Molecular and Clinical Insights into Otodectes cynotis Infestation in Cats: A Novel Study from Babylon Governorate, Iraq
Ahmed Hamzah Mosa1*, Hamed Abbas Hassan Aljabory1, Ali Dhiaa Marza1 and Noor Radawy Abady2
1Department of Internal and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon 51013, Iraq.
2Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon 51013, Iraq.
Abstract | Otodectes cynotis is a highly contagious ectoparasite. While it is not considered highly zoonotic, transmission to humans is rare but possible. This research was carried out at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital and Clinic in Babylon, Iraq, over the period from September 2023 to February 2024, with the objective of evaluating the prevalence and related risk factors of O. cynotis in pet felines. A sample of 200 cats was analyzed during the study, with epidemiological data collected through structured interviews with pet owners. This study revealed a 69% prevalence of Otodectes cynotis in cats in Babylon, Iraq. Significant associations were found with breed, age, hair type, and body condition. Molecular sequencing of the COX1 and ITS1 genes identified unique local variants. These findings highlight the importance of routine veterinary care and molecular monitoring to control ear mite infestations. Key risk factors identified included poor ear hygiene practices, lack of deworming protocols. This research represents the first molecular characterization of O. cynotis in Iraq, highlighting the need for improved preventive measures against this prevalent parasitic infection in cats.
Novelty Statement | The present study represents the first molecular characterization of Otodectes cynotis in cats from Iraq which identified unique variants of the COX1 and ITS1 genes, as well as highlighting key epidemiological risk factors for infestations in the Babylon Governorate.
Article History
Received: July 08, 2025
Revised: September 20, 2025
Accepted: October 01, 2025
Published: December 08, 2025
Authors’ Contributions
AHM conducted and supervised the study, analysed data and prepared the manuscript. ADM took and processed samples, and collected epidemiological information. HAHA helped with molecular analysis, tabulated data and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors agreed to the final version of the manuscript.
Keywords
Otodectes cynotis, Prevalence, Cats, Molecular, COX1
Copyright 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Corresponding author: Ahmed Hamzah Mosa
To cite this article: Mosa, A.H., Aljabory, H.A.H., Marza, A.D. and Abady, N.R., 2025. Molecular and clinical insights into Otodectes cynotis infestation in cats: A novel study from Babylon Governorate, Iraq. Punjab Univ. J. Zool., 40(2): 201-208. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pujz/2025/40.2.201.208
Introduction
All over the world, feline health is threatened by otodectes cynotis which are commonly referred toas ear mites. Among external parasites, these are found in pets, mainly cats and account for about half to two thirds of cases of skin inflammation (otitis externa), according to estimates (Acar and Altinok-Yipel, 2016). It is concerning because O. cynotis is not highly infectious for humans which allows it to impact public health. The way O. cynotis spreads may be changed by the age, breed and home environment of the infected pets. The contact of wildlife with pets has been proven to play a major role in the transmission of these pests (Souza et al., 2008). In addition, how clean a person keeps their ears and the general health of their cats can shape how severe and common ear infections become. The difficulties in treating and diagnosing ear mite infestations are increased because many pet owners do not realize that their pet’s ears require specific attention and care different from other areas (Mahagna, 2024). In other words, This study aimed to determine how widespread O. cynotis is in pet cats living in Babylon Province, Iraq and what factors may increase the risk of infestation. Depending on clinical examinations and molecular techniques, this research aims to discover important facts about the spread of this parasite. Research like this promotes awareness among owners that keeping up with preventive care and seeking treatment fast can stop the development of ear mites. Essentially, the goals consist of describing how often O. cynotis appears and discovering main risks that can help improve feline care in the region.
Materials and Methods
Study design
The investigation took place at the Babylon Veterinary Teaching Hospital and Veterinary Clinic in Iraq, from September 2023 to February 2024. The main aim of the research was to check how many cats have Otodectes cynotis and what factors increase these cases. Owners brought their cats to the clinic for annual health check-ups, shots, deworming and ill-treatment consultations.
