Review Article
Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Emerging Control Strategies
Eman A. Muhsin1, Shahrazad Ahmed Alkhayat2*and Riyadh Hameed Nsaif2
1Scientific Research Commission, Baghdad, 11001, Iraq; 2Diyala University, College of Sciences, Diyala city, Diyala, 32001, Iraq.
Abstract | Hemorrhagic fever diseases (HFDs) are severe viral illnesses caused by pathogens from 4 main families, mainly Filoviridae, Arenaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Bunyaviridae. These diseases are characterized by high fever, vascular leakage, and multi-organ dysfunction, with case fatality rates reaching 90 % in untreated cases. Transmission occurs through zoonotic spillover from animal reservoirs (i.e., bats, rodents, and arthropods) and human-to-human contact. Recent advances include the rVSV-ZEBOV Ebola vaccine and monoclonal antibody therapies, yet most HFDs lack specific treatments. Key challenges persist in diagnostics, outbreak containment, and climate-driven geographic expansion of vectors. The aim of this review is to improve current knowledge on HFD pathogenesis, epidemiology, and control strategies, highlighting critical gaps in global preparedness. Strengthening surveillance systems, developing pan-HFD countermeasures, and implementing One Health approaches are essential for mitigating these lethal viral pathogens.
Received | May 24, 2025; Revised | July 15, 2025; Accepted | July 25, 2025; Published | August 03, 2025
*Correspondence | Shahrazad Ahmed Khalaf, Diyala University, College of Sciences, Diyala city, Diyala,32001, Iraq; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Muhsin, E.A., S.A. Alkhayat and R.H. Nsaif. 2025. Hemorrhagic fever viruses: Epidemiology, pathogenesis and emerging control strategies. Novel Research in Microbiology Journal, 9(4): 322-331.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.NRMJ/2025/9.4.322.331
Keywords | Viral hemorrhagic fevers, Ccytokine storm, Outbreak control, Zoonotic transmission, Vaccine development
Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Hemorrhagic fever diseases are zoonotic infections that pose significant common health threats due to their high mortality levels and potential for epidemic spread. Notable examples include Ebola virus disease (EVD), Lassa fever, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), Marburg virus disease (MVD), yellow fever, and Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). These diseases are endemic in tropical or subtropical regions, besides sporadic outbreaks causing global concern (WHO, 2023). HFDs include a group of severe and fatal viral illnesses characterized via high fever, bleeding diathesis, and multi-organ failure. These diseases are caused by several distinct families of RNA viruses, including Filoviridae (Ebola and Marburg viruses), Arenaviridae (Lassa with Junin viruses), Flaviviridae (dengue and yellow fever viruses), and Bunyaviridae (Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever and Rift Valley fever viruses). Clinical manifestations of HFDs range from mild febrile illness to severe hemorrhagic syndromes with case fatality rates of more than 90 % in some outbreaks (Feldmann et al., 2020). The objective of this study is to display the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and merging control strategies of HFDs.
Epidemiology of hemorrhagic fever diseases
The epidemiology of HFDs is strongly linked to associated zoonotic origins, with natural reservoirs including bats, mosquitoes, rodents, or ticks. Most of these viruses circulate calmly in animal populations, occasionally transmitted to human being via direct contact with infected animals, contaminated environments, and/ or insect vectors (Peters et al., 2022). HFDs include several types including Ebola and Marburg viruses that are primarily found in Central and West Africa (Feldmann et al., 2020), Lassa fever that is endemic in West Africa, particularly Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and Liberia (Richmond and Baglole, 2023). Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever that is prevalent in Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Asia (Ergonul and Whitehouse, 2021). Dengue hemorrhagic fever that is widespread in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Pacific (Bhatt et al., 2022).
Once introduced into human populations, some HFDs such as Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa can spread rapidly through person-to-person transmission, particularly in settings with poor infection control measures, such as healthcare facilities and densely populated urban areas (WHO, 2023). Epidemiology of HFDs is presented in Table 1.
Transmission dynamics of hemorrhagic fever viruses
The transmission dynamics of HFVs are governed by complex interactions among zoonotic reservoirs, vectors, human behaviors, and environmental factors, creating distinct epidemiological patterns for each pathogen. Primary zoonotic transmission occurs through diverse routes, such as direct contact with infected animals (e.g., Ebola via bushmeat handling and Lassa fever through Mastomys rodent excreta), arthropod vectors (Aedes mosquitoes for dengue andticks for CCHF), or aerosolized rodent secretions (arenaviruses in agricultural settings) (Peters et al., 2022). Human-to-human transmission mechanisms vary significantly by virus, with filoviruses (Ebola, Marburg) spreading efficiently through direct contact with bodily fluids (case reproduction number R0 = 1.5-2.5 in outbreaks), while arenaviruses such as Lassa exhibit more limited secondary transmission (R0 < 1), except in nosocomial settings (WHO, 2023). Superspreading events disproportionately drive epidemics, as demonstrated by the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak where 3 % of cases generated 61 % of transmissions (Lloyd-Smith et al., 2021), often linked to funeral practices or healthcare exposures. Environmental persistence of viruses (e.g., Ebola in semen for >500 d, CCHF in tick eggs trans-ovarially) enables intermittent resurgence (Deen et al., 2022). Emerging data reveal climate-sensitive transmission patterns, with expanding geographic ranges for Aedes-borne diseases (i.e., dengue and yellow fever) and CCHF in warming temperate zones (Messina et al., 2022). The convergence of urbanization,
Table 1: Epidemiology of hemorrhagic fever diseases.
