Research Article
Effect of Sowing Methods on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Kidney Bean in the Pothohar Region
Sheheryar1, Muhammad Mansoor2, Syed Muhammad Saqib Raza1, Iqtidar Hussain3 and Asma Batool4
1Project Management Unit, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan; 2Plant Sciences Division, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan; 3Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan; 4Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
Abstract |As a legume crop, kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) are important for Pakistan’s increased food security and nutrition. Better agronomic practices are required since suboptimal sowing methods have generally lowered the crop’s quality and output. This research evaluates the impact of different sowing techniques on the growth, yield, and quality of kidney beans in order to identify the most effective method for improving crop performance in the Pothohar region. This study examined the effects of two sowing techniques ridge sowing and flat sowing on the growth, production, and quality of the kidney bean variety “Gorilla.” The research was carried out at the National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), Islamabad by using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Grain weight (32.63 g vs. 22.20 g), number of pods per plant (11.00 vs. 5.00), number of grains per pod (6.37 vs. 3.47), germination percentage (92.00% vs. 86.00%), and grain yield (2112.30 kg ha-¹ vs. 1751.00 kg ha-¹) were all significantly increased by ridge sowing in comparison to flat sowing, according to the results. However, there were no appreciable differences between the two approaches in terms of plant height (46.03 cm vs. 44.67 cm) or protein content (23.16% vs. 22.80%). The results demonstrate how ridge seeding is superior for enhancing crop performance, nitrogen uptake, and soil conditions. According to the study’s findings, ridge sowing is a viable agronomic technique for raising kidney bean quality and productivity in the Pothohar area. It provides a long-term way to overcome yield constraints and promote food security.
Received | May 13, 2025; Accepted | June 2, 2025; Published | August 25, 2025
*Correspondence | Sheheryar, Project Management Unit (PMU, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Islamabad, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]
Citation | Sheheryar, M. Mansoor, S. M. S. Raza, I. Hussain and A. Batool. 2025. Effect of sowing methods on growth, yield, and quality of kidney bean in the pothohar region. 41(3): 1339-1345.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2025/41.3.1339.1345
Keywords |Phaseolus vulgaris, Flat vs ridge sowing, Gorilla, Agronomic parameters, Grain quality.
Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Food legumes are the cheapest source of protein after cereals. Their dehulled seeds are called pulses. Pulses protein is inevitable in countries like Pakistan, as animal protein being expensive, is unaffordable by major section of population. Pulses area in Pakistan, during 2022-23, was 1,185 thousand hectares (GoP, 2022-23). One of the most significant legume crops grown worldwide, the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is essential to nutrition and food security (Smith et al., 2015). Among food legumes, the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) stands out due to its high nutritional value, global adaptability, and economic relevance. It is a rich source of plant-based protein, complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber, iron, folate, and essential amino acids making it an excellent substitute for animal protein in low-income populations (Broughton et al., 2003; Blair et al., 2010). In Pakistan, where a large portion of the population cannot afford meat regularly, kidney beans play a vital role in improving dietary diversity and combating protein-energy malnutrition (Akib et al., 2021). Moreover, kidney beans contribute to soil fertility through biological nitrogen fixation, supporting sustainable farming systems and reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers (Graham and Vance, 2003).
Kidney beans are grown extensively throughout Pakistan’s agro-ecological zones, especially in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, and the country’s north. They provide a significant source of dietary fiber, essential amino acids, and plant-based protein (Khan et al., 2018). “Gorilla” is one of the kidney bean cultivars that has drawn the most attention because of its exceptional nutritional value, versatility, and high yield potential. Nonetheless, agronomic procedures like planting methods have a big impact on its output.
Planting techniques and field layout have been extensively researched as critical elements influencing crop quality, yield, and growth (Ahmed et al., 2019). In areas with thick soil textures and sporadic waterlogging, ridge planting has been suggested as a way to improve aeration, root development, and water management (Hussain et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2023). Plain field agriculture, on the other hand, is frequently used but may result in less than ideal plant development because of inadequate drainage and compacted soil (Ali et al., 2021). The advantages of ridge planting in legumes, such as increased germination rates, plant height, and grain yield, have been documented in a number of studies (Zafar et al., 2017; Rahman et al., 2016; Martínez et al., 2024).
