An Annotated Checklist of Mollusca (Gastropods and Bivalves) of the Mangrove Ecosystem of Thoothukudi Coast, Gulf of Mannar, Southeast Coast of India
Periyasamy Ramesh, Pandurengan Padmavathy*, V. Rani, N. Jayakumar, S. Aanand, C. Sudhan and U. Arisekar
Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi – 628 008, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
The present study analyzed diversity, prepared a checklist and assessed molluscan biodiversity (gastropods and bivalves) associated with the mangrove ecosystem of the Thoothukudi coast, Gulf of Mannar, Southeast coast of India. Molluscan specimens were hand-picked fortnightly from three mangrove sampling stations (Thoothukudi, Palayakayal, and Punnakayal) along the Thoothukudi coast from December 2022 to November 2023. The investigation revealed 87 molluscs species recorded in the Thoothukudi mangroves, including 48 gastropods (7 orders, 17 families, and 34 genera, with Caenogastropoda (19 species) and Neogastropoda (9 species) being dominant. Notably, Euchleus asper was the sole species under order Segueniida) and 39 bivalves (6 orders, 12 families, and 33 genera, with Venerida (12 species) as the dominant order) among the gastropod Caenogastropoda and Neogastropoda were the dominant, while Venerida was the most prevalent bivalve in the Thoothukudi mangroves. This study highlights the crucial role of mangroves and its associated organism like gastropod and bivalves in supporting the mangrove ecosystem in species richness and which maintaining coastal biodiversity. Based on the Shannon-Weiner index (Shannn, 1948), the species richness indicates a healthy, stable condition of the ecosystem. The checklist provides a baseline for future monitoring and conservation, aiding protection strategies against anthropogenic impacts. This study suggests monitoring mangroves and their faunal biodiversity to maintain the sustained health of the ecosystem.
Article Information
Received 14 November 2024
Revised 15 December 2024
Accepted 27 December 2024
Available online 24 July 2025
(early access)
Published 30 March 2026
Authors’ Contribution
PR: Conceptualization, sampling and original draft preparation. PP: Conceptualization, Supervision and Methodology validation. CS: Species identification and statistical analysis. UA: Review and editing, revision, and proofreading. VR: Reviewing the draft. NJ: Methodology validation and data curation. SA: Supervision and methodology validation.
Key words
Mollusca, Gastropods, Bivalves, Checklist, Mangrove, Gulf of Mannar
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20241114090214
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
0030-9923/2026/0003-1187 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2026 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Mollusca are the largest and most diversified phylum in tropical waters, and they consist of a diverse group of soft-bodied organisms and occur in various shapes and colors. They provide the primary food sources for humans and other secondary consumers in the ecosystems (Asakura et al., 2020). Since many molluscs species have significant economic value, other biological indicators, and vital components of the food web and their significance in the ecosystem cannot be understated (Raveendran et al., 2016). Molluscs consume both living and decaying algae and plant materials, which contributes significantly to the ecological processes associated with the decomposition of organic detritus (Kelaher et al., 2007; Nagelkerken et al., 2008). As grazers, gastropods can regulate algal blooms and ephiphyton (Asakura et al., 2020; Keerthana et al., 2023), whereas bivalves, as filter feeders, can aid in the purification of marine waters that have been silted (Chatla and Padmavathi, 2017). According to a report by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF, 2014), Government of India, in 2014, India is home to a remarkable diversity of molluscan species. Of the approximately 66,535 known species of molluscs worldwide, India hosts 5,169 species, representing a significant portion of global molluscan biodiversity (MoEF, 2014). This figure, which is considered a conservative estimate, underscores the rich and varied ecosystems present in the country, ranging from terrestrial to freshwater and marine environments. The variety of these molluscs, including gastropods and bivalves, is a strong indicator of the health of mangrove ecosystems (Mawardi et al., 2023). Additionally, many bivalves and gastropods are economically significant, providing food for local communities (Zvonareva et al., 2015). Understanding their species diversity and their distribution is key to managing sustainable utilization of resources and ensuring food security. With this background, the current study aimed to compile a comprehensive checklist of molluscs, particularly on gastropods and bivalves, in the mangrove ecosystems of the Thoothukudi coast. This research involves identifying and documenting the biodiversity of molluscs associated with mangroves. This data will be invaluable for forming conservation and management strategies, aiding efforts to conserve and sustain these crucial ecosystems.