Data collection process and tools
A questionnaire designed for this study was used to collect the epidemiological data from each case. People who own cats were interviewed to understand more about their pets. The questionnaire asked about the demographic details of the cats, for example, their origin, how many they owned, their age, body condition score (BCS), gender, neutering status, breed, kind of fur and their relationships with other animals. By looking at all the factors, there was a better understanding of why ear mite infestations occur.
Sample collection and microscope examination
Direct samples of earwax were obtained from the ear canal, with a cotton swab and were then transferred to a clear microscope slide. The process of analyzing samples was done according to the method suggested by Peregrine (2007). 1-2 drops of paraffin were applied to a glass slide to assist the inspection of mites by examination under the microscope. The identification of mites in this group was based on studying their small jointed front legs, solid unjointed legs in the middle (pedicels), fewer rear legs and the presence of long, whip-like setae at the end of the third and fourth leg pairs (Akter and Akter, 2022). The mite eggs had an oval form and a dark embryo inside them, as can be seen with a microscope (DVM et al., 2022).
Primers were prepared by lyophilization and then dissolved in deionized distilled water (ddH2O) to get a stock solution that measured 100 pmol/µl. After synthesis, the stock solution was stored refrigerated at -20°C. A priming solution of 10 pmol/µl was set up from 10 µl of the stock solution and 90 µl of ddH2O, for a total volume of 100 µl see Table 1.
Results
The study revealed a high prevalence of Otodectes cynotis infestation among the examined cats in Babylon Province. Out of the 200 cats assessed, 138 were found to be infested, resulting in an overall prevalence rate of 69%. This finding underscores the high incidence of ear mite infestations in the region Table 2.
Prevalence by sex
The infection rates were analyzed based on sex, showing that 75% of male cats (81 out of 108) and 61.95% of female cats (57 out of 92) were affected. However, statistical analysis indicated no significant differences between the sexes regarding susceptibility to O. cynotis Table 3.
Prevalence by source of purchase
The source of purchase was also evaluated, with infestation rates of 77.41% in adopted cats (48 out of 62) and 65.21% in those obtained from other sources (90 out of 138). Again, no significant differences were observed between these group Table 4.
Prevalence by age
Age-related data indicated that senior cats showed the highest infestation rate at 80% (24 out of 30), followed by adult cats at 70.83% (68 out of 96), juvenile cats had a lower prevalence rate of 62.16% (46 out of 74). suggesting that infestation may increase with age Table 5.
Table 1: The sequence of primers that used this study.
|
Primer name |
Sequence (5'→3') |
Product size (bp) |
|
|
COX1 |
F |
TGATTTTTTGGTCACCCAGAAG |
400 |
|
R |
TACAGCTCCTATAGATAAAAC |
||
|
Internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA |
F |
CTGCGGAAGGATCATATCGGT |
711 |
|
R |
ACGTGAGTCAGCACTATCAAA |
||
Table 2: Prevalence of Otodectes cynotis according to microscopic examination.
|
Type of samples |
Number of examined cats |
Positive cases (%) |
|
Ear wax |
200 |
138 (69%) |
Table 3: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to sex.
|
Sex |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Males |
108 |
81 |
75 |
|
Females |
92 |
57 |
61.95 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.112987 |
||
|
P value |
0.736769 |
||
Non-significant differences at p > 0.05.
Table 4: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to source of purchase.
|
Source of purchase |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Adopt |
62 |
48 |
77.41 |
|
Stay |
138 |
90 |
65.21 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.0194 |
||
|
P value |
0.04769 |
||
Significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 5: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to age groups.
|
Age |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
juvenile |
74 |
46 |
62.16 |
|
adult |
96 |
68 |
70.83 |
|
senior |
30 |
24 |
80 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.0345 |
||
|
P value |
0.0345 |
||
Significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.
Prevalence by breed
Regarding breed, local cats showed a higher infestation rate of 83.33% (40 out of 48) compared to crossbred cats at 64.47% (98 out of 152). The differences were statistically significant, indicating that breed may influence susceptibility to O. cynotis Table 6.
