Monitoring Stored Grain Pests using Sticky Glue Traps from Warehoused Wheat of District Dadu, Sindh, Pakistan
Shamsher Ali* and Naheed Baloch
Department of Zoology, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
Studies for monitoring the stored grain pests using sticky glue traps were carried out in different areas of district Dadu on Taluka level during April-June, 2021. The observations were made at different grain storage sites by using sticky glue traps which are also considered as attractants and contains mixture of extracted wheat, oat and cold-pressed pumpkin seed oils. Maximum number of Rhyzopertha dominica were attracted towards traps in Government Warehouses followed by private godowns, grain stocking shop and home silos (406.6±15.2, 256.3±12.8, 222.6±14.1 and 214.3±6.11), respectively at Sita road. While, in Government and private warehouses of Taluka K.N Shah (289.6±8.08 and 286.33±14.8) Rhyzopertha dominica were observed in abundance. Whereas, high number of the same species were recorded from Government and private warehouses of Radhan, grain stocking shop and home silos of Bali Shah and Mehar City at the first interval of 10 days during June 2021. The similar number of Trogoderma granarium another stored wheat grain pest were observed in traps at studied sites of selected Talukas of District Dadu. However, they were all significantly different from control. Present findings would be helpful to recognize the efficiency of stored grain pests of wheat under different storage conditions and efficacy of sticked glue traps in enticing stored pests of wheat to develop a suitable pest management strategy against stored pests of wheat.
Article Information
Received 08 June 2022
Revised 05 December 2024
Accepted 19 December 2024
Available online 07 March 2025
(early access)
Published 14 January 2025
Authors’ Contribution
SA conducted an experimental study, data analyzed and wrote the paper. NB conceived, designed and supervised the investigational work.
Key words
Stored grain pests, Stored grains, Food attractant, Sticky glue trap, Extracted oils, Monitoring
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20220608170601
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
0030-9923/2026/0002-0513 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2026 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Cereal grains are the most important and principal food sources all over the world, and they account for a major root of high energetic nutrients as compared to other food integer. Among them, Triticum aestivum (wheat) is considered one of the most important dominant cereals and stable food than the other crops in cultivation, yields, and utilization in the Pakistan. During the year 2021, wheat production was estimated at 27 million tonnes in the Pakistan, covering a cultivated area of about 9.2 million hectares (FAO, 2021).
Most of the farmer stores large quantities of wheat grains every year for their consumption, good rate sale, and until taking new products (Chattha et al., 2015). Therefore, due to the long time storage of wheat grain are exposed to infestation by several insect pests which causes great loss of concerned grain (Manickavasagan et al., 2008). These pests are responsible for millions of dollars in grain losses in storage each year, posing a danger to any country’s food security program, particularly in developing countries where agricultural produce storage is mostly managed by resource-poor farmers (Ismaila et al., 2010; Balami et al., 2011). Globally, major losses in both quantity and quality of stored products are estimated to be between 10 and 40% of the total (Rees, 2004). Nearly in India 20% -25% (Rajashekar et al., 2010) and 10 to 15% grain damage observed by the attack of insect pests in Pakistan (Jilani, 1981).
Furthermore, wheat grain deterioration also affects the physical attributes of the grains, such as color, test weight, and texture (Nasar-Abbas et al., 2009). As a result, the final product has an unpleasant taste and smell and is inappropriate for human consumption (Vassanacharoen et al., 2008). This leads to infested grains may become unsalable and inedible (Obeng-Ofori, 2008). However, several insects pests cause great loss of stored grains among them, lesser grain borer Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) and khapra beetle Trogoderma granarium (Evert) are common and most destructive in the world (Roy et al., 2005; Mahmoud et al., 2015), specially in Pakistan.
To prevent maximum loss of stored grain from insect pest damage is primarily dependent on synthetically chemical insecticides such as fumigated phosphine or spraying, pyrethroids, malathion, chloropyrifos, methyl bromide etc and several other pesticides have been used by people of different areas of world for many years (Price and Mills, 1988; Singh, 1990; Kiran and Prakash, 2015). However, massive and indiscriminate use of synthetic pesticides results in increased resistance of the store’s grain pests along with led to the contradictory effect of toxic residues on stores grain, create human health problems, non-target animals, poses a great threat to the environmental concern (Stefanazzi et al., 2010). It’s important to protect grains and other food items from insect pest damage by storing them properly (Haq et al., 2005). So, the scientists are working to develop alternative methods which would be eco-friendly, non-toxic, economically safe, effective, and easy to operate for the control of various insect pests of stored grains such as Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) and Trogoderma granarium (Evert).
