Research Article
Growth and Yield Attributes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as Affected by Different Levels of Compost and Fym Under the Agroecological Conditions of District Buner
Laiq Zada1*, Abid Khan1, Noor Habib Khan1, Salahuddin1, Hafiz Muhammad Faisal Ayub2, Sada Bahar3, Riaz Ahmad Afridi4 and Sher Nawab Khan1
1Agricultural Research Station Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 2Cereal Crops Research Institute Pirsabak-Nowshera, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 3Directorate of Outreach Agriculture Research Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 4Agriculture Research Institute Tarnab Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Abstract | Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a staple food crop belonging to the family poaceae, plays a vital role among cereals. For human beings and animals, it is a major source of proteins and carbohydrates. Plant nutrients availability is the major contributing factor towards the productivity of any soil. Chemical fertilizers are ready-made sources of nutrients for crops. They are less bulky and can be handled and transported easily. However, chemical fertilizers are costly and also deteriorate quality of soil and food. Organic matters especially, composts and farmyard manure (FYM) not only improve soil health, but also provide plant nutrients for sustainable crop yield. In order to reduce the gap, a pot experiment was performed to appraise the effect of compost and FYM on growth and yield attributes of wheat under the agro-climatic conditions of District Buner during winter. The trial consisted of two factors: compost and FYM applied @ 0, 5, 10, 15 and 0, 10, 20 tons ha-1 respectively. Before the start of experiment, a media for each pot was prepared by mixing 12 Kg sieved soil and the required quantity of compost and FYM according to each treatments combination. Afterward the pots were filled with the already prepared media. Basal doses of N, P and K were applied as urea, single super phosphate (SSP) and sulphate of potash (SOP @ 120, 90 and 60 kg ha-1 to each pot. Wheat cultivar (Pirsabak-2015) was sown in these pots @ 30 seeds per pot and then thinned to nine. Pots were arranged by using CR Design with three replications. Plant height, tillers pot-1, spike length, grains spike-1, biological yield, grain yield and thousand-grain weight showed positive responses towards mix application of compost and FYM @ 15 and 10 tons-ha-1 as compared to control treatments. Therefore, combined application of compost and FYM @ 15 and 10 tons ha-1 respectively, is recommended to get a higher yield of wheat.
Received | April 26, 2024; Accepted | December 27, 2024; Published | Septemer 08, 2025
*Correspondence | L. Zada, Agricultural Research Station Buner, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | L. Zada, N.H. Khan, A. Khan, Salahuddin, H.M.F. Ayub, S. Bahar and R.A. Afridi. 2025. Growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by different levels of compost and fym under the agroecological conditions of district Buner. Advances in Agriculture and Animal Sciences, 41(1): 23-27.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aaas/2025/41.1.23.27
Keywords | Biological yield, Compost, FYM, Grain yield, Wheat
Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) a staple food crop belonging to the family poaceae plays a vital role among cereals. For human beings and animals, it is a major source of protein and carbohydrates. On about 8825-thousand-hectare area, it is grown in Pakistan and its total and average production is 24.34 million tons and 2827 kg ha-1 (Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, 2019). Crop yield of wheat is decreased due to water shortage, Imbalanced fertilizers and high costs of inputs. Plant nutrients are the major determinants of the productivity of any soil. Chemical fertilizers are a ready-made source of nutrients for crops. They are less bulky and easy in transport and handle. However, due to their high cost, growers could not afford and due to their mismanagement yield decreased day by day (Hussain et al., 1987). Organic matter in the form of farmyard manure, poultry manure, sewage sludges etc., has been used for a long time. Organic matters not only improve soil health, but also provide plant nutrients for sustainable crop yield (Lal, 2005; Kolay, 2000).