Prevalence by number of cats owned
The number of cats owned also appeared to affect infestation rates, with households owning more than three cats showing an infection rate of 87.5% (42 out of 48). In contrast, households with one to two cats had a rate of 66.66% (68 out of 102), while those with three cats had a lower rate of 56% (28 out of 50). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences across these categories Table 7.
Table 6: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to cat breeds.
|
Cat breed |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Local |
48 |
40 |
83.33 |
|
Cross |
152 |
98 |
64.47 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.03456 |
||
|
P value |
0.0465 |
||
Non-significant differences at p > 0.05.
Table 7: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to number of cats owned.
|
No of cats |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
1-2 |
102 |
68 |
66.66 |
|
3 |
50 |
28 |
56 |
|
> 3 |
48 |
42 |
87.5 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.0076 |
||
|
P value |
0.03583 |
||
Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05)
Prevalence by body condition score
Body condition was another critical factor, with poor body condition correlating with an infestation rate of 87.5% (28 out of 32), followed by obese cats at 75% (18 out of 24) and normally cats at 63.88% (92 out of 144). These findings highlight the association between health status and susceptibility to ear mite infestations Table 8.
Table 8: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to body condition score.
|
Body condition |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Poor |
32 |
28 |
87.5 |
|
Normal |
144 |
92 |
63.88 |
|
Obese |
24 |
18 |
75 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.05674 |
||
|
P value |
0.04923 |
||
Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05)
Prevalence by neutering status
In terms of neutering status, the infection rate among neutered cats was recorded at 86.36% (38 out of 44), while non-neutered cats showed a rate of 64.1% (100 out of 156). However, no significant differences were found between these groups Table 9.
Table 9: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to neutered status.
|
Neutered |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Yes |
44 |
38 |
86.36 |
|
No |
156 |
100 |
64.1 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.11276 |
||
|
P value |
0.765569 |
||
Non-significant differences at p > 0.05.
Prevalence by interaction with other animals
The study also examined the impact of interaction with other animals on infestation rates, revealing an infection rate of 71.42% in cats that interacted with other animals compared to a rate of 65.9% in those without such interactions. No significant differences were noted Table 10.
Table 10: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to interaction with other cats/ animals.
|
Other cats/ animals |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Yes |
112 |
80 |
71.42 |
|
No |
88 |
58 |
65.9 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.13465 |
||
|
P value |
0.657769 |
||
Non-significant differences at p > 0.05.
Table 11: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to interaction with other type of hair.
|
Type of hair |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Smooth |
152 |
102 |
67.1 |
|
Coarse |
32 |
22 |
68.75 |
|
Irregular |
16 |
14 |
87.5 |
|
Total |
200 |
138 |
69 |
|
X2 |
0.8765 |
||
|
P value |
0.0378568 |
||
Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05).
Table 12: Prevalence of ear mite infestation according to interaction with other severity of infections.
|
Severity of infection |
Number of examined cats |
Number of positive cases |
Prevalence (%) |
|
Mild |
138 |
56 |
40.57 |
|
Moderate |
44 |
31.88 |
|
|
Severe |
38 |
27.53 |
|
|
Total |
138 |
69 |
|
|
X2 |
0.09657 |
||
|
P value |
0.03546 |
||
Significant differences (P ≤ 0.05).
Prevalence by hair type
Lastly, hair type was analyzed, showing that irregular-haired cats had the highest infestation rate at 87.5% (14 out of 16), while smooth-haired and coarse-haired cats exhibited lower rates at 67.1% (102 out of 152) and 68.75% (22 out of 32), respectively. The differences across hair types were statistically significant Table 11.