For this purpose during the last two decades, several researchers have been designed an enormous application of traps to control insects pests for the storage of cereal products. In this context, one of the most promising methods to control stored product pests is the use of traps.
There are numerous examples of dermestid pheromones being successfully used to monitor Trogoderma and Attagenus species in the field (Burk holder and Ma, 1985). For monitoring and control stored grain pests, several types of pheromones were reviewed by Burkholder and Ma (1985). Also, food attractants have been used in laboratory testing and field trials, accordingly to the reports (Chambers, 1987).
In California state surveys, a food attractant trap made of a single layer of corrugated paper with flutes partially filled with a paste made of crushed Saunders (Pectinophora gossypiella), dried milk, and wheat germ was utilized (Okumura, 1972). Bar-Zeev (1976) and Bar-Zeev and Ben-Tamar (1979) observed the use of synthetic or natural food attractants against larvae of Trogoderma granarium. Moreover, wheat germ oil was found to be particularly attractive to Trogoderma glabrum (Herbst) by Nara et al. (1981). DeCoursey (1931) documented the usage of corrugated traps baited with wheat flour to catch Tribolium confusum Jacquelin duVal. Wilson (1940) used alcoholic fish meal extract-treated sticky traps to catch carpet beetle (Dermestidae) larvae in residences.
For the detection and monitoring of the khapra beetle under the USDA programme, Barak (1989) used flat-type traps baited with attractive material septa and fresh oils of sesame, pumpkin seed, wheat and oat.
The present study is aimed with considerable progress in the use of a sticky glue trap containing a mixture of oat, wheat germ, and cold-pressed pumpkin seed oils as food attractants for detection, monitoring, and control of common stored grain pests in different wheat storing places of District Dadu, Sindh, Pakistan. The main goal is to develop a versatile and effective food attractant sticky glue trap with certain progressive characteristics such as with higher capturing and killing efficiency of stored grain, without the use of insecticides, effective for multiple pest species.
Materials and Methods
Study area
To examine the attractiveness and capturing efficiency of food attractants sticky (glue) traps stored grain pests of wheat the study was conducted in 6 villages of K.N. Shah and Mehar each of District Dadu. The sticky glue traps were positioned in Government and private warehouses, wheat stocking shops and home silos at each selected location where different varieties of wheat were stored. The temperature and RH% were observed and presented in data on interval of 10 days.
Collection of material
Healthy wheat grains were collected from the grain suppliers and used in the glue traps along with wheat, oat and pumpkin seed extracted oil (Barak, 1989) to attract the stored grain pests of wheat. The wheat used in the traps were sieved to avoid dust particles, kernel pieces and broken wheat before initiating the experimental work.
Experimental design
Four sticky (glue) traps previously used by Mueller et al. (1990) measuring 31×20.9 cm at per study site such as home silos, wheat stocking shops, private and Government Warehouses were put in and replicated thrice where each trap was considered as replicate with additional control traps (no attractant oils used). In each trap 10 mg of wheat grain for wheat stored grain pests and 3 different types of extracted oils with 2 ml dosage were significantly mixed and put in a lid of plastic box special on the center of each sticky glue trap. These traps were placed where stored grain stock was stored in plastic bags, begged grains of stocking shops, private and Government Warehouses and in home silos. Attractant and non-attractant (control) traps were placed in a very near distance of stocked grains in plastic bags, begged grains and in home silos to assure that there is no disturbances for the study site’s activities and can be easily observed. The number of stored wheat grain pests were observed regularly and traps were changed on 10 day interval at each studied site.
Table I. Month-wise record (Mean±SD), Temp. (°C) and RH (%) of trapped Rhyzopertha dominica in different wheat storing places of Taluka K.N. Shah, District Dadu.
