Research Article

Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency and Wheat Productivity through Application of Humic Acid and Farmyard Manure with Synthetic Fertilizers

Sobia Bibi1, Maria Mussarat1, Dost Muhammad1, Zaryab Murad2*, Seon Yeong Im3, Ping Zhuang4, Ismail Khan4 and Abdul Rehman5*

Department of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar-Pakistan.; 2Key Laboratory of Soil Health Diagnostic and Green Remediation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment in the College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, 430070, CHINA; 3Department of Crop Sciences and Biotechnology, Dankook University, Cheonan-si 31116, Republic of Korea; 4Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, Xiaoliang Research Station of Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, and South China Botanical Garden, Guangzhou 510650, P.R. China; 5Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.

Abstract | The excessive use of chemical fertilizers for enhancing crop yields has led to negative effects on soil properties and plant growth, necessitating the exploration of integrated nutrient management approaches. A field experiment was carried out at the Research Farm of the University of Agriculture, Peshawar to assess the combined impacts of humic acid (HA) and farmyard manure (FYM) with synthetic fertilizers on nutrient use efficiency and wheat productivity. The study employed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications, incorporating HA (10 kg ha-1) and FYM (10 tons ha-1) along with different levels of NPK fertilizers (90-120, 60-90, and 45-60 kg ha-1 respectively). The results confirmed that the integrated application of HA and FYM with synthetic fertilizers significantly improved plant height, biological yield, and 1000- grain weight compared to the control treatment. While synthetic fertilizers alone enhanced grain yield and nutrient uptake, the combined application of FYM and HA with 75% NPK (N:90: P:60: K:45 kg ha-1) resulted in superior yield performance compared to 100% NPK application. Additionally, maximum nutrient use efficiency was observed in plots treated with the combination of FYM, HA, and 75% NPK fertilizer. These findings suggest that integrated nutrient management practices, particularly the combination of organic amendments with reduced synthetic fertilizer rates, can effectively improve wheat productivity while promoting sustainable soil fertility management.


Received | July 25, 2025; Accepted | Aug 19, 2025; Published | November 29, 2025

*Correspondence | Zaryab Murad, Department of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar-Pakistan; Abdul Rehman, Department of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar-Pakistan; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Bibi, S., M. Mussarat, D. Muhammad, Z. Murad, S.Y. Im, P. Zhuang, I. Khan and A. Rehman. 2025. Enhancing nutrient use efficiency and wheat productivity through application of humic acid and farmyard manure with synthetic fertilizers. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 41(4): 1980-1995.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2025/41.4.1980.1995

Keywords | Grain yield, Biological yield, Harvest index, Nutrient use efficiency, Extractable P and K.

Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Fertilizers are necessary to increase crop growth (USMAN, 2013). According to (Kalsoom et al., 2020) essential plant nutrients play a vital role in the development and growth of plants. Nitrogen is an essential element of plant cellular material, amino acids, nucleic acid, and chlorophyll. It is a major macronutrient that significantly increases yield (Sher et al., 2019). Its availability at early growth stages is very essential for the fulfillment of crop requirements (Slafer and Savin, 2018; Ur Rahman et al., 2019). The application of N improves the 1000-grain weight, N use efficiency, protein content and production (Liu et al., 2022). Phosphorus is also an important macronutrient required by plants and it improves the development of roots (Wang et al., 2021). Higher application of P fertilizer, up to a certain level, significantly increases P availability, improves P use efficiency, and enhances crop yield (Swaney and Howarth, 2019). Potassium is required by plants in large amounts and plays a role in biochemical and physiological processes (Khan et al., 2013). It enhances plant resistance to stresses such as temperature, drought, and diseases (Jat et al., 2013). Although chemical fertilizers have tremendous potential to increase yield significantly, they also have serious hazardous effects on human health, the environment, and soil health. To reduce the harmful impact of chemical fertilizers, we should focus on organic farming and use organic manures as an alternative source of plant nutrients.

In agriculture, organic amendments have been used to improve nutrient availability, including green manures and farmyard manures. Farmyard manures are a significant source of nutrient supply, also on smallholding farm areas. It is considered a valuable amendment and has a positive impact on the soil (Fageria, 2012). According to (Ramborun et al., 2021), it provides nutrients and plays a vital role in enhancing water-holding capacity and improving soil conditions for crop growth. It develops root strength, increases mineral uptake, improves chlorophyll synthesis, favorable seed germination, and enhances fertilizer maintenance. Organic manures improve soil condition physically, chemically, and biologically. They provide essential micro-nutrients, reduces the toxic effect of acidity, salinity, and alkalinity on crop growth. The application of farmyard manure enhances the concentration of N in soil (Ramborun et al., 2021).

Humic substances are the constituents of organic materials that are commonly available in soils, rivers, oceans, and coal sites and derived from the natural sources of peat, lignite and Leonardite (Bibi et al., 2024). Humic acid is formed due to the chemical and biological humification process of animal and plant residues with the help of soil microorganisms. Humic acid improves plant growth, soil properties, enhances soil fertility and CEC (Dawood et al., 2019). It has an effective impact on the enhancement of cytokinin and auxin content and it also improves plant metabolic activity (El-Sayed et al., 2024). The application of humic acid contributes to biotic and abiotic processes that significantly improve microbial respiration, xenobiotic transformation, enhance soil fertility and reduces the concentration of heavy metals (Kulikova and Perminova, 2021). The availability of P to plant becomes more convenient due to the presence of P containing substances at acidic soil environment (Chojnacka et al., 2020). The foliar application of humic acid stimulates the plant parameters like spike length and number, number of grains and 1000 grain weight (Kandil et al., 2016). Humic acid plays a significant role in improving wheat yield and is used to meliorate or decrease the negative impact of stress (Azarpour et al., 2012). According to (Burhan and AL-Taey, 2018), the amendment of humic acid is a pollution-free technique of agriculture. It is formed due to the decomposition of animal and plant materials that improves soil physically, chemically, increases plant metabolism and physiological parameters (Aziz et al., 2014).

Wheat is a major crop that is cultivated worldwide on a total area of 220 million hectares with an estimated yield of 750 million tons (Tadesse et al., 2018). Globally, the demand for wheat is expected to exceed 950 Mha-1 by the year 2020. The demand of wheat can be attained by increasing the worldwide production at the rate of 2.5 % per year (Bairwa et al., 2018). Wheat is one of the necessary foods containing almost 20 % of the protein and calories content and is an essential source of energy (Sheehy et al., 2019). After rice, it is the most cultivated crop in many developing countries and about 80 million farmers depend on wheat for their livelihood (Curtis and Quarnstrom, 2019). In Pakistan, wheat is cultivated over an area of 9.63 Mha-1 with a production of 31.4 million tons with an estimated yield of 3261 kg ha-1 and in KPK, it is cultivated on an area of 0.7325 million hectares with a total production of 1.26 million tons and a yield of 1721 kg ha-1 (USDA, 2014). Since a large global population depends on wheat for their food and livelihood, it is essential to increase production. Therefore, it is necessary to maximize wheat yield to bring prosperity and positive change in the socioeconomic life of the masses belonging to agriculture. Therefore, this study was conducted to sustainably increase wheat yield and enhance nutrient use efficiency to reduce production costs and improve the socioeconomic conditions of the farming community.