To dispose of organic wastes, an effective and environment-friendly technique is composting (Millner et al., 1998). In composting, organic wastes are altered into stable substances (i.e. humus) biologically. These can be stored and can be applied easily (Gallardo-Larva and Nogales, 1987). This method is economical and friendly to the environment. It is the source of energy and provides nutrients for sustainable farming. Due to the deterioration in soil quality and the high cost of fertilizers in Pakistan, composting is very crucial in Pakistan (Lasaridi and Stetiford, 1999). The present research study was conducted to assess the effect of different levels of FYM and compost on the growth and yield attributes of wheat under the ecological conditions of district Buner. The objectives of the current study are to assess the response of growth and yield attributes of wheat towards different levels of compost and FYM.
Objectives
Materials and Methods
Trail entitled “Growth and yield attributes of wheat as affected by different levels of compost and FYM” was conducted at Agriculture Research Station Buner in November, 2020. Treatments were applied as below. Before, the start of the experiment each pot was filled with 12 kg of sieved soil. Compost and farmyard manure (FYM) were mixed with soils before filling the pots according to their combination. N, P and K fertilizers were applied as urea, single super phosphate (SSP) and sulphate of potash (SOP) as a basal dose @ 120, 90 and 60 kg ha-1. The pots were arranged according to a completely randomized design with three replications. Seeds (30 No) of wheat (Pirsabak, 2015) were sown in each pot and latterly thinned (9 No). The pots were irrigated after a few days. Over-irrigation was avoided, and subsequent irrigation was adjusted according to crop’s needs. At maturity, wheat plants were harvested and data were recorded. The data was analyzed statistically (Steel and Torrie, 1980). Using the least significant difference (LSD), treatment means were compared. Data was recorded on:
Plant height (cm)
It was determined by taking five plants randomly from each pot with meter rod and then their average height was determined.
Tillers pot-1
Tillers pot-1 was determined by counting all the tillers of the plants in each pot and then their total number was noted.
Spike length (cm)
Spike length was determined by taking five spikes randomly in each pot with ruler and then their average was determined.
Grains spike-1
Grain/spike was determined by taking three spikes randomly in each pot, threshed manually, counted and then their average was noted.
Biological yield (g pot-1)
It was determined while harvesting each pot plants then sun-dried and weighed.
Grain yield (g/pot)
Grain yield was determined by threshing spikes of each pot manually and then weighted.
1000 grains weight
Thousand-grain weights were determined in each pot by sensitive electronic balance, while taking a random sample of thousand grains.
Results and Discussion
The result showed significant variations for plant height, when different treatments were applied. Plant height ranged from 54.46 to 75.75 cm. Plants having minimum height were noted in T1 (control), while plants having maximum height were noted in (T11), followed by T12 and T10 (Table 2). This is obvious from the results that the mingle application of compost and FYM @ 15 and 10 tons ha-1 had a significant effect on plant heights as compared to control and other treatments. Our findings are in line with Selvakumari et al. (2000), Dixit and Gupta (2000) and Khoshgoftarmanesh and Kalbasi (2002). Results regarding wheat tillers/pot showed significant variations towards application of different treatments. Tillers varied from 23 to 31.33 pot-1. The least tillers were noted in T1 (control), while maximum tillers were recorded in (T11) followed by T12 and T10 (Table 2). The above results clarify that combined application of compost and FYM @ 15 and 10 tons ha-1 had a significant effect on several numbers of tillers pots-1 as compared to control and other treatments. Our findings are similar to of Selvakumari et al. (2000), Dixit and Gupta (2000) and Khoshgoftarmanesh and Kalbasi (2002). Results for spike length also showed significant variations of wheat, when different treatments were applied. Spike length varied from 7 to 9.18 cm. Minimum spike length was recorded in control (T1), while maximum spike length was recorded in (T11) followed by T9, T10 and T11 (Table 2).