|
Month/ year/ days |
Areas of taluka |
Govt: warehouses |
Private warehouses |
Grain stocking shops |
Home silos |
Control |
Av: temp (°C) |
Av: R.H (%) |
|
April, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
K.N Shah |
231±8.18d |
135±5.56d |
135± 5.56 d |
142± 8.18 a |
70.3±18.7 d |
40.1±2.50 |
17.8± 4.02 |
|
11-20 |
Sita road |
329.6±8.32d |
189±6.24d |
159± 5.29 c |
128.3± 10.6 d |
63.3±11.5 a |
40.1±2.39 |
20.5± 7.61 |
|
21-30 |
Gozo |
330±6.24d |
182.3±4.72d |
156.6± 5.77d |
119.6± 5.13 d |
51.6±24.4 b |
40.7±3.30 |
25± 5.69 |
|
May 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Sindhi Butra |
282±10.8b |
195±12.1b |
195± 12.1 b |
202.6± 4.50 a |
78.6±22.3 c |
41.9±1.76 |
22.6± 3.53 |
|
11-20 |
Mitho Babar |
382±10.8b |
237±10.5b |
188.3± 17.9 b |
181± 8.71 b |
73.0±20.8 d |
42.8±2.19 |
23.9± 3.10 |
|
21-30 |
Rahouja |
365.3±10.0b |
225.3±8.38b |
202.6± 15.5 b |
160± 10.5 b |
60.0±30.0 d |
45.6±3.43 |
24.5± 8.32 |
|
June, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
K.N Shah |
311.6±12.5a |
222.6±14.1a |
222.6± 14.1a |
214.3± 6.11a |
82.3±58.6 b |
45 ±1.39 |
30.6 ± 4.69 |
|
11-20 |
Sita road |
406.6±15.2a |
256.3±12.8a |
216± 5.29a |
213.3± 10.2a |
80.6±52.1 b |
43.8±2.33 |
31.5± 2.06 |
|
21-30 |
Gozo |
391±2.62a |
241.6±10.6a |
230.6± 7.37a |
185± 14.5a |
79.0±53.3 a |
44.2±2.54 |
34± 5.61 |
|
July, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Sindhi Butra |
249.6±6.42c |
162.3±10c |
162.3± 10c |
151.6± 10.4b |
55.3±24.7 b |
45.1±2.33 |
32.1± 5.21 |
|
11-20 |
Mitho Babar |
355±13.2c |
212.3±8.73c |
128.3± 2.08d |
155.6± 20.5c |
45.6±21.5 a |
41.2±3.18 |
45.1± 8.21 |
|
21-30 |
Rahouja |
345±8.71c |
200±6.24c |
180.3± 8.96c |
139±7.81c |
40.6±17.4 d |
40.9±1.40 |
40.1± 5.84 |
According to Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, values preceded by distinct letters differ significantly by 5%.
Table II. Month-wise record (Mean±SD) of trapped Rhyzopertha dominica in different wheat storing places of Taluka Mehar, District Dadu.
|
Month/ year/ days |
Areas of taluka |
Govt: warehouses |
Private warehouses |
Grain stocking shops |
Home silos |
Control |
Av: temp (°C) |
Av: R.H (%) |
|
April, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mehar city |
198±4.35d |
150±4.58d |
146± 4.58d |
125.3± 6.65d |
66.3± 19.8 a |
39.5±2.72 |
16.4±3.62 |
|
11-20 |
Radhan |
226.6±4.16d |
220±6.0d |
127± 8.0d |
102± 4.58d |
55.0± 45.0 d |
38.4±3.69 |
19±6.20 |
|
21-30 |
Bali Shah |
190±4.58d |
187.3±6.42d |
149.3± 6.50d |
100± 3.60d |
48.3± 36.8 d |
41.4±3.91 |
26.1±4.93 |
|
May, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mureed Lakhir |
271±10.3a |
190±8.54b |
187± 8.54b |
180± 2.64b |
70.0± 18.0 b |
42.4±2.20 |
23.1±3.40 |
|
11-20 |
Betto |
268.3±6.65b |
265±12.1b |
156± 9.0c |
153± 8.54b |
61.3± 16.2 b |
40.3±3.62 |
21.1±3.75 |
|
21-30 |
But Serai |
235.6±10.6b |
212.6±4.04c |
199± 10.5b |
144± 9.53b |
53.3± 15.2 b |
44.4±3.38 |
25.5±7.87 |
|
June, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mehar city |
255.6±8.02b |
225±10.5a |
215± 10.5a |
196.6± 4.16a |
78.6± 22.3 d |
44.6 ±1.58 |
32.1 ±4.19 |
|
11-20 |
Radhan |
289.6±8.08a |
286.33±14.8a |
200± 11.0a |
175± 10.5a |
71.3± 22.2 a |
42.1±4.37 |
30.1±2.28 |
|
21-30 |
Bali Shah |
254.3±12.8a |
231.3±8.08b |
221± 12.5a |
168± 12.5a |
61.0± 23.5 b |
45.2±2.54 |
35±5.86 |
|
July, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mureed Lakhir |
234±6.55c |
170±6.55c |
166± 6.55c |
148.3± 8.50c |
50.6± 21.0 d |
44.6±2.67 |
31.8±5.09 |
|
11-20 |
Betto |
239±2.64c |
242.3±8.73c |
177± 10.0b |
132.6± 6.02c |
41.0± 17.3 a |
40.4±3.26 |
42.4±6.83 |
|
21-30 |
But Serai |
213.3±8.32c |
250±10.0a |
171± 8.54c |
123± 6.55c |
30.0± 17.3 b |
43±2.56 |
39.6±5.51 |
According to Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, values preceded by distinct letters differ significantly by 5%.