|
Disease |
Country/Region |
Key findings |
Reference |
|
Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) |
West Africa, Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. |
2014–2016 outbreak caused > 28,000 cases, case fatality rate (CFR) ~40–70 %, zoonotic spillover from bats. |
WHO (2016) |
|
Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) |
Uganda and Angola. |
Outbreaks in 2005 (Angola, CFR ~90%) and 2017 (Uganda), fruit bats identified as reservoirs. |
Amman et al. (2020) |
|
Lassa Fever |
Nigeria and West Africa. |
Annual outbreaks with increasing cases, CFR ~15–20 %; rodent-to-human transmission predominant. |
Richmond and Baglole (2023) |
|
Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) |
Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan. |
Tick-borne transmission, nosocomial outbreaks reported, CFR ~10–40 %. |
Ergonul and Whitehouse (2021) |
|
Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) |
Southeast Asia and Latin America. |
Aedes mosquitoes as vectors, severe dengue linked to secondary infections, CFR ~1–5 %. |
Bhatt et al. (2022) |
|
Yellow Fever |
Brazil and Africa. |
Resurgence in Brazil (2016–2018); mosquito-borne; CFR ~20–50 % in severe cases. |
WHO (2023) |
|
Rift Valley Fever (RVF) |
Kenya and Saudi Arabia. |
Outbreaks linked to livestock; mosquito vectors, CFR ~1 % (severe cases ~50 %). |
Peters et al. (2022) |
|
Hantavirus Hemorrhagic Fever |
South Korea, and Americas. |
Rodent-borne; Hantaan virus (Asia) and Sin Nombre virus (Americas), CFR varies (5–15 %). |
Jonsson et al. (2021) |
Table 2: Organ-specific damage in hemorrhagic fever diseases.
|
Organ system |
Key pathological findings |
Associated viruses |
Clinical manifestations |
References |
|
Liver |
Midzonal necrosis, hepatocyte apoptosis, and Councilman bodies. |
Yellow fever, Crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Ebola. |
Jaundice, elevated transaminases (AST>ALT), and coagulopathy |
Paessler and Walker (2022) |
|
Kidneys |
Acute tubular necrosis, and interstitial hemorrhage. |
Hantaviruses, Lassa, and CCHF. |
Oliguric renal failure, proteinuria, and hematuria |
Gupta et al. (2021) |
|
Lungs |
Pulmonary edema, alveolar hemorrhage, and hyaline membranes. |
Hantaviruses, and severe dengue. |
ARDS, hypoxemia, and respiratory failure |
Schieffelin et al. (2020) |
|
Heart |
Myocarditis, and subendocardial hemorrhage. |
Lassa, yellow fever, and Marburg. |
Cardiogenic shock, arrhythmias, and troponin elevation |
Younan et al. (2022) |
|
CNS |
Perivascular cuffing, microglial nodules, and neuronal apoptosis. |
Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa. |
Encephalopathy, seizures, and coma |
McElroy et al. (2019) |
|
Spleen/ Lymphoid |
Lymphocyte depletion, necrosis, and hemophagocytosis. |
All Viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) (especially Ebola). |
Immunosuppression, and secondary infections |
Feldmann et al. (2020) |
|
Gastrointestinal tract |
Mucosal hemorrhage, and ischemic enteritis. |
Ebola, Marburg, and CCHF. |
Hematemesis, melena, and diarrhea |
WHO (2023) |
land-use changes, and global travel has amplified spillover risks, necessitating integrated surveillance at human-animal-environment interfaces to predict and prevent outbreaks.