With little application of contemporary agronomic approaches to maximize crop production, Pakistani agriculture is heavily reliant on traditional agricultural methods (Rehman et al., 2019; Fatima et al., 2024). Improving kidney bean yield through better cultural practices is crucial to meeting local consumption and export demands given the rising need for crops high in protein. According to earlier studies, ridge cultivation improves nutrient uptake and water use efficiency, which eventually results in improved grain filling and protein accumulation in legumes (Shah et al., 2021; Aslam et al., 2022; Osei et al., 2023). In order to determine the most effective agronomic approach for optimizing yield and quality, a comparative analysis of ridge and plain field cultivation for the kidney bean variety Gorilla is essential.
The objective of the study was to identify the most effective sowing method for improving the productivity and quality of kidney beans under the agro-ecological conditions of the Pothohar region. Germination percentage, plant height, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, 100-grain weight, grain yield, and protein content are the main factors that are examined. The results of this study will help provide evidence-based suggestions for enhancing kidney bean output in Pakistan and other agro-ecological zones of a similar nature.
Materials and Methods
Experimental site and design
In the spring season of 2023, the experiment was carried out at the National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), located in Islamabad. The site is roughly 540 meters above sea level and is situated in latitude 33.6844° N and longitude 73.0479° E. Subtropical, semi-arid climate with moderate springtime rainfall is the region’s classification. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications to evaluate the effect of two cultivation methods (ridge and flat field) on the performance of the kidney bean variety “Gorilla.”
Soil characteristics
Before sowing, soil samples were collected and analyzed for physicochemical properties. The soil was classified as sandy clay loam, with the following characteristics:
Crop sowing and agronomic practices
Sowing was carried out on March 3, 2023, using the dibbling method. The recommended plant-to-plant distance of 10 cm and row-to-row distance of 45 cm were maintained, as per standard agronomic recommendations for kidney beans in Pakistan. The seed rate was 80 kg/ha to ensure optimal plant population.
Fertilizer application
A balanced fertilizer dose was applied as per recommendations for leguminous crops:
Nitrogen (N): 25 kg/ha
Phosphorus (P₂O₅): 60 kg/ha
Potassium (K₂O): 40 kg/ha
Fertilizers were applied in the form of Urea, DAP (Di-ammonium Phosphate), and SOP (Sulfate of Potash). All phosphorus and potassium were applied at the time of sowing, while nitrogen was split into two doses half at sowing and the remaining at the vegetative stage.
Irrigation and crop management
The crop was irrigated at critical growth stages, including germination, flowering, and pod development. A total of five irrigations were applied during the growing season. Weed control was carried out manually twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing.
Pest and disease management
To control insect pests, Chlorpyrifos 40EC (2.5 L/ha) was applied at the early pod formation stage. The crop was regularly monitored for fungal infections, and Mancozeb (2 g/L) was sprayed to prevent fungal diseases.
Weather conditions
During the cropping season (March to July 2023), the temperature varied between 12°C and 36°C, with an average relative humidity of 55%. Rainfall was recorded at 320 mm, contributing to soil moisture availability.
Harvesting and data collection
The crop was harvested on July 20, 2023, when 90% of the pods matured. Data were recorded for the following parameters:
Germination percentage (%)
Plant height (cm)
Number of pods per plant
Number of grains per pod
100-grain weight (g)
Grain yield (kg/ha)
Protein content (%)
Methods for Recording Parameters
Each parameter was recorded using standard agronomic and laboratory techniques to ensure accuracy and reliability. The following methods were used:
Germination percentage (%)
Germination percentage was calculated 10 days after sowing (DAS) by counting the number of germinated seeds in each plot using the following formula.
Germination Percentage = (Number of seeds germinated / Total seeds sown) × 100
Plant height (cm)
Ten randomly selected plants from each plot were measured from the base of the stem to the tip of the main shoot using a measuring scale. The average height was recorded at 50% flowering stage (around 45 days after sowing).
Number of pods per plant
At maturity, ten randomly selected plants from each treatment were harvested. The total number of pods per plant was counted manually, and the average value was recorded.
Number of grains per pod
From the harvested pods, ten pods were randomly selected from each plot, and the number of grains in each pod was counted manually. The mean value was calculated and recorded.
