Research Article
Optimizing Yield and Nutritional Quality in Napier Grass (cv Pennisetum purpureum) Based on Harvest Interval
Md Ashadul Alam1, Manik Miah2, Nasrin Sultana3, Md Iftakher Alam Sarker2, Gautam Kumar Deb1,2*
1Buffalo Research and Development Project, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Bangladesh; 2Buffalo Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Bangladesh; 3Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute Regional Station, Shahzadpur, Bangladesh.
Md Ashadul Alam and Manik Miah contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Abstract | In Bangladesh and elsewhere in tropical countries, smallholder livestock farmers face a significant challenge to maintain quality of pakchong grass (Pennisetum purpureum) required to produce milk and meat from ruminants. This study was conducted to investigate the potential of pakchong at different harvest interval (HI). A 3×4 factorial experiment were carried out in a randomized complete block design at four harvest interval (25d, 35d, 45d and 55d), for a total of 36 plots, each 5×5 m2 with 1m line spacing and 0.4m plant spacing. Dry matter yield (DMY) increased (P<0.001) at 55d HI than 25d HI whereas, crude protein (CP) content decreased (P<0.001) substantially from 19.52 to 9.51, degradability decreased from 62.9 to 51.7% and metabolizable energy (ME) from 8.74 to 7.06 MJ/kg DM. Plant height also found significantly (P<0.001) higher at 55d HI compared to 45d, 35d and 25d however leaf stem ratio significantly (P<0.001) increased in 25d HI followed by 35d, 45d and 55d. Furthermore, total gas production also found higher (P<0.001) at prolong HI. Negative correlation found (r = -0.85 to -0.90; and P<0.001) among CP, plant height, Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), whereas significant positive (r = 0.47 and 0.18; and P<0.01) correlation among leaf weight and sheath weight. Data were also analysed to investigate seasonal impacts on yield and quality. Total DM yield and CP or ME contents of pakchong grass was similar (P>0.06-0.08) among seasons. These results suggest high quality pakchong grass is capable to supply CP requirement of high producing dairy cows (19.5% CP at 25d HI) or beef cattle (14.3% CP at 35d HI) with a great deal of energy (8.7-7.4 MJ ME/kg DM) respectively. Further research is required whether ruminants can be grazed rotationally by matching HI so that the cost of production could be reduced compared to the current practice of cut and carry system of pakchong grass.
Keywords | Biomass, Correlation, Degradability, in-vitro, Morphology, Season
Received | October 24, 2025; Accepted | December 23, 2025; Published | January 20, 2026
*Correspondence | Gautam Kumar Deb, Buffalo Research and Development Project, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Bangladesh; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Alam MA, Miah M, Sultana N, Sarker MIA, Deb GK (2026). Optimizing yield and nutritional quality in napier grass (cv Pennisetum purpureum) based on harvest interval. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 14(1):113-125.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2026/14.1.113.125
ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316
Copyright: 2026 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Pakchong grass (Pennisetum purpureum) is more preferable roughage to farmers for their ruminants in tropical and sub-tropical based on its biomass yield and nutritional quality for increasing ruminant’s production towards ensuring animal protein sources (Hernandez et al., 2019; Oosting et al., 2014). Pakchong fodder has widely spread across the country for last decade. Consequently, tremendous ruminant’s population, milk and meat production has increased over the last half century from 6.5 mill to 57.14 mill, 1.34 lakh MT to 14.068 mill MT, 0.45 lakh MT to 8.71 mill MT while the population of buffalo increased from 0.08 mill to 1.52 mill, respectively (BBS 2020, DLS 2022-23). Moreover, about 80% of total forage ingested by ruminants are comprises of Napier pakchong in tropical and sub-tropical region (Kabirizi et al., 2015). Pakchong fodder is important for livestock production but harvesting it late makes it low quality resulting did not provide much energy and crude protein (CP) to the animals. Generally, pakchong harvested at 60 days or more ages, provide poor nutritive value (<9.5% CP % and <8.5 MJ/DM ME) resulting failed to support animal productive performances (Muinga et al., 1992; Brown et al., 1988). Additionally, higher level of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) also reduced feed intake of dairy animals. Conventionally harvested (≥60 day’s age) Napier contains more NDF (≥72%) with lower CP (≤8.5%) which suppress the DM intake (2.1%) resulting decreasing milk yield and losses live weight (36 g/day) (Islam et al., 2024). Gwayumba et al. (2002) also reported that Napier grass harvested at 70 to 91 days interval had very lower amount of crude protein (6.8-8% of DM) and about 7.5 MJ ME per kg DM. Therefore, quality Napier (Increased CPand ME) with decreased NDF should be supplied to dairy animals for increasing dry matter intake beyond 2% to sustain milk yield and meat production. Moreover, Napier grass supplied to dairy animals harvested at 28 days or greater interval is failed to meet up the requirement of ME and CP for moderate milk yield and meat production (Islam et al., 2024) because grasses offered to animals at early stage of growth had higher fiber digestibility which increase feed intake and animals productivity. Islam et al. (2023) also stated that, Napier pakchong grass has potential that, the crude protein content can be increased from 9.6 to 25.7 % of dry matter (DM), metabolizable energy can be 8.7 mega joule to 10.8 mega joule per kg DM with changing of defoliation leaf. Which suggested that, Napier pakchong can be yielded adequate CP and energy for optimizing dairy performances of ruminants. Quality Napier pakchong also induced more than 25000 liter milk and moderate meat production per animal per hectare in tropical and subtropical region (Farina et al., 2011). However, Napier pakchong grass has the potentiality to transform plant protein to animal protein all around the world. The important determinant of dairy animal’s production is feed intake. Aroeira et al. (1999) stated that, dairy cows fed with solely Napier grazed or harvested at 30 days interval no need to provide concentrate feed except dry season for moderate milk and meat productions in subsistence farming. Productivity and nutritional quality of pakchong fodder highly influenced by cutting age, early age cutting fodder yield more crude protein and lower crude fiber. Morphological characteristics and nutritional quality of pakchong fodder have been studied at generative stage, while little study on early growth stage and different harvest interval. However, there was not enough study about early harvesting yield and quality of Pakchong over the year to mitigate the gap between yield and quality. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the harvest interval and seasonal effects on pakchong forage and investigate the yield, quality, in-vitro degradability and their relationship at different growing stage.
Material and Methods
Experimental site and soil condition
The experiment was carried out at Buffalo Research Farm, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, situated about 30 km northwest of central city of Bangladesh. The location were existed in 23°42′0″ north and 90°22′30″ east and the average temperature (30.11 oC) was found 2.37% higher compared to the average temperature of Bangladesh. Precipitation rate was 74.11 mm with 120.12 rainy days yearly and the average humidity is 70% (Miah et al., 2025). The soil of experimental plot was clay in textured, under the Madhupur Terrace agro-ecological zone of Bangladesh (Hasan et al., 2019). The soil was normal or non-saline but acidic (pH=5.3) in condition. Total nitrogen, phosphorous and calcium were found in medium range, whereas carbon was higher in the soil (Table 1).
