Antibiotic Sensitivity and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Recovered from Human Patients

Bushra Perveen1*, Saeed ul Hassan Khan1, Syed Farhan Haider Rizvi2, Muhammad Anas1 and Zuhaib Ali3

1Department of Zoology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

2Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

3Islamabad Diagnostic Centre, Department of Zoology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an important bacterial pathogen, is frequently linked to hospital acquired infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals, necessitating prompt detection for control and prevention. The study aimed to examine the expression of antibiotic sensitivity and resistance genes in local P. aeruginosa isolates. The study was carried out between August 2023 to July 2024 at Islamabad Diagnostic centre (IDC), in the Department of Zoology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. After being isolated from a variety of clinical specimens and processed in IDC, P. aeruginosa was identified and its sensitivity assessed. Genes for antibiotic resistance were identified in P. aeruginosa. From a total of 105 samples from pus, urine, sputum, BAL, tissues, tips, blood, wound and BW, 50 P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered. Antibiotics sensitivity results of these isolates showed that colistin and polymyxin B were found to be effective due to their 100% sensitivity. Moreover, amikacin, tazobactam piperacillin, tobramycin and meropenem showed 76%, 74%, 72%, and 72% effectiveness against P. aeruginosa, respectively. Bacteria showed highest resistance against co-trimoxazole (100%) and 32-44% resistance was also observed against imipenem and ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin. β lactam resistance genes (DHA) and ESBL genes (CTX-M) were present in 2% and 16% of isolates, respectively. Similarly, quinolones resistance genes qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS genes were detected in 2%, 6% and 2% of isolates respectively. The genes, oqX, MOX, ACC, EBC, FOX, bla TEM, CIT, and bla SHV did not exist in any of the isolate. It is critical to avoid using antibiotics against which P. aeruginosa has shown high resistance, as these isolates may have spread from person to person.


Article Information

Received August 11, 2025

Revised September 05, 2025

Accepted September 20, 2025

Available online 09 April 2026

(early access)

Published 13 May 2026

Authors’ Contribution

BP: Conceptualization, performed the experimental work, data analysis and prepared the manuscript. SHK: Provided supervision and reviewed the manuscript. SFHR: Provided guidance for the study and assisted in manuscript editing. MA: Helped in data analysis and manuscript write-up. ZA: Facilitated sample provision and laboratory support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Key words

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Antimicrobial resistance genes, Antibiotic sensitivity, β lactam resistance genes, ESBL genes, Co-trimoxazole resistance

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20250811054943

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

0030-9923/2026/0004-1615 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2026 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



INTRODUCTION

The rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is well-known for producing green pigment (Peix et al., 2009). It is a member of a genus containing more than 120 species that are harmful to people, plants, and animals and are usually found in damp areas. P. aeruginosa has a high degree of genetic plasticity, which allows it to transform from a commensal to an opportunistic infection, particularly in people with weakened immune systems (Ramos, 2011). Immunocompromised patients are primarily affected by P. aeruginosa, which is primary cause of infections obtained in critical care facilities. It is associated with pneumonia, bacteraemia, cystic fibrosis, and urinary tract infections. Up to 23% of ICU infections are caused by this bacterium, which mostly affects the respiratory system (Gales et al., 2001).

The genome of P. aeruginosa consists of a single circular chromosome and plasmids that contain a high percentage of (65–67%) G+C (Winsor et al., 2016) and 5.5–7 Mbp genome size (Schmidt et al., 1996). All strains share a core genome that houses virulence factors, enable this bacterium to proliferate in diverse settings and infect humans (Römling et al., 1995).

This study aimed to examine the involvement of local P. aeruginosa strains in various infections by recovery from various types of infections along with its antibiotic susceptibility pattern and genes for antibiotic resistance in local P. aeruginosa strains via antibiotic sensitivity testing and PCRs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