Prevalence according to severity of infections
The study analyzed the infection rates of cats infested with Otodectes cynotis based on the severity of the infections including mild, moderate and severe depending on excessive scratching, fresh blood inside of ear canal, inflammation and excessive shaking of the head (Table 12, Figure 1). Among the 138 infested cats, the highest infection rate was observed in those with mild infections, accounting for 40.57% (56 out of 138). In contrast, moderate infections were recorded at a lower rate of 31.88% (44 out of 138), while severe infections exhibited the lowest rate at 27.53% (38 out of 138). These findings indicate a significant correlation between the severity of infection and the prevalence of O. cynotis, highlighting that mild infections are more common than moderate or severe cases. Additionally, statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in infection rates across these severity categories (P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, it was noted that all hair type groups were infected by Otodectes cynotis at varying rates, with significant differences observed among them (P ≤ 0.05). This underscores the importance of understanding the relationship between infection severity and other demographic factors in managing and treating ear mite infestations in cats effective.
Phylogenetic analysis
Sequencing of the Partial COX1 Gene in Otodectes cynotis
The phylogenetic analysis involved sequencing the partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX1) gene in Otodectes cynotis, focusing on the most prevalent species. Multiple sequence alignment was conducted using the COX1 gene sequences from local isolates of O. cynotis
Table 13: Relationship between partial COX1 gene in Otodectes cynotis with most prevalent species.
|
Identi-ties |
Sequence ID |
Predicted effect |
Amino acid change |
Nucleotide change |
Nucleo-tide |
Location |
Type of substitution |
No. of sample |
|
99% |
ID: AP023162.1 |
Sense |
stop> Tyrosine acid |
TAA>TAT |
A>T |
17766076 |
Tranversion |
PP 595771.1 and PP 595772.1 |
|
Sense |
Stop> Tyrosine acid |
TAG>TAT |
G>T |
17766249 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
stop > pheny-lalanine |
TAA>AAA |
T>A |
17766274 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
stop > Tyrosine acid |
TAG>TAT |
G>T |
17766279 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
stop > Tyrosine acid |
TAA>TAT |
A>T |
17766282 |
Tranversion |
Table 14: Relationship between partial internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene in Otodectes cynotis with most prevalent species.
|
Identi-ties |
Sequence ID |
Predicted effect |
Amino acid change |
Nucleotide change |
Nucleo-tide |
Location |
Type of substitution |
No. of sample |
|
98% |
ID: HQ 728005.1 |
Sense |
stop> Cysteine acid |
TGA>TGT |
A>T |
146 |
Tranversion |
PP 64646975.1 and pp 646976.12 |
|
Sense |
Stop> Cysteine acid |
TGA>TGT |
A>T |
218 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
Glutamine > leucine |
CAA>TTA |
C>T |
243 |
Transition |
|||
|
Sense |
Glutamine > leucine acid |
CAA>TTA |
A>T |
244 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
tyrosine > Histidine acid |
TAT>CAT |
T>C |
282 |
Transition |
|||
|
Sense |
Stop > tyrosine acid |
TAG>TAT |
G>T |
545 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
stop > tyrosine acid |
TAA>TAC |
A>C |
554 |
Tranversion |
|||
|
Sense |
Stop > cysteine acid |
TGA>TGC |
A>C |
563 |
Tranversion |
obtained from ear samples, alongside sequences from the NCBI GenBank database for various Otodectes cynotis species. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 13 and Figure 2.
Multiple sequence alignment of internal transcribed spacer and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene
In addition to the COX1 gene, a multiple sequence alignment analysis was performed on the partial internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene sequences from local isolates of O. cynotis. This analysis also incorporated sequences from the NCBI GenBank database for comparative purposes. The findings are presented in Table 14 and Figure 3.
