SJA_42_2_916-937

Introduction

Food security, in accompanying with economic advancement and employment opportunities, highly depends on poultry and livestock industries across the globe. Essential protein products, which include meat, together with eggs, milk, leather, and wool, are supplied by these sectors (Mottet and Tempio, 2017). According to FAO (2021), global meat production reached up to 337 million tons in 2020 because the poultry and livestock industries remained essential (FAO, 2021). The GDP of developing countries significantly depends on these industrial sectors. The poultry industry has become the industrial preference due to its rapid production process and low operational expenses, which have led to its market adoption across the world (Dikmen et al., 2012). As consumers’ demand increases for animal food, continued success in this industry is mandatory, which requires effective pest control systems (Makkar and Ankers, 2014). The agricultural food products generated by livestock is supplying food to 1.3 billion people of the human population and amount to 40% of total outputs (FAO, 2019). Translation research combined with superior nutrition programs and disease control systems has led to productivity increases, according to FAO’s (2019).

Similarly, the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, alongside textile manufacturing, get benefits from animal products and by-products (Fraser, 2008; Steinfeld et al., 2006). The production of fertilizer for agricultural purposes becomes possible through waste management of poultry and livestock, which enhances soil quality (Thornton and Herrero, 2010; Mottet et al., 2017; FAO, 2019). Rotational grazing systems, along with efficient feed management, present sustainable farming methods that decrease climate change impacts (Thornton and Herrero, 2010). When improved feeding methods along with genetic developments lead to decreased greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture (Fraser, 2008). Cattle grazing systems under passive management enable both carbon reduction and ecosystem preservation according to FAO (2019) and Steinfeld et al. (2006). Barnyard production shows that an increase in efficiency is because of modern agricultural techniques, which include sophisticated genetics and automated, precise farming approaches (Mottet and Tempio, 2017). Modern climate control features and veterinary services with updated feeding systems boost operational efficiency levels in the industry (FAO, 2021).

Objectives of the current review

The primary aim of this article is to study insect pests that affect poultry and livestock through detailed assessments of their biological characteristics and damage potential, along with relevant management methods. The review organizes the main insect pests that target both poultry (Table 1) and livestock (Table 4) by presenting their classification system, structural features, and an economic cost analysis (Tables 2 and 5). It evaluates both the short-term and long-term effects of these pests regarding their disease transmission capabilities, stress-related production reductions, and financial impacts on farmers. The analysis will investigate existing pest control strategies, examining their strengths and weaknesses, as well as the practical applications of chemical, biological, and cultural pest management solutions, including integrated pest management (IPM). The discussion highlights the necessity of environmentally friendly pest control strategies that mitigate the risks of pesticide resistance and reduce hazardous exposures to animals while protecting the environment. Additionally, the review acknowledges current research limitations in insect pest management and proposes new directions for advancing control strategies using emerging systems, novel biopesticides, and improved integrated pest management practices. This review consolidates existing information to provide critical knowledge that benefits researchers, veterinarians, and stakeholders in the poultry and livestock industries for effective pest management practices.

Major arthropod pests of the poultry sector

Ectoparasitic insects

Lice

Poultry lice, mainly the chicken body louse Menacanthus stramineus (Order: Psocodea; Suborder: Phthiraptera; Family: Menoponidae), are common ectoparasites of chickens and turkeys. Worldwide poultry populations suffer from infections from wingless parasitic insects within the insect order Phthiraptera (Gustafsson et al., 2025), and it has been demonstrated that body lice infestations occur by direct contact with breeding birds, in addition to contaminated equipment that harms feathers and creates skin irritation, resulting in production losses. The most harmful chicken louse, known as M. stramineus, feeds on blood, skin, and feathers among other species. The existence of the life stage lasts from 5 to 10 days, during which egg growth is established in 4 through 7 days (Bhawa, Morêki and Machete, 2023). Multiple parasites lead to such extensive damage that birds shed their feathers and their skin suffers from excruciating pain, making them more vulnerable to infections (https://poultry.extension.org/articles/poultry-health/external-parasites-of-poultry).

It is through flight feathers that Lipeurus caponis resides to consume the remaining feathers. The 14–21-day lifecycle of this parasite generates stress by negatively affecting the quality of feathers (https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/chicken-lice). Cuclotogaster heterographus attach to the comb areas, which leads to anemia development in addition to restlessness after 10–15 days (Gustafsson et al., 2025). Laboratory tests show that lice infections, specifically Goniocotes gallinae and Menopon gallinae, frequently infect chickens, resulting in 100% infestation rates in certain locations (Ikpeze et al., 2009). The lice require poultry as their lifecycle host, where they feed on feather particles. The life cycle of G. gallinae lasts for 36 days, yet the population can reproduce twice within a period of 11 to 14 days according to Saxena et al. (2007). M. gallinae became one of the earliest lineages of parasitic lice after its genome sequencing which allowed scientists to uncover information about louse evolutionary history and host transfer patterns (Xu et al., 2024). The poultry industry experiences financial losses because of lower market value for infested chickens that sell for a reduced amount of up to10-20% (Ikpeze et al., 2009).