Statistical analysis and meteorological data
All of the analyses were carried out using Statistix ® version 8.1, which tabulated the data using the ANOVA (analysis of variance) and LSD (Fishers least significant difference) tests. Regional AGRO-MET Centre Dadu provided the meteorological data used in this analysis.
Results
The results of present studies revealed that from April to June 2021, two stored grain pests, i.e., lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica, and khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium found in majority in food attractant traps. Rhyzopertha dominica found as dominant in K.N Shah and Mehar. The abundance of Rhyzopertha dominica and Trogoderma granarium were observed in the month of June at all studied areas. However, minimum number of both pest species trapped in April 2021 (Tables I, II, III, IV). In addition, significantly more Rhyzopertha dominica and Trogoderma granarium were captured in traps containing attractant oils than in control traps without their oils. The statistical significant and maximum number of pests were observed from the first 10 days (1-10) interval of May to the third 10 days (21-30) interval of June in selected four wheat storage sites of two talukas K.N. Shah and Mehar. While low record were recovered from 1st to 3rd 10 days interval of month April (Figs. 1, 2).
Discussion
The present studies was aimed to observe efficacy of sticked glue traps against wheat stored grain pests in different wheat storage sites of district Dadu. No work has been published previously from Sindh and Pakistan using glue sticked traps. However, other researchers used different trapping models incorporated various attractants against stored grain pests like Barak and Burkholder (1984) used corrugated paper trap baited with vegetable oils against stored- product insects for detection and monitoring. Likewise, Barak (1989) also reported that septa pheromone lure was more attractive for adult males of Trogoderma granarium and fresh oils of sesame, pumpkin, oat and wheat for the larvae used in a corrugated paper trap. Similarly in our trap mixture of these oils except sesame was used as an attractant in which maximum Rhyzopertha dominica were attracted to traps in June when compared with Trogoderma granarium. In addition, several other authors have used sticky glue traps as in our research work like Mueller et al. (1990) who utilized lasiolure-baited glue traps in a laboritical work for cigarette beetles. Buchelos and Levinson (1985) examined sticky traps with TDA (100µg) capture six-time
Table III. Month-wise record (Mean±SD of trapped Trogoderma granarium in different wheat storing places of Taluka K.N Shah, District Dadu.
