Research Article

Developmental Effects of L-aspartyl-L-Phenylalanine Methyl Ester During Early Pregnancy in Female Rats

Athraa Nori Humadi1*, Falah Muosa Kadhim Al-Rekabi2

1Department of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq; 2Department of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Abstract | Early gestation is a critical period of development, during which maternal exposure to artificial sweeteners may affect embryos. The present study examined the developmental and toxicological effects of L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester (L-APM) during early pregnancy in a rat model. Adult female rats (Rattus norvegicus, Wister strain) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control, 240 mg/kg L-APM, or 300 mg/kg L-APM. Study protocol in dams, fetal mortality, markers of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde, protein carbonyls and glutathione peroxidase activity) and reproductive indices were assessed. In offspring, COMET assay, growth parameters, inflammatory cytokines, and histopathological changes were performed. There was a significant dose-dependent increase in oxidative stress markers and a decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity, in association with impaired reproductive indices and increased fetal mortality following maternal exposure to L-APM (P < 0.001). Dams that received exposure to both 240 and 300 mg/kg b.w. showed a significant increase in DNA fragmentation as well as significant reductions in body weight and length of their offspring, along with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6) and mild histopathological changes in selected organs (P < 0.05, P <0.001, and P <0.0001). In conclusion, the results indicate that L-APM-induced oxidative damage, reproductive and other disturbances in the dams, as well as genotoxic, inflammatory and growth-associated effects in the offspring, could likely be linked to their exposure at early gestation. These results suggest that gestation in early pregnancy might be a sensitive period of exposure to artificial sweeteners, which will require some caution in the interpretation and further investigation.

Keywords | Artificial sweeteners, DNA integrity, Embryonic growth, Genotoxicity, Inflammatory cytokines, Oxidative stress


Received | December 19, 2025; Accepted | February 04, 2026; Published | April 22, 2026

*Correspondence | Athraa Nori Humadi, Department of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Humadi AN, Al-Rekabi FMK (2026). Developmental effects of L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester during early pregnancy in female rats. J. Anim. Health Prod. 14(2): 654-663.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2026/14.2.654.663

ISSN (Online) | 2308-2801

Copyright: 2026 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester (L-APM) is a high-potency non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) widely used in low-calorie foods and beverages, exhibiting a sweetness intensity approximately 200 times greater than that of sucrose (Magnuson et al., 2016; Lebda et al., 2017; Abbas and Nurdianti, 2025). Although L-APM has been approved for human consumption, increasing evidence suggests that maternal exposure to NNSs during pregnancy may adversely influence embryonic and fetal development.

Early gestation represents a critical developmental window encompassing implantation, placental establishment, and early embryonic patterning. During this period, the developing embryo is highly susceptible to metabolic and xenobiotic disturbances, which may result in persistent and long-term developmental consequences (Fowler et al., 2023; Iskandar et al., 2025). Maternal intake of NNSs during early pregnancy has been associated with impaired embryonic growth, disrupted organogenesis, and early developmental alterations in offspring (Ardalan et al., 2017; Rovelli and Longo, 2023).

Experimental animal studies have demonstrated that maternal exposure to L-APM can induce oxidative stress, reproductive dysfunction, and early neurodevelopmental alterations, including deficits in motor coordination, learning, and memory (Ali et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2021; Jones et al., 2023). Following ingestion, L-APM is metabolized into phenylalanine, aspartic acid, and methanol, metabolites capable of crossing the placental barrier. These metabolites may disrupt mitochondrial function, enhance the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and impair antioxidant defense mechanisms, thereby compromising cellular homeostasis during early embryogenesis (Abhilash et al., 2011; Lofthouse et al., 2016; He et al., 2023).

Elevated oxidative stress and metabolite accumulation have been shown to promote neuronal apoptosis, interfere with early neural circuit formation, and induce epigenetic modifications, including alterations in DNA methylation and histone acetylation. Such changes may adversely affect fetal growth, organogenesis, and neurobehavioral outcomes (Anbara et al., 2022; Griebsch et al., 2023; Yin et al., 2025). Moreover, in vivo studies have reported that maternal L-APM exposure alters oxidative stress biomarkers, inflammatory cytokine levels (e.g., IL-1β and IL-6), reproductive indices, and postnatal growth parameters, highlighting its potential teratogenic effects (Chen et al., 2022; Atalay et al., 2025).