Experimental land preparation and management
Napier pakchong (Pennisetum purpureum) fodder was cultivated in the experimental plot and the plot size was 25 m2 (5m×5m). Before transplantation of the fodder, the land was properly ploughed. The fertilizer doses were applied during land preparation, where 6 t/ha cow dung
Table 1: Soil composition of experimental plot.
|
Statistics |
Soil elements |
|||||||
|
pH |
EC (dS/m) |
Carbon (%) |
Total Nitrogen (%) |
Phosphorous (cmol/kg) |
Potassium (cmol/kg) |
Calcium (cmol/kg) |
Magnesium (cmol/kg) |
|
|
Mean |
5.3 |
0.072 |
0.87 |
0.09 |
22.81 |
0.09 |
3.31 |
0.12 |
|
SD |
0.29 |
0.01 |
0.13 |
0.01 |
2.69 |
0.01 |
0.23 |
0.02 |
|
Remarks |
Acidic |
Non Saline |
High |
Medium |
Medium |
Low |
Medium |
Low |
was applied as a basal dose, (TSP) Triple super phosphate and MP (Murate of Potash) were used 150:75 kg/ha. After each harvest 50 kg/ha urea fertilizer was top dressed uniformly and irrigation was applied. Line to line distance were kept 1m and plant to plant distance were 0.4m and 1m alley were maintained around each plot. Two stem with double nodes were transplanted into the plot. First harvest was completed after 60 days of transplantation for better tiller.
Experimental design
The experimental design was randomized complete block design (RCBD). Harvesting interval considered as treatment (4 harvesting interval 25 days, 35 days, 45 days and 55 days), each harvested at 3 season (3 season- rainy, winter and summer). This experiment was conducted at 4×3 factorial arrangement in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 blocks randomly, arranging 36 plots. Harvesting interval considered as treatment, each harvested at 3 season.
Harvesting process, morphology identification and sample analysis
Pakchong fodder was cultivated and first 60 days were considered as an establishment period of fodder plot. Subsequently, forage was harvested at 25 days, 35 days, 45 days and 55 days interval for year round (Rainy season- June to September, Winter season- October to January, Summer season- February to March). Forage was harvested at 5cm above the ground level. After each cut the fodder was fertilized and managed properly. A total of 14 harvest at 25 days, 10 harvest at 35 days, 8 harvest at 45 days and 6 harvest at 55 days were completed after establishment period in a year. Plant height, stem length, leaf length, stem diameter, sheath length, leaf yield, Sheath yield and Stem yield were measured after each harvest at Feed Biotechnology laboratory and stem diameter were determined from lower parts, middle parts and upper parts of the stem after removing leaf and sheath by measuring tape digital slide calipers. Plant height and other morphological characteristics were counted from 30 individual plants of each plot. Sample were collected randomly and analyzed as per AOAC (2005) for DM, Ash, CP, Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and Acid detergent fiber (ADF). DM was determined by oven drying samples at 105 oC for 6 hr. and ash was determined at 550 oC for 8 hour in Muffle furnace. Crude protein was determined by Kjeldahl method and ADF and NDF were determined by Gerhardt method in Feed Biotechnology laboratory, Animal Nutrition laboratory, BLRI, Dairy Science and Poultry Science laboratory, GAU and Quality control laboratory, DLS.
Collection of rumen fluid
Rumen liquor was obtained from a previously cannulated animal in Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI) dairy farm. Collected rumen liquid was promptly combined, transferred to a pre-warmed (39°C) vacuumed flask, purged with CO2, and then promptly capped to preserve anaerobic conditions. The flasks were conveyed to the laboratory in a thermostatic container to maintain a temperature of 39°C. The rumen fluid was filtered through pre sterilized four-layer cheesecloth while continuously flushing with CO2 to reduce exposure to oxygen (O2).
In-vitro gas production kinetics
The gas production kinetics of different ages Pakchng were measured using automatic gas production measurement technique which has been developed by Ankom Technology® (Macedon, NY, USA; ANKOMRF gas production system) (Ankom, 2011). Each module comprises a septa glass bottle (actual capacity: 313 ml) equipped with an ANKOM pressure sensor module (pressure range: −69 to +3447 kPa; resolution: 0.27 kPa; accuracy 0.1% measured values), featuring a microchip and a radio transmitter. The measured gas pressure was converted into moles of gas produced using the ideal gas law (Equation 1) and then converted to milliliters (ml) of gas produced by Avogadro’s law (Equation 2).
Where n = gas produced in moles (mol); p = pressure in kilopascals (kPa); V = headspace volume in the glass bottle in liters (L); T = temperature in Kelvin (K); R = gas constant (8.314472 L·kPa/K/mol).
Gas produced in mL = n × 22.4 × 1000 ….. (2)
The incubation of the target sample was carried out in a module containing 1g of respective feedstuff, 80 ml of buffer medium and 20 ml of rumen fluid as inoculum. The composition of the buffer medium was Resazurin 0.1% (w/v) solution, in-vitro buffer solution (NH4HCO3, NaHCO3), in-vitro micro mineral solution (CaCl2.2H2O, MnCl2.4H2O, CoCl2.6H2O, FeCl3.6H2O), in-vitro macro mineral solution (Na2HPO4 anhydrous, KH2PO4 anhydrous, MgSO4.7H2O), Reducing Solution (Cysteine HCl, 1N NaOH, Na2S.9H2O) as described by Goering and Van Soest (1970). All the glassware, solution and inoculum were maintained at 39C before placing them into the respective module. Finally, all the materials (target sample, buffer medium, inoculum) were placed into the respective module, purged with CO2 further and placed them in a shaking incubator with a temperature and rotation speed of 41C and 100, respectively. The fermentation was carried out for 48 hour. The ME was estimated by using following equations: ME (MJ/kg DM)= 21.574-0.207 NDF (Minson, 1984).
Determination of in vitro dry matter degradability (IVDMD)
After 24 hours of fermentation under the specified conditions, each sample was filtered to separate the solid and liquid parts. The solid portion was then washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove any leftover fermentation medium. Next, the cleaned solids were dried in a forced-air oven at 105°C until constant weight was achieved. The DMD was calculated by comparing the final dry weight to the original sample weight. DMD was quantified using the following equations adapted from Zhang et al. (2018):
IVDMD (g/kg of DM) = [1-W1*(V1/V2)/W2] *1000
Where, W2 and W1 indicate the DM weight (g) of Pakchong before and after 24h of fermentation, respectively, while V1 and V2 represent the volume (ml) of buffered rumen fluid in the bottle before and after sampling.
Statistical analysis
Considering the harvest interval age as treatment, biomass yield (Fresh, DMY and CPY), nutritional composition (DM, Ash, CP, ADF and NDF) and morphological data were analyzed in two-way ANOVA of Randomized complete block design using R studio (4.2.2). Mean difference were measured by using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Differences of mean value were considered significant if p value is less than 0.05. Correlation among morphological characteristics and nutritional parameters were determined through Pearson’s correlation and the differences at p<0.05 considered as significant correlation, p<0.01 considered as highly significant correlation.
Results
Morphological characteristics of Pakchong fodder
The results (Table 2) revealed that both season and harvest interval (HI) significantly (p<0.01) influenced the growth characteristics pakchong fodder. Plant height increased (p<0.01) progressively with longer harvest intervals and reached maximum at 55 days harvest interval followed by 45 days, 35 days and 25 days. Regardless of the harvest interval, plant height exhibited higher in rainy season compared to summer and winter season. Similarly, the number of leaves and other morphological characteristics including leaf length, sheath length, stem length and stem diameter were all enhanced at the 55 day harvest interval (p<0.05) compared to 45 days, 35 days and 25 days interval. Additionally, seasonal effects were also showed, with these parameters showing significantly higher (p<0.05) values in the rainy season, indicating that favourable moisture and temperature conditions during this period promote better vegetative growth.