Materials and Methods

Experimental site and treatments

A field experiment was conducted from 28th October, 2020 to 21st March 2021 the Agriculture Research Farm, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan, located at 34.1o21 N, 71o285 E (Figure 1) to study the role of organic amendments (Farmyard manure and Humic acid) and different levels of synthetic fertilizers (NPK) for soil physico-chemical properties, wheat yield, total nutrient uptake and use efficiency in alkaline calcareous soil of the semiarid region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The experimental soil had a pH of 7.63, with a texture class of silt loam comprising 21.3% sand, 68.2% silt, and 10.5% clay. The soil electrical conductivity was 0.18 dS m-¹, and the organic matter content was 0.63%. The total N content was 0.053%, while the available P and K levels were 4.39 mg kg-¹ and 88.42 mg kg-¹, respectively. During the period of the field experiment, Peshawar city had a soil temperature of 10.09–33.12 °C with an average temperature of 22.64 °C, while the air temperature was within the range of 9.47–31.11 0C with an average temperature of 21.50 0C. The monthly mean relative humidity and rainfall were 53.08% and 12.66 mm (Figure 2).

The experiment was designed with a two-factor factorial arrangement, incorporating organic amendments (Factor A) and NPK fertilizer levels (Factor B). Factor A included four levels of organic amendments: (1) no amendment (control), (2) farmyard manure (FYM) applied at 10 t ha-¹, (3) humic acid applied at 10 kg ha-¹, and (4) a combination of FYM and humic acid at the same rates. The FYM used in the experiment had the following physico-chemical properties: pH of 6.85 (1:5), electrical conductivity (EC) of 3.65 dS m-¹ (1:5), nitrogen (N) content of 1.07%, phosphorus (P₂O₅) content of 0.33%, potassium (K₂O) content of 0.77%, moisture content of 26.45%, organic matter content of 48.30%, and a carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio of 18:1. Factor B consisted of three levels of NPK fertilizer, expressed as a percentage of the recommended dose: (1) 0% NPK (no fertilizer), (2) 75% NPK (90:60:45 kg ha-¹ of N:P₂O₅:K₂O), and (3) 100% NPK (120:90:60 kg ha-¹ of N:P₂O₅:K₂O). The combination of these two factors resulted in a total of 12 treatments, which included inorganic fertilizers applied both alone and in combination with organic amendments. Each treatment was replicated three times to ensure statistical reliability. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with a factorial arrangement. The plot size for each treatment was 3 m × 3 m (9 m²), providing sufficient space for accurate measurement and observation of treatment effects.

 

Crop husbandry

Wheat seeds were sown on October 28, 2020, using a single-row hand drill. The seeds were planted in rows spaced 22.5 cm apart, with a seeding rate of 125 kg ha-¹. Fertilizer application was tailored based on the results of the soil analysis, as outlined in the treatment section. To manage weed growth, the herbicide Atlantis (a combination of iodosulfuron and mesosulfuron) was applied at a rate of 14.4 g active ingredient per hectare on December 15, 2020, during the early post-emergence stage. The crop received a total of four irrigations during its growth period, with each irrigation delivering 3 acre-inches of water. Additionally, a pre-sowing soaking irrigation of 4 acre-inches was applied to ensure optimal soil moisture for seed germination and early crop establishment. The crop was harvested on 21st March 2021 and was threshed to record the yield and other related traits.

 

Data recording

Agronomic parameters

At maturity, ten plants were selected randomly from each experimental unit and their height was measured using a scale. The grains per spike of ten spikes from the same plants were harvested and threshed to count the number of grains per spike. To determine 1000 grain weight, four subsamples of 1000 grains were taken from each plot and weighed. Grain yield was determined by manually harvesting each plot (whole plot), threshing and weighing the grains. The grain and straw yields are reported in kg ha−1 at 12 and 20% (the approximate moisture content of stored straw used for livestock fodder) moisture content, respectively. The harvest index was calculated as the ratio of dry grain yield to dry biological yield (grain yield + straw yield) and expressed as a percentage.

Soil physiochemical and plant mineral analysis

Soil samples were collected randomly from the experimental field using an auger. Sampling was conducted at a depth range of 0-15 cm to ensure a representative analysis of the topsoil. Each sample was carefully placed in a separate plastic bag, labeled appropriately to avoid cross-contamination or misidentification, and transported to the laboratory for further processing.

In the laboratory, the soil samples were air-dried to remove moisture, followed by sieving through a 2 mm mesh to achieve a uniform particle size for analysis. All subsequent laboratory analyses were conducted using standard protocols to ensure accuracy and consistency.

The pH of the soil was determined using the method proposed by Thomas (1996), which involves a soil-water suspension and measurement with a calibrated pH meter. Electrical conductivity (EC) was measured following the procedure outlined by Rhoades (1996), which assesses the soil’s salinity levels. Soil organic matter (SOM) content was analyzed using the method described by Nelson and Sommers (1996), which involves oxidation and titration to quantify organic carbon. For nutrient analysis, soil nitrogen (N) content was determined using the protocol established by Bremner and Mulvaney (1982), which involves the Kjeldahl digestion method. Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations in both soil and plant samples were measured using the method detailed by Soltanpour and Schwab (1977), which employs spectrophotometric and flame photometric techniques, respectively. .

Nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiencies

Nutrient uptake in plants was determined by using the following formula;

The N, P and K use efficiencies were calculated according to Fageria (2009).

Data analysis

The experiment was designed in randomized complete block design with a factorial arrangement and the data collected was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). The means were compared by using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) techniques. The ANOVA and LSD were computed by using the computer statistical software Statistics 8.1 (Analytical Software, 1985-2005).

Results

Agronomic parameter

The treatments significantly affected plant height (Table 1). The FYM+HA treatment had the maximum plant height (87.6 cm), which was statistically equivalent to FYM (86 cm). The control treatment had the lowest plant height (80.4 cm). In contrast, 100% nutrient application (N, P and K) produced the tallest plants (89.9 cm), followed by 75% (84.7 cm) and 0% (78.7 cm). The 1000-grain weight differed significantly between treatments (Table 1). The FYM + HA treatment had the highest grain weight (45.9 g), surpassing the control (43.9 g) but being statistically similar to FYM (44.9 g). The maximum 1000-grain weight was 46.4 g at 75% nutrient application (N, P and K) and the lowest at 0% (42.5 g). All the treatments significantly affected number of grain spikes per plant (Table 1). FYM+HA had the most grain spikes (46.9), followed by FYM (46.3), HA (45.7), and the control (44.7). The highest grain spikes (46.7) were at 75% NPK level, which was equal to 100% (46.6) but much greater than 0% (44.5). The treatments significantly affected grain yield (Table 1, Figure 3a). The FYM+HA treatment yielded 3755.9 kg/ha, followed by FYM (3509.1 kg/ha) and HA (3343.7 kg/ha), whereas the control treatment had the lowest yield of 3094.7 kg/ha. Among fertilizer rates the 100% nutrient treatment (N, P and K) yielded the most grain (3774.2 kg/ha), followed by 75% (3608.5 kg/ha) and 0% (2894.8 kg/ha). The results showed that FYM+HA produced the most biological yield (9483 kg/ha) as presented in Table 1, and Figure 3b. FYM and HA yielded 8991 and 8821 kg/ha respectively, while the control yielded 8449 kg/ha. Biological yield was highest at 75% nutrient level (9477 kg/ha), followed by 100% (9127 kg/ha) and lowest at 0% (8205 kg/ha). Treatments significantly affected harvest index (Table 1). The FYM+HA treatment had the highest harvest index (39.9%), followed by FYM (38.7%) and HA (37.8%) while control had the lowest harvest index (36.5%). Harvest index was highest with 100% nutrient application of N, P and K (41.3%), followed by 75% (38.1%) and lowest at 0% (35.2%).