Pathogenesis
Hemorrhagic fever diseases (HFDs) are caused by diverse RNA viruses that induce severe systemic infections, leading to vascular dysfunction, coagulopathy, and multi-organ failure. The pathogenesis involves complex interactions between viral factors and host immune responses. Target cells of viral entry and initial infection are endothelial cells (primary target in most HFDs, leading to vascular leakage), macrophages and dendritic cells (trigger cytokine storms), liver cells (e.g., in Yellow Fever, causing hepatocyte necrosis), and platelets and megakaryocytes (leading to thrombocytopenia).There are different mechanisms of viralrntry to human that depend on the type of virus that includes Filoviruses (Ebola, Marburg), which use glycoprotein (GP) to bind host receptors (NPC1, TIM-1), Arenaviruses (Lassa) that enter via α-dystroglycan and transferrin receptors. Flaviviruses (Dengue, Yellow Fever) that infect via DC-SIGN, and other C-type lectin receptors and Bunyaviruses (CCHF, Hantavirus), which attach to integrins and mediate endocytosis (Feldmann et al., 2020; Peters et al., 2022).
Immune system evasion and viral replication in hemorrhagic fever diseases
Hemorrhagic fever viruses employ sophisticated strategies to evade host immune defenses and facilitate robust viral replication, which are central to their pathogenicity. A key mechanism involves the suppression of the interferon (IFN) response; a critical first line of antiviral defense, for instance, Ebola virus VP35 protein directly inhibits RIG-I-like receptor signaling (Basler and Amarasinghe, 2021), while Lassa virus nucleoprotein (NP) disrupts the activation of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) (Hastie et al., 2017). Additionally, many of these viruses downregulate the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules on the infected cells, impairing antigen presentation to CD8+ T cells and enabling immune escape (Feldmann et al., 2020). Simultaneously, rapid viral replication occurs in permissive cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and endothelial cells, leading to high viral loads that further overwhelm the host immune system (Peters et al., 2022). This unchecked replication triggers excessive cytokine production (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β) through the activation of inflammasomes and Toll-like receptors, contributing to the characteristic “cytokine storm” observed in severe cases (McElroy et al., 2019). Combination of immune evasion and uncontrolled viral spread establishes a vicious cycle of systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and tissue damage, ultimately driving disease progression towards hemorrhage, shock, and multi-organ failure (WHO, 2020).
Cytokine storm and systemic inflammation in hemorrhagic fever diseases
The pathogenesis of HFDs is characterized by a dysregulated immune response culminating in a cytokine storm; a hyper-inflammatory state that drives systemic tissue damage and multi-organ failure. Following viral infection of macrophages and dendritic cells, excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) occurs via the activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) (McElroy et al., 2019). This cytokine surge disrupts endothelial barrier function by upregulating adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1, VCAM-1) and increasing vascular permeability, which facilitates plasma leakage and contributes to hypotensive shock (Feldmann et al., 2020). Nowadays, the over activation of NLRP3 inflammasome pathways, particularly the NLRP3 inflammasome, exacerbates IL-1β with IL-18 secretion, and amplifies the inflammatory cascade as reported by Gupta et al. (2021). The resulting systemic inflammation is strongly compounded by coagulopathy, as tissue factor (TF) expression above activated monocytes triggers disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), leading to widespread microthrombosis with hemorrhagic manifestations (Schieffelin et al., 2020). Clinical manifestations associated with this infection, including hemodynamic instability, progressive organ dysfunction, and capillary leak syndrome associated with the severity of secreted cytokines storm correlate directly with the rates of mortality such as in Ebola infections, Lassa fever, and/ or severe dengue (WHO, 2020). Modern therapeutic strategies encourage triggering of specific cytokines production (like IL-6 receptor antagonists) with broader immunomodulation (such as corticosteroids) that have shown limited efficacy, underscoring the necessity for precision approaches to mitigate the life-threatening complications of viral infections (van Griensven et al., 2022).
Table 3: Previous studies on the hemorrhagic fever disease.