Accordingly, this study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of maternal L-APM exposure during early pregnancy on oxidative stress status, reproductive dysfunction, and genotoxicity in dams, as well as on growth performance, inflammatory responses, and early neurodevelopmental outcomes in the offspring.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval and animal euthanasia

The experimental procedures were approved by the Scientific Committee of the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad (Animal Welfare Protocol PG/723, 31/03/2024). All experiments were therefore performed in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. At the conclusion of the experimental period (early-pregnancy) all pregnant female albino rats (Rattus norvegicus, Wister strain) were humanely anesthetized by rapid inhalation of chloroform into a small chamber until unconsciousness (and within 30 s) was achieved. When surgical anesthesia had been achieved (demonstrated by the absence of pedal reflexes), maternal euthanasia could be rapidly performed and maternal tissues and fetuses subsequently and immediately collected. They made all reasonable efforts to minimize both the pain and distress of the animals used and the number of animals used to gather adequate statistical validity.

Experimental design and dosing regimen

The study was conducted in accordance with FDA guidelines for reproductive toxicity, with specific modifications. Female albino rats were randomly divided into three groups (n= 10 per group): A control group and two treated groups. Animals in the treated groups (both female and male) received L-APM at doses of 240 and 300 mg/kg/day via oral gavage for a pre-gestational period of 60 consecutive days.

At the beginning of the experiment, the animals were 14–16 weeks old and weighed between 200–250 g. Rats were housed in special cages under standard laboratory conditions and allowed a two-week acclimatization period prior to treatment initiation. Housing conditions were maintained at a controlled temperature of 20–25 °C with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle in an air-conditioned room. Wood shavings were used as bedding and changed regularly, and cages were cleaned twice weekly. Animals were provided with a standard pellet diet and had free access to tap water ad libitum.

Mating and pregnancy confirmation

Female albino rats were separated from males one month prior to the experiment to allow acclimatization and synchronization of the estrous cycle. After completion of the 60-day pre-gestational exposure period, mating was carried out at a ratio of 2 females to 1 male. Pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of a vaginal plug and spermatozoa in vaginal smears, which was designated as gestation day 0. Administration of L-APM was continued throughout the early gestational period.

Biochemical assessments and molecular assessment

Hepatic GPx activity, MDA levels, protein carbonyl content, and serum glucose concentrations were measured using rat-specific ELISA kits (Elabscience, USA; Cat. No. E-EL-R2497 for GPx, E-EL-0060 for MDA, E-EL-R0726 for protein carbonyls and E-EL-R0166 for glucose). Additionally, inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6) were quantified using ELISA kits specific for rats (Cloud-Clone Corp., USA; Cat. No. SEA563Ra for IL-1β and SEA079Ra for IL-6) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Optical density (OD) for all biochemical and molecular parameters was determined in a microplate ELISA reader (e.g., BioTek ELx800, USA) at 450 nm, following the manufacturer’s protocols. All assays were processed in duplicate and performed in triplicate, and quantifications were conducted according to the standard curves attached with every kit.

Reproductive and teratogenic parameter assessments

Mortality rate in pups, and fertility, gestation, viability, and lactation indices were recorded to assess reproductive performance (Klaassen et al., 1986; Tag et al., 2021).

Cytogenic parameter

DNA damage was evaluated using the alkaline COMET assay with the COMETAssay® kit (Trevigen Inc., USA; Cat. No. 4250-050-K). Low melting point agarose and SYBR Green I were used for slide preparation and DNA staining, respectively. Fluorescence microscope was used to examine the slides for the assessment of DNA damage by alkaline COMET assay. Statistical robustness was achieved by analyzing 100 randomly selected cells per animal (50 cells per duplicate slide). Quantification of DNA damage was performed using specialized image analysis by COMET score software for the assessment of parameters such as (tail length, DNA % in tail, tail moment, olive moment).

Clinical observations

Maternal body weight was monitored throughout gestation. Offspring body weights were recorded at birth (day 0), day 4, and weekly until weaning (day 21). Pups were observed for gross structural abnormalities and functional development, including eye opening, ear unfolding, incisor eruption, and independent locomotion (Adams et al., 1985; Nguyen et al., 2017).

Neonatal functional and morphological evaluation

Histopathological Scoring and Statistical Analysis

The severity of histopathological alterations in the offspring’s brain, heart, and liver was evaluated using a semiquantitative 4-point scoring system: (0) Normal, (1) Mild, (2) Moderate, and (3) Severe. Scoring was based on the percentage of tissue involvement and the presence of degenerative changes, including neuronal gliosis, myofibrillar fragmentation, and hepatocellular necrosis.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to compare each treated group directly with the control group. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (Gibson-Corley et al., 2013; Dunnett, 1955; Landmann et al., 2021).

Ethical considerations and data analysis

All handling minimized stress, pain, and potential injury. Observations and measurements were performed gently and efficiently. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics v22. Results are presented as mean ± SE. One-way and two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate treatment effects, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant (Rosenfield and Melley, 1980; Field, 2024).