 

Table 1: Effect of FYM, HA and different rates of NPK fertilizer on plant height (cm), 1000-grain weight (g), grain spike-1, grain yield (kg ha-1), biological yield (kg ha-1) and harvest index (%) of wheat.

Treatments

Plant height cm

1000-grain weight g

Grain spike-1

Grain yield Kg/ha

Biological yield Kg/ha

Harvest index%

Control

80.4 c

43.9 d

44.7 d

3094.7 d

8449 d

36.5 c

FYM

86.0 a

44.9 b

46.3 b

3509.1 b

8991 b

38.7 ab

HA

83.6 b

44.4 c

45.7 c

3343.7 c

8821 c

37.8 b

FYM*HA

87.6 a

45.9 a

46.9 a

3755.9 a

9483 a

39.9 a

0

78.7 c

42.5 c

44.5 b

2894.8 c

8205 c

35.2 c

75

84.7 b

46.4 a

46.7 a

3608.5 b

9477 a

38.1 b

100

89.9 a

45.3 b

46.6 a

3774.2 a

9127 b

41.3 a

 

Note: Organic amendments (FYM and HA) and N, P and K fertilizers (0, 75 and 100% rates) were both applied in kgha-1

 

Table 2: Effect of FYM, HA and different rates of NPK fertilizer on straw N, straw P, straw K, grains N, grains P and grains K concentration of wheat

Treatments

Straw N

Straw P

Straw K

Grains N

Grains P

Grains K

%

Control

0.75 d

0.15 d

2.23 d

1.6 d

0.14 c

0.71 d

FYM

0.79 b

0.18 b

2.31 b

1.8 b

0.17 b

0.78 b

HA

0.77 c

0.17 c

2.28 c

1.7 c

0.16 bc

0.75 c

FYM*HA

0.81 a

0.20 a

2.35 a

2.0 a

0.19 a

0.82 a

0

0.71 c

0.12 c

2.14 c

1.2 c

0.13 c

0.61 c

75

0.79 b

0.19 b

2.34 b

1.9 b

0.16 b

0.91 a

100

0.85 a

0.20 a

2.41 a

2.2 a

0.19 a

0.78 b

 

Note: Organic amendments (FYM and HA) and N, P and K fertilizers (0, 75 and 100% rates) were both applied in kgha-1 Means that share distinct letters within a column are significantly (p≤0.05) different from one another NS = non-significant.

 

 

Concentration of N, P and K in wheat straw

The 100% NPK treatment had the greatest straw N content (0.85%), followed by FYM+HA (0.81%) (Table 2). In comparison to HA (0.77%) and control (0.75%), FYM alone (0.79%) displayed higher values, suggesting that full NPK fertilization and organic additions greatly increased nitrogen uptake in straw. Both the FYM+HA treatment and the 100% NPK treatment had the highest straw P content (0.20%) (Table 2). P levels in FYM (0.18%) were marginally higher than those in HA (0.17%) and control (0.15%), indicating that the addition of organic amendments enhanced the availability of phosphorus in straw. The 100% NPK (2.41%) and FYM+HA (2.35%) treatments had the greatest straw K content (Table 2, Figure 3c), followed by FYM (2.31%), HA (2.28%), and control (2.23%). The findings show that balanced NPK application and combined treatments improved potassium buildup in straw.

Concentration of N, P and K in wheat grains

In comparison to FYM (1.8%), HA (1.7%), and control (1.6%), the grain N content was much greater under the 100% NPK treatment (2.2%) and FYM+HA (2.0%), as shown in Table 2. These results imply that FYM and HA work in concert to enhance grain nitrogen uptake. As shown in Table 2, the grain P concentration maximized with 100% NPK (0.19%) and FYM+HA (0.19%). Compared to HA (0.16%) and control (0.14%), FYM (0.17%) produced higher values, suggesting that the combination of organic and inorganic amendments greatly increased the amount of phosphorus that accumulated in grains. The grain K content (Table 2) was maximal in the 75% NPK treatment (0.91%), followed by FYM+HA (0.82%)

 

Table 3: Effect of FYM, HA and different rates of NPK fertilizer on total N uptake, total P uptake, total K uptake, N-use efficiency, P-use efficiency and K-use efficiency of wheat

Treatments

Uptake N

Uptake P

Uptake K

N use efficiency

P use efficiency

K use efficiency

kg

%

Control

91.1 d

12.6 d

142.3 d

46.77 d

7.03 c

37.16 c

FYM

109.7 b

14.9 b

153.4 b

71.57 b

9.50 b

50.31 b

HA

99.0 c

14.2 c

151.5 c

55.53 c

9.19 b

48.22 b

FYM*HA

124.0 a

18.1 a

166.0 a

90.13 a

14.30 a

69.64 a

0

75.9 c

10.7 c

131.4 c

-

-

-

75

114.2 b

17.6 a

170.2 a

67.7

11.99 a

65.53 a

100

127.7 a

16.6 b

158.2 b

64.3

8.02 b

37.13 b

 

Note: Organic amendments (FYM and HA) and N, P and K fertilizers (0, 75 and 100% rates) were both applied in kgha-1. Means that share distinct letters within a column are significantly (p≤0.05) different from one another.

 

and FYM (0.78%). HA (0.75%) and the control (0.71%) exhibited the lowest concentrations. These findings underscore the significance of FYM and HA in augmenting potassium absorption in grains. Total Nutrient (N, P & K) Uptake

The combination of FYM and HA (FYM+HA) yielded the maximum nitrogen uptake at 124.0 kg, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 3d, indicating a notable improvement over the control group, which recorded 91.1 kg. FYM alone resulted in a significant rise of 109.7 kg, whereas HA exhibited moderate enhancements of 99.0 kg. The maximum nutrient uptake was seen at the 100% fertilizer treatment level, totaling 127.7 kg, demonstrating the efficacy of complete nutrient administration. Phosphorus absorption reached a maximum of 18.1 kg in the FYM+HA treatment, indicating the synergistic effect of the combined organic amendments (Table 3, Figure 3e). FYM and HA individually resulted in phosphorus uptakes of 14.9 kg and 14.2 kg, respectively, both exceeding the control’s uptake of 12.6 kg. Among fertilizer treatments, the 75% level demonstrated enhanced phosphorus uptake (17.6 kg) relative to the 100% level (16.6 kg), indicating possible optimization at lower input levels. The highest potassium uptake (166.0 kg) occurred in plants treated with FYM*HA (Table 3, and Figure 3f), underscoring the significance of organic amendments in potassium mobilization. FYM alone enhanced potassium uptake to 153.4 kg, whilst HA achieved 151.5 kg. The control therapy had a markedly reduced intake of 142.3 kg. The 75% fertilizer level exhibited excellent potassium uptake at 170.2 kg, exceeding the 100% level, which recorded 158.2 kg.