One hundred and five samples of pus, urine, sputum, ear swab, blood, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), tissue, tips (tracheal tips, catheter tips, stent, foley catheter), bronchial washes (BW), wound, were collected at Islamabad Diagnostic Centre, Islamabad under Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Isolates were recovered by culturing on MacConkey, Cled agar, and blood agar and incubated at 37 ºC temperature for 24 h. The isolates identification was confirmed by using microbiological conventional methods, which include Gram’s staining response, the morphological appearance of the colonies, and other conventional biochemical tests such the oxidase test. MacConkey agar was used to differentiate between lactose vs non lactose fermenters, Cled agar for urinary microbe’s differentiation while haemolysis was observed on blood agar. Further, strain was identified with the VITEK MS system (bioMérieux) and MALDI-TOF MS. A P. aeruginosa species-specific gene ecfX PCR was done to verify the isolate’s identity.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Using the disc diffusion method, the antibiotic sensitivity of 50 positive P. aeruginosa isolates was assessed. Using a 0.5 McFarland standard, colonies were suspended in saline for inoculum preparation. Three orientations with 60° rotations were used to streak the suspension on Muller Hinton agar. Filter paper discs containing different antibiotics were positioned and incubated at 37ºC temperature for 24 h after being allowed to air dry (Bauer et al., 1966). Using a Vernier calliper, inhibition zones were calculated, and the results were classified as sensitive, intermediate, and resistant using CLSI recommendations (CLSI, 2015) (Table I).

PCR for detection of antibiotic resistance genes

Fifty P. aeruginosa samples were tested for antibiotic resistance genes using PCR. The resistant genes for quinolone, ESBL, and β-lactamase (AmpC) genes were identified with results confirmed through gel electrophoresis.

The boiling procedure was used to extract genomic and plasmid DNA. 4 to 5 colonies were transferred from the overnight culture and suspended in 200 μl of nuclease-free PCR water. In heating block, the tubes were heated for 10 min, for 5 min immediately cooled the tubes in ice and later centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. Using the supernatant as template DNA.

 

Table I. List of antimicrobials tested.

S. No

Class

Name of antibiotics

Code

Conc. (ug)

1

Aminoglycosides

Amikacin

AK

30

Gentamycin

CN

10

Tobramycin

TOB

10

2

Cephalosporins

Ceftazidime

CAZ

10

Cefoperazone+sulbactam

SCF

105

Cefepime

FEP

30

3

Sulphonamides

Co-trimoxazole (Septran)

SXT

25

4

Quinolones

Levofloxacin

LEV

5

Ciprofloxacin

CIP

5

5

Fluoroquinolones

Moxifloxacin

MXF

5

6

Penicillin

Piperacillin

PRL

100

Tazobactam piperacillin

TZP

110

7

Polymyxins

Colistin

CT

10

8

Carbapenems

Imipenem

IPM

10

Meropenem

MEM

10

9

Polypeptide

Polymyxin B

PB

300

 

For PCR amplification AmpC bla genes, the primers shown in Table II were used. The final volume of 25 μl. Reaction contained 2.5 μl 10X KCl, 1.5 μl MgCl2, 0.5 μl of 10mM dNTPs, 0.75 μl primers MOXF, MOXR, DHA-F, DHA-R, CIT-F, CIT-R, 0.63 μl primers ACC- F, ACC-R, EBC-F, EBC-R, 0.5 μl primers FOX-F, FOX-R, 0.5 μl Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 7 μl PCR water, and 5 μl template DNA. The thermal cycle comprised initial denaturation at 94 for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles each of denaturation at 94 for 30 sec, annealing at 64 for 30 sec and extension at 72 for 1 min. Then final extension at 72 for 7 min (Pérez-Pérez and Hanson, 2002).

For PCR amplification of ESBLs Genes (bla TEM, bla SHV, bla CTX), the 25 μl final volume of reaction mixture contained 0.8 μl MgCl2, 0.5 μl of 10mM dNTPs, 2.5 μl of 10X NH4SO4 buffer, 0.25 μl Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 1 μl primers ESBL-TEM-F, ESBL-TEM-R, ESBL- SHV-F, ESBL- SHV-R, ESBL-CTX-M-F, ESBL-CTX-M-R, and 13.95 μl PCR water 5 μl template DNA. ESBL gene PCRs were conducted individually; they were not multiplex PCRs. The protocol involved an initial 5 min of denaturation at 94°C, 30 cycles each of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing for bla TEM at 56°C, bla SHV at 58°C, and for bla CTXM at 54°C for 30 sec, and an extension at 72°C for 2 min. Finally, there was a single, final extension at 72°C for 10 min and a hold at 22°C in the PCR machine for an infinite number of cycles (Chen et al., 2010).

 

Table II. Primers used in the PCRs.