Materials and methods
In this study, a comprehensive checklist of molluscs (gastropods and bivalves) in the mangrove region of Thoothukudi was prepared. The quadrant (20 quadrants/site/month) was placed randomly at a distance of every 10 m and the specimens collected fortnightly from three stations: Station-1, Thoothukudi (Roche Park, Lat 8°47’23’’N, Long 78°9’19’’E), Station-2, Palayakayal (Landing centre, Lat 8°40’13’’N, Long 78°6’9’’E), and Station-3, Punnakayal (Landing centre, Lat 8°38’8’’N, Long 78°7’20’’E) from December 2022 to November 2023. Sampling was conducted during low tide to maximize the molluscs, mangrove trees, and land area exposure. Live and dead shells of gastropods and bivalves were hand-picked, and some of them were identified on-site, while others were collected and transferred to the laboratory in an icebox. Molluscs samples were collected along the mangrove ecosystem of the Thoothukudi coast and analyzed following previous research reported by Keerthana et al. (2023). The bivalves and gastropods were separated and labeled individually. Along with standard websites like WoRMS, SeaLifeBase, and Natural History Museum Rotterdam, standard keys released by the Food and Agriculture Organization (Dholakia, 2013; Sonak, 2017) were used to identify the specimens. The recent taxonomic names were checked from websites such as sea life base and WoRMS (world register of marine species).
Results and discussion
The current study recorded a diverse array of 87 molluscs species belonging to two classes, Gastropoda and Bivalvia, across three selected mangrove stations along the coast of Thoothukudi (Table I). In this study, Station-1 recorded 32 genera and 42 species of molluscs. Station-2 exhibited the highest diversity with 56 genera and 72 species, indicating perhaps a more complex and heterogeneous habitat or less anthropogenic impact. Station 3 had 49 genera and 61 species, suggesting intermediate conditions between the other two stations. These species span 28 families, including Arcidae, Lucinidae, Donacidae, Psammobiidae, Tellinidae, Mytilidae, Margaritidae, Ostreidae, Pinnidae, Cyrenidae, Mactridae, Veneridae, Cerithiidae, Potamididae, Turritellidae, Littorinidae, Naticidae, Columbellidae, Melongenidae, Muricidae, Nassariidae, Tonnidae, Muricidae, Fasciolariidae, Neritidae, Ellobiidae, Chilodontaidae, and Trochidae. The Bivalvia class was represented by 39 species across six orders, 12 families, and 33 genera. The Order Venerida had the highest number of species (12), followed by the Order Cardiida with nine species and the Order Arcida with three species. The significant presence of Venerida and Cardiida indicates the favorable sedimentary conditions in these mangrove areas, which support filter-feeding bivalves. The class gastropoda comprised 48 species belonging to seven orders, 17 families, and 34 genera. The order Caenogastropoda found to be dominant with 19 species, followed by Neogastropoda with nine species. Notably, Euchleus asper was the only species recorded under the order Segueniidae. This diversity reflects the rich ecological niches and the adaptability of gastropods in mangrove ecosystems. Compared with previous studies, Yadav et al. (2019) documented 19 species of gastropods from 13 families and three species of bivalves from 3 families in the mangroves of Paradeep, Northeast India. Similarly, Karthick et al. (2020) reported six species of bivalves from 5 families and 11 species of gastropods from 8 families along the Tiruchendur coast, Southeast India. Chatla and Padmavathi (2017) recorded 23 species of molluscs in the Paleru and Moosy backwaters, Andhra Pradesh, with 16 species from 12 families of Gastropoda and seven species from 5 families of Bivalvia, which was closely related to the present study. Also, Ramanibai and Govindan (2018) identified 34 species of gastropods from 26 families and 17 species of bivalves from 13 families in Pulicat Lagoon, which was comparatively less than the current results. Notably, Boominathan et al. (2012) reported an extensive diversity of 215 molluscs species, comprising 133 gastropods and 77 bivalves, from various mangrove ecosystems across India. These studies collectively highlight molluscs communities’ considerable variation and richness in mangrove habitats across the Indian coastline.