Total Nutrient (N, P & K) Use Efficiency

Nitrogen consumption efficiency (Table 3 and Figure 3g) significantly increased with the FYM+HA treatment (90.13%), highlighting the improved nutrient use enabled by organic inputs. FYM alone achieved an efficiency of 71.57%, much surpassing that of HA at 55.53%. The control exhibited the lowest efficiency at 46.77%. The FYM+HA application demonstrated enhanced phosphorus usage efficiency (14.30%), signifying improved utilization of phosphorus resources under this treatment (Table 3). FYM and HA had similar efficiency (9.50% and 9.19%, respectively), both surpassing the control (7.03%). The assessment of fertilizer levels indicated that the 75% treatment (11.99%) surpassed the 100% level (8.02%). The integrated FYM+HA treatment attained the highest potassium utilization efficiency (69.64%), demonstrating the efficacy of organic amendments in improving nutrient uptake efficiency (Table 3, Figure 3h). FYM achieved an efficiency of 50.31%, whereas HA recorded 48.22%. Fertilizer treatments had an inverse relationship, with the 75% fertilizer level achieving the best efficiency (65.53%) in contrast to the 100% level (37.13%).

 

Table 4: Effect of FYM, HA and different rates of NPK fertilizer on soil PH, total soil N, AB-DTPA Extractable P and AB-DTPA Extractable K.

Treatments

Soil pH

Soil total N

AB-DTPA extractable P

AB-DTPA extractable K

%

mg/kg

Control

7.74 d

0.089 d

5.71 d

115.04 d

FYM

7.81 b

0.104 b

6.79 b

121.98 b

HA

7.79 c

0.101 c

6.07 c

117.23 c

FYM*HA

7.83 a

0.108 a

7.23 a

134.92 a

0

7.72 c

0.076 c

5.34 c

97.01 c

75

7.80 b

0.104 b

6.76 b

123.70 b

100

7.86 a

0.121 a

7.26 a

146.17 a

 

Note: Organic amendments (FYM and HA) and N, P and K fertilizers (0, 75 and 100% rates) were both applied in kgha-1. Means that share distinct letters within a column are significantly (p≤0.05) different from one another.

 

Soil indicators after experiment

The incorporation of FYM, HA and NPK fertilizer significantly influence soil pH after experiment as mentioned in Table 4. The maximum pH of the soil (7.84) was recorded in the plots that received the combine dose of FYM and HA. The increase in synthetic fertilizer application raises soil pH. The highest soil PH (7.86) was recorded in the plots that received 100% NPK as compare to control and other fertilizer treatments. The application of humic acid along with farmyard manure significantly affects soil pH as compared to alone application of farmyard manure and humic acid. Soil total N content after experiment was observed to increase with incorporation of NPK fertilizers (Table 4). The highest soil total nitrogen content (0.108%) was observed in the plots that received the combine dose of FYM+HA as compare to control other amendments treatments. Among different NPK fertilizers incorporation, the maximum data for soil total nitrogen (0.121%) was recorded in the plots treated with 100% NPK, followed by 75% NPK treated plots. The interaction of amendments incorporation and NPK application also significantly increased soil N (Figure 3i). The data in Table 4, indicates that the application of synthetic fertilizer had a significant effect on the improvement of AB-DTPA P extractable content of treated soil. The amendment of FYM and HA in combination with NPK fertilizer positively increase AB-DTPA extractable P content. The maximum AB-DTPA extractable P (7.23 mg kg-1) was observed in the plots that were amended with FYM along with HA. The mean data revealed that maximum AB-DTPA extractable P (7.26 mg kg-1) was obtained from the plots that received 100% NPK, followed by 75% NPK level, which resulted (5.34 mg kg-1) soil P content. The maximum data of AB-DTPA extractable K (134.9 mg kg-1) was recorded in the plots that were treated with FYM along with HA (Table 4). The incorporation of NPK fertilizers also improved the K level of the soil. The maximum AB-DTPA extractable K (146.2 mg kg-1) was noticed in the plots of 100% NPK, followed by 75% NPK, which produced (97.1 mg kg-1) of soil K content. Among the amendments, the highest value of soil K (134.9 mg kg-1) was noticed in the plot treated with FYM and HA that was followed by sole application of FYM that produced (115.04 mg kg-1) of soil K. The combined effect of amendments and synthetic fertilizers was found significant (Figure 3j). The amendments of FYM+HA with 75% NPK application result in maximum concentration of soil extractable K.

Discussion

Impact of humic acid, farmyard manure, and synthetic fertilizers on wheat growth and yield

The utilization of humic acid (HA), farmyard manure (FYM), and synthetic fertilizers resulted in significant enhancements in wheat growth and yield metrics by improving nutrient availability and soil quality. The use of HA significantly enhanced wheat plant height, corroborating other research (Roudgarnejad et al., 2021), (Khan et al., 2013; Weissy et al., 2018). This enhancement is attributed to HA’s function in augmenting nutrient availability and soil structure, thus promoting superior root development and plant growth (Mohammadipour et al., 2012). Likewise, FYM positively affected plant height by providing vital nutrients and enhancing soil conditions (Özkan et al., 2021), (Aksu, 2017). The simultaneous application of FYM and HA produced enhanced growth, underscoring its synergistic effect. The use of HA significantly increased the number of grains per spike by enhancing N availability during decomposition, hence supporting spike growth (Atak et al., 2004; Sharif et al., 2002; Sharma et al., 2014). FYM enhanced the grains per spike by augmenting soil fertility and facilitating a gradual release of nutrients (Chattha et al., 2019; Özkan et al., 2021). The amalgamation of FYM with synthetic fertilizers optimized the grains per spike, supporting evidence that such combinations improve nutrient usage efficiency (Aksu, 2017).

The integration of HA, FYM, and synthetic fertilizers significantly improved grain yield. HA enhanced nutrient absorption and photosynthetic efficiency, resulting in increased yields [42]. FYM enhanced soil organic matter and nutrient availability, whereas synthetic fertilizers supplied nutrients in a readily available form (Alizadeh Dehkordi, 2010; Li et al., 2012; Roudgarnejad et al., 2021). The synergistic application of these changes exceeded the efficacy of their individual use, as evidenced by numerous investigations (Ghanbari et al., 2013). HA enhanced soil nutrient availability and plant absorption, increasing thousand-grain weight (Atak et al., 2004; Shazma Anwar et al., 2016). FYM and NPK fertilizers optimized nutrient availability at critical growth stages (Antoun et al., 2010; Mahmood et al., 2017). Similar studies show that organic manures and synthetic fertilizers improve grain weight (El-Kouny, 2007). The application of HA greatly increased biological yield, presumably due to enhanced soil conditions and the availability of critical nutrients (Abril et al., 2007; Shazma Anwar et al., 2016). The FYM application enhanced biological yield by promoting soil microbial activity and nitrogen cycling (El-Sayed et al., 2024; Khayat, 2021). The harvest index was markedly enhanced by HA and FYM, especially when used in conjunction with synthetic fertilizers, illustrating their joint efficacy in optimizing resource utilization (Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019; Mahmood et al., 2017; Roudgarnejad et al., 2021).