Table 1: Treatments combinations of compost and FYM.
|
Treatments |
Compost (t ha-1) |
FYM ( t ha-1) |
|
T1 (control) |
0 |
0 |
|
T2 |
0 |
10 |
|
T3 |
0 |
20 |
|
T4 |
5 |
0 |
|
T5 |
5 |
10 |
|
T6 |
5 |
20 |
|
T7 |
10 |
0 |
|
T8 |
10 |
10 |
|
T9 |
10 |
20 |
|
T10 |
15 |
0 |
|
T11 |
15 |
10 |
|
T12 |
15 |
20 |
Results indicate that compost and FYM applied mix @ 15 and 10 ton ha-1 had significant effect on spike length as compared to control and other treatments. Our findings match with our findings are similar with Selvakumari et al. (2000), Dixit and Gupta (2000) and Khoshgoftarmanesh and Kalbasi (2002). Grain spike-1 indicated significant variations by the application of different treatments. Grain spike-1 of wheat varied from 27.67 to 64.33 g. minimum grain spike-1 were noted in control (T1), while maximum grain spike-1 was noted in (T11) followed by T8 and T10 (Table 2). Results clarify that combined application of compost and
Table 2: Growth and yield attributes of wheat as affected by compost and FYM.
|
Treatments |
Pl.H (cm) |
Till (pot-1) |
Sp.L (cm) |
G/Spike |
B.Y (g pot-1) |
G.Y (g pot-1) |
TGW (g) |
|
T1 (control) |
54.46cd |
23 ef |
7.0de |
27.67g |
50.23e |
25f |
29c |
|
T2 (FYM @ 10T ha-1) |
62.11bcd |
25.33def |
8.4bc |
42 |
57.50cde |
27.33f |
35.33d |
|
T3 (FYM @20T ha-1) |
62.7bcd |
22.67f |
8.54abc |
42f |
55.57cde |
32.16e |
34.67d |
|
T4 (Compost@ 5T ha-1) |
63.96bcd |
25 def |
8.14cd |
47e |
60.42cde |
32.5 e |
36.33cd |
|
T5 (Compost@5 FYM@10T ha-1) |
56.87d |
25 def |
7.46e |
51.3cd |
69.7bcde |
35.25de |
38 bcd |
|
T6 (Compost@5&FYM@20 T ha-1) |
66.22abc |
25.67cde |
7.42e |
48de |
78.04bcd |
36.67cd |
40.33b |
|
T7 (Compost@10T ha-1) |
67.5ab |
23ef |
8.34bc |
53bc |
66.52cde |
39 c |
40bc |
|
T8 (Compost@10&FYM@10T ha-1) |
64.79bcd |
26c |
7.92cde |
57b |
69.7bcde |
39.167c |
40.33b |
|
T9 (Compost@10&FYM@20 T ha-1) |
65.11bcd |
28.33bc |
8.84ab |
53 bc |
70.8bcde |
42.67 b |
39.33bc |
|
T10 (Compost@15T ha-1) |
67.72ab |
29.33ab |
8.5bc |
54.3bc |
79.80bc |
42.67 b |
40.33bc |
|
T11(Compost@15&FYM@10T ha-1) |
75.75a |
31.33a |
9.18a |
64.33a |
114.75a |
48.33 a |
44.67a |
|
T12(Compost@15&FYM@20T ha-1) |
67.72ab |
29.33ab |
8.23bc |
52cd |
93.14ab |
44.16 b |
41ab |
|
LSD |
8.511 |
2.878 |
0.643 |
4.1086 |
24.489 |
3.1094 |
3.8816 |
Means followed by similar letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05%.
FYM @ 15 and 10 tons ha-1 had a significant effect on grain spike-1 as compared to control and other treatments. These results are supported by Khan and Hussain (2001). Similarly results showed significant differences in biological yield.