|
Month/year/ days |
Areas of taluka |
Govt: warehouses |
Private warehouses |
Grain stocking shops |
Home silos |
Control |
Av: temp (°C) |
Av: R.H (%) |
|
April, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
K.N Shah |
52±4.58d |
72.6±3.05d |
40± 8.54c |
45± 6.08d |
32.6± 20.2 d |
40.1±2.50 |
17.8±4.02 |
|
11-20 |
Sita Road |
76.6±8.50c |
51.3±4.50d |
105± 9.0b |
29± 7.0d |
15.3± 10.1 c |
40.1±2.39 |
20.5±7.61 |
|
21-30 |
Gozo |
75±4.35d |
63±5.0d |
68± 4.0d |
9.0± 2.0d |
4.0± 2.64 d |
40.7±3.30 |
25±5.69 |
|
May, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Sindhi Butra |
108±6.55b |
130±4.58b |
89± 12.5ab |
75.6± 4.16b |
44.3± 40.4 c |
41.9±1.76 |
22.6±3.53 |
|
11-20 |
Mitho Babar |
134±10.5a |
107.6±8.50b |
85± 8.0c |
73± 9.0b |
40.6± 44.1 c |
42.8±2.19 |
23.9±3.10 |
|
21-30 |
Rahouja |
117.6±2.30b |
101±7.0b |
131.6± 12.7a |
60± 4.0b |
30.0± 17.3 c |
45.6±3.43 |
24.5±8.32 |
|
June, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
K.N Shah |
136±7.54a |
153.6±5.50a |
106± 14.5a |
98.3± 5.68a |
47.0± 37.9 b |
45 ±1.39 |
30.6 ±4.69 |
|
11-20 |
Sita Road |
150±11.5a |
134±10.5a |
140± 6.0a |
91± 10.0a |
39.0± 17.5 b |
43.8±2.33 |
31.5±2.06 |
|
21-30 |
Gozo |
137±8.18a |
121±8.0a |
112± 2.64b |
39± 3.0c |
16.6± 10.6 c |
44.2±2.54 |
34±5.61 |
|
July, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Sindhi Butra |
73±5.56c |
95±3.60c |
68± 10.5b |
56.6± 3.05c |
21.3± 14.7 b |
45.1±2.33 |
32.1±5.21 |
|
11-20 |
Mitho Babar |
106±9.53b |
76±6.55c |
62± 7.0d |
54± 8.0c |
23.0± 14.1 a |
41.2±3.18 |
45.1±8.21 |
|
21-30 |
Rahouja |
88.3±10.01c |
81±6.0c |
89± 10.0c |
86± 5.0a |
30.0± 13.2 a |
40.9±1.40 |
40.1±5.84 |
According to Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, values preceded by distinct letters differ significantly by 5%.
Table IV. Month-wise record (Mean±SD) of trapped Tribolium castaneum in different wheat Storing Places of Taluka Mehar, District Dadu.
|
Month/ year/ days |
Areas of taluka |
Govt: warehouses |
Private warehouses |
Grain stocking shops |
Home silos |
Control |
Av: temp (°C) |
Av: R.H (%) |
|
April, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mehar city |
47±9.0d |
55.6±5.77b |
20±0.0d |
11.0± 2.64c |
9.66± 9.01 d |
39.5±2.72 |
16.4±3.62 |
|
11-20 |
Radhan |
80±7.54d |
35±7.0d |
19±6.55d |
4.0± 4.0c |
1.0± 0.0 d |
38.4±3.69 |
19±6.20 |
|
21-30 |
Bali Shah |
48±1.0d |
67±5.0d |
14±3.0d |
2.0± 1.73d |
0.33± 0.57 d |
41.4±3.91 |
26.1±4.93 |
|
May, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mureed Lakhir |
97±13.0b |
70±7.0b |
75±4.58b |
28.3 ±10.0c |
10.6± 9.01 b |
42.4±2.20 |
23.1±3.40 |
|
11-20 |
Betto |
140.3±9.50b |
89±10.0b |
70±10.5b |
29± 6.0b |
8.66± 6.50 b |
40.3±3.62 |
21.1±3.75 |
|
21-30 |
But Serai |
94±3.0b |
102±7.0b |
57±5.0b |
55.6± 10.9ab |
12.0± 9.16 b |
44.4±3.38 |
25.5±7.87 |
|
June, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mehar city |
121±15.0a |
100±20.0a |
96±6.55a |
30± 3.60b |
16.0± 8.71 a |
44.6 ±1.58 |
32.1 ±4.19 |
|
11-20 |
Radhan |
165±10.5a |
110.3±5.50a |
91±12.5a |
65± 7.0a |
20.3± 13.0 a |
42.1±4.37 |
30.1±2.28 |
|
21-30 |
Bali Shah |
118±4.0a |
136±8.0a |
75±6.0a |
74.3± 10.2a |
24.3± 3.0.9 a |
45.2±2.54 |
35±5.86 |
|
July, 2021 |
||||||||
|
1-10 |
Mureed Lakhir |
71±11.0c |
120.3±0.5a |
54±2.64c |
51± 4.58a |
22.3± 10.2 c |
44.6±2.67 |
31.8±5.09 |
|
11-20 |
Betto |
105±8.54c |
61.6±14.8c |
46±8.54c |
10± 5.0c |
2.0± 1.73 c |
40.4±3.26 |
42.4±6.83 |
|
21-30 |
But Serai |
74±2.0c |
81±6.0c |
30±4.0c |
36.6± 15.1bc |
4.0± 2.64 c |
43±2.56 |
39.6±5.51 |
According to Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, values preceded by distinct letters differ significantly by 5%.