Results

Maternal administration of L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester (L-APM) during early gestation significantly affected reproductive performance and maternal physiological parameters. As shown in Table 1, fetal mortality was significantly increased in the treated groups, whereas fertility, gestation, viability, and lactation indices were markedly reduced compared with the control group (P < 0.001).

In addition, oxidative stress markers were significantly altered. Serum glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was significantly decreased, while malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonyl (PCO) levels were significantly elevated in treated dams, indicating enhanced oxidative stress status (Table 1).

Offspring born to L-APM–treated dams exhibited significant neurobehavioral impairments. As summarized in Table 2, latency times in the Negative Geotaxis test were significantly prolonged, cleft avoidance times were increased, and swimming ranks were significantly reduced compared with control offspring (P < 0.0001).

 

Table 1: Reproductive performance and oxidative stress parameters.

Groups

Early Stage

Control

300 mg/kg

240 mg/kg

LSD

P-value

Total Number of Dead Fetuses

2.80 ± 0.37 b

31.80 ± 0.58 a

30.40 ± 0.51 a

1.53

<0.001

Fertility Index of Dams

90.00 ± 0.32 a

69.20 ± 1.11bc

70.40 ± 1.08 b

2.81

<0.001

Gestation Index of Dams

98.60 ± 0.87a

76.00 ± 0.45c

78.00 ± 0.45 b

1.92

<0.001

Viability Index of Pups

97.20 ± 0.37a

69.60 ± 1.69 b

70.40 ± 1.47 b

4.04

<0.001

Lactating Index (L.I.)

95.40 ± 0.51a

65.20 ± 0.74 b

65.60 ± 0.68 b

1.99

<0.001

GPX Concentrations (μmol/l) in Dams

84.80 ± 1.50 a

25.60 ± 1.36 c

34.40 ± 3.04 b

6.50

<0.0001

MDA (Nanomol/ml) in Dams

0.65 ± 0.05 c

8.14 ± 0.35a

7.10 ± 0.25 b

0.77

<0.0001

Protein Carbonyl (Nanomol/ml) in Dams

0.44 ± 0.051c

10.30 ± 1.01 a

6.15 ± 0.23 b

1.84

<0.0001

 

Values are means ± SEM, n = 5 per treatment group. Means in a row without a common small letter differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means in a column without a common capital letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).

 

Table 2: Neurobehavioral test.

Early stage

Groups

Control

300 mg/kg

240 mg/kg

LSD

P-value

Negative Geotaxis Test (60 second) of Pups

6.20 ± 2.54 b

25.40 ± 2.48 a

23.20 ± 1.11 a

6.62

<0.0001

Cleft Avoidance Test (per 60 second) of Pups

13.00 ± 0.84c

44.40 ± 1.86 a

36.80 ± 2.48 b

5.71

<0.0001

Swimming Rank Test/ Grade of Pups (per 60 second)

4 ± 0 a

2.60 ± 0.25 b

2.80 ± 0.20 b

0.56

0.003

 

Values are means ± SEM, n = 5 per treatment group. Means in a row without a common small letter differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means in a column without a common capital letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).

 

Table ٣: Blood glucose levels (mg/dl) of dams before and at the end of gestation.

Early Stage

Group

Control

300 mg/kg

240 mg/kg

LSD

P-value

Before

79.90 ± 0.69 Bb

86.5 ±1.88 Ba

82.10 ±0.61 Bb

3.45

0.002

End

123 ± 1.67 Ac

162 ± 2.21 Aa

154 ± 0.81 Ab

4.76

<0.0001

LSD

3.71

5.95

2.07

P-value

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

Values are means ± SEM, n = 30 per treatment group. Means in a row without a common small letter differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means in a column without a common capital letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).

 

Table 4: Inflammatory markers and histopathology scores.

Early Stage

Groups

Control

300 mg/kg

240 mg/kg

LSD

P-value

IL-1 β (pg/ml) in Pups

74.50 ± 2.01 c

110.00 ± 1.95a

97.10 ± 2.40 b

6.56

<0.0001

IL-6 (pg/ml) in Pups

9.80 ± 0.38 b

16.80 ± 1.19 a

15.90 ± 0.79 a

2.63

0.0001

Brain Histopathology Score

0.00 ± 0.00

2.00 ± 0.00*

1.00 ± 0.00*

Liver Histopathology Score

0.00 ± 0.00

0.40 ± 0.00*

0.40 ± 0.00*

Heart Histopathology Score

0.00 ± 0.00

0.50 ± 0.00*

0.17 ± 0.00*

 

Values are means ± SEM, n = 5 per treatment group. Means in a row without a common small letter differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means in a column without a common capital letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).*Significantly different from Control group at same pregnancy stage (P < 0.001, * Dunnett’s test). GPX; glutathione peroxidase, MDA: malondialdehyde, IL: interleukin.