|
Virus |
Study focus |
Key findings |
Country |
Year |
Reference |
|
Dengue |
Pathogenesis |
First described antibody-dependent enhancement. |
Thailand |
1970 |
Halstead (1970) |
|
Lassa |
Treatment |
Ribavirin reduces mortality from 55% to 5% |
Liberia |
1986 |
McCormick et al. (1986) |
|
Lassa |
Seroprevalence |
15 % sero-positivity in endemic regions |
Sierra Leone |
1987 |
McCormick et al. (1987) |
|
CCHF |
Vector biology |
Demonstrated transovarial transmission in ticks. |
South Africa |
1989 |
Shepherd et al. (1989) |
|
Hantavirus |
Syndrome description |
First identified hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. |
USA |
1994 |
Duchin et al. (1994) |
|
Rift Valley |
Outbreak investigation |
Linked epidemic to heavy rainfall and mosquito vectors. |
Kenya |
1998 |
Woods et al. (1998) |
|
Ebola |
Reservoir identification |
Found Ebola virus RNA in fruit bats. |
Gabon, Congo |
2005 |
Leroy et al. (2005) |
|
Marburg |
Animal reservoir |
Identified Egyptian fruit bats as natural hosts. |
Uganda |
2007 |
Towner et al. (2006) |
|
Yellow Fever |
Vaccine efficacy |
Showed 17D vaccine provides lifelong immunity. |
Brazil |
2013 |
Gotuzzo et al. (2013) |
|
Ebola |
Outbreak dynamics |
Characterized transmission chains in West Africa outbreak. |
uinea |
2015 |
Faye et al. (2015) |
|
Ebola |
Vaccine efficacy |
rVSV-ZEBOV showed 97.5 % efficacy |
Guinea |
2016 |
Henao-Restrepo et al. (2021) |
|
Ebola |
mAb treatment |
REGN-EB3 reduced mortality to 33.5 %. |
DRC |
2019 |
Mulangu et. al. (2019) |
|
Lassa |
Viral persistence |
Detected viral RNA in semen for 6 months post-infection. |
Nigeria |
2020 |
Whitmer et al. (2020) |
|
CCHFV |
Virology, pathogenesis, pathology and clinician guidance |
Clarified virus-host interactions and clinical presentation, and aids in early diagnosis and management. |
USA |
2024 |
Frank et al. (2024) |
|
CCHFV |
Genetic diversity and reassortment in human isolates |
Identified re-assortant strains in Pakistan, and indicating active viral evolution |
Pakistan |
2024 |
Umair et al. (2024) |
|
CCHFV |
Sero-surveillance in domestic ruminants |
High seroprevalence in goats and sheep suggests endemicity in southern Spain. |
Spain |
2024 |
Baz-Flores et al. (2024) |
|
CCHFV |
Case report: Immunoglobulin and cytokine response in fatal infection |
Severe disease linked to delayed antibody response and uncontrolled cytokine storm. |
Senegal |
2025 |
Mhamadi et al. (2025) |
Endothelial dysfunction and vascular leakage in hemorrhagic fever diseases
The harshness of severe HFDs is attributed to the development of profound dysfunction of endothelium leading to catastrophic vascular leakage, as a pathophysiological process that strongly underlies shock besides multi-organ failure. Moreover, viral infection of endothelium cells can directly disrupt them via vascular integrity by multiple mechanisms, including downregulation of the tight junction proteins (like claudin-5, occludin) with adherens junctions (VE-cadherin), leading to an increase in para cellular permeability (Paessler and Walker, 2022). Simultaneously, the cytokine storm characterizing these infections, particularly elevated levels of VEGF, angiopoietin-2, and TNF-α, induces cytoskeletal reorganization in endothelial cells, further compromising barrier functions (Goldsmith et al., 2021). Loss of endothelial integrity is exacerbated by virus-induced apoptosis via both intrinsic (mitochondrial) and extrinsic (death receptor) pathways, as demonstrated in Ebola and dengue virus infections (Rasmussen et al., 2023). Additionally, the dysregulated host response leads to widespread activation of the coagulation cascade, with thrombin generation promoting further endothelial activation and platelet consumption (Schieffelin et al., 2023). The resulting clinical manifestations include progressive hemoconcentration, third spacing of fluids, and the characteristic hemorrhagic diathesis observed in severe cases. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that glycocalyx shedding, the degradation of the protective endothelial surface layer, may serve as both a biomarker of disease severity and a therapeutic target in hemorrhagic fevers (Younan et al., 2022).
Organ-specific damage in hemorrhagic fever diseases
Hemorrhagic fever viruses induce distinct patterns of organ-specific damage that contribute to their high mortality rates, with pathological manifestations varying by viral family and host factors. The liver is frequently targeted, particularly by yellow fever and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever viruses, which cause midzonal necrosis, hepatocyte apoptosis, and councilman bodies, leading to jaundice, coagulopathy, and acute liver failure (Paessler and Walker, 2022). Renal dysfunction; a hallmark of Hantavirus infections, results from direct viral injury to tubular epithelial cells and immune-mediated damage, manifested as acute kidney injury with proteinuria and oliguria (Gupta et al., 2021). Pulmonary involvement predominates in Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and severe dengue, where cytokine-driven capillary leak syndrome causes noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Schieffelin et al., 2020). Cardiac complications, including myocarditis and arrhythmias, are particularly severe in Lassa fever and yellow fever due to direct viral infection of cardiomyocytes and ischemia from hypovolemic shock (Younan et al., 2022). Neurological features result from mild encephalopathy towards fatal encephalitis of late-stage Ebola with Marburg virus infections, where viral penetration of the blood-brain barrier can be triggered and neuroinflammation with neuronal apoptosis occurs (McElroy et al., 2019). The spleen besides lymphoid tissues has shown markedly extensive lymphocyte depletion with necrosis, which contributes to secondary infections and immunosuppression (Feldmann et al., 2020). These organ-specific illnesses collectively drive multi-organ failure of the terminal haemorrhagic fever pathologies, with the pattern of severity regarding injury reflecting both intensity of host immune response and viral tropism (WHO, 2023).