Mites

The red poultry mite, Dermanyssus gallinae (Class: Arachnida; Subclass: Acari; Order: Mesostigmata; Family: Dermanyssidae), and the northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Order: Mesostigmata; Family: Macronyssidae), are the most important ectoparasites of poultry. The presence of mites causes two main issues in poultry farms, causing blood loss and pain, in addition to spreading diseases to other birds. Due to their quick reproduction procedure, poison spiders spread with exceptional severity according to Sparagano et al. (2014). Dermanyssus gallinae spends its total life span from 7 to 10 days as a feeding predator during nighttime hours while hiding during daylight. An infestation from this parasite results in anemia and stress, together with decreased egg production according to its well-known clinical presentation (Sparagano et al., 2014). Laying hens frequently encounter the ectoparasite Ornithonyssus sylviarum, known as the Northern fowl mite, which produces noticeable welfare risks and economic expenses. The parasitic infestation of chickens causes a decrease of 2 to 15% in egg output, reduces the feed conversion ratio (Devaney, 1979), and lowers egg quality (Vezzoli et al., 2016; Jarrett et al., 2022). The physical and psychological health of hens deteriorates when infested by mites because they develop skin irritations, suffer from damaged feathers, alongside impaired immune function (Vezzoli et al., 2016; Jarrett et al., 2022). Infestation can be varied at different levels of severity due to factors such as hen age and housing system (Jarrett et al., 2022). Research shows that MHC haplotypes impact mite resistance by creating differences between the B21 haplotype, which starts earlier but causes less skin inflammation than the B15 haplotype (Murillo et al., 2016). The potential of breeding programs to introduce mite resistance requires enhanced studies of how mites affect both genetics and business parameters.

The Megninia species and similar feather mites frequently invade the skin of poultry birds as well as wild bird species. M. ginglymura exists at high frequencies within broiler breeder farms in India (D’souza et al., 2001) and in laying hen systems in Brazil (Horn et al., 2018). The mite infestation leads to depluming itch as a pathogenic effect on fowls according to D’Souza et al. (2001). Feather mite contamination results in weak plumage quality and shorter wings, together with lower muscle protein storage in birds (Harper 1999). Some feather mite species demonstrate commensalism and mutualistic relationships, which sustainability help sustainably extract detritus and detrimental microorganisms from bird feathers (Labrador et al., 2021). Egg productivity decreases, and feed consumption and survival rates suffer alongside commercial losses when mites lead to higher infection rates of E. coli and Salmonella (Sparagano et al., 2014).

Fleas

Blood-feeding fleas such as the sticktight flea Echidnophaga gallinacea (Class: Insecta; Order: Siphonaptera; Family: Pulicidae), the European chicken flea Ceratophyllus gallinae (Order: Siphonaptera; Family: Ceratophyllidae), and the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis (Order: Siphonaptera; Family: Pulicidae) are opportunistic ectoparasites of poultry. During their journeys through the feathers, the flat body of fleas combined with their powerful back legs enables young birds to move unaided (Bitam et al., 2010; Mullen and Durden, 2019). Fleas belonging to the species E. gallinacea complete their life cycle within 14 to 30 days. During feeding, the female sticktight flea (E. gallinacea) stays on the eyes along with wattle and comb tissue before egg laying resulting in adults that develop within bedding materials according to Soulsby (1982).

The European chicken flea (C. gallinae) begins its feeding behavior before it enters secluded hiding areas after choosing its nesting materials. The lifecycle duration of this parasite ranges from 10–50 days, depending on temperature levels and environmental moisture (Rust, 2017). The presence of fleas leads to severe skin conditions that also cause microbial infections, beginning with the biting process. Continuous E. gallinacea infestation leads to anemic symptoms along with weight reduction and almost no egg production, in addition to anxiety and destructive habits in poultry (Mullen and Durden, 2019). Pathogenic microorganisms travel through the fleas’ digestive tract to chickens, and the worms Raillietina that reside inside fleas cause further deterioration in poultry health (Oliveira, Alves, and Sosa-Gómez, 2014).