 

Maternal exposure to L-APM resulted in significant alterations in metabolic balance. Blood glucose levels showed a marked and significant elevation in treated groups compared with controls (P < 0.0001), as demonstrated by two-way ANOVA analysis (Table 3).

Inflammatory biomarkers were significantly elevated in pups born to treated dams. Serum levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were markedly higher compared with controls (P < 0.0001), as presented in Table 4.

Histopathological lesion scores also revealed significant structural alterations in offspring tissues. Brain sections showed mild to moderate cortical disturbances (Figure 1), liver tissues exhibited hepatocellular vacuolation and

 

sinusoidal congestion (Figure 2), and cardiac sections showed myofibrillar disorganization and focal myocardial degeneration (Figure 3). Semi-quantitative histopathological scoring demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in tissue damage across all examined organs (Table 4). Neuronal degeneration and gliosis scores in the brain were significantly higher in the 300 mg/kg group compared with the 240 mg/kg group (P < 0.001). Similarly, liver and heart tissues showed significantly elevated injury scores, reflecting severe hepatocellular vacuolation and myocardial hyaline degeneration, respectively (P < 0.05).

Genotoxic evaluation using the COMET assay demonstrated significant DNA damage in offspring of

 

Table 5: DNA damage level in blood lymphocyte using COMET assay.

Damage

Groups

Early Stage

Control

300 mg/kg

240 mg/kg

LSD

P-value

COMET Assay Analysis Values

No

44.30 ± 0.52 a

40.70 ± 0.84 b

41.10 ± 0.79 b

2.25

0.009

Low

42.70 ± 0.39a

36.60 ± 0.70b

36.90 ± 0.79 b

2.02

<0.0001

Medium

5.39 ± 0.21b

11.10 ± 0.29 a

11.00 ± 0.41 a

0.98

<0.0001

High

7.62 ± 0.19b

11.60 ± 0.29 a

11.00 ± 0.28a

0.79

<0.0001

Tail Length Values/Micrometer

3.80 ± 0.12 b

8.90 ± 0.33 a

8.20 ± 0.37 a

0.92

<0.0001

DNA% in tail (Percent)

2.40 ± 0.19 b

8.60 ± 0.29 a

8.10 ± 0.33 a

0.85

<0.0001

Tail Moment Values (Percent)

2.10 ± 0.10 b

8.30 ± 0.37a

8.10 ± 0.33 a

0.91

<0.0001

Olive Moment (Percent)

1.60 ± 0.19 b

8.10 ± 0.33 a

7.60 ± 0.25 a

0.81

<0.0001

 

Values are means ± SEM, n = 5 per treatment group. Means in a row at each time point without a common small letter differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means in a column at each time point without a common capital letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).

 

Table 6: Physical growth parameters of offspring.

Time

Groups

Early Stage

Control

300 mg/kg

240 mg/kg

LSD

P-value

Body Weight of Pups

First day

5.55 ± 0.20 a

3.10 ± 0.10 b

3.60 ± 0.19 b

0.50

<0.0001

Week 1

15.20 ± 1.13 a

10.10 ±0.88 b

11.10 ± 0.26 b

2.40

0.0003

Week 2

25.10 ± 0.67 a

16.20 ±0.63 b

16.90 ± 0.26 b

1.29

<0.0001

Week 3

32.70 ± 0.72 a

22.20 ±0.47b

22.70 ± 0.52 b

1.68

<0.0001

Week 4

50.40 ± 0.66 a

31.80 ±0.42 b

31.80 ± 0.39 b

1.46

<0.0001

Body Length/cm of Pups.

First day

5.11 ± 0.07a

4.90 ± 0.07 ab

4.70 ± 0.17 b

0.33

0.017

Week 1

9.40 ± 0.52 a

8.60 ± 0.46 a

8.98 ± 0.08 a

1.15

0.390

Week 2

12.60 ± 0.16 a

12.00 ± 0.37 a

12.20 ± 0.13 a

0.45

0.208

Week 3

16.60 ± 0.17 a

14.40 ± 0.19 b

14.40 ± 0.22 b

0.57

<0.0001

Week 4

24.80 ± 0.15 a

18.30 ± 0.27 b

18.60 ± 0.18 b

0.59

<0.0001

 

Values are means ± SEM, n = 5 per treatment group. Means in a row at each time point without a common small letter differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means in a column at each time point without a common capital letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).