Diagnostic advances
These aforementioned viral diseases can be diagonized via molecular techniques (i.e., Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and antigen detection assays that have improved early diagnosis (Bhatt et al., 2022). RT-PCR is a technique used to detect the RNA, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, and is widely used in the diagnostic studies due to its high sensitivity and specificity (Al-Rashid, 2023). Antigen detection assays are fast techniques used to detect specific proteins from pathogens, such as viruses, these techniques provide quicker results compared to RT-PCR, but are usually less sensitive (Mahasem, 2021). However, the serological assays remain crucial for surveillance (Ergonul and Whitehouse, 2021), used to detect antibodies in the human blood after infection to confirm whether an individual had been earlier exposed to a microbial pathogen or not (Whitman et al., 2020).
Synthesizing key findings on hemorrhagic fever epidemiology and recent studies
The compiled studies revealed critical patterns in hemorrhagic fever (HF) epidemiology while highlighting both progress and persistent gaps in our understanding of these dangerous pathogens. Several important themes have emerged.
First, the geographic distribution of HF viruses continues to evolve, with multiple studies confirming expansion beyond traditional endemic zones. The 2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa (Faye et al., 2015) and subsequent spread to urban areas demonstrated how quickly these viruses can exploit new ecological niches. Similarly, climate-linked hantavirus spread in Argentina (Piudo et al., 2005) underscore how environmental changes are reshaping HF risk maps.
Second, transmission dynamics appear more complex than previously understood. While animal reservoirs remain the primary source as reported by Leroy et al. (2005), human-to-human transmission potential varies dramatically among the viruses. Lassa virus persistence findings (Whitmer et al., 2018) identified new challenges in managing sexual transmission risks during post-outbreak periods.
Treatment and prevention advances have been uneven across HF viruses. The rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine success (Henao-Restrepo et al., 2021) and monoclonal antibody breakthroughs (Mulangu et al., 2019) for Ebola contrast sharply with the lack of approved countermeasures for most other HFs. Even where treatments exist, such as ribavirin for Lassa (McCormick et al., 1986), real-world implementation barriers persist in endemic regions.
Treatment and vaccination strategies for hemorrhagic fever diseases
The management of HFDs remains challenging due to the limited availability of the targeted therapies, necessitating a combination of supportive care, antiviral medications, and vaccination where applicable. Supportive therapy forms the cornerstone of treatment, focusing on fluid resuscitation, electrolyte balance, and management of coagulopathy to prevent shock and multi-organ failure (WHO, 2023). For specific viruses, antiviral agents such as ribavirin (effective against Lassa fever and some arenaviruses) and favipiravir (investigated for Ebola and CCHF) have shown variable efficacy, though their use is often limited by toxicity and late-stage administration (Siegel et al., 2022). Immunotherapies, including monoclonal antibodies (e.g., REGN-EB3 with mAb114 for Ebola), have demonstrated significant survival benefits of clinical trials by neutralizing viral particles and modulating immune responses (Mulangu et al., 2019). Vaccination has emerged as a critical preventive approach, and the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine showed >97 % efficacy towards Ebola ranges as a vaccination good trial (Henao-Restrepo et al., 2021). However, vaccine development for other HFDs, such as Lassa fever and CCHF, remains in experimental stages, hindered by antigenic diversity and limited commercial incentives (Bente et al., 2020). Despite above advances, major challenges persist, including cold-chain in vaccines requirements, late presentation of illnesses, and absence of standardized protocols for emerging viruses. Future strategies must prioritize broad-spectrum antivirals, rapid diagnostics, and universal vaccine platforms to come up with the evolving threat regarding HF in endemic regions (Feldmann et al., 2020).