Bed bugs

Bed bugs, including Cimex lectularius and Cimex hemipterus (Class: Insecta; Order: Hemiptera; Family: Cimicidae), are blood-feeding ectoparasites that infest poultry houses, causing economic damage and welfare issues. During the daytime, bed bugs hide in narrow spaces because their dorsoventrally compressed body shape allows them to fit into small openings between materials such as crevices and nest materials (Doggett et al., 2018; Axtell and Arends, 1990). The bed bug goes through 5 immature stages before achieving maturity but requires blood from host animals after discarding every skin layer in its developmental cycle of 35 to 50 days (Polanco et al., 2011; Potter, 2011). The parasites sense hosts during nighttime through their heat and carbon dioxide detection capabilities, along with specialized mouthparts that help them extract blood from birds (Doggett et al., 2018). Infestations by bed bugs cause distress and insomnia in animals, which reduces poultry eating behaviors and leads to weight decrease and damages feathers, and also causes secondary infection development (Axtell and Arends, 1990; Potter, 2011). The presence of bed bugs throughout poultry farms causes both stress and anemia and stimulates a reduction in overall egg production (González-Morales et al., 2022). The pests easily build hazardous populations that might result in substantial blood depletion in hosts during 3-8 months (Pereira et al., 2013). It remains unclear whether bed bugs transmit diseases, but their presence increased expenses and reduced profits to poultry farms (Doggett et al., 2018).

Endoparasitic insects

Lesser mealworm

The lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Order: Coleoptera; Family: Tenebrionidae), also known as the darkling beetle, is a common pest of poultry houses. The insect thrives most efficiently within areas that are both hot and humid by hiding inside multiple organic materials, which consist of manure and cracks, and any remains of feed. A. diaperinus mealworms can survive without moving through 4 developmental phases from their beginning as eggs until becoming adults. Female lesser mealworms place their eggs in organic material until the ectodermal stage larvae reach maturity for 4–7 days before they migrate to ceramic litter to feed on decayed matter mixed with poultry manure (Acharya et al., 2014). A lesser mealworm species needs 37.9 days at 30°C temperature to complete its life cycle, during which the larvae grow for 26.2 days while the pupae survive 5.5 days (Thornton and Herrero, 2010). The broiler house population of larvae reaches its highest number at point 26 days into the flock cycle, according to Lambkin et al. (2007). The lesser mealworm beetle (A. diaperinus) establishes itself as a major poultry facility pest because it damages building structures while

Table 1: Major insect pests affecting poultry production.

Pest	Scientific name	Region	Effects on poultry	References
Lice	Menacanthus stramineus (Chicken Body Louse)	Reported in Sindh, Pakistan; also, in Indian backyard flocks.	Causes feather loss, irritation, anemia, stress, and reduced egg production.	Pavlicevic et al., 2021; Knežević et al., 2018; Shaikh et al. (2022)
Mites	Dermanyssus gallinae (Poultry Red Mite)	Widespread in Pakistan and India poultry farms.	Causes anemia, stress, disease transmission, and a 20% drop in egg production.	Sparagano et al., 2014; Flochlay et al., 2017; Eladl et al., 2018; Sparagano and Ho (2020)
Fleas	Echidnophaga gallinacea (Sticktight Flea)	Documented in Indian poultry; present in Pakistan rural flocks.	Attaches to the skin, causing irritation, weight loss, and reduced egg production.	Knežević et al., 2018; Sparagano et al., 2009; Sharma et al., 2020; Udhayavel et al., 2019
Flies	Musca domestica (House fly)	Abundant in poultry houses in Punjab, Pakistan and India.	Spreads bacterial diseases, increasing infection risk and poultry stress.	Oliveira et al., 2014; Acharya et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2018; Abbas et al. (2015)
Bed bugs	Cimex lectularius	Occasionally infest poultry houses in Indo-Pak rural setups.	Causes skin irritation, stress, weight loss, and egg reduction.	Weeks et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2017; Murillo, 2021
Lesser mealworm	Alphitobius diaperinus	Found in poultry litter in Pakistan and India.	Damages insulation, transmits bacteria, and competes for feed.	Smith et al., 2021; Crippen et al., 2009; Ahmed et al., 2015; Sammarco et al. 2023

holding pathogens that threaten animals (Smith et al., 2021; Sammarco et al., 2023). Lesser mealworms can carry and spread bacterial pathogens, including Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli, which endanger both poultry health and food safety (Smith et al., 2021; Polat et al., 2024). Crippen et al. (2009) established that these beetles speedily absorb Salmonella inside their alimentary canal and circulatory system to disseminate pathogens. These beetles display night-time behavior patterns that make birds feel agitated, leading to their physical unrest (Axtell and Arends, 1990).