Leaf-stem yield and ratio of pakchong at different harvest interval
The results (Table 3) indicated that harvest interval and season both had significant (p<0.05) effects on the yield components of pakchong. Leaf yield was highest (p<0.05) at 25 days harvest interval gradually declining with longer intervals (Table 3). In contrast, sheath yield showed higher at 45 days, while stem yield increased its maximum at 55 days indicating the increasing structural biomass production over time. With respect to season, leaf and sheath yields were found higher during winter season whereas, stem yield was higher in rainy season. Notably, Leaf stem ration was significantly (p<0.05) higher at
Table 2: Morphological characteristics of Pakchong at different harvest interval seasonally.
|
Season, Harvest Interval (HI) and their interaction |
Parameters |
||||||
|
Plant height (cm) |
Leaf Number (nos) |
Leaf length (cm) |
Sheath length (cm) |
Stem length (cm) |
Stem diameter (cm) |
||
|
Season |
Summer |
109.50b |
9.50 |
57.42b |
18.63b |
26.94a |
6.23b |
|
Rainy |
116.37a |
10.85 |
64.45a |
21.03a |
25.51a |
7.08a |
|
|
Winter |
105.45c |
10.25 |
54.53c |
14.15c |
19.07b |
6.11b |
|
|
Harvest Interval (HI) |
25 days |
61.49d |
7.20 |
44.43d |
13.43c |
16.35d |
5.29d |
|
35 days |
88.65c |
8.65c |
57.79c |
16.27b |
21.81c |
5.82c |
|
|
45 days |
115.71b |
9.50b |
64.45b |
18.37a |
26.89b |
6.87b |
|
|
55 days |
146.61a |
11.50a |
71.67a |
19.23a |
38.68a |
8.11a |
|
|
SEM |
1.15 |
0.08 |
0.81 |
0.52 |
0.82 |
0.09 |
|
|
Level of Sig. |
Season |
<0.001 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
|
HI |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
|
Season*HI |
0.62 |
0.04 |
<0.001 |
0.02 |
<0.001 |
0.01 |
|
a,b,c Mean in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); Highly significant (p<0.05); NS= Non significant (p>0.05).
Table 3: Leaf, sheath, stem percentage and ratio.
|
Season, harvest interval (HI) and their interaction |
Parameter |
||||
|
Leaf yield (g/100g) |
Sheath yield (g/100g) |
Stem yield (g/100g) |
Leaf stem ratio |
||
|
Season |
Summer |
43.64b |
16.32b |
40.04b |
1.08b |
|
Rainy |
41.62b |
14.07c |
44.31a |
0.93c |
|
|
Winter |
45.07a |
17.55a |
37.38c |
1.21a |
|
|
Harvest Interval (HI) |
25 days |
64.95a |
10.82b |
24.23c |
2.68a |
|
35 days |
50.93b |
14.15a |
34.90c |
1.46b |
|
|
45 days |
40.67c |
16.02b |
43.29b |
0.93c |
|
|
55 days |
37.37d |
13.57c |
49.05a |
0.76d |
|
|
SEM |
0.52 |
0.30 |
0.73 |
0.07 |
|
|
Level of Sig. |
Season |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.02 |
|
HI |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.01 |
<0.001 |
|
|
Season*HI |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
|
a,b,c Mean in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); Highly significant (p<0.001); NS= Non significant (p>0.05).
25 days harvest interval and declined as harvest interval increased, indicating younger pakchong yielded more biomass to leaves than stem. Across season, leaf stem ratio was higher (p<0.05) in winter season than summer and rainy respectively. Interaction between season and harvest interval significantly influenced all yield components, the combined role of environmental conditions and harvest interval in determining Pakchong fodder productivity (Table 3).
Effects of harvest interval on forage production and nutritive value
The research result revealed that both season and harvest interval had significant (p<0.05) effects on yield and nutritive value of Pakchong fodder (Table 4). Significantly (p<0.05) higher dry matter yield found with longer harvest interval and reached maximum at 55 days, while fresh biomass yield and crude protein yield varied significantly over the season. Similarly, dry matter content, ash, crude fiber, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber were highest at 55 days harvest interval reflecting advanced plant maturity. In contrast, crude protein content was significantly higher at 25 days and decreased with delayed harvest interval. The interaction between season and harvest interval also significantly (p<0.05) affected both fresh biomass yield, crude protein yield.
Total gas production and degradability
Season had significant effect (p<0.05) on the 24 hour gas production (GP24) and effective dry matter degradability of pakchong fodder (Table 5). GP24 found higher (p<0.05) during summer and winter season than rainy season, while effective dry matter degradability was found higher (p<0.05) in rainy season followed by summer and winter season. Irrespective of season, GP24 was higher (p<0.05) with plant maturity or longer harvest interval, reached maximum at 55 days of harvest interval and lower (p<0.05) in 25 days harvest interval, whereas in vitro dry matter degradability (IVDMD) showed opposite trend and found higher (p<0.05) at 25 days of harvest interval, with advancing harvest interval IVDMD declined. Similarly, estimated metabolizable energy (ME) was found higher in pakchong harvested at 25 days compared to 35 days, 45 days and 55 days, respectively. An interaction effect were observed between season and harvest interval on GP24 gas production and metabolizable energy.
Table 4: Harvest interval and seasonal effects on biomass yield and nutritive value of Pakchong.
|
Season, harvest interval and interaction |
Parameters |
||||||||
|
DM (g/100g) |
CP (g/100g) |
Ash (g/100g) |
ADF (g/100g) |
NDF (g/100g) |
Total FBY (t/h/y) |
Total DMY (t/h/y) |
Total CPY (t/h/y) |
||
|
Season |
Rainy |
16.92 |
13.48 |
9.59 |
38.45 |
68.27 |
166.44a |
28.26a |
3.63a |
|
Winter |
17.13 |
13.22 |
9.71 |
38.83 |
68.65 |
159.06c |
27.39b |
3.45c |
|
|
Summer |
16.90 |
13.56 |
9.74 |
38.59 |
68.55 |
162.18b |
27.56b |
3.54b |
|
|
Harvest Interval (HI) |
25 days |
12.58d |
19.52a |
7.84c |
33.98d |
62.99g |
167.93b |
21.504g |
4.25a |
|
35 days |
14.82c |
14.30b |
8.84b |
36.05c |
66.56e |
155.66d |
23.07ef |
3.30d |
|
|
45 days |
17.26b |
12.46c |
10.28a |
37.60b |
68.59c |
161.56c |
27.89d |
3.47c |
|
|
55 days |
20.72a |
9.51d |
10.84a |
38.93a |
69.65a |
155.90d |
32.29b |
3.07e |
|
|
SEM |
0.57 |
0.84 |
0.70 |
0.58 |
0.67 |
4.28 |
1.88 |
0.93 |
|
|
Sig. level |
Season |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.33 |
0.10 |
0.06 |
<0.001 |
0.08 |
0.04 |
|
HI |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.01 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
|
HI*Season |
0.91 |
0.08 |
0.98 |
0.74 |
0.04 |
0.51 |
0.89 |
0.05 |
|
DM=Dry matter; CP=Crude protein; CF=Crude Fiber; ADF= Acid Detergent Fiber; NDF= Neutral Detergent Fiber; FBY= Fresh Biomass Yield; DMY=Dry Matter Yield; CPY=Crude Protein Yield. a,b,c Mean in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); Highly significant (p<0.001); NS= Non significant (p>0.05).