greater in comparison to no pheromone against Ephestia elutella. For Scolytid beetles, sticky traps have been practiced (Browne, 1978; Birch, 1979; McLean and Borden, 1979). Furthermore, Leos-Martinez et al. (1987) recorded baseball perforated traps had a significantly lower capturing efficiency than six other designated traps to lesser grain borer. Likewise in our studies minimum capture of khapra beetle observed in sticky glue traps. In addition, during the experimental work, some records of control (without the use of attractant oils) traps were taken, their capturing efficacy was 1/3 times declined observed at the food attractant traps in all sites. Most of the researchers conduct lab experiments for the installation of differently designed traps against stored grain pests at lab and warehouses with maintained temperature (22-27°C) and (60-70%) of relative humidity (Barak and Burkholder, 1984; Barak, 1989; Dowdy and Mullen, 1998; Lindgren et al., 1983). Our work was slightly contrary to these scientists.
Conclusion
The glue stick traps induced more adults of stored grain pest species Rhyzopertha dominica as compared to Trogoderma granarium larvae. Greater infestation of both species of stored grain pests were observed in Government granaries due to lack of maintenance and inappropriate storage. The glue stick traps mixed with different oil extracts proved effective in attracting Rhyzopertha dominica and Trogoderma granarium. Rhyzopertha dominica found as dominant in K.N Shah and Mehar Talukas of district Dadu. The abundance of Rhyzopertha dominica and Trogoderma granarium were found in traps in the month of June. It is suggested that if we use such types of traps properly during the initial infestation period in godowns it would be possible to obtain good control on stored grain pests.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the concerned persons of wheat storage of Dadu District, who helped and allowed for trap installation and field visit.
Funding
The study received no external funding.
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Balami, D.H., Ogboru, I. and Talba, D.M., 2011. The cereal economy in Nigeria and the sub regional dimension. A publication of social science study group (SSSG), Benue State University, Makurdi. SSSG Series No.29, Vol.1.
Barak, A.V., 1989. Development of a new trap to detect and monitor khapra beetle (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). J. econ. Ent., 82: 1476-1477. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/82.5.1470
Barak, A.V. and Burkholder, W.E., 1984. A versatile and effective trap for detecting and monitoring stored-product coleoptera. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 12: 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(85)90112-4
Bar-Zeev, M., 1976. Materials attractive or repellent to larvae of Trogoderma granarium. Israel J. Ent., 11: 61-72.
Bar-Zeev, M. and Ben-Tamar, D., 1979. The response of the adults of the Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera, Dermestidae) to various synthetic compounds. Riv. Parassitol., 40: 49-55.
Birch, M.C., 1979. Use of pheromone traps to suppress populations of Scolytus multistriatus in small, isolated Californian communities. Bull. ent. Soc. Am., 25: 112-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/besa/25.1.112
Browne, L.E.., 1978. A trapping system for the western pine beetle using attractive pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol., 4: 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989336
Buchelos, C.T. and Levinson, A.R., 1985. Population dynamics of Ephestia elutella (Hubner) in tobacco stores with and without insecticidal treatments: A survey by pheromone and unbaited traps. Z. angew. Ent., 100: 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1985.tb02759.x
Burkholder, W.E. and Ma, M., 1985. Pheromones for monitoring and control of stored-product insects. Annu. Rev. Ent., 30: 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.30.010185.001353
Chambers, J., 1987. Recent developments in techniques for the detection of insect pests of stored products. In: 1987 BCPC Mono No. 37 Stored Products Pest Control, pp. 151-160.
Chattha, S.H., Hasfalina, C.M., Mirani, B.N. and Mahadi, M.R., 2015. Traditional storage methods and their effect on quality characteristics of wheat grain in Sindh. Pak. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J., 17: 346-353. Open access at http://www.cigrjournal.org.
DeCoursey, J.D., 1931. A method of trapping the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum DuVal. J. econ. Ent., 24: 1079-1081. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/24.5.1079
Dowdy, A.K. and Mullen, M.A., 1998. Multiple stored-product insect pheromone use in pitfall traps. J. Stored Prod. Res., 34: 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(97)00018-0
FAO, 2021. FAO GIEWS country brief on Pakistan. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/giews/countrybrief/country.jsp?code=PAK
Haq, T., Usmani, N.F. and Abbas, T., 2005. Screening of plant leaves as grain protectants against Tribolium castaneum during storage. Pakistan. J. Bot., 37: 149–153.