Effect of organic amendments and synthetic fertilizers on N content in wheat

Application of synthetic fertilizers, manures, and humic acid dramatically affected wheat shoot and grain nitrogen (N). These amendments improved soil nutrient availability, N uptake, and plant growth, increasing nitrogen concentrations in plant parts. The integration of synthetic fertilizers and organic amendments, including manures and humic acid, markedly increased nitrogen content in wheat shoots. Manures enhanced soil nitrogen levels by augmenting organic matter and microbial activity, leading to increased nitrogen availability for plant absorption (Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022). Likewise, HA improved soil nutrient dynamics, thus increasing nitrogen concentration in shoots (Delfine et al., 2005; Taimur Naseem et al., 2015). The combination of synthetic fertilizers and manures enhanced these effects, since the fertilizers supplied readily available nitrogen, while manures facilitated prolonged nutrient release, hence enhancing nitrogen uptake efficiency (Daur, 2014; Taimur Naseem et al., 2015). The utilization of synthetic fertilizers in conjunction with manures and HA markedly elevated nitrogen concentration in wheat grains. This enhancement was ascribed to the mechanisms of improved soil nitrogen availability and augmented nitrogen uptake by plants (Adekiya et al., 2016; Alizadeh Dehkordi, 2010; Antoun et al., 2010; Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019). The combination of manures and synthetic fertilizers enhanced grain nitrogen content by increasing nutrient availability during critical growth phases (Khayat, 2021). The integrated use of HA, manures, and synthetic fertilizers enhanced nitrogen absorption via various processes. This encompassed the improvement of soil nutrient retention capacity, microbial activity, and nutrient mineralization, which jointly augmented the availability of nitrogen for plant absorption (Daur, 2014; Delfine et al., 2005). Synthetic fertilizers offered an immediate supply of nitrogen, whilst manures and humic acids enabled its prolonged release and effective absorption by plants (Adekiya et al., 2016; Taimur Naseem et al., 2015).

Effect of organic amendments and synthetic fertilizers on P uptake in wheat

Organic additives like manures and humic acid (HA) combined with synthetic fertilizers increased wheat straw and grain phosphorus (P). This improvement is due to improved soil nutrient availability, microbial activity, and plant uptake. The amalgamation of manures and synthetic fertilizers enhanced phosphorus concentration in wheat straw, as evidenced by our results and supported by previous research (Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019; Tabbassum et al., 2022). The synergistic application of HA enhanced this impact by optimizing soil nutrient dynamics and plant absorption efficiency (Matuszak-Slamani et al., 2017; Savita et al., 2018). These amendments improved phosphorus availability in the soil, facilitating greater absorption by plants and accumulation in straw (Akande et al., 2006). The integrated use of manures, synthetic fertilizers, and HA markedly enhanced phosphorus buildup in wheat grains. When combined with NPK fertilizers, manures increased soil phosphorus content and maintained its availability over the growth season (Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019; Mahmood et al., 2017). HA enhanced soil phosphorus availability and absorption efficiency by improving nutrient retention and microbial activity (Aşık et al., 2009; Nasiroleslami et al., 2021). The collaboration of HA, manures, and synthetic fertilizers enhanced soil conditions, promoting improved phosphorus absorption by plants. HA enhanced microbial proliferation and activity, which was essential for phosphorus solubilization and mobilization (Daur, 2014; Delfine et al., 2005). Manures facilitated prolonged nutrient release, whereas synthetic fertilizers offered immediately accessible phosphorus, establishing an ideal nutrient equilibrium for plant development (Adekiya et al., 2016). This combination markedly improved phosphorus uptake efficiency and accumulation in both straw and grains (Khayat, 2021).

Effect of organic amendments and synthetic fertilizers on K concentration and uptake in wheat

Manures, humic acid (HA), and synthetic fertilizers increased soil, straw, and grain K content, improving plant uptake. This improvement is due to soil nutrient availability and plant nutrient absorption. The incorporation of manures markedly elevated soil potassium levels, subsequently enhancing potassium concentration in wheat straw (Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019; Thomas et al., 2019). The use of humic acid further intensified this impact by augmenting nutrient retention in the soil and raising potassium availability for plant absorption(Matuszak-Slamani et al., 2017; Savita et al., 2018). The synergistic use of manures and synthetic fertilizers enhanced nutritional equilibrium, resulting in increased potassium buildup in plant straw. The integration of manures with synthetic fertilizers led to a substantial enhancement in potassium concentration in wheat grains (Ashrafi Esfahani et al., 2019; Nasiroleslami et al., 2021). Humic acid treatment augmented potassium uptake and grain accumulation by enhancing nutrient availability and soil conditions (Antoun et al., 2010; Aşık et al., 2009; Roudgarnejad et al., 2021). The maximum potassium content in cereals was recorded with the integrated use of manures, synthetic fertilizers, and humic acid. The integration of HA, manures, and synthetic fertilizers enhanced the accessibility and absorption of K by wheat plants. HA significantly contributed to the enhancement of soil K retention, the stimulation of microbial activity, and the improvement of root uptake efficiency (Aşık et al., 2009; Delfine et al., 2005). Manures facilitated a gradual release of K and enhanced soil structure, but synthetic fertilizers guaranteed the prompt availability of nutrients, establishing an ideal nutritional equilibrium for plant development (Adekiya et al., 2016; Khayat, 2021; Martins et al., 2003).

Effect of manures and synthetic fertilizers on nutrient use efficiency

The integration of manures into soil significantly enhanced N availability, leading to greater N use efficiency by plants. This enhancement is ascribed to the gradual-release characteristics of organic amendments and their function in augmenting soil nutrient retention and microbial activity (Farrag and Bakr, 2021; Mahmood et al., 2017; Rees and Castle, 2002). The integration of manures and synthetic fertilizers improved N use efficiency by ensuring a balanced nutrient supply (Vieira et al., 2016). The amalgamation of manures with fertilizers markedly elevated soil P levels, resulting in augmented P absorption and higher utilization efficiency. Multiple investigations indicated that the application of manures at varying quantities enhanced P availability and promoted its effective consumption by plants (Abo-Baker, 2017; Farrag and Bakr, 2021; Rees and Castle, 2002). The combined action of manures and synthetic fertilizers established a more advantageous nutritional environment for plant growth, hence optimizing P use efficiency. Fertilizers also augmented the availability of K in the soil, hence improving K uptake and use efficiency. Studies demonstrate that the utilization of farmyard manure enhances K use efficiency by improving soil structure and nutrient retention capacity (Farrag and Bakr, 2021). The synergistic application of synthetic fertilizers and manures significantly improved K utilization efficiency by providing a balanced and continuous nutrient supply (Xi et al., 2019).

