristics of plants of Harboi rangeland, Kalat, Pakistan. J. Trop. Sub Trop. Bot., 13(2): 130-138

Fazal, H., N. Ahmad, A. Rashid and S. Farooq. 2010. A checklist of phanerogamic - Flora of Haripur Hazara, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 42(3): 1511-1522.

Haq, F.U., H. Ahmad and Z. Iqbal. 2015. Vegetation description and phytoclimatic gradients of Subtropical forests of Nandiar Khuwar catchment district Battagram. Pak. J. Bot., 47(4): 1399-1405.

Haq, F.U., H. Ahmad, M. Alam, I. Ahmad and R. Ullah. 2010. Species diversity of vascular plants of Nandiar Valley Western Himalaya, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 42(SI): 213-229.

Hooker, J.D., 1872-1897. The Flora of British India. 7 vols. London: Reeve and Co. pp. 5568.

Hussain, F., S.M. Shah, L. Badshah and M.J. Durrani. 2015. Diversity and ecological characteristics of flora of Mastuj Valley, district Chitral, Hindukush range, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 47(2): 495-510.

Ilyas, M., R. Qureshi, M. Arshad and S.N. Mirza. 2013. A preliminary chick list of the vascular Flora of Kabal Valley, Swat, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 45(2): 605-615.

Khan, S.M. and H. Ahmad, 2014. Role of indigenous arqiyat distillery in conservation of Rosa species. Int. J. Phyt., 6(2): 162-164.

Khan, S.M., S. Page, H. Ahmad and D.M. Harper, 2013. Sustainable utilization and conservation of plant biodiversity in montane ecosystems; using the Western Himalayas as a case study. Ann. Bot., 112(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct125

Manikandan, R. and P. Lakshminarasimhan. 2012. Flowering plants of Rajiv Gandi National Park, Karnataka, India. Check List., 8(6): 1052-1084. https://doi.org/10.15560/8.6.1052

Marwat, Q. and R.A. Qureshi. 2000. A checklist of the vascular plants found in upper Siran reserved and guzara forests, District Manshera, Pakistan. Pak. J. Pl. Sci., 6(1-2): 43-57.

Mehmood, A., S.M., Khan, A. Shah, A.H. Shah and H. Ahmad. 2015. First floristic exploration of the district Torghar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 47: 57-70.

Saima, S., A.A. Dasti, Q. Abbas and F. Hussain. 2010. Floristic diversity during moon soon in Ayubia National Park, Distt. Abbottabad, Pakistan. Pak. J. Pl. Sci., 16(1): 43-50.

Shah, G.M. and M.A. Khan. 2006. Check list of medicinal plants of Sirin Valley Mansehra, Pakistan. Ethnobot. Leaflets,10: 63-71.

Stewart, R.R., 1972. An annotated catalogue of vascular plants of west- Pakistan and Kashmir. Karachi: Fakhri Printing Press.

Takhtadzhian, A.L. and A. Cronquist. 1986. Floristic regions of the world. University of California press, Berkeley, Calif. London.

Urooj, R., S.S. Ahmad, M.N. Ahmad and S. Khan. 2015. Ordinal classification of vegetation along Mangla dam, Mirpur, AJK. Pak. J. Bot., 47(4): 1423-1428.

Waris, H.M., M. Mukhtar, S. Anjum, G.R. Bhatti, S.A. Pirzada and K. Alam. 2013. Floristic composition of the plants of the Cholistan Desert, Pakistan. Am. J. Plant Sci., 4: 58-65. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.412A1009

Zaheer, D. and A.A. Sardar. 2008. A checklist of the vascular plants of Tehsil Shakargarh, District Narowal, Pakistan. Pak. J. Pl. Sci., 14(1): 15-19.