Gene/Sequence (5′ → 3′)

Product size(bp)

β-Lactamases (Pérez-Pérez and Hanson, 2002)

AmpC-MOX F= GCTGCTCAAGGAGCACAGGAT

R= CACATTGACATAGGTGTGGTGC

520

AmpC-CIT F= TGGCCAGAACTGACAGGCAAA

R= TTTCTCCTGAACGTGGCTGGC

462

AmpC-DHA F= AACTTTCACAGGTGTGCTGGGT

R= CCGTACGCATACTGGCTTTGC

405

AmpC-ACC F= AACAGCCTCAGCAGCCGGTTA

R= TTCGCCGCAATCATCCCTAGC

346

AmpC-EBC F= TCGGTAAAGCCGATGTTGCGG

R= CTTCCACTGCGGCTGCCAGTT

302

AmpC-FOX F= AACATGGGGTATCAGGGAGATG

R= CAAAGCGCGTAACCGGATTGG

190

Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases (Chen et al., 2010)

ESBL-TEM F= ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA

R= GACAGTTACCAATGCTTAATC

1086

ESBL-SHV F= GGGTTATTCTTATTTGTCGC

R= TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTC

567

ESBL-CTXM F= CGCTTTGCGATGTGCAG

R= ACCGCGATATCGTTGGT

550

Plasmid-mediated quinolones (Robicsek et al., 2006; Qiu et al., 2019)

oqxA F= GATCAGTCAGTGGGATAGTTT

R= TACTCGGCGTTAACTGATTA

671

qnrA F= ATTTCTCA CGCCAGGATTTG

R= GATCGGCAAAGGTTAGGTCA

516

qnrB F= GATCGTGAAAGCCAG AAAGG

R= ACGATGCCTGGTAGTTGTCC

469

qnrS F= ACGACATTCGTCAACT GCAA

R= TAAATTGGCACCCTGTAGGC

417

 

For PCR amplification of Qnr Genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS), the final volume of 25 μl of reaction mixture contained 2.5 μl of 10X KCl, 0.5 μl of 10mM dNTPs, 1.5 μl MgCl2, 0.25 μl Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 1 μl primers qnrA-F, qnrA-R, qnrB-F, qnrB-R, qnrS-F, qnrS-R, 9.25 μl PCR water and 5 μl template DNA. The PCR conditions were performed with certain modifications including, denaturation at 94°C for 45 sec, annealing at 52°C for 45 sec, and extension at 72°C for 60 sec, with a cycle number of 32 (Robicsek et al., 2006).

For PCR amplification r oqxA gene, the 25 μl final volume contained 2.5 μl of 10X KCl, 0.5 μl of 10mM dNTPs, 1.5 μl MgCl2, 0.25 μl Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), 1 μl each primers oqxA-F and oqxA-R, 13.25 μl PCR water, and 5 μl template DNA. The PCR conditions were performed with certain modifications. For example, 5 min of initial denaturation at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles each of denaturation at 94°C for 60 sec, 55 sec of annealing at 56°C, and 6 min of extension at 68°C. Additionally, a final 10-min extension at 72°C (Qiu et al., 2019). Above PCR products were analysed on 1% agarose gel using ethidium bromide. A 50 bp DNA ladder was used and bands were visualised through gel documentation system.

RESULTS

Out of 105 samples cultured on MacConkey, Cled, and blood agar, 48% were identified as P. aeruginosa, displaying reddish or pale-yellow colonies. All 50 isolates tested positive for the oxidase test after gram staining showed pink rods. Samples presenting a green index for P. aeruginosa species with a confidence value of 95- 99.9% were considered to be positive in MALDI-TOF VITEK MS. A P. aeruginosa species-specific gene ecfX PCR verified the isolate’s identity. Maximum isolates were found in pus, followed by urine, sputum, tissue, BAL, wound, blood, ear swab, catheter tips, and BW (Table III). The study found that 54% of the recovered strains were male, and 46% were female, with a median age of 50 years (Table IV).

 

Table III. Samples tested positive for P. aeruginosa from different sources.

S. no

Type of sample

Total samples taken

Sample +ve for P. aeruginosa

1

Pus

21

14

2

Urine

20

12

3

Sputum

11

9

4

Tissue

8

5

5

BAL

9

3

6

Wound

10

3

7

Blood

6

1

8

Ear swab

5

1

9

Tips

9

1

10

BW

6

1

Total

105

50

 

Table IV. Age-wise distribution of samples.