The wide distribution of families such as Ellobiidae, Littorinidae, Potamididae, and Neritidae in this study aligns with findings by Hogarth (2015) and Kantharajan et al. (2017), who reported these families as common in Indo-Pacific and Southeast Asian mangroves. This similarity underscores the ecological importance of these families in mangrove ecosystems, where they play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and as prey for higher trophic levels.
Table I. Checklist of molluscs: gastropods and bivalves of the mangrove ecosystems of the Thoothukudi coast.
|
S. No |
Species name |
Common name |
Sampling stations |
No. recorded |
Size range (cm) |
Utility |
|
Phylum: Mollusca; Class: Bivalvia; Subclass: Autobranchia |
||||||
|
Infraclass: Pteriomorphia; Order: Arcida; Family: Arcidae |
||||||
|
1 |
Larkinia grandis (Broderip & Sowerby, 1829)* |
Mangrove cockle |
TH |
106 |
1.8 - 2.7 |
- |
|
2 |
Tegillarca granosa (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Blood cockle |
TH, PA, PU |
138 |
1.5 – 2.4 |
C |
|
3 |
Barbatia sp., (Gray, 1842)* |
Ark clam |
PA, PU |
184 |
2.6 – 3.5 |
- |
|
Infraclass: Heteroconchia; Order: Lucinida; Family: Lucinidae |
||||||
|
4 |
Anodontia alba (Link, 1807) * |
Buttercup lucine |
TH, PA, PU |
162 |
1.2 – 2.6 |
- |
|
5 |
Anodontia edentula (Linnaeus, 1758) * |
Toothless lucine |
TH, PA |
136 |
1.6 - 2.8 |
C |
|
6 |
Loripes orbiculatus (Poli, 1795)* |
Pale lucine |
PA, PU |
155 |
1.9 – 2.6 |
- |
|
Order: Cardiida; Family: Donacidae |
||||||
|
7 |
Donax incarnates (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Fleshy donax |
PA, PU |
142 |
2.3 – 2.7 |
- |
|
8 |
Latona sordida (Hanley, 1845)* |
Beam clams |
PA, PU |
112 |
2.2 – 3.3 |
- |
|
9 |
Donax pulchellus (Hanley, 1843)* |
Beautiful donax |
PA, PU |
128 |
1.2 – 2.5 |
- |
|
10 |
Hecuba scortum (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Leather donax |
PA, PU |
146 |
4.5 – 7.9 |
- |
|
11 |
Donax semisulcatus (Hanley, 1843)* |
Half striated donax |
PA, PU |
118 |
3.5 – 4.6 |
- |
|
12 |
Hiatula planulata (Reeve, 1857)* |
Sunset clams |
TH, PA |
122 |
3.6 – 8.5 |
- |
|
13 |
Alaona ala (Hanley, 1845)* |
Tellin clams |
TH, PA, PU |
102 |
2.4 – 3.6 |
- |
|
14 |
Ardeamya petitiana (d’Orbigny, 1845)* |
Not found |
TH, PA |
98 |
2.1 – 2.8 |
- |
|
15 |
Serratina fissa (Spengler, 1798)* |
Not found |
PA, PU |
114 |
1.9 – 2.5 |
- |
|
Infraclass: Pteriomorphia |
||||||
|
Order: Mytilida; Family: Mytilidae |
||||||
|
16 |
Byssogerdius striatulus (Hanley, 1843)* |
Not found |
PA, PU |
116 |
2.7 – 3.5 |
- |
|
17 |
Mytella strigata (Hanley, 1843)* |
Charru mussel |
PA, PU |
124 |
1.8 – 3.4 |
- |
|
18 |
Perna perna (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Brown mussel |
PA, PU |
143 |
5.3 – 8.1 |
HC |
|
19 |
Perna viridis (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Green mussel |
TH, PA, PU |
187 |
7.6 – 9.8 |
HC |
|
Order: Ostreida; Family: Margaritidae |
||||||
|
20 |
Pinctada imbricata (Roding, 1798)* |
Atlantic pearl oyster |
TH, PA, PU |
248 |
2.6 – 5.5 |
HC |
|
21 |
Magallana cuttackensis (Newton and Smith, 1912)* |
True oysters |
TH, PA, PU |
270 |
7.2 – 8.9 |
- |
|
22 |
Magallana bilineata (Roding, 1798)* |
Philippine cupped oyster |
TH, PA, PU |
176 |
5.6 – 7.8 |
C |
|
23 |
Ostrea edulis (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Edible oyster |
PA, PU |
142 |
3.8 – 6.2 |
C |
|
24 |
Saccostrea cuccullata (Born, 1758)* |
Hooded oyster |
PA, PU |
164 |