Impact of manures and synthetic fertilizers on soil properties

The simultaneous use of manures and synthetic fertilizers elevated soil pH relative to the exclusive use of synthetic fertilizers. Studies by (Pal et al., 2015; Shazma Anwar et al., 2016) corroborate this finding, demonstrating that the use of synthetic fertilizers, whether singularly or in conjunction with organic additions, elevated soil pH. Comparable findings were documented by (Bhatt et al., 2018), corroborating the beneficial effect of integrated manures and synthetic fertilizers on enhancing soil pH. The integrated application of manures, synthetic fertilizers, and humic acid effectively augmented total N levels in soil by minimizing N losses and promoting their retention. Research conducted by (Khayat, 2021; Zhou et al., 2016) indicated substantial increases in total N in soil due to organic and synthetic amendments. The results of (Bhatt et al., 2018; Kalsoom et al., 2020; Kumar and Singh, 2010) corroborated these findings, affirming the synergistic effect of manure and synthetic fertilizers on enhancing soil N availability. The amalgamation of manures and synthetic fertilizers markedly elevated soil P levels. Studies by (Bhatt et al., 2018; Dhaliwal et al., 2015; Sharma et al., 2014) corroborate these findings, indicating that manures augment P availability via enhancing soil microbial activity and nutrient cycling. The efficacy of manures in augmenting soil P concentration was further validated by (Bairwa et al., 2018).

When mixed with synthetic fertilizers, manures greatly increased soil K levels. Research conducted by (Bhatt, 2012; Dhaliwal et al., 2015) validated the synergistic benefits of these amendments in enhancing soil K concentration, presumably attributable to the gradual release of K from organic sources and the prompt availability from synthetic fertilizers. The FYM soil organic matter enrichment and HA’s nutrient chelation and absorption promoted nitrogen availability, improving plant physiological characteristics. FYM+HA synergy increased root development, nutrient absorption, and consistent release, while HA promoted nutrient mobility and photosynthetic efficiency, enhancing grain development (Sheoran et al., 2024). Soil organic carbon, microbial activity, and stress tolerance increased yield attributes and harvest index, while FYM helped retain nutrients and HA (Tathe et al., 2024) stimulated hormone activity for effective grain assimilation. Integration maximized plant growth and production. N increases cell elongation, chlorophyll production, and protein creation, enhancing vegetative growth and grain filling. Potassium (K) controls enzymes, osmotic balance, and stress tolerance, while phosphorus (P) improves root development, energy transfer, and blooming. N, P, and K optimize growth, biomass, and assimilate partitioning, increasing yield and harvest index (Afzal et al., 2023).

Conclusions and Recommendations

The combined application of HA+FYM significantly concentration of N, P and K in the plants compared to the sole application of NPK. Total uptake of plant NPK increased by 39%, 47%, and 40%, respectively, with the application of HA+FYM and 75% synthetic fertilizers compared to the individual application of 75% NPK. The N, P and K use efficiency was also improved with the combined application of HA+FYM and synthetic fertilizers. Similarly, after harvesting a significant increase was recorded in soil total N, P and K with the combined application of HA+FYM as compared to the application of either amendments or NPK alone. To decrease the use of commercial fertilizers and improve soil properties, 10 kg ha-1 humic acid in combination with FYM and 75% NPK (90-60-45 kg NPK ha-1) is recommended for the enhancement of grain yield, nutrient availability, and soil physicochemical properties. It is suggested that similar research should be conducted at different locations with more NPK levels for wider spread use of organic manures.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Department of Soil and Environmental Science, The University of Agriculture Peshawar.

Novelty Statement

This research explored the potential of organic amendments with synthetic fertilizers for nutrient use efficiency and wheat productivity.

Author’s Contribution

Sobia Bibi: Principal author, conducted the research and wrote first draft, data collection and analysis, Scientific review.

Maria Mussarat: Dost Muhammad, Scientific writing and data collection.

Zaryab Murad: Seon Yeong Im, Ping Zhuang, Ismail Khan, Abdul Rehman.

Generative AI or AI assisted technology statement

The authors have declared no Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Abo-Baker, A. 2017. Successive application impact of some organic amendments combined with acid producing bacteria on soil properties, NPK availability and uptake by some plants. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6: 2394-2413. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.274

Abril, A., D. Baleani, N. Casado-Murillo, L. Noe, 2007. Effect of wheat crop fertilization on nitrogen dynamics and balance in the Humid Pampas, Argentina. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 119: 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.005

Adekiya, A.O., T.M. Agbede, S.O. Ojeniyi, 2016. The effect of three years of tillage and poultry manure application on soil and plant nutrient composition, growth and yield of cocoyam. Experimen. Agric., 52: 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479715000253

Afzal, A., S. Bahader, T. Ul Hassan, I. Naz, A.u. Din. 2023. Rock phosphate solubilization by plant growth-promoting Bacillus velezensis and its impact on wheat growth and yield. Geomicrobiol. J., 40: 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2022.2128113

Akande, M., F. Oluwatoyinbo, C. Kayode, F. Olowokere. 2006. Response of maize (Zea mays) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) intercrop relayed with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to different levels of cow dung amended phosphate rock. World J. Agric. Sci., 2: 119-122.

Aksu, T. 2017. The effects of different nitrogen and farm manure doses on yield, quality and antioxidant activity of bread wheat.

Alizadeh Dehkordi, P. 2010. Effect of livestock and urea fertilizers on net soil mineralization, growth and yield of maize under cut irrigation at flowering. M. Sc. Thesis. Fac. Agric. Natur. Res., Shahrekord.

Antoun, L.W., S.M. Zakaria, H.H. Rafla. 2010. Influence of compost, N-mineral and humic acid on yield and chmical composition of wheat plants. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Engineer. 1: 1131-1143. https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2010.75819

Ashrafi Esfahani, A., Y. Niknejad, H. Fallah, S. Dastan. 2019. Integrated management of organic manures and chemical fertilizers for enhancing paddy yield and the nutrient content of rice cultivars. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Analys., 50: 570-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2019.1573248

Aşık, B.B., M.A. Turan, H. Çelik, A.V. Katkat. 2009. Uptake of wheat (Triticum durun cv. Salihli) under conditions of salinity. Asian J. Crop Sci., 1: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2009.87.95

Atak, M., M. Kaya, C. Ciftci. 2004. Effects of zinc and humic acid applications on yield and yield components of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.).

Azarpour, E., M. Moraditochaee, H.R. Bozorgi. 2012. Evaluating energy balance and energy indices of wheat production in rain-fed farming in northern Iran. Afric. J. Agric. Res., 7: 1950-1955. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.1941

Aziz, M.A., A. El-Fattah, K. Faiza, F.A. Sherif. 2014. Effect of cyanobacteria, humic substances and mineral nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield and its components. J. Agric. Chemis. Biotechnol., 5: 253-264. https://doi.org/10.21608/jacb.2014.49902

Bairwa, D.D., J. Modhvadia, V. Bhadu. 2018. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to phosphorus and sulphur fertilization. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci., 6: 354-357. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.7025

Bhatt, B. 2012. Effect of long term fertilizer application in rice-wheat system on crop productivity and soil. Ph. D. Thesis submit. GBPUA. T. Pantnag. Ind., 135-145.