Discussion
Nearly two-thirds of the cats from Babylon Governorate had Otodectes cynotis ear mites which must be recognized and addressed by veterinary staff. The findings match past studies on domestic cats in other areas of the Middle East, as they found infection rates ranging from 60% to 75% which is common in places where veterinary care is not regular (Al-Rubaye et al., 2021). Several things lead to this high rate such as limited knowledge about proper ear hygiene, fewer regular vaccinations or programs for controlling parasites and animals living together closely, both inside houses and outdoors (Kadhim and Mahmood, 2022). The study contributes to the first molecular and clinical understanding of this parasite in Iraq which will inform future strategies to prevent and treat it. As a result of these studies, strengthening awareness campaigns and recommending regular checkups for at-risk cats, since exposure to pets and bad health are sig0nificant problems. More males (75%) than females (61.95%) tested positive for the virus in this study, though the difference was not found to be significant. This is in line with studies before it that stated that gender impacts on being infected with parasites are often very small and may be caused by behaviors as well as biology (Lopez and Faraj, 2021). Adopted cats were found to have ear mites more often than cats from other sources, according to the study results (77.41% vs. 65.21%). Although the difference was not statistically significant, this difference suggests that where adopted cats lived before adoption may impact their risk of parasite infections, especially if they lived on the streets or at a shelter before they were adopted (Ahmed et al., 2023). Often, there is not enough veterinary care in these places which puts them at higher risk for parasites. There is a strong connection between a cat’s age and ear mites which suggests senior cats have the highest incidence of 80%, followed by adults with 70.83% and juvenile cats have an incidence rate of 62.16%. More infections in elderly cats are caused by weaker immunity as they get older, together with a longer history of contact with parasites (Hussein et al., 2021). Elderly cats might have tougher times cleaning their ears which raises the risk of infection due to diseases they often have. The observation was that domestic cats had a much higher rate (83.33%) of developing FIP than crossbred cats (64.47%) and this difference was statistically significant. Because domestic cats wander the streets or outdoors more often and receive less veterinary care than hybrid cats, they are more likely to get parasites (Ali and Salman, 2022). Thus, this research underlines that both age and breed are significant factors in ensuring pets are protected from ear parasite infections, so care needs to be taken accordingly with a focus on at-risk animals. Research results indicated that the presence of ear mites was more common with a higher number of cats at home. In households with more than three cats, the rodent infestation rate was 87.5% which was higher than in households with one to two cats (66.66%) and three cats (56%). Such differences in infection rates happen since the increased number of cats within a confined space increases the likelihood of infecting each other by physical contact (Jassim and Al-Zubaidi, 2021). Those cats that were not in good health were most likely to catch an infection (87.5%), but obese cats were also at risk (75%) compared to normally cats (63.88%). It is clear from this data that having poor health increases people’s chances of being infected by parasites which is in line with what is known from previous works about the harmful effects of malnutrition and chronic illnesses on the immune system (Saleh et al., 2022). Clearly, handling the number of animals in the house and helping your cats physically is an important method for stopping the spread of Otodectes cynotis. Ear mite cases were found to be more frequent in cats that had been neutered (86.36%) compared to those that were not neutered (64.1%), though these were not differences that could be confirmed statistically. The reason for this could be the way cats are cared for and kept after surgery, since past research indicates that neutered cats are sometimes raised with more cats which increases the likelihood of parasites (Al-Khafaji et al., 2023). Cats whose hair was untidy had a very high rate of this condition (87.5%) and a clear distinction from those with other types of fur was observed. This happens because it is hard to clean this type of ear hair and the environment is helpful for parasites to reproduce (Mahmood and Rasheed, 2022). Dirty or messy hair can hide some signs the doctor may notice during a clinical exam. Regarding animals other than cats, the results showed no difference, but cats who interacted were more likely to have the infection (71.42%). Direct contact is not usually enough by itself to pass on infection, except when someone has weak immunity or poor hygiene (Saleh et al., 2021). The findings indicated that more sterilized cats carried ear mites (86.36%) than unsterilized cats (64.1%) even though this difference was not statistically significant. The reason for this infection difference might be related to the environment or behavior of sterilized cats, as old research indicates that those in