Age group

Sample size

0-10

3

11-20

5

21-30

2

31-40

2

41-50

5

51-60

9

61-70

14

71-80

7

81-90

3

 

Table V. Antimicrobial sensitivity results for P. aeruginosa.

Antibiotic tested

Total isolates tested

Number of sensitive isolates (%)

Number of intermediate isolates (%)

Number of resistant isolates (%)

Amikacin (AK)

50

38 (76%)

1 (2%)

11 (22%)

Ceftazidime (CAZ)

50

34 (68%)

2 (4%)

14 (28%)

Co-trimoxazole (Septran) (SXT)

50

0(0%)

0(0%

50(100%)

Gentamycin (CN)

50

35 (70%)

1 (2%)

14 (28%)

Levofloxacin (LEV)

50

34 (68%)

0 (0%)

16 (32%)

Moxifloxacin (MXF)

50

33 (66%)

0 (0%)

15 (30%)

Piperacillin (PRL)

50

33 (66%)

0 (0%)

16 (32%)

Cefoperazone + sulbactam (SCF)

50

35 (70%)

1 (2%)

12 (24%)

Cefepime (FEP)

50

34 (68%)

1 (2%)

15 (30%)

Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

50

34 (68%)

0 (0%)

16 (32%)

Colistin (CT)

50

50(100%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

Imipenem (IPM)

50

27 (54%)

1 (2%)

22 (44%)

Meropenem (MEM)

50

36 (72%)

1 (2%)

13 (26%)

Tazobactam piperacillin (TZP)

50

37 (74%)

0(0%)

13 (26%)

Polymyxin B (PB)

50

49 (98%)

1 (2%)

0(0%)

Tobramycin (TOB)

50

36 (72%)

0 (0%)

14 (28%)

 

P. aeruginosa have shown highest resistance against Co-trimoxazole as 100%, followed by imipenem (44%), levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin (32%). colistin (100%) and polymyxin (100%) were more effective than other antimicrobials. Similarly, amikacin (76%), tazobactam piperacillin (74%), meropenem and tobramycin (72%) were also reported sensitive drugs (Table V).

Among β lactam resistance genes, only (DHA) gene and among ESBL-CTXM, TEM, SHV genes, only CTX-M were present in 2% and 16% of isolates, respectively. The study found that quinolones resistance genes qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS were detected in 2%, 6%, and 2% of isolates respectively, while oqxA gene was not detected.

DISCUSSION

P. aeruginosa, due to its widespread presence and resistance to antibiotics, poses a significant threat to healthcare professionals and the public. The decreased antibiotic uptake, efflux pump overexpression, overproduction of β-lactamases, and changed drug targets are among the mutations that render P. aeruginosa challenging to eliminate as compared to other pathogens (Breidenstein et al., 2011). Mutations in mexR and nfxB genes derepress the efflux pumps MexAB–OprM and MexCD–OprJ (Stickland et al., 2010), while mexZ gene mutation causes overexpression of MexXY–OprM, causing resistance to aminoglycosides, cefepime and fluoroquinolones (Muller et al., 2011).

This six-month study was directed to assess antibiotic sensitivity and resistant genes in hospital P. aeruginosa isolates, finding 48% MDR P. aeruginosa resistance against 16 antibiotics. A frequency of 36.5% was reported in Karachi hospitals in 2015 (Mansoor et al., 2015).

The study found 50 P. aeruginosa isolates in 105 clinical samples, with 54% from male and 46% from female patients. The patients median age of 50 years indicates that older persons may be more vulnerable to Pseudomonas infections. This study’s findings align with a 2022 survey in Palestine, involving 54.6% males and 45.4% females, with a median age of 53 years (Shbaita et al., 2023). P. aeruginosa was primarily isolated from pus (28%), urine (24%), and sputum (18%) specimens, consistent with a study in Rawalpindi, Pakistan in 2010 (Gill et al., 2011) (Table VI).