Ismaila, U., Gana, A.S., Tswanya, N.M. and Dogara, D., 2010. Cereals production in Nigeria: Problems, constraints and opportunities for betterment. Afr. J. agric. Res., 5: 1341-1350.
Jilani, G., 1981. Post-harvest protection of food grain with natural insect repellents. Prog. Farm., 1: 66-29.
Kiran, S. and Prakash, B., 2015. Assessment of toxicity, antifeedant activity, and biochemical responses in stored-grain insects exposed to lethal and sublethal doses of Gaultheria procumbens L. essential oil. J. Agric. Fd. Chem., 63: 10518−10524. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03797
Leos-Martinez, J., Granovsky, T.A., Williams, H.J., Vinson, S.B. and Burkholder, W.E., 1987. Pheromonal trapping methods for lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Environ. Ent., 16: 747–751. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/16.3.747
Lindgren, B.S., Borden, J.H., Chong, L., Friskie, L.M. and Orr, D.B., 1983. Factors influencing the efficiency of pheromone-baited traps for three species of ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent., 115: 303– 313. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent115303-3
Mahmoud, A.K., Bedawi, S.M. and Satti, A.A., 2015. Efficacy of some botanical extracts in the control of khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium). J. Sci., 5: 213–217.
Manickavasagan, A., Tayas, D.S. and White, G.N.D., 2008. Thermal imaging to detect infestation by Cryptolestes furrungineus inside wheat kernels. J. Stored Prod. Res., 44: 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2007.10.006
McLean, J.A. and Borden, J.H., 1979. An operational pheromone-based suppression program for an ambrosia beetle, Gnathotrichus sulcatus, in a commercial sawmill. J. econ. Ent., 72: 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/72.2.165
Mueller, D., Pierce, L., Benezet, H. and Krischik, V., 1990. Practical application of pheromone traps in the food and tobacco industry. J. Kansas Ent. Soc., 63: 548-553.
Nara, J.M., Lindsay, R.C. and Burkholder, W.E., 1981. Analysis of volatile compounds in wheat germ oil responsible for an aggregation response in Trogoderma glabrum larvae. J. agric. Fd. Chern., 29: 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00103a018
Nasar-Abbas, S.M., Siddique, K.H.M., Plummer, J.A., White, P.F., Harris, D., Dods, K. and Antuono, M.D., 2009. Faba bean (Viciafaba L.) seeds darken rapidly and phenolic content falls when stored at higher temperature, moisture and light intensity. Fd. Sci. Technol., 42: 1703-1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.013
Obeng-Ofori, D., 2008. Management of stored product arthropods pest. In: Postharvest science and technology (eds. E.W. Cornelius and D. Obeng-ofori), College of Agriculture and Consumer Services, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, pp. 92-146.
Okumura, G.T., 1972. Warehouse beetle a major pest of stored food. Nat. Pest Contr. Operat. News, 32: 4-5, 24.
Price, L.A. and Mills, K.A., 1988. The toxicity of phosphine to the immature stages of resistant and susceptible strains of some common stored product beetles and implications for their control. J. Stored Prod. Res., 24: 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(88)90008-2
Rajashekar, Y., Gunasekaran, N. and Shivanandappa, T., 2010. Insecticidal activity of the root extract of Decalepis hamiltonii against stored-product insect pests and its application in grain protection. J. Fd. Sci. Technol., 43: 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0049-6
Rees, D., 2004. Insects of stored products. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Victoria. https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643101128
Roy, B., Amin, R. and Uddin, M.N., 2005. Leaf extracts of shiyalmutra (Blumea lacera) as botanical insecticides against lesser grain borer and rice weevil. J. biol. Sci., 5: 201-204. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.201.204
Singh, S.R., 1990. Insect pests of tropical food legumes. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 451.
Stefanazzi, N., Stadler, T. and Ferrero, A., 2010. Composition and toxic, repellent and feeding deterrent activity of essential oil against the stored- grain pest Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Wiley Online Library 10.1002/ps.2102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2102
Vassanacharoen, P., Pttanapo, W., Lucke, W. and Vearasilp, S., 2008. Control of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) by radio frequency heat treatment as alternative phytosanitary processing in milled rice. J. Pl. Dis. Prot., 115: 45.
Wilson, H.F., 1940. Lures and traps to control clothes moths and carpet beetles. J. econ. Ent., 33: 651-653. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/33.4.651