 

L-APM–treated dams. Tail length, percentage of DNA in the tail, tail moment, and olive tail moment were all significantly increased in treated groups compared with controls (P < 0.0001), following a clear dose-dependent pattern (Table 5, Figure 4).

Postnatal growth and development were adversely affected by maternal L-APM exposure. Offspring from treated dams exhibited significantly reduced body weights and shorter body lengths from birth through the fourth week of lactation (P < 0.05–0.0001), as presented in Table 6.

 

 

 

Discussion

Early gestational exposure to L-APM was associated with measurable genotoxic and developmental alterations in offspring, although the magnitude of these effects was generally less pronounced than those reported following exposure during later stages of gestation. COMET assay parameters, including tail length, percentage of DNA in the tail, tail moment, and olive tail moment, were significantly increased in treated pups compared with controls, indicating early DNA strand breaks likely linked to oxidative stress (Fındıklı and Türkoğlu, 2014; Hamza et al., 2019). Greater DNA migration observed in the 300 mg/kg group relative to the 240 mg/kg group suggests a dose-dependent genotoxic effect even during this early developmental window (Collins, 2004; Hassan et al., 2023). In the present study, male rats were exposed to L-APM for two months prior to mating, a period encompassing a complete spermatogenic cycle. This paternal exposure may have contributed to the observed genotoxic and developmental alterations in the offspring. Increasing evidence indicates that oxidative stress–inducing xenobiotics can compromise sperm DNA integrity and induce epigenetic modifications, which may be transmitted to the embryo and influence early developmental processes (Aitken and Curry, 2011; Soubry et al., 2014). Accordingly, the contribution of paternal exposure cannot be excluded and may partially explain the presence of measurable effects despite exposure occurring during early gestation. Mechanistically, reactive oxygen species generated during L-APM metabolism, particularly from methanol and formaldehyde, may compromise genomic integrity before organogenesis is complete (Ruszkiewicz and Albrecht, 2015; Agarwal et al., 2022).

Maternal exposure to L-APM also induced early oxidative stress, as evidenced by decreased glutathione (GSH) and increased malondialdehyde (MDA) in both dams and offspring tissues. Within the same context, maternal blood glucose was modestly but significantly elevated, particularly in the 300 mg/kg group, suggesting early impairment of carbohydrate metabolism. This hyperglycemia may result from oxidative stress affecting pancreatic β-cell function and disrupting insulin secretion (Aboshanady et al., 2018; Ayala et al., 2014). These findings indicate that even during early gestation, L-APM metabolites can interfere with maternal metabolic homeostasis in a dose-dependent manner.

Inflammatory responses were also evident, with significant elevations in pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 in exposed offspring, particularly at the higher dose. Early activation of inflammatory pathways may disrupt fetal immune homeostasis and contribute to later developmental vulnerability (Dinarello, 2011; Oummadi, 2023; Mohammed et al., 2024; Ashish et al., 2025).

Offspring growth was adversely affected, as demonstrated by reductions in body weight and crown–rump length. Mild alterations were observed at 240 mg/kg, whereas 300 mg/kg exposure produced more pronounced growth retardation, suggesting early metabolic disruption prior to critical organ development. Elevated maternal phenylalanine levels may impair placental transport of essential amino acids, further exacerbating oxidative stress in embryonic tissues (Lubos et al., 2011; Bhoumik et al., 2023).

Neurobehavioral testing revealed subtle but measurable deficits. Prolonged response latencies in the Negative Geotaxis test indicated impaired vestibular and sensorimotor integration, while modest increases in Cleft Avoidance time and decreased Swimming Rank scores reflected early hippocampal- and cerebellar-associated functional compromise (Smart and Dobbing, 1971; Whishaw and Kolb, 2004; Vorhees and Williams, 2006; Lebda et al., 2017).

Histopathological assessment supported these functional and molecular findings. Brain sections exhibited mild neuronal vacuolation, focal gliosis, and early vascular congestion, consistent with oxidative stress-mediated injury. Liver tissues showed mild hepatocellular vacuolation and sinusoidal congestion, while cardiac tissue displayed early cardiomyocyte vacuolation and minor myofibrillar disorganization, reflecting early organ-specific sensitivity to oxidative and metabolic stress (Trocho et al., 1998; Zhu et al., 2018; Rana et al., 2018). The adoption of a standardized histopathological scoring system in this study provides an objective quantitative framework to evaluate L-APM’s early-stage toxicity. Although the lesion scores in the brain, liver, and myocardium were less severe than those typically observed in later gestation, they exhibited a significant, dose-dependent increase compared to controls (P < 0.05). These initial structural alterations marked by mild neuronal vacuolation and focal gliosis represent a critical early disruption of cellular homeostasis. The significant correlation between these histological scores and prolonged neurobehavioral latencies suggests that even during early embryonic patterning, L-APM metabolites initiate a cascade of oxidative damage that destabilizes the structural foundation necessary for subsequent functional and sensorimotor integration in the offspring.