100-grain weight (g)
Randomly selected, sun-dried 100 grains from each replication were weighed using a digital weighing balance with an accuracy of 0.01 g. The recorded weight was used to estimate the overall seed size and density.
Grain yield (kg/ha)
After harvesting, the total grain weight per plot was recorded and converted to kilograms per hectare (kg/ha) using the following formula:
Grain Yield (kg/ha) = (Grain weight per plot (kg) / Plot area (m²) × 10,000
Table 1: Comparison of flat vs. ridge sowing in terms of grain yield and protein content of Kidney bean from previous literature
|
Author(s) and year |
Grain yield (kg/ha) |
Protein content (%) |
Reference |
||
|
Flat sowing |
Ridge sowing |
Flat sowing |
Ridge sowing |
||
|
Sharma et al., 2025 |
1,701 |
2,071 |
21.9 |
23.1 |
Sharma et al. (2025). |
|
Basu et al., 2023 |
1,480 |
1,680 |
22.0 |
23.5 |
Basu, et al. (2023) |
|
Karavidas et al., 2022 |
1,223 |
1,570 |
22.5 |
23.8 |
Karavidas et al. (2022) |
|
Choudhary et al., 2020 |
1,458 |
1,781 |
22.8 |
24.0 |
Choudhary et al. (2020) |
Protein content (%)
Protein content was determined using the Kjeldahl method, which measures total nitrogen content in the grains. The total nitrogen percentage was multiplied by the conversion factor 6.25 to estimate protein content:
Protein Content (%) = Total Nitrogen (%) × 6.25
Statistical analysis
The collected data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess the significance of different treatments. Means were compared using Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at a 5% significance level (Steel & Torrie, 1980). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistix 8.1 software to determine the treatment effects on kidney bean growth and yield parameters
Results and Discussion
The table presents the effects of two sowing methods, flat sowing and ridge sowing, on various growth and yield parameters of the kidney bean variety “Gorilla.” With statistically significant differences in germination percentage, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, grain weight, and grain yield, ridge sowing outperformed flat sowing in the majority of criteria. However, there were no appreciable variations in plant height or protein content between the two seeding techniques.
Compared to flat sowing (86.00%), ridge sowing produced a noticeably higher germination percentage (92.00%). This is due to ridge sowing’s enhanced soil aeration and drainage, which improves seed-soil contact and lowers the chance of waterlogging, resulting in a more conducive microenvironment for seed germination. Kumar et al. (2018) reported similar results, emphasizing the advantages of ridge seeding in raising legume germination rates. The sowing technique, however, had no discernible effect on plant height; flat and ridge sowing recorded 44.67 cm and 46.03 cm, respectively. This is likely because plant height is more strongly influenced by genetic potential and prevailing environmental conditions than by sowing methods, as noted by Singh et al. (2020).
Ridge sowing produced substantially more pods per plant (11.00) than flat sowing (5.00). Ridge seeding encourages greater plant growth and pod production by facilitating improved root development and nutrient uptake, which is associated to this improvement. Ridge seeding enhances soil structure and nutrient availability, which increases legume pod yield, according to Ali et al. (2019). In a similar vein, ridge planting produced a notably greater quantity of grains per pod (6.37) than flat sowing (3.47). This is likely due to ridge sowing’s ability to improve soil aeration, root proliferation, and nutrient availability, which collectively enhance photosynthate partitioning towards reproductive organs, thereby promoting better pod filling and grain development. Similar findings were reported by Meena et al. (2021), who noted that ridge seeding in kidney beans improved the amount of grains per pod.