Bhatt, M., K. Raverkar, R. Labanya, C.K. Bhatt. 2018. Effects of long-term balanced and imbalanced use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manure (FYM) on soil chemical properties and yield of rice under rice-wheat cropping system. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem., 7: 703-708.

Bibi, S., M. Mussarat, D. Muhammad, Z. Murad. 2024. Effect of Humic Acid Applied With Farmyard Manure on Nutrients Use Efficiency and Wheat Yield. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3891565/v1

Bremner, J.M., and C.S. Mulvaney, 1982. Nitrogen—total. Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties. pp. 595-624.

Burhan, A.K., D.K. AL-Taey. 2018. Effect of Potassium humate, humic acid, and compost of rice wastes in the growth and yield of two cultivars of Dill under salt stress conditions. Advan. Natur. Appl. Sci., 12: 1-6.

Chattha, M.U., M.U. Hassan, L. Barbanti, M.B. Chattha, I. Khan, M. Usman, A. Ali, M. Nawaz. 2019. Composted sugarcane by-product press mud cake supports wheat growth and improves soil properties. Int. J. Plant Prod., 13: 241-249 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00051-x.

Chojnacka, K., K. Moustakas, A. Witek-Krowiak. 2020. Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy. Bioresour. Technol., 295: 122223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223

Curtis, K., and D. Quarnstrom. 2019. Untangling the economic and social impediments to producer adoption of organic wheat. J. Food Distrib. Res., 50(1): 105-113.

Daur, I. 2014. Effect of humic acid on growth, protein and mineral composition of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) r. br.] fodder. Pak. J. Bot., 46: 505-509.

Dawood, M.G., Y.R. Abdel-Baky, M.E.S. El-Awadi, G.S. Bakhoum. 2019. Enhancement quality and quantity of faba bean plants grown under sandy soil conditions by nicotinamide and humic acid application. Bullet. Nation. Res., Centre 43: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0067-0

Delfine, S., R. Tognetti, E. Desiderio, A. Alvino. 2005. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat. Agron. Sustain. Develop., 25: 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2005017

Dhaliwal, M., S. Dhaliwal, H. Thind, R. Gupta. 2015. Effect of integrated nutrient management on physico-chemical parameters of soil in rice-wheat system. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2015.00005.8

El-Kouny, H. 2007. Effect of organic manure and biofertilizers on wheat grown in lacustrine soil as compared with mineral fertilizers.

El-Sayed, H.S., A. Hassan, K.M. Barakat, H. El-Bashir. 2024. Improvement of growth and biochemical constituents of Rosmarinus officinalis by fermented Spirulina maxima biofertilizer. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 108452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108452

Fageria, N., 2012. Role of soil organic matter in maintaining sustainability of cropping systems. Commun. soil sci. plant Analys., 43: 2063-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.697234

Fageria, N.K., O.P. De Morais and A.B. Dos Santos. 2010. Nitrogen use efficiency in upland rice genotypes. J. Plant Nutri., 33(11): 1696-1711

Farrag, H., A.A. Bakr. 2021. Biological reclamation of a calcareous sandy soil with improving wheat growth using farmyard manure, acid producing bacteria and yeast. SVU-Int. J. Agric. Sci., 3: 53-71. https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijas.2021.57919.1070

Ghanbari, A., Y. Ismaili, M. Babaeans. 2013. Effect of animal and chemical fertilizers on forage yield, grain and some nutrient concentrations in elemental barley grain (Hordeum vulgare L.). Iranian J. Plant Eco-physiol., 8: 23-36.

Jat, G., S. Majumdar, N. Jat, S.P. Mazumdar. 2013. Potassium and zinc fertilization of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in western arid zone of India. Ind. J. Agron., 58: 67-71. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i1.4147

Kalsoom, M., F.U. Rehman, T. Shafique, S. Junaid, N. Khalid, M. Adnan, I. Zafar, M.A. Tariq, M. Raza, A. Zahra. 2020. Biological importance of microbes in agriculture, food and pharmaceutical industry: A review. Innov. J. Life Sci., 8: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijls.2020.v8i6.39845

Kandil, A., A. Sharief, S. Seadh, D. Altai. 2016. Role of humic acid and amino acids in limiting loss of nitrogen fertilizer and increasing productivity of some wheat cultivars grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci., 3: 123-136.

Khan, A., M. Khan, F. Hussain, M. Akhtar, A. Gurmani, S. Khan. 2013. Effect of humic acid on the growth, yield, nutrient composition, photosynthetic pigment and total sugar contents of peas (Pisum sativum L). J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 35.

Khayat, M. 2021. Evaluation effect of farmyard manure (FYM) to improve cereal crop yield. J. Crop Nutr. Sci., 7: 68-76.

Kulikova, N.A., I.V. Perminova. 2021. Interactions between humic substances and microorganisms and their implications for nature-like bioremediation technologies. Molecul., 26: 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092706

Kumar, V., A. Singh. 2010. Long-term effect of green manuring and farmyard manure on yield and soil fertility status in rice-wheat cropping system. J. Ind. Soc. soil sci., 58: 409-412.

Li, C.F., L.X. Yue, Z.K. Kou, Z.S. Zhang, J.P. Wang, C.G. Cao. 2012. Short-term effects of conservation management practices on soil labile organic carbon fractions under a rape rice rotation in central China. Soil Tillage Res., 119: 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.12.005

Liu, L., S. Zhang, M. Chen, D. Cui, X. Ding. 2022. Organic amendment increases wheat yield by improving soil N transformations and reducing N loss in North China Plain. Archiv. Agron. Soil Sci., 68: 1974-1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1946682

Mahmood, F., I. Khan, U. Ashraf, T. Shahzad, S. Hussain, M. Shahid, M. Abid, S. Ullah. 2017. Effects of organic and inorganic manures on maize and their residual impact on soil physico-chemical properties. J. soil sci. plant Nutr., 17: 22-32. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017005000002

Martins, A., O. Bataglia, O. Camargo, H. Cantarella. 2003. Produção de grãos e absorção de Cu, Fe, Mn e Zn pelo milho em solo adubado com lodo de esgoto, com e sem calcário. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 27: 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000300018

Matuszak-Slamani, R., R. Bejger, J. Cieśla, A. Bieganowski, M. Koczańska, A. Gawlik, D. Kulpa, M. Sienkiewicz, M. Włodarczyk, D. Gołębiowska. 2017. Influence of humic acid molecular fractions on growth and development of soybean seedlings under salt stress. Plant Growth Regul., 83: 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0312-1

Mohammadipour, E., A. Golchin, J. Mohammadi, N. Negahdar, M. Zarchini. 2012. Effect of humic acid on yield and quality of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). Annal. Biolog. Res., 3: 5095-5098.