The relatively subtler phenotypic alterations observed during early gestation may be explained by the developmental stage of the embryos. At this period, organ systems are not yet fully differentiated, and some tissues may possess compensatory mechanisms that temporarily mitigate functional disruption.

Nonetheless, measurable oxidative stress, genotoxicity, metabolic disturbances, and inflammatory activation indicate that even early exposure to L-APM can initiate pathways leading to later developmental consequences.

Collectively, these findings indicate that early gestation represents a sensitive window for maternal exposure to L-APM. Exposure was associated with dose-dependent increases in oxidative stress, DNA damage, maternal metabolic disruption, reproductive disturbances in dams, and growth, inflammatory, and early neurobehavioral alterations in offspring. Effects were more pronounced at 300 mg/kg than at 240 mg/kg, underscoring the vulnerability of early embryonic development to xenobiotic-induced toxicity. Limitations of the study include the focus on early postnatal outcomes and the inference of mechanistic pathways from biochemical, behavioral, and histopathological markers rather than direct molecular analyses, highlighting the importance of further studies to assess potential long-term neurodevelopmental and metabolic consequences. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term developmental consequences and clarify underlying mechanisms.

Conclusions

Early gestation is a highly sensitive window for maternal exposure to L-APM. Exposure during this period induced dose-dependent oxidative stress, DNA damage, and reproductive disturbances in dams, along with growth retardation, inflammatory activation, and early neurobehavioral alterations in offspring. Effects were more pronounced at 300 mg/kg than at 240 mg/kg, demonstrating a clear dose-response relationship. Limitations include the focus on early postnatal outcomes and inference of mechanistic pathways from biochemical, behavioral, and histopathological markers. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term developmental consequences and clarify underlying mechanisms.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank members of the Department of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq for providing the necessary facilities and support for this research.

Novelty Statement

This study provides original experimental data on the dose-dependent developmental effects of L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester (240 and 300 mg/kg) during early pregnancy in female rats. The study applies a structured histopathological scoring system to evaluate tissue damage and developmental alterations during this critical gestational stage, contributing to a more detailed assessment of potential risks associated with L-APM exposure.

Authors’ Contribution

ANH and FMK designed the study. ANH conducted the experimental work and collected the samples. FMK performed the statistical analysis and interpretation of data. ANH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Generative AI and AI-assisted technology statement

The authors confirm that no generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used in the writing, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Ali I, Ayad ZM, Al-Rekabi FMK (2020). Toxopathological and cytogenetic effects of commercial sweetener aspartame after chronic oral administration in rat pups. Indian J. Med. Forensic Med. Toxicol., 14(3): 1147–1153.

Abbas BA, Nurdianti RR (2025). Feed additives used in nutrition and improve the poultry performance and health: A review. Iraqi J. Vet. Med., 49(1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.30539/kyt5dj31

Abd Elfatah AA, Ghaly IS, Hanafy SM (2012). Cytotoxic effect of aspartame (diet sweet) on the histological and genetic structures of female albino rats and their offspring. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 15(19): 904–918. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2012.904.918

Abhilash M, Paul MS, Varghese MV, Nair RH (2011). Effect of long term intake of aspartame on antioxidant defense status in liver. Food Chem. Toxicol., 49(6): 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.02.019

Aboshanady AM, El-Sawaf MES, Abdel ARAEE, Attia MM (2018). The effect of aspartame ingestion in pregnant female albino rats on placental and fetal weights, umbilical cord length, and histology of fetal pancreas. Tanta Med. J., 46(2): 114–120. https://doi.org/10.4103/tmj.tmj_5_18

Adams J, Buelke-Sam J, Kimmel CA, Nelson CJ, Reiter LW, Sobotka TJ, Tilson HA (1985). Collaborative behavioral teratology study: Protocol design and testing procedures. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol., 7: 579–586.