Public health challenges and control strategies for hemorrhagic fever diseases
Hemorrhagic fever diseases (HFDs) considered as formidable common health challenges because of their epidemic nature of high rate fatality rates and complex methods of transmission, necessitating multifaceted control dynamics. Early detection with surveillance remains the critical obstacle, as initial symptoms usually mimic common febrile illnesses, causing delayed diagnosis besides increased transmission risks, mainly under resource-limited settings where Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) capacity is very scarce (WHO, 2023). Healthcare-associated outbreaks can amplify epidemics, such as demonstrated in the 2014-2016 Ebola crisis during inadequate infection prevention besides control (IPC) measures (Schieffelin et al., 2020). Zoonotic spillover prevention requires coordinated One Health approaches to be achieved, including rodent control of Lassa fever and livestock vaccination of Rift Valley fever, (Bente et al., 2020). Community engagement poses another challenge, such as cultural burial practices, necessitating culturally sensitive risks in communication strategies (Fallah et al., 2022).Vaccination campaigns, while being successful towards Ebola via ring vaccination, to face logistical barriers in remote areas that remain unavailable for most HFDs (Henao-Restrepo et al., 2021). Climate change besides urbanization is expanding vector habitats mainly in rural areas, increasing arboviral HFDs outbreaks such as dengue besides yellow fever, necessitating adaptive vector programs and control (Gubler, 2022). Effective control gathering with strengthening health systems through laboratory networks and rapid response teams besides cross-border collaboration can be as outlined in the WHO’s Global network for preventing HFD (WHO, 2023). Sustainable solutions should integrate surveillance innovations such as AI-powered outbreak prediction, thermostable vaccines, and community-led interventions as an obvious address of evolving common threats.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Hemorrhagic fever diseases pose an ongoing global health threat due to their severe clinical manifestations, epidemic potential, and complex transmission dynamics. While recent advances in vaccines and therapeutics have improved outbreak response capabilities, significant gaps remain in prevention and treatment for many pathogens. Effective control requires strengthened surveillance systems, accelerated research into broad-spectrum countermeasures, and robust public health infrastructure, particularly in endemic regions. Addressing the interconnected challenges of zoonotic spillover, climate change impacts, and health system vulnerabilities will be critical for future pandemic preparedness. Sustained international cooperation and investment are essential to mitigate the substantial morbidity and mortality caused by these deadly viral pathogens. This study recommends immediate implementation of strict infection control measures if the microbial infection occurs and highlights the importance of public health interventions, such as contact tracing, separation, and community awareness, particularly during epidemics. Finally, it underscores the essential of continuing research studies on vaccines and targeted therapies.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to express sincere gratitude to the researchers whose valuable studies formed the foundation of this review.
Novelty Statement
This review presents recent advances in understanding immune responses to viral infections, highlights unresolved issues, and suggests future research pathways.
Author’s Contribution
Eman A. Muhsin: Conceptualization and formal analysis.
Eman A. Muhsin, Shahrazad Ahmed Khalaf and Riyadh Hameed Nsaif: Investigation.
Shahrazad Ahmed Khalaf and Riyadh Hameed Nsaif: Data curation and writing original drafts.
Shahrazad Ahmed Khalaf: Reviewing, editing the manuscript, and scientific corrections.
Funding source
No-funding was received.
Conflict of interests
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
References
Al-Rashid, K., 2023. Brief note on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Virol. Mycol., 12: 260.
Amman, B.R., Albariño, C.G., Bird, B.H., Nyakarahuka, L., Sealy, T.K., Balinandi, S. and Nichol, S.T., 2020. Marburg virus resurgence in Uganda: A one health perspective. Emerg. Infect. Dis.,
Basler, C.F. and Amarasinghe, G.K., 2021. Evasion of interferon responses by Ebola and Marburg viruses. J. Interferon Cytok. Res., 41(1): 3–14.
Baz-Flores, I., García-Bocanegra, I., Camacho-Sillero, L., Cano-Terriza, D., Jiménez-Ruiz, S., Risalde, M.A., and Rodríguez-Prieto, V., 2024. Seroprevalence of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in domestic ruminants, southern Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 30(4). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3004.221604
Bente, D.A., Forrester, N.L., Watts, D.M., McAuley, A.J., Whitehouse, C.A. and Bray, M., 2020. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever vaccine development: Current status. Vaccines, 8(3): 521.
Bente, D.A., Forrester, N.L., Watts, D.M., McAuley, A.J., Whitehouse, C.A. and Bray, M., 2020. Emerging viruses: One health perspectives. Lancet Infect. Dis., 20(1): e1–e9.
Bhatt, S., Gething, P.W., Brady, O.J., Messina, J.P., Farlow, A.W., Moyes, C.L. and Hay, S.I., 2022. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature,
Deen, G.F., Massaquoi, T.A., Sesay, F.R., Kanu, J.S., Foday, M.J., Yillia, J.P. and Sahr, F., 2022. Use of whole-genome sequencing to identify transmission links of Ebola virus during the 2014–2016 epidemic in Sierra Leone. N. Eng. J. Med., 387(6): 496–508.
Duchin, J.S., Koster, F.T., Peters, C.J., Simpson, G.L., Tempest, B., Zaki, S.R. and Ksiazek, T.G., 1994. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: A clinical description of 17 patients. N. Eng. J. Med., 330(14): 949–955. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199404073301401
Ergonul, O. and Whitehouse, C.A., 2021. Crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever: A global perspective. Springer.
Fallah, M., Skrip, L.A., Gertler, S., Nguyen, V.K. and Jalloh, M.F., 2022. Risk communication during disease outbreak response in sub-Saharan Africa: Gaps and lessons learned from Ebola, cholera, and COVID-19. Br. Med. J. Glob. Health, 7(3): e008102.