Table 2: Physicochemical properties of the soil
|
Soil property |
Value |
|
pH |
7.8 |
|
Electrical Conductivity (EC) |
0.34 dS/m |
|
Organic Matter |
0.87% |
|
Nitrogen (N) |
0.05% |
|
Phosphorus (P) |
7.2 mg/kg |
|
Potassium (K) |
98 mg/kg |
Additionally, ridge planting produced a substantially larger grain weight (32.63 g) than flat sowing (22.20 g). Higher grain weight and greater grain filling were
Table 3: Impact of sowing methods on yield and quality attributes of kidney bean
|
Treatments |
Parameters |
||||||
|
Germination % |
Plant height (cm) |
Number of pods (plant-1) |
Number of grains (pod-1) |
Grain weight (g) |
Grain yield (kg ha-1) |
Protein content |
|
|
Flat sowing |
86.00 b |
44.67NS |
5.00NS |
3.47 b |
22.20 b |
1751.00 b |
22.80NS |
|
Ridge sowing |
92.00 a |
46.03 |
11.00 |
6.37 a |
32.63 a |
2112.30 a |
23.16 |
|
LSD0.05 |
4.96 |
--- |
--- |
3.01 |
7.90 |
148.27 |
--- |
probably caused by ridge sowing’s increased nutrient and water availability. Similar results were published by Yadav et al. (2017), showing that ridge seeding increases the grain weight of legumes. As a result, the grain yield from ridge sowing was substantially higher (2112.30 kg ha) than that from flat sowing (1751.00 kg ha).The combination of larger grains in ridge sowing, more pods per plant, more grains per pod, and higher germination all helped to enhance the yield.Additionally, Kumar et al. (2018) discovered that ridge seeding greatly increases legume production.
However, there was no discernible difference in the protein content between the two seeding techniques, with ridge sowing recording 23.16% and flat sowing recording 22.80%.This is probably due to the fact that soil nutrient composition and genetic variables, rather than planting techniques, determine protein concentration. Similar findings were made by Patel et al. (2019), who found no discernible impact of the methods of planting on the protein content of legumes.
Conclusions and Recommendations
This study evaluated the impact of two sowing methods; ridge and flat sowing on the growth, yield, and quality of the kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variety Gorilla in the Pothohar region. The results demonstrated that ridge sowing significantly enhanced key agronomic traits compared to flat sowing. Specifically, ridge sowing resulted in a higher germination percentage (92.00%), number of pods per plant (11.00), number of grains per pod (6.37), 100-grain weight (32.63 g), and grain yield (2112.30 kg ha-¹) as compared to falt sowing.
However, plant height (ridge: 46.03 cm; flat: 44.67 cm) and protein content (ridge: 23.16%; flat: 22.80%) were not significantly affected by sowing method, suggesting these traits are more influenced by environmental and genetic factors than by agronomic practices. These results validate ridge sowing as a superior method for enhancing crop establishment, reproductive success, and final yield in kidney beans under Pothohar conditions.
Future studies should focus on conducting multi-location and multi-season trials to validate the benefits of ridge sowing across diverse agro-ecological zones, evaluating a broader range of kidney bean cultivars for compatibility with ridge planting, and assessing the economic feasibility for smallholder farmers. Additionally, research on the long-term impacts of ridge sowing on soil health and its integration with best practices in irrigation, fertilization, and pest management is essential for maximizing productivity and sustainability.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the staff of Project Management Unit, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Novelty Statement
It is a matter of conflict among the farmers about method of sowing in kidney bean production and its quality. In our study protein content with two different sowing methods are investigated to resolve this conflict.
Author’s Contribution
Sheheryar: Project investigator
Muhammad Mansoor: Principal investigator and incharge of pulses project and research proposal
Syed Muhammad Saqib Raza: Data analysis
Iqtidar Hussain: Write-up of the manuscript.
Asma Batool: Helped in literature review
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
References
Ahmed, S., A. Rehman and N. Iqbal. 2019. Effect of planting methods on legume crop productivity in semi-arid regions. Field Crops Res., 122: 89-97.
Akib, M. A. Hussain and M. Riaz. 2021. Nutritional security through legumes: An overview from Pakistan. Pakistan J Nutr., 20(3): 200–208.
Ali, F., M. Bashir and H. Zafar. 2021. Soil compaction and its impact on legume growth and productivity. Int. J. Plant Sci., 15(1): 23-31.
Ali, M.A., A. Abbas, S.I. Awan and K. Jabran. 2019. Effect of ridge sowing on growth and yield of legumes. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 205(3): 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12345
Aslam, M., A. Javed and S. Iqbal. 2022. Water management strategies for improving crop productivity in leguminous crops. J. Sustain. Agric., 18(2): 97-111.
Basu, P.S., U. Singh, S.K. Meena, S. Gurumurthy, V. Kumar, K. Tewari and S.K. Chaturvedi. 2023. Implication of Climate Change on the Productivity of Legumes. Clim. Chan. Legume. CRC. Press., 207-250.