It varied from 50.23 to 114.75 g. minimum biological yield pot-1 was recorded in control (T1), while maximum biological yield pot-1 was noted in (T11) followed by T12 and T10 (Table 2). The above results indicate that applying compost and FYM mingle @ 15 and 10 tons ha-1 had a significant effect on biological yield as compared to control and other treatments. Our results are somewhat similar with Sarwar et al. (2008). Similarly results regarding grain yield and thousand-grain weight showed significant variations among the treatments. Grain yield varied from 25 to 48.33 g. similarly thousand grain yield varied from 29 to 44.67 g. minimum grain yield pot-1 were recorded in control (T1), while maximum grain yield pot-1 were recorded in (T11) followed by T12 and T10 (Table 2). The above results are in line with Pooran et al. (2002) and Bajpai et al. (2002).
Conclusion
It is concluded from the above results and discussion that all the growth and yield attributes of wheat showed positive responses towards mingle application of compost and farmyard manure. To get better yield of wheat compost and FYM should be applied mingle @ 15 and 10 tons ha-1.
Acknowledgment
I am very grateful to Director Dr Mohammad Sajjad for his cooperation and field staff of ARS Buner for their sincere work during this research experiment.
Novelty Statement
The use of organic fertilizers i.e Compost and FYM increased yield of wheat and also improved quality of soil.
Author’s Contribution
L. Zada: Designed and wrote paper.
M. Sajjad: Analysed the data and facilitate.
A. Khan: Helped in writing the paper.
S. N. Khan: Helped in designing of the trial.
A. Ayub: Helped in collection of data.
Generative AI and AI-assisted technology statement
The authors declare that no Genrative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Bajpai, R.K., S.K. Upadhyay, B.S. Joshi and R.S. Tripathi. 2002. Productivity and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system under integrated nutrient supply systems. Indian J. Agron., 47(1): 20-25. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v47i1.3110
Dixit, K.G. and B.R. Gupta. 2000. Effect of farmyard manure, chemical and Biofertilizers on yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and soil properties. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48(4): 773-780.
Gallardo-Larva, F. and R. Nogales. 1987. Effect of application of town refuse compost on the Soil-plant system- A review. Biol. Wastes, 19(1): 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(87)90035-8
Hussain, A., M. Rashid and M. Yasin. 1987. Advantages of FYM and its better use. Zarat Nama Lahore, 33: 17-18.
Khan, A.M. and I. Hussain. 2001. Manuring effect on the potential grain yield of wheat in the light of the Holy Quran. J. Biol. Sci., 1(2): 62-64. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2001.62.64
Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H. and M. Kalbasi, 2002. Effect of municipal waste leachate on soil properties and growth and yield of rice. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33(13 & 14): 2011-2020. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120005745
Kolay, A.K., 2000. Basic concepts of soil science. 2nd Ed. New-Age International Publisher, New Delhi. pp. 256.
Lal, R., 2005. World crop residue-residue production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ. Int., 31(4): 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005
Lasaridi, K.E. and E.I. Stentiford. 1999. Composting of source separated MSW: An approach to respirometric techniques and biodegradation kinetics. In: International symposium on “composting of organic matter”. Kassandra-Chalkidiki, Greece.
Millner, P.D., L.J. Sikora, D.D. Kaufman and M.E. Simpson. 1998. Agricultural uses of biosolids and other recyclable municipal residues. In: Agricultural uses of municipal, animal and industrial byproducts. Conserv. Res. Rep., pp. 44.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, 2019. Pakistan statistical yearbook. Provincial Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division. Government of Pakistan, pp. 21-22.
Pooran, C., P.K. Singh, M. Govardhan and P. Chand. 2002. Integrated management in rainfed castor (Ricinus communis L). Indian Progress. Agric., 2(2): 122-124.
Sarwar, G., N. Hussain, H. Schmeisky, S. Muhammad, M. Ibrahim and E. Safdar. 2008. Improvement of soil physical and chemical properties with compost application in rice-wheat cropping system. Pak. J. Bot., 40(1): 275-282.
Selvakumari, G., M. Baskar, D. Jayanthi and K.K. Mathan. 2000. Effect of integration of Flyash with fertilizers and organic manures on nutrient availability, yield and nutrient uptake of rice in alfisols. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 268-278.
Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill, Inc. Book Co. New York, USA.