Agarwal A, Maldonado Rosas I, Anagnostopoulou C, Cannarella R, Boitrelle F, Munoz LV, Saleh R (2022). Oxidative stress and assisted reproduction: A comprehensive review of its pathophysiological role and strategies for optimizing embryo culture environment. Antioxidants, 11(3): 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030477

Aitken RJ, Curry BJ (2011). Redox regulation of human sperm function: from the physiological control of sperm capacitation to the etiology of infertility and DNA damage in the germ line. Antioxid. Redox Signal., 14(3): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3186

Anbara H, Kian M, Darya GH, Sheibani MT (2022). Long-term intake of aspartame-induced cardiovascular toxicity is reflected in altered histochemical parameters, evokes oxidative stress, and triggers p53-dependent apoptosis in a mouse model. Int. J. Exp. Pathol., 103(6): 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/iep.12458

Ardalan MR, Tabibi H, Attari VE, Mahdavi AM (2017). Nephrotoxic effect of aspartame as an artificial sweetener: A brief review. Iran. J. Kidney Dis., 11(5): 339.

Ashish A, Rai S, Mishra S, Maurya AK, Yadav AK, Vishwakarma S, Singh R (2025). Cytokine profiles and metabolic dysregulation in endometriosis: Insights into diagnostic and therapeutic targets. Mol. Biol. Rep., 52(1): 641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-025-10766-y

Atalay EC, Demirhan BE, Celep AGS (2025). Low-calorie sweeteners and reproductive health: evidence and debates. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci., 21(3): 309–332. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734013315621240802055207

Ayala A, Muñoz MF, Argüelles S (2014). Lipid peroxidation: Production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2014: 360438. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/360438

Bhoumik S, Kumar R, Srivastava P, Singh A, Siddiqui Z, Rizvi SI (2023). Investigation of the toxic effects of aspartame as an artificial sweetener in food: Effect on redox and inflammatory biomarkers in rat. J. Food Saf. Hyg., 9(2): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13423

Cai C, Sivak A, Davenport MH (2021). Effects of prenatal artificial sweeteners consumption on birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr., 24(15): 5024–5033. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021000173

Chen YC, Yeh YC, Lin YF, Au HK, Hsia SM, Chen YH, Hsieh RH (2022). Aspartame consumption, mitochondrial disorder-induced impaired ovarian function, and infertility risk. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23(21): 12740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112740

Collins AR (2004). The COMET assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol. Biotechnol., 26(3): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1385/MB:26:3:249

Dinarello CA (2011). A clinical perspective of IL-1β as the gatekeeper of inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol., 41(5): 1203–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201141550

Dunnett CW 1955. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50(272): 1096-1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294

Field A (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications, London, UK.

Findikli Z, Turkoglu S (2014). Determination of the effects of some artificial sweeteners on human peripheral lymphocytes using the COMET assay. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci., 6(8): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.5897/JTEHS2014.0313

Fowler SP, Gimeno Ruiz de Porras D, Swartz MD, Stigler Granados P, Heilbrun LP, Palmer RF (2023). Daily early-life exposures to diet soda and aspartame are associated with autism in males: A case-control study. Nutrients, 15(17): 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15173772

Frazier KS, Seely JC, Hardisty JF, Herbert RA (2021). Behavioral and functional assessments in developmental and reproductive toxicology studies. Birth Defects Res., 113(4): 255–272.

Gibson-Corley KN, Olivier AK, Meyerholz DK. 2013. Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research. Veterinary Pathology, 50(6): 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813485099

Griebsch LV, Theiss EL, Janitschke D, Erhardt VKJ, Erhardt T, Haas EC, Grimm HS (2023). Aspartame and its metabolites cause oxidative stress and mitochondrial and lipid alterations in SH-SY5Y cells. Nutrients, 15(6): 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15061467

Hamza RZ, Al-Eisa RA, Mehana AE, El-Shenawy NS (2019). Effect of L-carnitine on aspartame-induced oxidative stress, histopathological changes, and genotoxicity in liver of male rats. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol., 30(2): 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2018-0064

Hassan MR, Ahmed S, El-Sayed H (2023). Oxidative stress markers and DNA integrity in neonatal rats. J. Appl. Toxicol., 43(4): 512–526.

He X, Zhong Q, Yan K, Li G, Yang J (2023). Oral exposure to an acceptable daily intake dose of aspartame induced a delayed pro-inflammatory cytokine response in the cerebrospinal fluid of rats. Food Chem. Toxicol., 178: 113931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2023.113931

Hill JL, Mitchell JA, Duvall SW (2018). Developmental neurobehavioral testing in neonatal rodents. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol., 76(1): e48.

Iskandar MK, El-Balshy RM, Elhadidy AG (2025). The effects of aspartame on some fetal tissues of female albino rats. Egypt. J. Zool., 83: 28–43.

Jones SK, McCarthy DM, Stanwood GD, Schatschneider C, Bhide PG (2023). Learning and memory deficits produced by aspartame are heritable via the paternal lineage. Sci. Rep., 13(1): 14326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41213-2

Klaassen CD, Amdur MO, Doull J (1986). Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. 3rd ed. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, USA.