3.4 – 5.7 |
C |
|
25 |
Pinna sp., (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Pen shells |
TH, PA |
126 |
7.3 – 9.5 |
C |
|
Infraclass: Heteroconchia |
||||||
|
Order: Venerida; Family: Cyrenidae |
||||||
|
26 |
Villorita cyprinoides (Gray, 1825)# |
Black clam |
PA, PU |
246 |
2.8 – 3.6 |
- |
|
Family: Mactridae |
||||||
|
27 |
Mactra grandis (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Plain Trough shell |
PA, PU |
360 |
4.5 – 5.1 |
C |
|
Family: Venerida |
||||||
|
28 |
Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Stripped Venus clam |
TH, PA |
288 |
2.6 – 3.9 |
C |
|
29 |
Circe scripta (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Script venus |
TH |
152 |
3.6 – 4.2 |
- |
|
30 |
Eucallista purpurata (Lamarck, 1818)* |
Purple amiantis |
PA, PU |
134 |
4.1 – 4.6 |
- |
|
31 |
Gafrarium pectinatum (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Comb venus |
TH, PA, PU |
211 |
3.9 – 4.4 |
- |
|
Table continued on next page........... |
||||||
|
S. No |
Species name |
Common name |
Sampling stations |
No. recorded |
Size range (cm) |
Utility |
|
32 |
Lliochione subrugosa (Wood, 1828)* |
Venus clams |
PA, PU |
168 |
3.1 – 3.7 |
- |
|
33 |
Marcia opima (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Fertile venus |
TH, PA, PU |
144 |
3.5 – 3.9 |
- |
|
34 |
Meretrix casta (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Backwater hard clam |
TH, PA, PU |
432 |
3.7 – 4.6 |
- |
|
35 |
Meretrix meretrix (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Asiatic hard clam |
TH, PA, PU |
582 |
3.6 – 4.3 |
C |
|
36 |
Paratapes textile (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Textile venus |
TH, PA |
142 |
3.2 – 3.8 |
C |
|
37 |
Pelecyora trigona (Reeve, 1850)* |
Trigonal dosinia |
PA, PU |
151 |
2.8 – 3.6 |
- |
|
38 |
Protapes gallus (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Rooster venus |
PA, PU |
173 |
3.5 – 5.2 |
C |
|
39 |
Sunetta menstrualis (Menke, 1843)* |
Mauve sunetta |
TH, PU |
132 |
2.6 – 3.5 |
SF |
|
Phylum: Mollusca; Class: Gastropoda |
||||||
|
Order: Caenogastropoda Family: Cerithiidae |
||||||
|
40 |
Cerithium atratum (Born, 1778)* |
Dark cerith |
TH, PA, PU |
678 |
1.8 – 2.5 |
- |
|
41 |
Cerithium coralium (Kiener, 1841)* |
Coral cerith |
TH, PA |
799 |
1.6 – 2.2 |
C |
|
42 |
Cerithium lutosum (Menke, 1828)* |
Variable cerith |
TH, PA, PU |
822 |
1.5 – 2.0 |
- |
|
43 |
Cerithium traillii (Sowerby, 1855)* |
Traills cerith |
TH, PA |
756 |
2.1 – 2.8 |
- |
|
44 |
Clypeomorus batillariaeformis (Habe and Kosuge, 1966)* |
Necklace or channeled cerith |
TH, PA |
528 |
2.3 – 2.9 |
- |
|
45 |
Clypeomorus bifasciata (Sowerby, 1855)* |
Sea snail or mud snail |
PA, PU |
711 |
1.4 – 2.3 |
- |
|
46 |
Pseudovertagus clava (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Cerithids |
PA, PU |
432 |
1.3 – 2.5 |
- |
|
47 |
Rhinoclavis kochi (Philippi, 1848)* |
Kochi’s cerith |
PA, PU |
620 |
2.1 – 3.1 |
- |
|
Family: Potamididae |
||||||
|
48 |
Cerithidea anticipata (Iredale, 1929)* |
Sea snail or mud snail |
TH |
384 |
2.4 – 3.6 |
- |
|
49 |
Pirenella alata (Philippi, 1849)* |
Mud whelks |
TH, PU |
512 |
2.2 – 2.8 |
- |
|
50 |
Pirenella arabica (Reid, 2016)* |
Not found |
TH, PA |
488 |
1.8 – 3.0 |
- |
|
51 |
Pirenella cancellata (Ozawa and Reid, 2016)* |
Not found |
TH, PA |
311 |
1.7 – 2.3 |
- |
|
52 |
Pirenella cingulata (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Hom snails |
TH, PA, PU |
454 |
1.6 – 2.4 |
C |
|