Faye, O., Boëlle, P.Y., Heleze, E., Faye, O., Loucoubar, C., Magassouba, N. and Sall, A.A., 2015. Chains of transmission and control of Ebola virus disease in Conakry, Guinea. Nature, 524(7563): 97–101.
Feldmann, H., Jones, S.M., Daddario-DiCaprio, K.M., Geisbert, J.B., Ströher, U., Grolla, A. and Geisbert, T.W., 2020. Ebola virus disease: Advances in vaccine development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 18(7): 365–378.
Feldmann, H., Sprecher, A. and Geisbert, T.W., 2020. Ebola. N. Eng. J. Med., 382(19): 1832–1842. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1901594
Flórez-Álvarez, L., de Souza, E.E., Botosso, V.F., de Oliveira, D.B., Ho, P.L., Taborda, C.P. and Minoprio, P., 2022. Hemorrhagic fever viruses: Pathogenesis, therapeutics, and emerging and re-emerging potential. Front. Microbiol., 13: 1040093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1040093
Frank, C., Matysiak, T., Becker, S. and Günther, S., 2024. Virology, pathogenesis, and clinical features of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: A review for clinicians. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 30(5): 847–853. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3005.231646
Goldsmith, C.S., Miller, S.E. and Martines, R.B., 2021. Ultrastructural characterization of Ebola virus infection in the human placenta. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 27(5): 1407–1414.
Gotuzzo, E., Yactayo, S. and Córdova, E., 2013. Yellow fever vaccination provides lifelong immunity. Vaccine, 31(45): 5181–5187.
Gubler, D.J., 2022. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: The unholy trinity of the 21st century. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 20(5): 269–283.
Gupta, M., Spiropoulou, C. and Rollin, P.E., 2021. Ebola virus infection of human PBMCs causes massive death of macrophages, CD4 and CD8 T cell sub-populations in vitro. Virology, 364(1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.017
Halstead, S.B., 1970. Observations related to pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Yale J. Biol. Med., 42(5): 350–362.
Hastie, K.M., Zandonatti, M.A., Kleinfelter, L.M., Heinrich, M.L., Rowland, M.M., Chandran, K. and Aphire, E.O., 2017. Structural basis for antibody-mediated neutralization of Lassa virus. Science, 356(6341): 923–928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7260
Henao-Restrepo, A.M., Camacho, A., Longini, I.M., Watson, C.H., Edmunds, W.J., Egger, M. and Kieny, M.P., 2021. Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine for Ebola virus disease: Final results from the Guinea ring vaccination trial. Lancet, 399(10325): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32621-6
Jonsson, C.B., Figueiredo, L.T.M. and Vapalahti, O., 2021. Hantaviruses: History and global impact. Viruses.
Leroy, E.M., Kumulungui, B., Pourrut, X., Rouquet, P., Hassanin, A., Yaba, P. and Swanepoel, R., 2005. Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature, 438(7068): 575–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/438575a
Lloyd-Smith, J.O., Schreiber, S.J., Kopp, P.E. and Getz, W.M., 2021. Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature, 589(7843): 555–561.
Mahase E., 2021. Covid-19: Rapid antigen tests may be better at detecting infectious cases than PCR, says WHO. Br. Med. J., 372: n208.
McCormick, J.B., King, I.J., Webb, P.A., Scribner, C.L., Craven, R.B., Johnson, K.M. and Peters, C.J., 1986. Lassa fever: Effective therapy with ribavirin. N. Eng. J. Med., 314: 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198601023140104
McCormick, J.B., King, I.J., Webb, P.A., Scribner, C.L., Craven, R.B., Johnson, K.M. and Peters, C.J., 1987. N. Eng. J. Med., 316(1): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198601023140104
McElroy, A.K., Mühlberger, E. and Muñoz-Fontela, C., 2019. Immune barriers of Ebola virus infection. Curr. Opin. Virol., 37: 104–112.
Messina, J.P., Brady, O.J., Golding, N., Kraemer, M.U.G., Wint, G.R.W., Ray, S.E. and Hay, S.I., 2022. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nat. Microbiol., 7(5): 712–724.
Mhamadi, M., Fall, B., Dieng, Y., Loucoubar, C., Fall, A., Faye, O. and Ka, O., 2025. Kinetics of immunoglobulin and cytokine response in a fatal case of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Senegal. Front. Virol., 4: Article 1498672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2024.1498672
Mulangu, S., Dodd, L.E., Davey, R.T., Tshiani, M.O., Proschan, M., Mukadi, D. and Grais, R.F., 2019. A randomized, controlled trial of Ebola virus disease therapeutics. N. Eng. J. Med., 381(24): 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993
Paessler, S. and Walker, D.H., 2022. Pathogenesis of the viral hemorrhagic fevers. Ann. Rev. Pathol., 17: 389–421.