Landmann M, Wimmers F, Schughart K (2021). A semiquantitative scoring system for histopathological and immunohistochemical assessment of lesions and tissue tropism. Viruses, 13(5): 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050868

Lebda MA, Sadek KM, El-Sayed YS (2017). Aspartame and soft drink-mediated neurotoxicity in rats: implication of oxidative stress, apoptotic signaling pathways, electrolytes and hormonal levels. Metab. Brain Dis., 32(5): 1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-017-0052-y

Liao Z, Zhu Q, Huang H (2023). Involvement of IL-1β-mediated necroptosis in neurodevelopment impairment after neonatal sepsis in rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24(19): 14693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914693

Lofthouse EM, Perazzolo S, Brooks S, Crocker IP, Glazier JD, Johnstone ED, Lewis RM (2016). Phenylalanine transfer across the isolated perfused human placenta: An experimental and modeling investigation. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 310(9): R828–R836. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00405.2015

Lubos E, Loscalzo J, Handy DE (2011). Glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal., 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3586

Magnuson BA, Carakostas MC, Moore NH, Poulos SP, Renwick AG (2016). Biological fate of low-calorie sweeteners. Nutr. Rev., 74(11): 670–689. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuw032

Mazarati A, Jones NC, Galanopoulou AS, Harte-Hargrove LC, Kalynchuk LE, Lenck-Santini PP, Veliskova J (2018). A companion to the preclinical common data elements on neurobehavioral comorbidities of epilepsy. Epilepsia Open, 3: 24–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12236

Mohammed FF, Abdelrazik EG, Anwar A, Abdelgayed SS (2024). Hepatic P53 upregulation and the genotoxic potential of acesulfame-K treatment in rats. Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 43: 09603271241236900. https://doi.org/10.1177/09603271241236900

Nguyen AT, Armstrong EA, Yager JY (2017). Neurodevelopmental reflex testing in neonatal rat pups. J. Vis. Exp., (122): 55261. https://doi.org/10.3791/55261 https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.3791/55261

Oummadi A (2023). Evaluation of the effects of inflammation and combined exposure to environmental toxicants during the perinatal period. PhD thesis, Université d’Orléans and Macquarie University.

Rana P, Aleo MD, Gosink M, Will Y (2018). Evaluation of in vitro mitochondrial toxicity assays and physicochemical properties for prediction of organ toxicity using 228 pharmaceutical drugs. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 32(1): 156–167 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00246.

Rosenfield RL, Melley MA (1980). Statistics for Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

Rovelli V, Longo N (2023). Phenylketonuria and the brain. Mol. Genet. Metab., 139(1): 107583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2023.107583

Ruszkiewicz J, Albrecht J (2015). Changes in the mitochondrial antioxidant systems in neurodegenerative diseases and acute brain disorders. Neurochem. Int., 88: 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.12.012

Smart JL, Dobbing J (1971). Vulnerability of developing brain. II. Effects of early nutritional deprivation on reflex ontogeny and development of behaviour in the rat. Brain Res., 28(1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(71)90526-9

Soubry A, Hoyo C, Jirtle RL, Murphy SK (2014). A paternal environmental legacy: Evidence for epigenetic inheritance through the male germ line. Bioessays, 36(4): 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201300113

Stegink LD (2020). Maternal phenylalanine metabolism and fetal growth restriction. J. Nutr., 150(2): 287–296.

Tag HM, Elgawish RA, Ebaid HM, Abdel-Rahman M, Abdelrazek HM (2021). Prenatal exposure to exogenous progesterone adversely affects fetal development in albino rats. J. Basic Appl. Zool., 82(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-021-00212-3

Trocho C, Pardo R, Rafecas I, Virgili J, Remesar X, Fernandez-Lopez JA, Alemany M (1998). Formaldehyde derived from dietary aspartame binds to tissue components in vivo. Life Sci., 63(5): 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00282-3

Vorhees CV, Williams MT (2006). Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc., 1(2): 848-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.116

Whishaw IQ, Kolb B (Eds.) (2004). The behavior of the laboratory rat: a handbook with tests. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162851.001.0001

Yin X, Shi Y, Sheng T, Ji C (2025). Early-life gut microbiota: A possible link between maternal exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners and metabolic syndrome in offspring. Nutr. Rev., 83(7): e1954–e1969. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae140

Zhu H, Jin Q, Li Y, Ma Q, Wang J, Li D, Chen Y (2018). Melatonin protected cardiac microvascular endothelial cells against oxidative stress injury via suppression of IP3R-[Ca2+] c/VDAC-[Ca2+] m axis by activation of MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Cell Stress Chaperones, 23(1): 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-017-0827-4