53 |
Pirenella conica (Blainville, 1829)* |
Not found |
TH, PA |
208 |
1.1 – 1.4 |
- |
|
54 |
Pirenella microptera (Kiener, 1841) * |
Not found |
TH, PA |
334 |
1.3 – 2.5 |
- |
|
55 |
Pirenella retifera (Sowerby, 1855) * |
Mangrove whelk |
PA, PU |
386 |
1.0 – 1.8 |
- |
|
56 |
Terebralia palustris (Linnaeus, 1767)* |
Giant mangrove whelk |
TH, PA |
212 |
2.0 – 2.9 |
- |
|
57 |
Terebralia sulcata (Born, 1778)* |
Sulcate swamp cerith |
PA, PU |
188 |
2.2 – 2.8 |
- |
|
Family: Turritellidae |
||||||
|
58 |
Turritella acutangula (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Tower shells |
PA, PU |
122 |
6.3 – 7.9 |
- |
|
Order: Littorinimorpha |
||||||
|
Family: Cymatiidae |
||||||
|
59 |
Lotoria triangularis (Perry, 1811)* |
Perry’s Triton |
TH, PA |
134 |
4.2 – 5.8 |
- |
|
60 |
Ranularia testudinaria (Adams and Reeve, 1850)* |
Tortoise Triton |
TH, PA |
128 |
5.4 – 6.9 |
- |
|
61 |
Naria ocellata (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Ocellate cowry |
PA, PU |
106 |
2.5 – 3.1 |
- |
|
Family: Littorinidae |
||||||
|
62 |
Littoraria scabra (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Mangrove periwinkle |
TH, PA |
154 |
1.4 – 2.8 |
- |
|
63 |
Eunaticina papilla (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Papilla moon snail |
PA, PU |
96 |
2.1 – 3.6 |
- |
|
Family: Tonnidae |
||||||
|
64 |
Tonna galea (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Giant tun |
TH |
45 |
5.7 – 7.3 |
C |
|
Order: Neogastropoda Family: Columbellidae |
||||||
|
65 |
Euplica scripta (Lamarck, 1822)* |
Dotted dove shell |
PA, PU |
168 |
2.2 – 2.8 |
- |
|
Family: Melongenidae |
||||||
|
66 |
Volegalea cochlidium (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Spiral melongena |
TH |
105 |
5.2 – 7.3 |
- |
|
Table continued on next page........... |
||||||
|
S. No |
Species name |
Common name |
Sampling stations |
No. recorded |
Size range (cm) |
Utility |
|
Family: Muricidae |
||||||
|
67 |
Trophon plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786) * |
Murex snails or rock snails |
PA, PU |
172 |
4.1 – 5.3 |
- |
|
Family: Nassariidae |
||||||
|
68 |
Nassaria coromandelica (Smith, 1894)* |
Indian Phos |
PA, PU |
122 |
3.3 – 4.5 |
- |
|
69 |
Nassarius stolatus (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Nassa mud snails or dog whelks |
PA, PU |
138 |
2.4 – 2.8 |
- |
|
70 |
Phrontis tiarula (Kiener, 1841)* |
Western mud nassa |
PA, PU |
145 |
1.5 – 1.9 |
- |
|
71 |
Tritia reticulata (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Netted dog-whelk |
PA, PU |
136 |
2.1 – 2.7 |
- |
|
Family: Muricidae |
||||||
|
72 |
Murex trapa (Roding, 1798)* |
Rare spined murex |
TH, PU |
58 |
6.2 – 6.8 |
C |
|
Family: Fasciolariidae |
||||||
|
73 |
Fusinus longissimus (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Long spindle |
TH |
48 |
10.5–12.6 |
- |
|
Subclass: Neritimorpha |
||||||
|
Order: Cycloneritida; Family: Neritidae |
||||||
|
74 |
Clithon olivaceum (Recluz, 1843)* |
Nerites |
PA, PU |
164 |
2.1 – 2.6 |
- |
|
75 |
Clithon oualaniense (Lesson, 1831)* |
Guamanian nerite |
PA, PU |
131 |
0.7 – 1.1 |
- |
|
76 |
Nerita polita (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Turbo snail |
PA, PU |
138 |
2.5 – 3.2 |
C |
|
77 |
Neritodryas dubia (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Nerites |
PA, PU |
123 |
1.9 – 2.5 |
- |
|
78 |
Vitta virginea (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Virgin nerites |
PA, PU |
118 |
0.9 – 2.2 |