Disease spread and economic impact

Role of pests in transmitting avian pathogens

Worldwide poultry production incurs losses because of the transmission of avian diseases by poultry pests, because of ectoparasites and endoparasites (Puvača et al., 2019). The health and production numbers of poultry suffer major threats due to pests and diseases that affect both egg-laying and meat-raised birds. The mechanism of disease transmission combines mechanical and biological elements, which deteriorate bird health and boost mortality numbers (Collett, 2013). The global trade of exotic birds facilitates disease spread, threatening livestock production as well as wildlife populations (Burgos and Burgos, 2007). The biological processes required for egg production become targets in laying flocks due to viral infections, which results in decline in both quantity and quality (Hassan and Abdul-Careem, 2020). The primary signs of illness consist of unkempt feathers together with anorexia along with depression, and diarrheal symptoms (Yitbarek et al., 2016).

The poultry red mite serves as a pathogen carrier for five major disease agents, including E. coli with P. multocida, and M. gallisepticum alongside AIV (Sparagano et al., 2014). In one research, Dermanyssus gallinae carrying Salmonella, a bacterial infection it functions as a transfer agent between birds, causing salmonellosis outbreaks (Chauve, 1998). The chicken pathogen Staphylococcus aureus causes a range of diseases that affect birds, such as septicemia, omphalitis, and arthritis, along with synovitis, osteomyelitis, and dermatitis (Bergmann et al., 1980; Tabar et al., 2024). The combined infections generate economic concerns due to lameness, weight loss, and reduced egg production levels (Tabar et al., 2024). Researchers in Pakistan established that septic arthritis developed because of S. aureus bacteria affecting both broiler and layer chickens primarily in their hock joints (Malhi et al., 2015). Among all isolated S. aureus strains causing infections in fowl, the site variety known as gallinae contained crystal-violet Type A strains, which showed specific lysis patterns, and this combination was detected in approximately 78.1% of cases (Bergmann et al., 1980).

The poultry disease Necrotic enteritis (NE), produced by Clostridium perfringens, causes total yearly losses above $6 billion. NE causes severe economic setbacks by killing broiler birds and reducing the productivity of laying hens. The disease progression starts when bacteria attach to tissues, followed by toxin release and subsequent mucosal tissue destruction (Flores-Dıaz et al., 2016; Alizadeh et al., 2021). The bacteria Campylobacter jejuni exist outside and inside these beetles because they can pass this pathogen to chickens through eating practices (Strother et al., 2005). Worldwide poultry facilities experience widespread infestation from the lesser mealworm beetle (Alphitobius diaperinus), which obstructs facility integrity and maintains many disease-causing pathogens (Smith et al., 2021; Sammarco et al., 2023). Scientific research has documented that beetles quickly take up bacteria, including Salmonella, in their alimentary canal and hemolymph (Crippen et al., 2009). Bacterial acquisition and transfer between beetles and poultry manure occur best when the concentrations of Salmonella is high, as per research conducted by Crippen et al. (2009). The beetle demonstrates its pathogen maintenance and transfer capabilities, which necessitate properly integrated pest management systems for controlling contamination risk in poultry farms (Smith et al., 2021; Crippen et al., 2009).

Economic losses from pest infestations

The parasitic disease coccidiosis inflicts significant financial losses on the poultry industry, mainly by harming the development of broiler chickens (Bera et al., 2010). The prevalence of coccidiosis in Indian poultry farms led to Rs 1.14 billion loss during the 2003-04 period, as it reduced body weight gain while increasing feed conversion ratio. The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae creates expense burdens of up to 60 euros on annual farm production for farmers (Pavlicevic et al., 2021). Worldwide, poultry farms have a substantial pest control issue due to D. gallinae poultry red mite infestations, with rates exceeding 80-90% in particular European nations (Knežević et al., 2018). Cases of stress occur in chickens because of ectoparasites, leading to compromised animal welfare and mortality combined with economic losses in the poultry industry, according to Sparagano et al. (2009).

Poultry production suffers from heat stress due to environmental exposure and this factor causes detrimental effects on growth performance, along with both egg production and product quality standards (Lara and Rostagno, 2013). D. gallinae functions as a pathogen for transmission of Salmonella and Newcastle disease, together with various bacterial and viral diseases, which adversely affect poultry health (Knežević et al., 2018). Research by Eladl et al. (2018), together with Flochlay et al. (2017), indicates that severe mite infestations cause a decrease in egg yield by up to 20% while increasing their daily feed consumption by approximately 10-15%. The poultry industry maintains importance for both food security and economic progress, even it experiences health problems from Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) disease (Acharya and Phuyal, 2024; Mottet and Tempio, 2017). The economic impact of diseases on poultry farming exceeds 20% of total net revenue (Zhou et al., 2020). Nepal depends primarily on imported vaccines to prevent diseases, even though it manufactures its local vaccines (Poudel et al., 2020).