Nasiroleslami, E., H. Mozafari, M. Sadeghi-Shoae, D. Habibi, B. Sani. 2021. Changes in yield, protein, minerals and fatty acid profile of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under fertilizer management involving application of nitrogen, humic acid and seaweed extract. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 21: 2642-2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00552-7

Özkan, R., M. Bayhan, L. Yorulmaz, M. Öner, M. Yıldırım. 2021. Effect of different organic fertilizers on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci., 5: 433-442. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.1

Pal, B., S. Pati, S. Badole, V. Malothu, P. Patra. 2015. Effect of integrated nutrient management on nitrogen dynamics in soil of rice-potato based cropping sequence. J. Appl. Natur. Sci., 7: 652-655. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i2.661

Ramborun, V., S. Facknath, B. Lalljee. 2021. Indigenous/traditional climate-smart practices effects on soil fertility and maize yield in Mauritius agricultural system. J. Agric. Food Res., 3: 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100096

Rees, R., K. Castle. 2002. Nitrogen recovery in soils amended with organic manures combined with inorganic fertilisers. Agron., 22: 739-746. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2002061

Rhoades, J.D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical Conductivity and total dissolved solids; In: D.L. Sparks (ed.). Methods of soil analysis part 3. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Madison WI USA. 14: 417-436.

Roudgarnejad, S., M. Samdeliri, A.M. Mirkalaei, M.N. Moghaddam. 2021. The role of humic acid application on quantitative and qualitative traits of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Gesunde Pflanz., 73: 603-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00581-3

Savita, S., G. Girijesh, M.D. Kumar, A. Nagarajappa. 2018. Effect of humic substances on nutrient uptake and yield of soybean. Inter. J. Chemic. Stud., 6: 1565-1569.

Sharif, M., R. Khattak, M. Sarir. 2002. Wheat yield and nutrients accumulation as affected by humic acid and chemical fertilizers.

Sharma, R., V. Kaushal, G. Verma, S. Sharma. 2014. Effect of three decade long application of chemical fertilizer and amendments on crop yield under maize-wheat cropping system in an acid alfisol. J. App. Natur. Sci., 6: 106-109. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i1.383

Shazma Anwar, S.A., I.K. Iftikhar Khan, S.H. Saddam Hussain, M. Anjum, B.I. Babar Iqbal, A.H. Ashraf Hussain, M. Iqbal, N.A. Nawab Ali. 2016. Wheat response to different levels of humic acid and brassinolide. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2016.50103

Sheehy, T., E. Carey, S. Sharma, S. Biadgilign. 2019. Trends in energy and nutrient supply in Ethiopia: a perspective from FAO food balance sheets. Nutr. J., 18: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-019-0471-1

Sheoran, S., D. Prakash, P.K. Yadav, R.K. Gupta, N. Al-Ansari, S. El-Hendawy, M.A. Mattar. 2024. Long-term application of FYM and fertilizer N improve soil fertility and enzyme activity in 51st wheat cycle under pearl millet-wheat. Scient. Repor., 14: 21695. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72076-w

Sher, A., L. Zhang, M. Noor, M. Nadeem, U. Ashraf, S. Baloch, A. Ameen, X. Yuan, P. Guo. 2019. Nitrogen use efficiency in cereals under high plant density: manufacturing, management strategies and future prospects. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 17. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_1013910153

Slafer, G.A., R. Savin. 2018. Can N management affect the magnitude of yield loss due to heat waves in wheat and maize? Current opinion plant biolo., 45: 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.07.009

Soltanpour, P.A., and A.P. Schwab. 1977. A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro‐and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 8(3): 195-207.

Swaney, D.P., R.W. Howarth. 2019. Phosphorus use efficiency and crop production: Patterns of regional variation in the United States, 1987–2012. Sci. Tot. Environ., 685: 174-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.228

Tabbassum, R., M. Naveed, I. Mehboob, M.H. Babar, J. Holatko, N. Akhtar, M. Rafique, J. Kucerik, M. Brtnicky, A. Kintl. 2022. Comparative Response of Fermented and Non-Fermented Animal Manure Combined with Split Dose of Phosphate Fertilizer Enhances Agronomic Performance and Wheat Productivity through Enhanced P Use Efficiency. Agron., 12: 2335. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102335

Tadesse, W., Z. Bishaw, S. Assefa. 2018. Wheat production and breeding in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities in the face of climate change. Int. J. Clim. Chan. Strat. Manag., 11: 696-715. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2018-0015

Taimur Naseem, T.N., M.M. Maria Mussarat, M. Khan, M.W. Muhammad Waheed, T.K. Tariq Kamal, M.A. Muhammad Adil, S. Khan. 2015. Effect of city waste compost applied alone and in combination with chemical fertilizer on the yield and nutrient uptake of wheat and subsequent maize crop. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2015.44004

Tathe, A.S., S.A. Gode, S.S. Kolape. 2024. Response of Potassium Humate as Foliar Sprays on Growth Parameters, Chlorophyll Content, Yield and Quality of Cowpea. Asian J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 10: 215-222. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i2278

Thomas, C.L., G.E. Acquah, A.P. Whitmore, S.P. McGrath, S.M. Haefele. 2019. The effect of different organic fertilizers on yield and soil and crop nutrient concentrations. Agron. 9: 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120776

Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.). Methods of soil analysis part 3. Amer. Soc. Agron. 16:475-490.

Ur Rahman, M.H., A. Ahmad, A. Wajid, M. Hussain, F. Rasul, W. Ishaque, M.A. Islam, V. Shelia, M. Awais, A. Ullah. 2019. Application of CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton model for cultivars and optimum planting dates: Evaluation in changing semi-arid climate. Field Crop. Res., 238: 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.007

USDA, F., 2014. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. Livestock and poultry: World Market and Trade.

USMAN, K.,. 2013. Effect of phosphorus and irrigation levels on yield, water productivity, phosphorus use efficiency and income of lowland rice in northwest Pakistan. Rice Sci., 20: 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60109-2

Vieira, E.F., J. Carvalho, E. Pinto, S. Cunha, A.A. Almeida, I.M. Ferreira. 2016. Nutritive value, antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds profile of brewer’s spent yeast extract. J. Food Composit. Analys., 52: 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.07.006

Wang, X., J. Shen, P. Hedden, A.L. Phillips, S.G. Thomas, Y. Ge, R.W. Ashton, W.R. Whalley. 2021. Wheat growth responses to soil mechanical impedance are dependent on phosphorus supply. Soil Tillage Res., 205: 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104754

Weissy, A., B. Pasary, A. Rkhzady. 2018. Effect of humic acid and micronutrient nanocoders on chickpea response (Cicer arietinum L.) rainfall in autumn cultivation. J. Crop Physiol., 40: 93-110.

Xi, Q., W. Lai, Y. Cui, H. Wu, T. Zhao. 2019. Effect of yeast extract on seedling growth promotion and soil improvement in afforestation in a semiarid chestnut soil area. Forest., 10: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010076

Zhou, M., B. Zhu, N. Brüggemann, M. Dannenmann, Y. Wang, K. Butterbach-Bahl. 2016. Sustaining crop productivity while reducing environmental nitrogen losses in the subtropical wheat-maize cropping systems: a comprehensive case study of nitrogen cycling and balance. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 231: 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.022.