- |
|
79 |
Vittina waigiensis (Lesson, 1831)* |
Red racer nerite snail |
PU |
132 |
1.6 – 2.3 |
- |
|
Subclass: Heterobranchia; Infraclass: Euthyneura |
||||||
|
Order: Ellobiida; Family: Ellobiidae |
||||||
|
80 |
Allochroa bronnii (Philippi, 1846)* |
Hallow shelled snails |
PU |
145 |
1.8 – 2.6 |
- |
|
81 |
Cassidula aurisfelis (Bruguiere, 1789)* |
Cat ear helmet snail |
TH, PA,PU |
112 |
1.2 – 2.5 |
- |
|
82 |
Cassidula labrella (Deshayes, 1830)* |
Not found |
PU |
135 |
1.6 – 2.3 |
- |
|
83 |
Cassidula nucleus (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Banded |
TH, PU |
108 |
1.3 – 2.2 |
- |
|
84 |
Melampus adamsianus (Pfeiffer, 1855)* |
Salt march snail |
PA, PU |
118 |
1.7 – 2.3 |
- |
|
Subclass: Vetigastropoda |
||||||
|
Order: Seguenziida; Family: Chilodontaidae |
||||||
|
85 |
Euchelus asper (Gmelin, 1791)* |
Sea snail |
TH, PA |
138 |
1.2 – 2.5 |
- |
|
Order: Trochida; Family: Trochidae |
||||||
|
86 |
Trochus cariniferus (Reeve, 1842)* |
Small sea snail |
TH, |
126 |
1.0 – 2.2 |
- |
|
87 |
Umbonium vestiarium (Linnaeus, 1758)* |
Button top snail |
TH, PU |
134 |
1.3 – 1.8 |
C |
TH, Thoothukudi; PA, Palayakayal; PU, Punnakayal; #, least concern; *, not evaluated; C, commercial; HC, highly commercial; SF, subsistence fisheries.
The diversity and distribution of molluscs recorded in this study underscore the ecological richness of the mangrove habitats along the Thoothukudi coast. The findings contribute valuable data to understanding molluscs diversity in Indian mangroves and highlight the need for ongoing conservation efforts to protect these vital ecosystems against environmental and anthropogenic pressures. Further comparative studies across different geographic regions and long-term monitoring are essential to understand the impacts of climate change and habitat degradation on molluscs communities in mangrove ecosystems.
Ravindran and Rajesh (2013) catalogued three species of gastropods spanning three genera from Punnakayal. Among these, the utility status of 16 species was classified under the commercial category, with an additional three species falling into the high commercial category and one species designated for subsistence fisheries. Intriguingly, an analysis of the international union for conservation of nature (IUCN) status unveiled that nearly all species (86) were categorized as not evaluated (NE), with only one species listed under the least concern (LC) category (Table I). Mangroves serve as indispensable habitats for numerous coastal wildlife, offering crucial breeding sites and nursery grounds. In this intricate web of coastal ecology, bivalves and gastropods emerge as pivotal players, influencing the dynamics of mangrove ecosystems. Despite their significance, our understanding of the molluscan species inhabiting mangrove environments remains limited. The study area, bordered by salt pans, industrial activities, and other anthropogenic influences, highlights the urgent need for ongoing ecosystem monitoring. Such care is imperative to safeguard these invaluable resources and ensure sustainability amidst rising environmental pressures. Regular monitoring efforts can furnish invaluable insights into the health of mangrove ecosystems, facilitating informed conservation strategies to preserve these vital habitats for future generations. This study suggests monitoring mangroves and their faunal biodiversity to maintain the sustained health of the ecosystem.