In developing nations, the expansion of the poultry industry causes four main things in like poverty reduction alongside small farmer market entry, health risks to humans, and harm to the environment (Mottet and Tempio, 2017). The meat industry experiences substantial financial losses worldwide because poultry develop parasitic infections mainly from fasciolosis and cysticercosis. The infections cause detrimental effects on meat quality and lead to carcass grading reductions and organ rejection in abattoirs, according to Regasa and Seboka (2021) and Dahourou et al. (2019). Each year, in the case of livestock, the condition of fasciolosis results in US$3 billion of agricultural losses globally by decreasing both meat and milk yields (Regasa and Seboka, 2021). Northeastern Iran experienced 80.8% of organ and carcass condemnations, which were mainly caused by parasites, primarily including E. granulosus and D. dendriticum (Borji and Parandeh, 2010). The combination of unfavorable pre-slaughter handling methods with stress causes increased economic losses because it impacts both market value and meat quality properties (Faucitano, 2018).

The structural pest lesser mealworm (A. diaperinus) damages poultry house insulation materials to an extensive extent, according to Turner (1986). The pupating process of late-stage larvae tunneling into polystyrene and fiberglass insulation materials until adulthood, and they start enlarging the passages, resulting in loss of insulation and decreased R-value ratings (González-Morales et al., 2022). Moisture in manure, together with wall materials and insulation types, determines the extent of infestation (Turner 1986, Despins et al. 1987). The beetles transmit pathogens to animals while replacing their normal food diet, thus hindering broiler weight gain (Japp et al., 2010). The presence of diseases along with pests in poultry production facilities leads to major economic losses throughout the global industry. Viral threats in Nigeria include Newcastle disease avian influenza, and infectious bursal disease, which have been found to result in maximum losses (Sadiq and Mohammed., 2017). Coccidiosis, together with clostridiosis, frequently affects broiler chickens while layers primarily develop salpingoperitonitis (Jones et al., 2019).

Pathogens transmitted from arthropods and rodents result in an increased danger of foodborne infections to poultry, according to Yang et al. (2014). Small-scale farmers do not give priority to invest in biosecurity measures because poultry only contributes 10% of their household earnings (Otte et al., 2021). Research has focused mainly on epidemiology without adequate studies about the financial impacts. Logical and scientific evidence shows that uncontrolled diseases lead to unprofitable flocks, yet appropriate intervention measures reduce financial losses Jones et al., 2019). The evaluation of recurring outbreak costs through future research will strengthen disease prevention plans (Sadiq and Mohammed, 2017).

Management of poultry pests

The control and registration of poultry pests involves biological methods, together with chemical methods, as well as physical control through cultural practices (Table 3). The pest control sector protects bed bugs alongside lice, mites, fleas, and lesser mealworms using synthetic pyrethroids, which they combine with organophosphates and carbamates, but sustain insecticide protection by rotating between the use of spinosad, fluralaner, ivermectin, and insect growth regulators (Sparagano et al., 2014). The fungal strain Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae possess

Table 2: Economic impact of poultry pests.

Pest/Disease	Region	Economic losses	References
Coccidiosis	India	Rs 1.14 billion loss due to lower weight gain and poor feed efficiency.	(Bera et al., 2010)
Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae)	Europe	Prevalence up to 90%, causing stress, mortality, 20% egg loss, and 10-15% higher feed costs.	(Knežević et al., 2018)
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)	Global	Losses exceed 20% of poultry income.	(Zhou et al., 2020)
Fasciolosis	Global	Over $3 billion loss due to reduced meat and milk yield.	(Regasa and Seboka, 2021)
Parasitic infections (e.g., Echinococcus granulosus, Dicrocoelium dendriticum)	Iran	80.8% of carcasses condemned.	(Borji and Parandeh, 2010)
Preslaughter stress factors	Global	Reduced carcass value and meat quality.	(Faucitano, 2018)
Lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus)	Global	Damages poultry house insulation, increasing costs.	(Turner, 1986; Vaughan et al., 1984; Despins et al., 1987)
Newcastle disease, Avian Influenza, and Infectious bursal disease	Nigeria	Major economic losses, Newcastle Disease is the most severe.	(Sadiq and Mohammed, 2017)
Coccidiosis and clostridiosis in broilers	Global	Significant losses: Salpingoperitonitis impacts the layers.	(Jones et al., 2019)
Arthropods and rodents	Global	Spread pathogens, increasing foodborne risks and losses.	(Yang et al., 2014)
Uncontrolled poultry diseases	Global	Can render flocks unprofitable without intervention.	(Jones et al., 2019)

efficient biological pest control traits for poultry pests, which provide a substitute for chemical insecticides (Oliveira et al., 2014; Weeks et al., 2018). Studies have shown that these fungi destroy multiple arthropods in addition to eliminating house flies as well as lesser mealworms and feather mites (Oliveira et al., 2014). The fungal bio-pesticides reduce 3 important factors of the adult fly multiplication while lowering their chance to reproduce and produce eggs (Acharya and Phuyal, 2024). Large-scale field deployment of these pathogens faces ongoing challenges because scientists need to develop effective isolates and suitable formulas for deployment, as well as strains that tolerate diverse environmental conditions (Weeks et al., 2018).