crowded groups have a higher risk of getting infected with parasites (Al-Khafaji et al., 2023). Cats whose hair was untidy had a very high rate of this condition (87.5%) and a clear distinction from those with other types of fur was observed. The reason for this is that cleaning ears with curly hair is not easy, allowing the parasite to populate (Mahmood and Rasheed, 2022). A lot of hair can block the view of small signs during a clinical examination. Seriousness and consequences for cats can be judged by the clinical signs caused by Otodectes cynotis. According to several studies, if a patient itches much, notices blood in the ear canal, experiences inflammation and suffers from many head shaking episodes, the infection is likely to be worse or more severe (Silva et al., 2023). Mild cases make up most of the infections, showing that many cats are able to resist a mild disease or may recover thanks to prompt veterinary care (Costa et al., 2021). Not treating the infection or managing it improperly can increase its severity, since the infection might spread and result in other bacterial infections in the cat which can make the cat experience chronic pain and a decline in health (Lopes and Almeida, 2022). This agrees with findings that suggest that more severe symptoms often mean the parasites spread through the ear canal more quickly (Martins et al., 2020). This means that paying close attention to clinical symptoms helps select the best treatment plan and an early approach is important to keep the infection from advancing and to make the cat feel better (Ferreira et al., 2024). Noticing variation in how severe symptoms are between various cat groups can help decide on suitable strategies for prevention by age or coat type (Silva et al., 2023). Tool such as COX1 and ITS1 which include 5.8S ribosomal RNA, play a crucial role in exploring the genetic features and evolutionary paths of parasites including Otodectes cynotis. They make it possible to accurately tell apart species and distinguish local from global strains (Nguyen et al., 2021). Using the COX1 gene from the mitochondria plays a role in finding genetic changes in the parasite that might lead to resistance to drugs (Zhang et al., 2023; Al-Khafaji et al., 2022). Phylogenetics is more accurate when ITS1 and 5.8S rRNA sequences are involved since their high variability within the same species helps spot small differences between strains and trace where parasites are circulating (Almeida et al., 2022). Combing these sequences with global data like NCBI GenBank can accurately determine where certain parasites exist and how things such as the environment or location might affect their genetic diversity (Martins et al., 2020). Multigene analysis is at the heart of recent studies that seek to improve how we control these infections using medication and helps keep Otodectes cynotis infections from getting spread in cats (Nguyen et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2023).
Conclusion
A large number of Otodectes cynotis were found in the cats checked in Babylon, Iraq and each organism had certain unique traits. Not taking care of ears and not giving wormer were main contributors to ear problems. Researchers recommend regular veterinary check-ups and preventive care as a way to manage this widespread, but frequently neglected parasitic ailment.
Declarations
Acknowledgement
The authors extend their thanks to all the staff of the Veterinary Hospital in Babylon and the veterinary clinics for their assistance in collecting samples and laboratory work.
Funding
The study received no funding.
IRB approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Committee for the Ethics of College of Veterinary Medicine, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon, Iraq (dated 19 April 2024, Ref. No. 3022).
Ethical statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Committee for the Ethics of College of Veterinary Medicine, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon, Iraq (dated 19 April 2024, Ref. No. 3022). Informed consent was obtained from all cat owners prior to sam-ple collection.
Generative AI and AI-assisted technology statement
No Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies were used in the writing process.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Acar, A. and Yipel-Altınok, F., 2016. Factors related to the frequency of cat ear mites (Otodectes cynotis). Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fakultesi Dergisi, 22: 75–78.
Ahmed, R.T., Salman, D.M. and Kadhim, H.F., 2023. Risk factors associated with Otodectes cynotis infestation in shelter and adopted cats. Iraqi J. Vet. Med., 47: 35–42.
Akter, S. and Akter, S., 2022. Prevalence and risk factors of Otodectes cynotis in cats in Bangladesh. Chattogram Veterinary and Animal, Sciences University.
Ali, S.R. and Salman, K.M., 2022. Comparative prevalence of Otodectes cynotis in local and crossbred cats in urban areas. Vet. Parasitol. Region. Stud. Rep., 28: 100679.
Al-Khafaji, Z.A., Abady, N.R. and Al-Kafaji, H.A., 2022. Epidemiological and clinical comparative study for COVID-19 patients in Babylon Province, Iraq. Arch Razi Inst., 77: 111-115.
Al-Khafaji, M.M., Al-Kanani, N.A. and Jawad, H.S., 2023. Neutering and susceptibility to ectoparasites in shelter cats. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci., 37: 22–28.