Peters, C.J., Khan, A.S. and Ksiazek, T.G., 2022. Filoviruses and arenaviruses. In: (eds. D.M. Knipe and P.M. Howley). Fields Virology (7th ed., pp. 1024–1056). Wolters Kluwer.
Piudo, L., Monteverde, M., González Capria, S., Padula, P. and Carmanchahi, P., 2005. Distribution and abundance of sigmodontine rodents in relation to hantavirus in Neuquén, Argentina. J. Vector Ecol., 30(1): 119–125.
Rasmussen, A.L., Okumura, A. and Ferris, M.T., 2023. Host genetic diversity enables Ebola hemorrhagic fever pathogenesis and resistance. Science, 379(6632): eabq3983.
Richmond, J.K. and Baglole, D.J., 2023. Lassa fever: Epidemiology, clinical features, and social consequences. Br. Med. J., 327(7426): 1271–1275. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1271
Schieffelin, J.S., Levy, D.C. and Goba, A., 2023. Endothelial activation and dysfunction in Ebola virus disease. J. Infect. Dis., 227(5): 647–659.
Schieffelin, J.S., Shaffer, J.G., Goba, A., Gbakie, M., Gire, S.K., Colubri, A. and Garry, R.F., 2020. Clinical illness and outcomes in patients with Ebola in Sierra Leone. N. Eng. J. Med., 371(22): 2092–2100. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411680
Shepherd, A.J., Laird, H.M., Roller, R.J. and Peters, C.J., 1989. Field and laboratory investigation of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2(3): 227–230.
Siegel, D., Pruijssers, A.J., Riva, L., Kramer, K., 2022. Antiviral therapies for hemorrhagic fever viruses. Antivir. Res., 201: 105299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2022.105299
Towner, J.S., Amman, B.R., Sealy, T.K., Carroll, S.A., Comer, J.A., Kemp, A. and Rollin, P.E., 2006. Rapid diagnosis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever by reverse transcription–PCR in an outbreak setting and assessment of patient viral load as a predictor of outcome. J. Infect. Dis., 193(6): 739–741.
Towner, J.S., Amman, B.R., Sealy, T.K., Carroll, S.A., Comer, J.A., Kemp, A. and Rollin, P.E., 2007. Marburg virus infection detected in Egyptian fruit bats. PLoS Pathog., 3(7): e91.
Umair, M., Nisar, M.I., Khan, H., Kiani, F.A. and Khan, J.A., 2024. Reassortment and genetic diversity of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus isolates from humans in Pakistan. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 30(4): 654–664. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3004.231155
Van Griensven, J., Edwards, T., de Lamballerie, X., Semple, M.G., Gallian, P., Baize, S. and Malvy, D., 2022. Evaluation of convalescent plasma for Ebola virus disease in Guinea. N. Eng. J. Med., 374(1): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1511812
Whitman, J.D., Hiatt, J., Mowery, C.T., Shy, B.R., Yu, R., Yamamoto, T.N., et al., 2020. Test performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serological assays. Nat. Biotechnol., 38(10): 1174–1183.
Whitmer, S.L.M., Bausch, D.G., Jones, S. and Lemoh, C., 2018. New lineage of Lassa virus, Togo, 2016. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 24(3): 599–602. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2403.171905
Woods, C.W., Karpati, A.M., Grein, T., McCarthy, N., Gaturuku, P., Muchiri, E. and Ollin, P.E., 1998. Rift Valley fever outbreak during extreme rainfall period, northeastern Kenya, 1997–1998. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 4(2): 208–212.
World Health Organization, 2016. Ebola situation report 30 March 2016. https://apps.who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-30-march-2016.
World Health Organization, 2023a. Clinical management of viral hemorrhagic fevers: A WHO guideline. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549608.
World Health Organization, 2023b. Yellow fever factsheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/yellow-fever.
World Health Organization, 2023c. WHO viral haemorrhagic fevers fact sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/viral-haemorrhagic-fevers.
World Health Organization, 2023d. Global framework for haemorrhagic fever preparedness. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240066977
World Health Organization, 2023e. Viral haemorrhagic fevers: Transmission dynamics. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240066977
World Health Organization, 2023f. Viral hemorrhagic fevers: Fact sheets. https://www.who.int.
Younan, P., Iampietro, M. and Nishida, A., 2022a. Cardiac dysfunction in viral hemorrhagic fevers. Nat. Rev. Cardiol., 19(6): 385–398.
Younan, P., Iampietro, M. and Nishida, A., 2022b. Ebola virus binding to Tim-1 on T lymphocytes induces a cytokine storm. Sci. Immunol., 7(73): eabj3621.