Declarations
Acknowledgment
All authors thank the Dean, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Thoothukudi and the Vice-Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India, for providing necessary facilities and support.
Funding
Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Nagapattinam – 611 002.
IRB approval
This article has approved by review committee members of Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi – 628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ethical approval
No animals were harmed during the entire research.
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Asakura, A., Kawamura, M., Kamiya M. and Satoh, T.P., 2020. Basic taxonomy of marine organisms. Japanese marine life: A practical training guide in marine biology. Springer Chem. Japan, 1: 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1326-8_3
Boominathan, M., Ravikumar, G., Chandran M.S. and Ramachandra, T.V., 2012. Mangrove associated molluscs of India. Natl. Conf. Conserv. Manage. Wetl. Ecosyst., 7: 1-11.
Chatla, D. and Padmavathi, P., 2017. Diversity of malacofauna from the Paleru and Moosy backwaters of Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. J. Ent. Zool. Stud., 5: 881-887.
Dholakia, A.D., 2013. Identification of marine and freshwater molluscs shells. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi.
Hogarth, P.J., 2015. The biology of mangroves and seagrasses. Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716549.001.0001
Kantharajan, G., Pandey, P.K., Krishnan, P., Samuel, V.D., Bharti V.S. and Purvaja, R., 2017. Molluscan diversity in the mangrove ecosystem of Mumbai, west coast of India. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 14: 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.06.002
Karthick, M., Saravanakumari, R., Suvitha, A.S., Kalyani T.P. and Azhagu, R., 2020. Diversity of molluscs in Tiruchendur coast, Tuticorin district, Tamil Nadu, India. Sci. Acta Xaveriana Int. Sci. J., 11: 13-18.
Keerthana, M., Arisekar, U., Kingston, S.D. and Sudhan, C., 2023. Malacofaunal diversity (gastropods and bivalves) along the mangrove forest area of the Gulf of Mannar marine biosphere region, South India. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 67: 103201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103201
Kelaher, B.D, Castilla, J.C., Prado, L., York, P., Schwindt E. and Bortolus, A., 2007. Spatial variation in molluscan assemblages from coralline turfs of Argentinean Patagonia. J. Mollus. Stud., 73: 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eym008
Mawardi, A.L., Khalil, M., Sarjani T.M. and Armanda, F., 2023. Diversity and habitat characteristics of gastropods and bivalves associated with mangroves on the east coast of Aceh Province, Indonesia. Biodiv. J. Biol. Biodiv., 24. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240959
MoEF, 2014. India’s fifth national report to the convention on biological diversity. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 1-100.
Nagelkerken, I., Blaber, S.J.M., Bouillon, S., Green, P., Haywood, M., Kirton, L.G., Meynecke, J.O., Pawlik, J., Penrose, H.M., Sasekumar A. and Somerfield, P.J., 2008. The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquat. Bot., 89: 155-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.007
Ramanibai, R. and Govindan, S., 2018. Mollusc diversity at Pulicat Lagoon (India). Transylvanian Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res., 20: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2018-0003
Raveendran, S., Sathick, O., Muthukumaravel, K., Rajakumar, R. and Ramu, S., 2016. Molluscan diversity in Keezhathottam of Thanjavur district, tamil Nadu, India with special reference to gastropods and bivalves. Int. J. Zool. appl. Biosci., 1: 141-143.
Ravindran, V.S. and Rajesh, S., 2013. Biodiversity of Punnakayal Mangroves, SE coast, India. Int. J. Sci. Res., 2: 256-258. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/FEB2013/85
Sonak, S.M., 2017. Molluscs and their shells. In: Marine Shells of Goa. Springer, Cham. pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55099-2_1
Yadav, R., Malla, P.K., Dash, D., Bhoi, G., Patro S. and Mohapatra, A., 2019. Diversity of gastropods and bivalves in the mangrove ecosystem of Paradeep, east coast of India: A comparative study with other Indian mangrove ecosystems. Mollus. Res., 39: 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13235818.2019.1644701
Zvonareva, S., Kantor, Y., Li. X. and Britayev, T., 2015. Long-term monitoring of Gastropoda (Mollusca) fauna in planted mangroves in central Vietnam. Zool. Stud., 54: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40555-015-0120-0