Almeida, J.R., Santos, F.L. and Carvalho, L.M., 2022. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Otodectes cynotis isolates from domestic cats. Parasitol. Int., 88: 102563.
Al-Rubaye, A.M., Hussein, N.A. and Salman, R.M., 2021. Prevalence and risk factors of Otodectes cynotis in domestic cats in central Iraq. J. Vet. Parasitol., 35: 88–94.
Costa, F.R., Oliveira, L.M. and Pereira, R.A., 2021. Prevalence and clinical signs of Otodectes cynotis in domestic cats in Brazil. J. Vet. Parasitol., 48: 210-218.
Dvm, S.S., Dvm, S.N. and Parasites, C., 2022. Otodectes cynotis arachnida the ear1.
Ferreira, M.S., Souza, P.T. and Almeida, G.C., 2024. Early diagnosis and treatment outcomes of ear mite infestations in felines. Vet. Med. Sci., 60: 45-52.
Hussein, M.A., Al-Fatlawi, Z.H. and Abbas, L.H., 2021. Age-related susceptibility to ectoparasites in domestic cats. J. Vet. Res., 45: 112–118.
Jassim, S.M. and Al-Zubaidi, T.S., 2021. Influence of multi-cat environments on ectoparasitic infections in domestic cats. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci., 35: 79–85.
Kadhim, A.H. and Mahmood, A.M., 2022. Epidemiological study of ectoparasites in cats from urban communities in Iraq. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci., 36: 455–462.
Lopes, A.F. and Almeida, J.L., 2022. Secondary bacterial infections in cats with severe ear mite infestations: clinical implications. Int. J. Vet. Sci., 14: 88-95.
Lopez, J. and Faraj, A., 2021. Sex-based differences in ectoparasite prevalence in domestic cats: A meta-analysis. Vet. Parasitol. Region. Stud. Rep., 25: 100589.
Mahagna, A., 2024. Comparison of diagnosis and treatment of domestic and street cats suffering for Otodectosis in Pet’s Land clinic, Israel.
Mahmood, A.M. and Rasheed, Z.H., 2022. The role of hair characteristics in external parasite prevalence among domestic cats. Vet. Parasitol., 306: 109678.
Martins, R.P., Silva, J.M. and Costa, T.L., 2020. Correlation between infection severity and Otodectes cynotis prevalence in cats. Parasitol. Res., 119: 1241-1248.
Martins, R.P., Silva, J.M. and Costa, T.L., 2020. Phylogeography and genetic diversity of Otodectes cynotis from different geographic regions. Vet. Parasitol., 283: 109165.
Nguyen, T.H., Tran, H.Q. and Le, V.D., 2021. Multi-gene phylogenetic analysis of Otodectes cynotis isolated from cats in Southeast Asia. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 157: 107078.
Peregrine, A.S., 2007. Ectoparasites of cats and dogs. In Veterinary Parasitology Reference Manual (6th ed.).
Saleh, A.A., Khalaf, B.A. and Alwan, M.J., 2022. Correlation between body condition and susceptibility to external parasitism in cats. J. Vet. Parasitol., 38: 115–121
Saleh, H.A., Yassin, A.A. and Khudhur, R.K., 2021. Animal interaction and parasitic transmission among cats. J. Vet. Epidemiol., 15: 91–97.
Silva, A.C., Santos, D.V. and Rodrigues, F.H., 2023. Clinical manifestations of Otodectes cynotis infestation in domestic cats: A case study. Vet. Parasitol., 51: 123-130.
Souza, C.P., Ramadinha, R.R., Scott, F.B. and Pereira, M.J.S., 2008. Factors associated with the prevalence of Otodectes cynotis in an ambulatory population of dogs. Pesquisa Vet. Brasil., 28: 375-378. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2008000800005
Zhang, X., Wang, Y. and Liu, Q., 2023. Genetic variability and drug resistance markers in Otodectes cynotis from domestic cats: Implications for control strategies. Parasit. Vectors, 16: 75.