Additionally, Figure 1 illustrated the gas production profiles of Pakchong fodder harvested at different intervals and seasons exhibited a clear non-linear (curvilinear) fermentation pattern, described by second order polynomial (quadratic) regression models. In all harvest interval and across seasons gas production increased rapidly during the initial incubation phase (0-12h) followed by a gradual declined in the rate of increased as incubation progress, finally reached a plateau stage between 30-48 hour. The characteristics of curve reflected the typical dynamics of microbial fermentations and the substrate for fermentation were utilized rapidly at the beginning after which gas production showed due to substrate depletion and reduced microbial activity. The quadratic equations for each harvest interval and season showed strong coefficients of determination (Adj R2= 0.98-0.99) indicated an excellent fit of the polynomial model to the observed data. The positive linear term in all curves described the initial upward fermentation trend while the negative quadratic term reflected the curve trajectory and eventual plateauing of gas production. This confirmed that the fermentation process is inherently non-linear and quadratic model is appropriated for determining the rapid-slow fermentation transition. Additionally, Seasonal effects was found. Gas production was significantly higher at rainy and winter season compared to the summer season at same harvest intervals. Similarly, Pakchong fodder harvested at longer intervals tended to produce more total volume of gas. However, despite variations in measure, all curves showed similar quadratic shape, indicated the overall fermentation kinetics remained consistent on harvest interval.
Table 5: In vitro gas production of pakchong at different harvest interval.
|
Season, HI and their interaction |
In vitro digestibility |
|||
|
GP24 (ml/g DM) |
IVDMD (%) |
Estimated ME (MJ/Kg DM) |
||
|
Season |
Summer |
30.89b |
57.13b |
7.75 |
|
Rainy |
29.53c |
59.07a |
7.62 |
|
|
Winter |
31.87a |
55.66c |
7.56 |
|
|
Harvest Interval (HI) |
25days |
20.39d |
62.92a |
8.74a |
|
35days |
28.62c |
59.58b |
7.51b |
|
|
45days |
33.11b |
55.34c |
7.17bc |
|
|
55days |
40.47a |
51.70d |
7.06c |
|
|
SEM |
0.18 |
0.37 |
0.02 |
|
|
Level of sig |
Season |
0.04 |
<0.001 |
0.06 |
|
HI |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.02 |
|
|
Season*HI |
<0.001 |
0.98 |
0.04 |
|
GP= Gas production, IVDMD= in vitro dry matter degradability; ME= Metabolizable Energy. a,b,c Mean in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05); Highly significant (p<0.001); NS= Non significant (p>0.05).
Correlation between morphology and nutritive quality of Pakchong
Correlation analysis (Figure 2) revealed that dry matter (DM) had significant positive associations (r= 0.41 to 0.88, p<0.001) with plant height, leaf length, stem length, acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and ash content. Conversely, dry matter content was also strongly and negatively correlated with crude protein (r= -0.91, p<0.001). Crude protein showed a moderate positive relationship with leaf yield (r= 0.47, p<0.001), while strong negative (r= -0.80 to -0.90, p<0.001) correlation to plant height, leaf length, stem length, ADF, NDF and ash. Both, ADF and NDF were positively correlated (r= 0.45 to 0.82, p<0.001) with plant height, stem length and leaf length. Ash content also showed positive correlations (r= 0.45 to 0.80, p<0.001) with plant height, stem length, leaf length, ADF and NDF. Additionally, plant height and stem length also positively correlated (r= 0.51, p<0.001) to each other.
Discussion
Morphological characteristics of Pakchong fodder
The results (Table 2) showed that both season and harvest interval (HI) had significant (p<0.01) effects on plant height of pakchong fodder. Irrespective of season higher plant height found (p<0.01) at 55 days (146.61 cm) harvest interval followed by 45 days (115.71 cm), 35 days (88.65 cm) and 25 days (61.49 cm). Ahamed et al. (2021) reported that plant height of pakchong fodder increased progresively with cutting interval, significantly higher plant height at 60 days cutting interval. Additionally, Roy et al. (2021) also stated that, pakchong plant height significantly differ from season to season at 50 days cutting interval (135.80 cm). Furthermore, Walaiphan et al. (2019) observed that pakchong fodder plant height increased with cutting interval (120 cm to 150 cm). Onjai-Uea et al. (2022) also reported that plant height of pakchong significantly influenced by plant space and age, who observed 148.51 cm plant height for pakchong cultivar and 137.72 cm harvested at 60 days. However, the present study was agreed to previous study and demonstrated that both season and harvest interval (HI) are key determinants of the vegetative growth of Pakchong fodder. Additionally, Plant height exhibited higher in rainy season (116.37 cm) compared to summer (109.50 cm) and winter (105.45 cm) season. The current study showed similiar results with Roy et al. (2025) who exhibited that Napier pakchong height was higher in rainy season compared to summer and winter season. Holm et al. (1979) stated that pakchong fodder grown better height in rainy season because of moist and favourable climateic condition. Genetically, pakchong is a tallest plant (Sarker et al., 2019) had better regrowth capability that was shaped and inherited through selection and slightly affected by environmental influences. Leaf number was found maximum (p<0.05) at rainy season. Irrescpective of season leaf number was found higher (p<0.05) in 55 days than 45 days, 35 days and 25 days respectively. Leaf length, sheath length, stem length, and stem diameter were highest (p<0.05) at the 55-day harvest interval, while all these traits were significantly greater (p<0.01) during the rainy season than in summer or winter. Roy et al. (2021) showed that season had significant effects on pakchong leaf length (87.86 cm at 50 days). The current study revealed lower leaf length compared to previous study. Pakchong fodder leaf length increased with lowering plant spacing. The previous study was conducted with 50 to 50 cm spacing, whereas the current study showed 100 to 40 cm spacing. Assuero and Tognetti (2010) stated that tillering and growth of grasses is regulated by an interaction of genetic, physiological and environmental factors. In aligned with this, leaf length, sheath length, stem length and stem diameter found to be increased during rainy season due to long daytime temperature and humidity that favour Napier grass growth over winter season. Growth traits, including plant height, leaf number, leaf length, sheath length, stem length, and stem diameter, consistently increased with longer harvest intervals with the 55-day interval producing the most pronounced growth. Pakchong is highly adaptive quality to tropic and sub-tropic climate and have better growth potential compared to other available cultivar in Bangladesh.