Scientific investigations focus on enhancing the practical utility of these biopesticides for commercial use within poultry industries. Multiple proven strategies make up an effective approach to managing pests in poultry farms. Temperature levels above 45°C within litter spaces lead to the complete death of Alphitobius diaperinus population members at different life stages (Wolf et al., 2014). Academic research has shown that litter rotation alongside appropriate ventilation can help decrease moisture levels and speed up drying, yet more studies need to confirm the impact on litter condition and animal comfort (Pepper and Dunlop, 2021). High moisture content (37.4-51.1%) in litter performs a unique function to inhibit ammonia emission (Miles et al., 2011). Releasing heat causes negative impacts on poultry by lowering their feed intake and growth rates while decreasing operational output. The prevention of heat stress in animals can be reduced by procedures such as nutritional modifications along with electrolyte and vitamin supplementation, feed formulation methods, and controlled fasting and water distribution management (Bhawa et al., 2023). The integration of various methods produces more suitable growing conditions, which leads to enhanced production while resolving pests and environmental problems in poultry systems.

The essential oils from plants could provide safe, natural methods for controlling poultry pests. Multiple essential plant oils such as tea tree oil, eucalyptus oil, and neem oil have proved effective in killing poultry red mites (Quilicot et al., 2020; Puvača et al., 2019). The antimicrobial along with antioxidant, and acaricidal effects of tea tree oil surpass almost 80% mortality rates against poultry red mites (Puvača et al., 2019). The joint application of neem products together with diatomaceous earth leads to better results against stored product pests than separate treatments alone (Ulrichs and Mewis, 2000). The use of essential oils as feed additives produces multiple health benefits, such as by improving poultry productivity along with strengthening appetite and

Table 3: Poultry pest control methods.

Control method	Target pests	Examples/Details	References
Chemical control	Bed bugs, lice, mites, fleas, lesser mealworms	Synthetic pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, spinosad, fluralaner, ivermectin, insect growth regulators	(Sparagano et al., 2014)
Biological control	House flies, lesser mealworms, feather mites	Entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae)	(Oliveira et al., 2014; Weeks et al., 2018)
Fungal biopesticides	House flies	Reduce adult fly populations, egg viability, and fecundity	(Acharya et al., 2015)
Heat treatment	Alphitobius diaperinus (Lesser mealworm)	High temperatures (45°C) cause total mortality of adults and larvae	(Wolf et al., 2014)
Litter management	Various poultry pests	Litter turning, proper ventilation, moisture reduction	(Pepper and dunlop, 2021)
Essential oils and plant products	Poultry red mites, stored product pests	Tea tree, eucalyptus, neem oils, diatomaceous earth, improved poultry productivity	(Quilicot et al., 2020; Puvača et al., 2019; Ulrichs and Mewis, 2000)
Nutrient and feed management	General poultry health and pest resistance	Electrolyte and vitamin supplementation, controlled feeding, water management	(Bhawa et al., 2023)
Antibiotic alternatives	Poultry red mites, bacterial infections	Essential oils used as feed additives (improve appetite, and immune response)	(Krishan and Narang, 2014; Puvača et al., 2019)

stimulating immune response, according to Krishan and Narang (2014) and Puvača et al. (2019). The research community needs to explore better ways to use these natural approaches as antibiotic growth promoter substitutes, while investigating how they work in poultry farms (Quilicot et al., 2020).

Major insect pests of livestock sector

Hematophagous arthropod pests

Ticks

Ticks are classified into three families: Argasidae (soft ticks), Ixodidae (hard ticks), and Nuttalliellidae (represented by Nuttalliella namaqua). Important livestock pests include Hyalomma anatolicum and Rhipicephalus microplus (Family: Ixodidae), and the fowl tick Argas persicus (Family: Argasidae. (Guglielmone et al. (2010) and Nava et al. (2009)). According to Guglielmone et al. (2010), globally there exist 896 tick species, divided between 193 of the Argasidae family and 702 of the Ixodidae family. The cattle pests H. anatolicum, along with R. microplus, affect ruminants in tropical and subtropical zones as principal hard ticks. Farm practices that increase tick prevalence in livestock herds include the nonexistence of rural poultry combined with non-use of acaricides and traditional housing methods and extensive grazing patterns (Rehman et al., 2017).