Oue research found polymyxin B and colistin are 100% effective against Pseudomonas infections, with colistin being a 100% sensitive antimicrobial in Pakistan, according to Farooq et al. (2019) and Ladadweh et al. (2021). The study found amikacin (76%), piperacillin-tazobactam (74%), tobramycin (72%), and meropenem (72%), which were similar to results from a Peshawar 2014 study with amikacin showing the highest sensitivity (92.86%) (Samad et al., 2017). Pokharel et al. (2019) reported comparable findings with piperacillin/tazobactam (76.0%),

 

Table VI. Number of genes detected and source of isolates.

S. No

Source of isolates

Number of isolates

Antibiotic resistance pattern

Genes detected

1

Pus

5

SXT

Nil

2

Pus

3

IPM, SXT

Nil

3

Pus

4

AK, CAZ, IPM, MEM, SXT, TZP, FEP, TOB, CIP, CN, LEV, SCF MXF, PRL

Nil

4

Pus

1

AK, SXT, IPM, MEM, TZP, TOB, FEP, CIP, CN, LEV, PRL

Nil

5

Pus

1

SXT

CTX, qnrS

6

Urine

3

SXT

Nil

7

Urine

2

SXT, IPM

Nil

8

Urine

1

CAZ, SXT, MEM, TZP, TOB, SCF, PRL, FEP, CIP, CN LEV, MXF

Nil

9

Urine

1

AK, CAZ, SXT, IPM, MEM, TZP, TOB, FEP, CIP, CN, LEV, MXF, PRL, SCF

Nil

10

Urine

1

SXT, IPM

qnrB

Urine

1

SXT, IPM

Nil

11

Urine

1

SXT

DHA, qnrA

12

Urine

1

SXT, IPM

CTX

13

Urine

1

CAZ, SXT, IPM, MEM, TZP, TOB, FEP, CIP, LEV, MXF, PRL, SCF

CTX

14

Sputum

2

SXT

CTX

15

Sputum

5

SXT

Nil

16

Sputum

1

SXT, PRL

Nil

17

Sputum

1

AK, CAZ, SXT, IPM, MEM, TZP, TOB, FEP, CIP, CN, LEV, MXF PRL, SCF

CTX, qnrB

18

Tissue (Hip)

3

SXT

Nil

19

Tissue (Hip)

1

SXT

CTX

20

Tissue (Hip)

1

AK, CAZ, SXT, IPM, FEP, CIP, CN, LEV, MXF, PRL,

DHA

21

BAL

2

SXT

Nil

22

BAL

1

SXT

CTX

23

Wound

2

AK, CAZ, SXT, IPM, MEM, TZP, TOB, FEP, CIP, CN, LEV, MXF, PRL, SCF

Nil

24

Wound

1

CAZ, SXT, IPM, PRL, FEP, CIP, LEV, MXF, PRL

qnrB

25

Blood

1

SXT

Nil

Ear swab

1

SXT, IPM, TOB, CIP, CN, LEV, MXF, PRL, SCF

Nil

26

Tips

1

SXT

Nil

27

BW

1

CAZ, SXT, IPM, MEM, TOB, FEP, CIP, CN, LEV, MXF

Nil

 

AK, Amikacin; CAZ, Ceftazidime, CIP, Ciprofloxacin; FEP, Cefoperazone; GEN, Gentamicin; LEV, Levofloxacin; IMP, Imipenem; MEM, Meropenem; BPB, Polymyxin; TZP, Tazobactam piperacillin; TOB, Tobramycin; MXF, Moxifloxacin; PRL, Piperacillin; SCF, Cefoperazone + sulbactam; CT, Colistin; SXT, Co-trimoxazole.

 

amikacin (71.7%), tobramycin (71.7%) and meropenem 65.2% sensitive against Pseudomonas (Pokharel et al., 2019). Of all the antibiotics examined in this study, amikacin was the most effective medication of choice for treating MDRPA, followed by colistin and polymyxin.

This study found 100% cotrimoxazole resistance against Pseudomonas infections, consistent with previous studies with imipenem being the most resistant antibiotic (44%) (Aneela et al., 2019).

In Gujrat India, bacteria showed higher resistance against imipenem (Javiya et al., 2008), followed by β-lactams and quinolones, with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin showing 32% and 32%, respectively.