Leaf-Stem yield and ratio of pakchong at different harvest interval
The leaf to stem ratio considered as critical determinant to evaluate the forage nutritive value and grazing quality (Annicchiarico, 2007). Leaf-stam ratio (Table 3) was significantly (p<0.05) higher at 25 days (2.68) harvest interval compared to 35 days (1.46), 45 days (0.93) and 55 days (0.76). Onjai-Uea et al. (2022) stated that in Napier pakchong grass, the leaf-stem ratio decreased with prolonged harvesting age, with the leaf fraction showed a marked reduction between 45 and 75 days. Pakchong harvested at 25 days had more leafy part that contained more nutrients and less fibrous than stem fractions (Tyas et al., 1998). Zailan et al. (2016) explained that more leaf-stem ratio indicated good quality forage which was aligned with the current studies. So, the current study was fully agreed with the previous study, early harvesting of pakchong yielded more leafy part. Moreover, season affected the leaf-stem ratio and it was higher (p<0.05) in winter (1.21) season than summer (1.08) and rainy (0.93) season respectively. Roy et al. (2025) showed similiar results previously, who reported that Napier fodder had higher leaf-stem ratio in winter season than summer and rainy season. Halim et al. (2013) also reported that the Napier leaf stem ratio varied from 0.57 to 1.63. The current study showed increased leaf-stem ratio than previous study due to early harvest interval. Previous studies had demonstrated that the leaves of forage legumes provided higher nutrient concentrations than stems, which were generally of inferior quality (Rao and Northup, 2012). Accumulately, Leaf, sheath, stem yield and ratio had significantly affected by interaction of season and harvest interval. Liman et al. (2022) reported that significantly higher leaf content was found at 40 days of cutting compared the 50 days and 60 days. Additionally, increasing leaf to stem ratio increased crude protein yield indicated more nutrition because nutritional components are densely distributed in the leaf. Nutritional quality or leaf crude protein decreased while starting generative stage. Wangchuk et al. (2015) also stated that leaf stem ratio is higher at early stage indicated more leaf yield. The current study had completely agreed with previous studies. Additionally, Budiman et al. (2012) also reported that leaf yield decreased at 12 weeks of age. Additionally, average stem diameter increased (p<0.01) at rainy season followed by summer and winter season respectively and also 55 days harvest interval compared to 45 days, 35 days and 25 days respectively. Liman et al. (2022) also stated that stem yield induced with increased cutting age for the elongation of stem and plant maturation. Ahamed et al. (2021) also observed significant effects of cutting interval on leaf yield and leaf stem ratio per tiller. Harvest interval and season reflected to shift in biomass production driven by plant maturity and environmental conditions. Short harvest intervals (25 days) favored leaf production and a higher leaf-stem ratio, indicated that younger plants prioritize photosynthetically active tissues over structural supportet.
Effects of harvest interval on forage production and nutritive value
The research results also showed (Table 4) that, the harvesting interval significantly (p<0.05) increased DM at 55 days (20.72g/100g) compared to 45 days (17.26g/100g), 35 days (14.82g/100g) and 25 days (12.58g/100g), respectively. Regardless the harvest interval, DM content did not varied significantly (p>0.05). Sarker et al. (2021) stated that dry matter content of different napier cultivars in drought and non-drought region varied from 11% to 17% harvested at 60 days. ADF content found higher at 55 days (38.93g/100g) harvest interval than 45 days (37.60g/100g), 35 days (36.05g/100g) and 25 days (33.98g/100g), respectively. In terms of NDF found significantly higher at 55 days of harvest interval (69.65g/100g) followed by 45 days (68.59g/100g), 35 days (66.56g/100g) and 25 days (62.99g/100g). Ash content also found increased (p<0.05) with 55 days of harvest interval (10.84g/100g) compared to 45 days (10.28g/100g), 35 days (8.84g/100g) and 25 days (7.84g/100g). Nonetheless, season had found no effects on dry matter content, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and ash content. Onjai-Uea et al. (2022) found higher DM, CF and Ash at 75 days compared to 60 days and 45 days. Ansah et al. (2010) stated that dry matter yield of Napier varied from 25 t/h/y to 45 t/h/y. Current study had consented to Tessema et al. (2010) who also reported that DM yield, CF, ADF and NDF was higher in Napier pakchong grass in later harvesting due to faster growth rate which accumulated more dry matter. Baath et al. (2020) also reported previously that, levels of ADF and NDF increased steadily with the progression of the growing season, accompanied by an accumulation of cell wall constituents that peak at plant maturity. Sarker et al. (2019) also found similar results harvested at 60 days of pakchong. Furthermore, Sollenberger (2002) described that, higher dry matter, ADF, NDF, lignin were related to harvesting day, while decreasing nutritional qualities. Fiber contents tends to increase with growing maturity (Lounglawan et al., 2014). Moreover, Haryani et al. (2021) also reported that fiber content is lower in 6th week age pakchong compared to 8th weeks and also reported that 5.9% fiber content increased in 6th to 7th week of growing age and 3.4% in 7th to 8th week of growing age. So, lengthy harvest interval of pakchong increased these parameters due to its growing maturity. The present research also showed the similar results with previous study. Remarkably, crude protein content and yield increased (p<0.05) at 25 days (19.52 g/100g and 4.25 t/ha/y) harvest interval compared to 45 days (12.46 g/100g and 3.47 t/ha/y), 35 days (14.30 g/100g and 3.30 t/ha/y) and 55 days (9.51 g/100g and 3.07 t/ha/y), respectively. Roy et al. (2021) reported that, dry matter content and crude protein yield varied seasonally, dry matter content found higher in Rabi season and crude protein yield found significantly higher in Kharif 1. In addition, harvest interval had significant effects on crude protein content and yield. Furthermore, the current research showed that harvest interval or pakchong age had significant effects on crude protein. Ahamed et al. (2021) reported that pakchong had higher crude protein harvested at 40 days (11.23%) than 50 days (9.49%) and 60 days (8.01%). Onjai-Uea et al. (2022) also stated that, 45 days of harvesting of pakchong grass yield more CP compared to 60 days or 75 days. This changes occurred due to stage of plant maturity. The plant switched from vegetative growth phase to reproductive growth phase. In that phase, plants had more stem resulted higher fiber content but a lower crude protein level. Additionally, Budiman et al. (2012) reported that crude protein of Napier grass decreased with increasing of defoliation intervals. Not only this perennial forage, Adjei and Fianu (1985) reported that, with extended of harvesting ages (60, 90, and 120 days), the average crude protein (CP) content in the leaves and stems of forage legumes dropped from 22.5 to 17.5% and from 11.9 to 9.4%, but the average crude fiber content increased correspondingly from 20.0 to 26.8% and 27.1 to 31.9%. Mohammad et al. (2022) also mentioned that mean value of crude protein found highest at 45 days compared to 60 days and 75 days of cutting interval and the crude protein content decreased due to plant maturity. The current research revealed the similar results with previous study. Nutrient composition changed due to several factors such as climate, season, soil fertility, fertilizer application, soil type, weather and irrigation (Schut et al., 2010). Furthermore, Wadi et al. (2004) described harvesting age as critical factor for crude protein, although dry matter increases CP content decreases. So, crude protein content had been used to determine the forage quality as key factor. Moreover, CP content is a critical factor for voluntary feed intake for ruminants, less than 7% CP in ruminants diet reduced voluntary feed intake as well as digestion (Nori et al., 2009). Minimum requirement of CP for adult cattle and heifer is 10%, higher percentage requirement for growing cows or lactating stage (Thayalini et al., 2019). The current study showed higher crude protein at 25 days interval of harvesting may fulfill the requirement for all growing stage.