The life cycle of ticks includes four transformational stages from egg through larva into nymph and finally ending with adulthood (Awerbuch and Sandberg, 1995; Due et al., 2013). The life span of hard ticks spans from 2 to 3 years, yet each developmental stage requires a single blood meal, while soft ticks undergo repeated feeding following multiple juvenile stages (Due et al., 2013). The deer tick (Ixodes dammini) requires between 2 to 4 years to finish its cycle, depending on the suitable hosts it encounters (Xu et al., 2024). The lifecycle development of Ixodes ricinus proceeds through three years from egg to adult. The temperatures above 7°C activate ticks, and their activity reaches its peak during spring months. Eggs from a single female tick number between one thousand and to two thousand (Reid, 1987), which enhances their population development.

Environmental variations influence the natural cycle of tick populations (Xu et al., 2024). The species depend on host transportation since they do not perform lateral movements but ascend plants to find potential hosts (Reid, 1987). The presence of ticks in domestic animals creates weight loss in live bodies while causing anemia and reducing the quality levels of hides and skin (Rajput et al., 2006; Eskezia, 2016). Protozoan, rickettsial, and viral diseases transmitted by ticks create widespread economic damage throughout the world (Jongejan and Uilenberg, 1994; Rajput et al., 2006). The economic effect of ticks generates financial losses through three major categories, which include reduced body weight, diminished milk output, and the expense of treatments (Eskezia, 2016). Production of meat, milk, eggs, and leather becomes affected when ticks infest cattle, small ruminants, swine, and poultry (Hurtado and Giraldo-Ríos 2018).

Mosquitoes

Mosquitoes of the genera Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex (Class: Insecta; Order: Diptera; Family: Culicidae) are important hematophagous ectoparasites. Several arboviruses, notably Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), West Nile virus (WNV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), transmitted by mosquito genera such as Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex, pose significant health threats to livestock and, by extension, humans (Pagès and Cohnstaedt, 2018), (Bird and Nichol, 2012; Tariku and Rebuma, 2024). RVFV is particularly notorious for its outbreaks in Africa and the Middle East, leading to severe economic consequences for the livestock industry, especially affecting domestic ruminants like sheep and cattle, which suffer high mortality and abortion rates (Linthicum et al., 2016; Tariku and Rebuma, 2024). Environmental factors such as heavy rainfall and flooding contribute to the proliferation of mosquito vectors responsible for RVFV transmission (Masters et al., 2020), (Masters et al., 2020).

Mosquitoes undergo a four-stage life cycle from eggs to adults, which takes about 7 to 10 days depending on species and environmental conditions; Aedes aegypti, for instance, can withstand prolonged periods of desiccation. Temperature influences the growth and mortality rates of mosquito populations—higher temperatures may curtail development (Arévalo-Cortés et al., 2022). The virulence of RVFV transmitted by Aedes and Culex mosquitoes result in high mortality rates and reproductive failures in livestock, notably with 100% abortion rates in affected species. Additionally, JEV and WNV infections pose reproductive risks for pigs, indicating a broader risk to the livestock sector (Bird and Nichol, 2012; Linthicum et al., 2016). Climate change and human-induced environmental changes further exacerbate these viral transmissions (Pagès and Cohnstaedt, 2018; Singh et al., 2015). The presence of blood-feeding dipteran insects leads to notable productivity losses in dairy and beef cattle, significantly impacting milk and meat yield, with financial losses estimated at $160 per cow over five months, thereby enhancing risks to livestock during nighttime hours (Pagès and Cohnstaedt, 2018).

Stable flies

The stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans (Order: Diptera; Family: Muscidae) damages livestock operations throughout the world by causing economic harm to cattle production (Taylor, 2020). Ball-feeding behavior of these insects leads to troubles that lower productivity levels in addition to reduced animal welfare. The U.S. cattle industry loses approximately $2.211 billion yearly due to stable flies, yet the economic impact is divided into four sections: dairy experiences $360 million in losses the cow-calf sector sustains $358 million in damages and pastured cattle endure $1.27 billion in expenses while feedlot cattle experience $226 million losses (Taylor et al., 2012). Decreased milk production in dairy cows, along with weight loss problems in beef cattle, creates the main economic issues in this situation. The clustering of cattle due to stable fly results in increased heat stress that causes 71.5% of observed weight reduction (Xu et al., 2024).