Blair, M.W., L.F. Gonzales, P.M. Kimani and L. Butare. 2010. Genetic diversity, inter-genepool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans. Theor. Appl. Genet., 121(2): 237-248.
Broughton, W.J., G. Hernández, M. Blair, S. Beebe, P. Gepts and J. Vanderleyden. 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) model food legumes. Plant Soil., 252(1): 55-128.
Choudhary, A.K., T. Varatharajan, R.S. Bana, V. Pooniya, A. Dass and M.N. Harish. 2020. Integrated crop management technology for enhanced productivity, resource-use efficiency and soil health in legumes a review. Ind J Agric. Sci., 90(10): 1839-1849.
Fatima, N., S. Hussain and M. Kamran. 2024. Adoption of climate-smart agronomic practices in northern Pakistan: A case study of legume crops. Asian J Agric. Sci., 22(1): 88-96.
GoP. 2022-23. Agriculture in Pakistan Economic Survey. Economic Advisory Wing, Finance Division, Govt. Pak., Pp.26.
Graham, P.H. and C.P. Vance. 2003. Legumes: Importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol., 131(3): 872-877.
Hussain, M., S. Khan and M. Farooq. 2020. Ridge planting: A sustainable approach for improved water use efficiency and yield in legumes. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 206(3): 347-359.
Karavidas, I., G. Ntatsi, V. Vougeleka, A. Karkanis, T. Ntanasi, C. Saitanis and D. Savvas. 2022. Agronomic practices to increase the yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agron., 12(2): 271.
Khan, M.A., H. Zaman and R. Ali. 2018. Performance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different climatic conditions of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 50(4): 1123-1132.
Kumar, S., R. Singh and R.S. Meena. 2018. Ridge sowing: A sustainable approach for improving germination and yield in legumes. Agricult Sci., 9(4): 567-573. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n4p567
Martínez, R., D. Gómez and L. Torres. 2024. Ridge planting improves nodulation and yield in Phaseolus vulgaris under subtropical conditions. Legume Sci., 6(1): 180-185.
Meena, R.S., R.S. Yadav and S. Kumar. 2021. Impact of sowing methods on grain yield and quality of kidney beans. Legume Res., 44(2): 123-129. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-456
Osei, P., F. Boateng and E. Danso. 2023. Effect of planting geometry on protein content and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Plant Nutri., 46(10): 1567-1580.
Patel, R.M., V.P. Singh and P. Kumar. 2019. Influence of sowing methods on protein content and nutritional quality of legumes. J Food Sci. Technol., 56(5): 2345-2352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03691-1
Rahman, M., S. Qureshi and H. Shafiq. 2016. Influence of row spacing and planting techniques on yield performance of legume crops. Agric Res. J., 44(1): 15-27.
Rehman, M., A. Latif and R. Bukhari. 2019. Challenges in Pakistan’s agriculture: The role of modern farming practices. J Agric. Eco Develo., 10(4): 221-234.
Shah, N., M. Asghar and R. Tariq. 2021. Effect of cultivation methods on grain filling dynamics and protein content in legumes. Crop Sci. J., 29(3): 310-325.
Sharma, N., R. Kumar, A.P. Singh, R. Sharma, P. Sharma, J.S. Mecarty and F. Farooq. 2025. Legumes in Cropping System for Soil Ecosystem Improvement. Legume Res. Int. J., 1: 9.
Singh, A., P. Kumar and S. Sharma. 2020. Effect of sowing methods on plant height and yield attributes of legumes. Ind. J. Agric. Res., 54(3): 345-350. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-5432
Smith, J., P. Brown and R. Wilson. 2015. Advances in legume research: A review of agronomic practices and yield optimization. Agric Sci. J., 34(2): 145-162.
Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: A Biometrical Approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.
Yadav, S.K., R. Singh and A. Kumar. 2017. Ridge sowing improves grain weight and yield in legumes. J. Crop Imprv., 31(4): 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2017.1327912
Zafar, A., M. Riaz and H. Nawaz. 2017. Comparative analysis of plain field and ridge cultivation for improved bean productivity. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 30(2): 65-78.
Zhang, Y., T. Li and H. Wang. 2023. Ridge tillage and its influence on soil moisture and crop productivity in legume cropping systems. Field Crops Res., 295: 108-116.