The research result revealed that both harvest interval (age) and season had significant (p<0.01) effects. Irrespective of season, harvest interval had significant effects on fresh biomass yield (FBY), crude protein (CP) contents, ash content, acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), dry matter yield, CP yield of pakchong grass (Table 3). Significantly (p<0.05) higher fresh biomass yield were observed at 25 days (167.93 t/ha/y) than 45 days (161.56 t/ha/y), 55 days (155.90 t/ha/y) and 35 days (155.66 t/ha/y). Dry matter yield was found significantly higher at 55 days (32.29 t/ha/y) compared to 45 days (27.89 t/ha/y), 35 days (23.07 t/ha/y) and 25 days (21.504 t/ha/y). Due to increasing the harvest interval pakchong started their generative activities and plant elongation, maturation may be the factor for increasing the fresh biomass yield. Roy et al. (2021) showed that pakchong produced 336.8 t/ha/y fresh biomass and 45.3 t/ha/y dry matter yield at 50 days harvest interval which was higher than current study. The reason of lowering the fresh biomass yield than previous study was plant spacing. Rengsirikul et al. (2011) stated that biomass yield of Napier varied significantly based on location, management strategies, season and variety. Dry matter content increased with increasing of plant growing age which lead to increasing dry matter yield. Harvest interval could affect the higher plant height, dry matter yield, photosynthetic activities, increasing tiller and mature leaf number. So this factor could be attributed to increase dry matter yield with increasing harvest interval. Onjai-Uea et al. (2022) stated that, pakchong produced more dry matter at increased of plant growing age but poor nutritional quality who reported 20.16 t/ha/y at 45 days and 22.98 t/ha/y at 75 days. Previous sole study (Roy et al., 2025) on Leaf stage (LS) based management of Napier grass and demonstrated that LS could be used as a field friendly criterion to monitor yield and quality of Napier grass. This LS also could be matched easily with harvest interval. Increased the leaf stage (LS) from 6 to 14 reduced the crude protein (CP) level from 184 to 118 g/kg DM and lowered the metabolizable energy (ME) from 10.4 to 7.3 MJ/kg DM. This indicated that harvesting Napier grass at an earlier LS could enhance its nutritional quality. However, improved quality come with a trade-off, as dry matter yield was reduced by nearly 50% when harvested at the lower LS or early harvest interval. The combined effect of season and harvest interval on yield and quality revealed a trade-off between biomass yield and forage quality driven by plant maturity and environmental conditions. Longer harvest interval markedly increased dry matter yield, reduced forage digestibility and nutrient availability. Conversely, shorter harvest (25 days) interval suggested significantly higher crude protein. The inverse relationship between harvest interval and crude protein yield highlighted the fundamental quality and quantity compromise in forage management. Roy et al. (2025) reported that cattle fed the 6 LS pakchong showed markedly superior performance compared with those received the 14 LS pakchong showed higher average daily gain (610 vs. 270 g/day) and a more efficient feed conversion ratio (6.4 vs. 16.2). These differences highlighted a clear trade-off between forage yield and nutritional quality. Overall, the findings indicated that harvesting pakchong grass at 6 LS or 25 days harvest interval optimized feed nutritive value, enhanced cattle growth and improved feed conversion efficiency.
Total gas production and degradability
Pakchong fodder harvested at 55 days (40.47 ml) produced significantly (p<0.05) higher gas at 24 hours of fermentation followed by 45 days (33.11 ml), 35 days (28.62 ml) and 25 days (20.39 ml). Nevertheless harvesting interval, season also affects (p<0.05) the gas production at 24 hours. Maximum gas production at 24 hours found at and winter (31.87 ml) compared to summer (30.89 ml) rainy (29.53 ml) season. Roy et al. (2025) agreed to current results, who reported that 24 hour gas production had higher value at summer season and lower at rainy season. Additionally, Napier cultivar produced not less than 30 ml gas at 24 hour of fermentation, Pakchong produced 35.1 ml gas at 24 hour of fermentation harvested at 50 days interval. Significant (p<0.001) in vitro dry matter degradability (IVDMD) of pakchong was discovered at 25 days (62.92%) harvest interval followed by 35 days (59.59%), 45 days (55.34%) and 55 days (51.70%). The current study results agreed to Tessema et al. (2010) who explained that Napier grass increased the fibre content that contributed to decrease in digestibility. Kabuga and Darko (1993) also reported that dry matter degradability decreased with increasing harvesting age of grass species in the tropics. Moreover, Taliafero et al. (1975) described that older fodder had lower in vitro dry matter degradability. In addition, Pakchong fodder harvested at 25 days (8.74 MJ/kgDM) revealed maximum estimated metabolizable energy (ME) than 35 days (7.51 MJ/kgDM), 45 days (7.17 MJ/kgDM) and 55 days (7.06 MJ/kgDM). Roy et al. (2025) previously stated that pakchong had 7.83 ME (MJ)/kg DM harvested at 50 days of harvest interval. Bashar et al. (2024b) also observed that pakchong fodder had greater dOM and ME than other varieties. Additionally, 1 kg of milk yield decreased for dropping 1% of dOM in grass (Peryaud and Delagarde, 2013). Warly et al. (2004) reported that the organic matter digestibility of tropical grasses varied for harvesting age, cutting interval and cutting height between 51% in P. purpuphoides and 64.4% in P. purpureum. Islam et al. (2022) also reported that 0.83kg milk yield increased with 1% of crude protein in Napier grass. Tauqir et al. (2009) reported that Napier grass contained higher fermentable carbohydrate that can be added more carbohydrate supplement to increased quality of silage and animal production. The current study also found the similar results that pakchong fodder harvested at prolong harvest interval showed lower degradability. Additionally, pakchong fodder harvested at four different harvest interval showed that cumulative gas production was increasing at 0-12 hours (Figure 1). Zailan et al. (2016) explained that 80% gas production occurred within 24 hour of incubation period, Gas production increased rapidly from 2 to 48 h of incubation and then plateaued between 48 and 96 h. The current study also agreed to Kamalak et al. (2005) also. After 30 hours it had turned into plateau state in 25 days of harvest interval and 36-48 hours for other harvest interval. Ansah et al. (2013) reported that Napier grass remained 48 hour in the rumen. Fodder of Pennisetum genus exhibited higher gas production with advancing plant maturity (Nguyen et al., 2024).
Correlation between morphological characteristics and nutritional quality of pakchong
Correlation of different morphological characteristics and nutritional composition had presented in Figure 2. While, the plant height, leaf length, stem length had found positively (p<0.05) strong correlation with dry matter (DM), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and ash content, whereas strong negative correlation with crude protein (CP). Crude protein had found moderate correlation with leaf yield, whereas had strongly negative (p<0.01) correlation with plant height, leaf length, stem length, ADF, NDF and Ash. Additionally, plant height had positively (p<0.05) correlated with stem length. The current research results had agreed to Ahamed et al. (2021) who found positively and strongly correlation among growth parameters and nutritional parameters. In addition, Cajarville et al. (2015) also reported the similar results between plant morphologies, in vitro gas production and WSC.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The current study proved that harvest interval strongly affect the fresh biomass yield, dry matter yield, crude protein yield, in vitro gas production, degradability and correlation between plant morphologies and nutrients. With the plant maturation, dry matter yield increased and forage quality decreased significantly. Thus, a farmer may monitor pakchong grass quality directly after counting the last harvesting time and can determine harvest or grazing time. Finally, this study suggested the harvest interval of pakchong at 25 days with optimum field management to harvest more nutrients for animals. Further research could be carried on harvesting type whether rotational grazing aligned with optimal harvest intervals can maintain forage yield, regrowth viability and nutritive value comparable to cut-and-carry systems, improve animal intake, growth or milk yield and reduce labor and feeding costs.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Buffalo Research and Development Project and Buffalo Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341 for unwavering support helpful guidance to complete the research. The authors are also grateful to the farm and lab associated personnel.