Data from a literature review reported that imipenem resistance in P. aeruginosa is caused by mutations in the protein present in outer membrane and deactivation of the oprD gene. Resistance against Imipenem and other antibiotics are caused by mutations in the mexT or mexS genes, which decrease OprD and increase MexEF-OprN pump activity. Furthermore, the acquisition of carbapenemase genes (CEGs) leads to chromosomal changes that cause carbapenem resistance, the hydrolysis of carbapenems by β-lactamases leads to resistance to most β-lactam antibiotics. These carbapenemases are characterized by the presence of heterologous genes obtained through HGT (Botelho et al., 2015, 2017, 2018; Breidenstein et al., 2011). AmpC β-lactamase induction is influenced by ampG (PA4393), and mutation in this gene significantly reduces sensitivity to β-lactams. This suggests that P. aeruginosa uses defensive mechanisms in an adaptive manner to fight against the antibiotics’ inhibitory effects (Zhang et al., 2010). It has been demonstrated that ampC target mutations promote cephalosporins’s resistance (Berrazeg et al., 2015; Rodríguez-Martínez et al., 2009).

Different surveys reported that P. aeruginosa usually develop resistance against cephalosporins and penicillin such as piperacillin dur to overexpression of AmpC via certain mutations in genes involved in peptidoglycan-recycling, including dacB, ampD, ampDh2, ampDh3 and ampR genes (Cabot et al., 2011; Juan et al., 2006; Moya et al., 2009). Mutations in the ftsK gene for cell division have been linked to inherent resistance to β-lactam and ciprofloxacin (Alvarez-Ortega et al., 2010; Breidenstein et al., 2008). P. aeruginosa’s resistance to FQs is caused by mutations in gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes, which encode DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV (Bruchmann et al., 2013).

In this study, PCR analysis on 50 strains isolated DNA revealed varying percentages of specific genes. Among the six AmpC genes, the study detected only blaDHAM gene in 4% of isolates, and the other five AmpC resistance genes were not found even in single amplicon. The study examined three genes TEM, SHV, and CTX-M, revealing the highest prevalence of the blaCTX-M gene at 16%. The most common ESBL gene in Brazil was blaCTX-M-2 (19.6%) (Polotto et al., 2012) Which is somehow close to our study.

The study identified quinolones resistance genes qnrA (2%), qnrB (6%), qnrS (2%), and oqxA (0%) in Pseudomonas isolates. qnrB was common among qnr genes. Our results were in accordance with study where qnrB found to be high prevalent gene (Saki et al., 2022).

Antimicrobial resistance is influenced by HGT of resistance genes, bacterial mutations, and spontaneous evolution. Healthcare settings are hotspots for AMR, with longer hospital stays and increased antimicrobial costs. The development of cheap, novel antimicrobials, avoiding longer stays, and low healthcare costs are crucial for combating this problem.

Hand hygiene is crucial in reducing healthcare-associated infections. Promoting frequent hand decontamination and enhancing hand wash basin availability can improve compliance. Decontaminating hospital floor and equipment is essential for Pseudomonas infections. Enforcing a law prohibiting medication sales without a physician’s prescription is necessary to prevent self-medication.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results revealed that a significant percentage of P. aeruginosa isolates had β-lactam, quinolones and fluoroquinolones resistance. The most effective antibiotics according to the results are, colistin, polymyxin B, amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin. P. aeruginosa shown high resistance to antibiotics such as co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, and piperacillin. Antibiotics like colistin and polymyxin B will be helpful if the strain of P. aeruginosa is highly drugs resistant. Therefore, physicians must provide rational treatments to prevent the emergence of P. aeruginosa strain antibiotic resistance. As a result, it is critical to avoid using antibiotics against which P. aeruginosa has shown high resistance, as these isolates may have spread from person to person. In our study, the AMR genes that have been found were DHA, CTX-M, qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS. Therefore, it is critical to carry out additional research focusing on resistance genes other than those examined in this study, as limited AR genes have been found in P. aeruginosa in the present study.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges Quaid-i-Azam University for providing research facilities and academic support. Appreciation is also extended to Islamabad Diagnostic Centre for their valuable collaboration and technical assistance.

Funding

This research work was funded by the University Research Fund of Quaid-i-Azam University and by IDC, Islamabad.

Ethical statement and IRB approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Bioethics Committees of Quaid-i-Azam University.

Generative AI and AI-assisted technology statement

The authors declare that no generative AI and AI assisted technology was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Alvarez-Ortega, C., Wiegand, I., Olivares, J., Hancock, R.E. and Martínez, J.L., 2010. Genetic determinants involved in the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 54: 4159-4167. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00257-10

Aneela, S., Abrar, S., Saeed, M., Hussain, S., Hannan, A. and Riaz, S., 2019. Distribution of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Tertiary Care Hospitals of Lahore, Pakistan. J. Islamabad Med. Dent. College, 8: 23-28.

Bauer, A., Kirby, W., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M., 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. clin. Pathol., 45: 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493

Berrazeg, M., Jeannot, K., Ntsogo Enguéné, V.Y., Broutin, I., Loeffert, S., Fournier, D. and Plésiat, P., 2015. Mutations in β-lactamase AmpC increase resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to antipseudomonal cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 59: 6248-6255. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00825-15

Botelho, J., Grosso, F., Quinteira, S., Mabrouk, A. and Peixe, L., 2017. The complete nucleotide sequence of an IncP-2 megaplasmid unveils a mosaic architecture comprising a putative novel bla VIM-2-harbouring transposon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 72: 2225-2229. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx143

Botelho, J., Grosso, F., Sousa, C. and Peixe, L., 2015. Characterization of a new genetic environment associated with GES-6 carbapenemase from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate belonging to the high-risk clone ST235. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 70: 615-617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku391

Botelho, J., Roberts, A.P., León-Sampedro, R., Grosso, F. and Peixe, L., 2018. Carbapenemases on the move: It’s good to be on ICEs. Mobile DNA, 9: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-018-0141-4

Breidenstein, E.B., de la Fuente-Núñez, C. and Hancock, R.E., 2011. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: All roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol., 19: 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.04.005

Breidenstein, E.B., Khaira, B.K., Wiegand, I., Overhage, J. and Hancock, R.E., 2008. Complex ciprofloxacin resistome revealed by screening a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant library for altered susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 52: 4486-4491. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00222-08

Bruchmann, S., Dötsch, A., Nouri, B., Chaberny, I.F. and Häussler, S., 2013. Quantitative contributions of target alteration and decreased drug accumulation to Pseudomonas aeruginosa fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 57: 1361-1368. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01581-12

Cabot, G., Ocampo-Sosa, A.A., Tubau, F., Macia, M.D., Rodríguez, C., Moya, B. and Martínez-Martínez, L., 2011. Overexpression of AmpC and efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from bloodstream infections: Prevalence and impact on resistance in a Spanish multicenter study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 55: 1906-1911. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01645-10

Chen, H., Shu, W., Chang, X., Chen, J.A., Guo, Y. and Tan, Y., 2010. The profile of antibiotics resistance and integrons of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing thermotolerant coliforms isolated from the Yangtze River basin in Chongqing. Environ. Pollut., 158: 2459-2464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.03.023

Farooq, L., Memon, Z., Ismail, M. O. and Sadiq, S., 2019. Frequency and antibiogram of multi-drug resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Pakistan. Pakistan J. Med. Sci., 35: 1622.

Gales, A., Jones, R., Turnidge, J., Rennie, R. and Ramphal, R., 2001. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: Occurrence rates, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and molecular typing in the global SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1997–1999. Clin. Infect. Dis., 32(Suppl. 2): S146-S155. https://doi.org/10.1086/320186

Gill, M.M., Usman, J., Kaleem, F., Hassan, A., Khalid, A., Anjum, R. and Fahim, Q., 2011. Frequency and antibiogram of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Coll Phys. Surg. Pak., 21: 531-534.

Javiya, V.A., Ghatak, S.B., Patel, K.R. and Patel, J.A., 2008. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India. Indian J. Pharmacol., 40: 230-234. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.44156

Juan, C., Moyá, B., Pérez, J.L. and Oliver, A., 2006. Stepwise upregulation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosomal cephalosporinase conferring high-level β-lactam resistance involves three AmpD homologues. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 50: 1780-1787. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.50.5.1780-1787.2006

Ladadweh, H.E., Falana, H.H., Ma’ali, J.M., Aweis, P.A., Nofal, H.N. and Naseef, H.A., 2021. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from different clinical specimens: Survey article. Am. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 16: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajptsp.2021.1.8

Mansoor, K., Tanvir, S.B., Shariq, A., Hussain, A., Farooqi, B.J., Ahmed, S. and Tanvir, R., 2015. Frequency and susceptibility pattern of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in isolates of patients from a tertiary care hospital of Karachi, Pakistan. Eur. J. Biotechnol. biol. Sci., 2: 33-36.