Novelty Statement
This research presents the thorough and comparative assessments of Pakchong fodder across multiple harvest interval and season, markedly revealed significant variation in yield, nutritional quality and in vitro degradability and total gas production dynamics. The results identified that Pakchong harvested at 25d contain higher crude protein, energy content, degradability and lower in vitro gas production, thereby providing valuable guidance for improving qualities of Pakchong fodder in tropical livestock production.
Author’s Contribution
MAA reviewed the literature, monitoring the activities, data curation and performed to finalize the draft. MM reviewed the literature, conceptualized and conducted the research experiment, performed lab analysis, data curation, analysis and writing the original draft. NS monitoring the activities, data curation and performed to review and editing the final draft. MIAS reviewed the literature and lab analysis. GKD conceptualized the research experiment, supervised the research activities, funding acquisition and editing the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Generative AI and AI-assisted technology statement
The authors declared that no generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used in the preparation of manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Adjei MB, Fianu FK (1985). The effect of cutting interval on the yield and nutritive value of some tropical legumes on the coastal grassland of Ghana. Trop. Grassl., 19: 164–171.
Ahamed S, Rakib MRH, Jalil MA (2021). Forage growth, biomass yield and nutrient content of two different hybrid Napier cultivars grown in Bangladesh. Bang. J. Anim. Sci., 50(1): 43-49. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v50i1.55568
Ankom (2011). Available online: https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/documentfiles/RF_Manual.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2025).
Annicchiarico P (2007). Inter-and intra-population genetic variation for leaf: Stem ratio in landraces and varieties of lucerne. Grass Forage Sci., 62(1): 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00562.x
Ansah T, Osafo ELK, Hansen HH (2010). Herbage yield and chemical composition of four varieties of Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass harvested at three different days after planting. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am., 1(5): 923-929. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2010.1.5.923.929
AOAC (2005). Official methods of analytical chemist. Aassociation of official analytical chemists (AOAC). 18th ed., Washington DC.
Aroeira LJM, Lopes FCF, Deresz F, Verneque RS, Dayrell MS, de Matos LL, Maldonado-Vasquez, H, Vittori A (1999). Pasture availability and dry matter intake of lactating crossbred cows grazing elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum.). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 78(3-4): 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00270-3
Assuero SG, Tognetti JA (2010). Tillering regulation by endogenous and environmental factors and its agricultural management. Am. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol., 4(1): 35-48.
Baath GS, Northup BK, Gowda PH, Rocateli AC, Singh H (2020). Summer forage capabilities of tepary bean and guar in the southern Great Plains. Agron. J., 112(4): 2879-2890. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20220
Bashar MK, Haese E, Sultana N, Rodehutscord M (2024). In vitro ruminal fermentation, methane emissions, and nutritional value of different tropical feedstuffs for ruminants. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 11(4): 924-935. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k842
Brown D, Salim M, Chavalimu E, Fitzhugh H (1988). Intake, selection, apparent digestibility and chemical composition of Pennisetum purpureum and Cajanus cajan foliage as utilized by lactating goats. Small Rumin. Res., 1(1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(88)90044-2
Budiman B, Soetrisno RD, Budhi SPS, Indrianto A (2012). Morphological characteristics, productivity and quality of three napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum schum) cultivars harvested at different age. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric., 37(4): 294–301. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.37.4.294-301
Cajarville C, Britos A, Errandonea N, Gutierrez L, Cozzolino D, Repetto JL (2015). Diurnal changes in water-soluble carbohydrate concentration in lucerne and tall fescue in autumn and the effects on in vitro fermentation. N. Z. J. Agric. Res., 58(3): 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2015.1018391
DLS (2022-23). Livestock economy at a glance. Department of livestock services. Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock. https://dls.gov.bd/site/page/22b1143b-9323-44f8-bfd8-647087828c9b/Livestock-Economy
Fariña SR, Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJA (2011). Complementary forage system whole-farm study: Forage utilization and milk production. Anim. Prod. Sci., 51(5): 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10242
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970). Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some application), Agricultural Handbook: ARS-USDA, Wasinghton, DC.
Gwayumba W, Christensen DA, McKinnon JJ, Yu P (2002). Dry matter intake, digestibility and milk yield by Friesian cows fed two Napier grass varieties. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 15(4): 516–521. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.516
Halim RA, Shampazuraini S, Idris AB (2013). Yield and nutritive quality of nine Napier grass varieties in Malaysia. Malays. J. Anim. Sci., 16(2): 37-44. http://www.msap.my/mjas16-2/5(YIELD-HalimRidzwan_37-44)-rev3.pdf
Haryani H, Norlindawati AP, Aswanimiyuni A, Nurzillah M, Saiful SM (2021). Cutting age effects on yield and nutritive values of napier pakchong (Cenchrus purpureus cv. Pakchong). Malays. J. Vet. Res., 12(2): 46-51.
Hasan M, Islam MA, Hasan MA, Alam MJ, Peas MH (2019). Groundwater vulnerability assessment in Savar upazila of Dhaka district, Bangladesh-A GIS-based DRASTIC modeling. Groundw. Sust. Dev., 9: 100-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100220
Hernández-Castellano LE, Nally JE, Lindahl J, Wanapat M, Alhidary IA, Fangueiro D, Grace D, Ratto M, Bambou JC, de Almeida AM (2019). Dairy science and health in the tropics: Challenges and opportunities for the next decades. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 51(5): 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14787
Holm L, Pancho JV, Hrberger JP, Plucknett DL (1979). A geographical atlas of world weeds. Toronto, Canada: John Wiley and Sons Inc. (pp. xlix+-391)
Islam MR, Garcia SC, Islam MA, Bashar MK, Roy A, Roy BK, Sarker NR, Clark CEF (2024). Ruminant Production from Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum): A review. Animals, 14(3): 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14030467
Islam MR, Garcia SC, Sarker NR, Islam MA, Clark CEF (2023). Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) management strategies for dairy and meat production in the tropics and subtropics: Yield and nutritive value. Front. Plant Sci., 14: 1269976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1269976
Islam MR, Garcia SC, Sarker NR, Roy BK, Sultana N, Clark CEF (2022). The role of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum schumach) for improving ruminant production efficiency and human nutrition in the tropics. In: Climate change and livestock production: Recent advances and future perspectives. Springer, Chapter 13: 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9836-1_13
Kabirizi J, Muyekho F, Mulaa M, Msangi R, Pallangyo B, Kawube G, Zziwa E, Mugerwa S, Ajanga S, Lukwago G (2015). Napier grass feed resource: Production, constraints and implications for smallholder farmers in Eastern and Central Africa. pp. 1–173. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281556114
Kabuga JD, Darko CA (1993). In sacco degradation of dry matter and nitrogen in oven dried and fresh tropical grasses and some relationships to in vitro dry matter digestibility. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 40 (2-3): 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90156-E
Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Ozay O, Ozkose E (2005). Chemical composition and its relationship to in vitro gas production of several tannin containing trees and shrub leaves. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 18(2): 203-208. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.203
Liman L, Wijaya AK, Erwanto E, Muhtarudin M, Adhianto K (2022). Productivity and quality of pakchong-1 hybrid grass (Pennisetum purpureum× Pennisetum americanum) at different harvesting ages and fertilizer levels. Pak. J. Bio. Sci., 25 (5): 426-432. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2022.426.432
Lounglawan P, Lounglawan W, Suksombat W (2014). Effect of cutting interval and cutting height on yield and chemical composition of King Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum americanum). APCBEE Procedia. 8: 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.075
Miah M, Sultana N, Islam MT, Shejuty SF, Deb GK, Al-Mamun M (2025). Effects of moringa (Moringa oleifera) silage on milk yield, milk composition and serum biochemical indexes of lactating Pabna cattle. Trop. Anim. H. Prod., 57 (3): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04405-8
Minson DJ (1984). Digestibility and voluntary intake by sheep of five Digitaria species. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 24 (127): 494-500. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9840494
Mohamad SSS, Kamaruddin NA, Ting JY (2022). Study on chemical composition of napier pak chong (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum glaucum) harvested at different growth stages. J. Agrobio. 13(1): 24-30. https://doi.org/10.37231/jab.2022.13.1S.315
Muinga RW, Thorpe W, Topps JH (1992). Voluntary food intake, live-weight change and lactation performance of crossbred dairy cows given ad libitum Pennisetum purpureum (Napier grass var. Bana) supplemented with leucaena forage in the lowland semi-humid tropics. Anim. Prod., 55(3): 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100021024
Nguyen HTD, Schonewille JT, Pellikaan WF, Nguyen TX, Hendriks WH (2024). In vitro gas production of common southeast asian grasses in response to variable regrowth periods in Vietnam. Fermentation, 10(6): 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10060280
Nori H, Sani SA, Tuen AA (2009). Chemicaland physical properties of Sarawak (East Malaysia) rice straws. Livest. J. Rur. Dev., 78(83.1): 80-7.
Onjai-Uea N, Paengkoum S, Taethaisong N, Thongpea S, Sinpru B, Surakhunthod J, Paengkoum P (2022). Effect of cultivar, plant spacing and harvesting age on yield, characteristics, chemical composition, and anthocyanin composition of purple Napier grass. Animals, 13 (1): 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010010
Oosting SJ, Udo HMJ, Viets TC (2014). Development of livestock production in the tropics: Farm and farmers’ perspectives. Animals, 8(4): 1238–1248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000548
Peyraud JL, Delagarde R (2013). Managing variations in dairy cow nutrient supply under grazing. Animals, 7 (1): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002394
Rao SC, Northup BK (2012). Pigeon pea potential for summer grazing in the southern Great Plains. Agron. J., 104(1): 199-203. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0260
Rengsirikul K, Ishii Y, Kangvansaichol K, Pripanapong P, Sripichitt P, Punsuvon V, Tudsri S (2011). Effects of inter‐cutting interval on biomass yield, growth components and chemical composition of napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) cultivars as bioenergy crops in Thailand. Grass. Sci., 57 (3): 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2011.00220.x
Roy A, Roy BK, Bashar MK, Sarker NR, Sultana N, Billah MM, Al-Mamun M (2025). Biomass yield, morphological characteristics, nutritional values and in vitro digestibility of different napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 13 (7): 1445-1460. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2025/13.7.1445.1460
Roy BK, Roy A, Sarkar NR, Islam MR, Cameron Clark AP, Mamun A, Sultana N, Jalil A (2021). Study on the production performance and physiological characteristics of available Napier cultivars in BLRI under the similar agronomical management practices. Proceedings of the Annual Research Review Workshop 2021, BLRI, Savar, Dhaka-1341, 27-28 January 2022; pp. 15-16
Sarker NR, Habib MA, Yeasmin D, Tabassum F, Mohammed RA (2021). Studies on biomass yield, morphological characteristics and nutritive quality of napier cultivars under two different geo-topographic conditions of Bangladesh. Am. J. Plant Sci., 12(6): 914-925. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.126061
Sarker NR, Yeasmin D, Tabassum F, Amin MR, Habib MA (2019). Comparative study on biomass yield, morphology, silage quality of hybrid napier and pakchong and their utilization in bull calves. J. Agri. Sci. Tech., 9(3): 166-176. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2019.03.004
Schut AGT, Gherardi SG, Wood DA (2010). Empirical models to quantify the nutritive characteristics of annual pastures in southwest Western Australia. Crop Past. Sci., 61(1): 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08438
Sollenberger LE (2002). Mott Elephant Grass. University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. and M. University Cooperative Extension Program. Available online: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/AG/AG155/AG155-13013317.pdf
Taliaferro CM, Horn FP, Tucker BB, Totusek R, Morrison RD (1975). Performance of three warm-season perennial grasses and a native range mixture as influenced by N and P fertilization 1. Agron. J., 67(3): 289-292. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700030003x
Tauqir NA, Sarwar M, Jabbar MA, Mahmood S (2009). Nutritive value of jumbo grass (Sorghum bicolour Sorghum sudanefe) silage in lactating Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Pak. Vet. J., 29(1): 5-10.
Tessema ZK, Mihret J, Solomon M (2010). Effect of defoliation frequency and cutting height on growth, dry-matter yield and nutritive value of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum L. Schumach). Grass. Forage Sci., 65(4): 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00761.x
Thayalini K, Siti Hajar Z, Wan Abdul Ghani M, Mohammad Fitri RH, Nasyah Rita Azira, MAN, Mohd Rosly S (2019). Rumput Napier Pakchong sebagai sumber protein ternakan ruminan (Napier Pakchong grass as protein source for ruminants). Buletin Teknologi MARDI Bil., 16: 53-61.
Tyas JA, Hofman PJ, Underhill SJ, Bell KL (1998). Fruit canopy position and panicle bagging affects yield and quality of Tai So’lychee. Sci. Hortic., 72(3-4): 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00125-8
Wadi A, Ishii Y, Idota S (2004). Effects of cutting interval and cutting height on dry matter yield and overwintering ability at the established year in Pennisetum species. Plant Prod. Sci., 7(1): 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.7.88
Walaiphan C, Chittamart N, Tawornpruek S, Aramrak S, Fujii K (2019). Studies on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen turnover derived from sugarcane residues incorporated into a sandy loam soil. In: Proceedings of the 45th congress on science and technology of Thailand (STT45) seedling innovation for sustainable, Chiang Rai, Thailand, pp. 87–92.
Wangchuk K, Rai K, Nirola H, Dendup C, Mongar D (2015). Forage growth, yield and quality responses of Napier hybrid grass cultivars to three cutting intervals in the Himalayan foothills. Trop. Grassl.-Forrajes Trop., 3(3): 142-150. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(3)142-150
Warly LE, Fariani A, Ichinohe T, Fujihara T (2004). Study on nutritive value of tropical forages in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 17(11): 1518-1523. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1518
Zailan MZ, Yaakub H, Jusoh S (2016). In vitro digestibility and gas production characteristics of four Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars as fresh fodder. Mal. J. Anim. Sci., 19(2): 95-106. http://mjas.my/mjas-v2/rf/pages/journal/v19i2-10-Zailan(In%20vitro%20)_r4.pdf
Zewdu T, Baars RMT, Yami A (2002). Effect of plant height at cutting, source and level of fertiliser on yield and nutritional quality of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum L. Schumach.). Afr. J. Range Forage Sci., 19(2): 123-128. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220110209485783
Zhang X, Wang M, Wang R, Ma Z, Long D, Mao H, Wen J, Bernard LA, Beauchemin, KA, Tan Z (2018). Urea plus nitrate pretreatment of rice and wheat straws enhances degradation and reduces methane production in in vitro ruminal culture. J. Sci. Food Agric., 98(14): 5205-5211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9056