Moya, B., Dötsch, A., Juan, C., Blázquez, J., Zamorano, L., Haussler, S. and Oliver, A., 2009. β-Lactam resistance response triggered by inactivation of a nonessential penicillin-binding protein. PLoS Pathog., 5: e1000353. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000353

Muller, C., Plésiat, P. and Jeannot, K., 2011. A two-component regulatory system interconnects resistance to polymyxins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 55: 1211-1221. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01252-10

Peix, A., Ramírez-Bahena, M.H. and Velázquez, E., 2009. Historical evolution and current status of the taxonomy of genus Pseudomonas. Infect. Genet. Evol., 9: 1132-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2009.08.001

Pérez-Pérez, F.J. and Hanson, N.D., 2002. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J. clin. Microbiol., 40: 2153-2162. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.6.2153-2162.2002

Pokharel, K., Dawadi, B.R., Bhatt, C.P. and Gupte, S., 2019. Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v17i01.1877

Polotto, M., Casella, T., de Lucca Oliveira, M.G., Rúbio, F.G., Nogueira, M.L., de Almeida, M.T. and Nogueira, M.C., 2012. Detection of P. aeruginosa harboring bla CTX-M-2, bla GES-1 and bla GES-5, bla IMP-1 and bla SPM-1 causing infections in Brazilian tertiary-care hospital. BMC Infect. Dis., 12: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-176

Qiu, J., Jiang, Z., Ju, Z., Zhao, X., Yang, J., Guo, H. and Sun, S., 2019. Molecular and phenotypic characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from farmed minks in Zhucheng, China. BioMed. Res. Int., 2019: 3917841. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3917841

Ramos, J.L., 2011. Pseudomonas: Volume 1 genomics, life style and molecular architecture. Springer Science and Business Media.

Robicsek, A., Strahilevitz, J., Sahm, D., Jacoby, G. and Hooper, D., 2006. qnr prevalence in ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 50: 2872-2874. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01647-05

Rodríguez-Martínez, J.M., Poirel, L. and Nordmann, P., 2009. Extended-spectrum cephalosporinases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 53: 1766-1771. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01410-08

Römling, U., Greipel, J. and Tümmler, B., 1995. Gradient of genomic diversity in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosome. Mol. Microbiol., 17: 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17020323.x

Saki, M., Farajzadeh Sheikh, A., Seyed-Mohammadi, S., Asareh Zadegan Dezfuli, A., Shahin, M., Tabasi, M. and Khani, P., 2022. Occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical specimens in southwest Iran: A multicentral study. Sci. Rep., 12: 2296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06128-4

Samad, A., Ahmed, T., Rahim, A., Khalil, A. and Ali, I., 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients of respiratory tract infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Peshawar. Pakistan J. Med. Sci., 33: 670.

Schmidt, K.D., Tümmler, B. and Römling, U., 1996. Comparative genome mapping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO with P. aeruginosa C, which belongs to a major clone in cystic fibrosis patients and aquatic habitats. J. Bact., 178: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.1.85-93.1996

Shbaita, S., Abatli, S., Sweileh, M.W., Aiesh, B.M., Sabateen, A., Salameh, H.T. and Zyoud, S.E.H., 2023. Antibiotic resistance profiles and associated factors of pseudomonas infections among patients admitted to large tertiary care hospital from a developing country. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Contr., 12: 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01355-4

Stickland, H.G., Davenport, P.W., Lilley, K.S., Griffin, J.L. and Welch, M., 2010. Mutation of nfxB causes global changes in the physiology and metabolism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Proteome Res., 9: 2957-2967. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9011415

Winsor, G.L., Griffiths, E.J., Lo, R., Dhillon, B.K., Shay, J.A. and Brinkman, F.S., 2016. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucl. Acids Res., 44: D646-D653 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1227.

Zhang, Y., Bao, Q., Gagnon, L. A., Huletsky, A., Oliver, A., Jin, S. and Langaee, T., 2010. ampG gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its role in β-lactamase expression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 54: 4772-4779. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00009-10