Stable flies need blood for natural survival and reproduction activities since both genders show persistent blood-feeding behavior (Taylor, 2020). The infestation of stable flies results in decreased cattle production potential because they cause dairy cows to produce 139 kg less milk annually and attain 6-26 kg less weight across different cattle types (Taylor et al., 2012). Researchers have discovered that dipteran pests, stable flies as one group of them, can decrease cattle live body weight gain by 10-11% over 5 months, which may lead a 100-cattle feedlot to lose $16,000 (Boonsaen et al., 2024). Research confirms the necessity of powerful strategies that control flies in cattle farms. Female stinging insects spend their life cycle by laying between 100 and 1,000 eggs in rotting organic materials, according to Foil and Hogsette (1994). Adult flies extract required blood meals from livestock animals for successful reproduction (Foil and Hogsette, 1994; Taylor, 2020). The conditions caused by their painful bites lower livestock productivity and also cause disturbances to human activities (Taylor, 2020). Practical studies demonstrate that cattle productivity suffers major declines because of stable fly infestations, which reduce milk output and weight growth (Taylor et al., 2012). Challenges to both physiological functioning and natural behaviors are observed in cattle that encounter stable flies, and these manifestations result in worsened heat stress effects while simultaneously diminishing productivity (Byford et al., 1992; Wieman et al., 1992).

Horn flies

The horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Order: Diptera; Family: Muscidae) remains a small, dark-grey biting insects that mainly attack cattle, whereas they may also impact horses and various other livestock populations (Votýpka and Mihalca, 2020; Boxler, n.d.). These blood-feeding ectoparasites depend on host contact for life survival so they live most on the host’s back and shoulders and underbelly region (Votýpka and Mihalca, 2020). Adult flies from both sexes need blood for survival, and they need to eat multiple blood meals each day, according to Kuramochi (2000). Research has thoroughly examined numerous fly species that live in cattle dung. The female SanSimonicus lay large numbers of eggs in fresh dung, where each egg reaches maturity in less than a day. The maturation of larvae at three stages stretches from 2.5 to 7 days based on conditions of the environmental. Following several days to 7.5 days of development, the flies emerge from the poo mass during the pupal stage (Vezzoli, King, and Mench, 2016). Multiple generations per year are possible because egg-to-adult development takes place within 7-24 days according to Parr (1962) and the other research authors Melo et al. (2020), Sammarco, Hinkle and Crossley, (2023).

The development along with oviposition of H. irritans depends on temperature, moisture content, dung composition, and feeding behavior (Parr, 1962; Melo et al., 2020; Campbell and Kettle, 1976; Wang, 1964). Knowledge of pest flies lifecycles in cattle farming remains essential for creating successful control measures (Melo et al., 2020). The bloodsucking horn flies (H. irritans) result in substantial economic damage to cattle, which results in annual United States losses surpassing $2.3 billion according to Brewer et al. (2021). Adult horn flies require a powerful host because they spend nearly all their time on cattle while performing blood feeds between 38 times each day (Brewer et al., 2021). Successful host location by these flies depends on temperature, wind velocity, and humidity, and occurs within a temperature range of 18.3°C (Faucitano, 2018).

Acute infestation in beef steers causes physical stress and elevates their heart rates, respiration rates, and body temperatures according to Schwinghammer et al. (1986). Throughout their blood diet, these pests generate pain, which makes cattle off feed and causes restlessness in them (Kaufman and Weeks, 2012). A heavy horn fly population exceeding 200 per animal results in a weight loss of 15-50 pounds in calves experiencing at weaning. According to Tomberlin (2023), the presence of horn flies decreases milk productivity in dairy cows by up to 20% and reduces both the quantity and quality of milk in cows (Mays et al., 2014). The impact on milk production differs among sire breeds and in lactating animals, but certain breeds appear less affected by flies (Mays et al., 2014). Horn flies create yearly economic losses that amount to between $700 million to $1 billion throughout the USA, as per Kaufman and Weeks (2012).

Internal pests and parasitic larvae

Bot flies

Bot flies of the family Oestridae (Class: Insecta; Order: Diptera), including Oestrus ovis, Hypoderma spp., and Gasterophilus intestinalis, parasitize mammals exclusively after they complete their life cycle inside various hosts, including cattle, horses, and sheep, as well as numerous other animals (Catts 1982; Angulo-Valadez et al. 2010). Throughout their life cycle, eggs are laid onto animal hair or body opening areas before larvae penetrate tissues to migrate until larval emergence starts the pupation process (Colwell et al., 2006). Oestrus ovis, commonly known as the sheep nasal bot fly, attacks nasal cavities along with sinuses, creating irritation that results in fluid discharge, according to Angulo-Valadez et al. (2010). Studied bighorn sheep reveal that this species might transmit between different animal species (Wolf et al., 2014). Adult bot flies exist for only a brief duration before death while skipping the feeding stage because they dedicate themselves to reproductive activities (Dahourou et al., 2019). The developmental stage of larvae occurs within multiple host tissues because different species use subcutaneous areas to create warbles and gastric mucosa to complete maturity (Colwell et al., 2006).

The worldwide spread of bot flies leads to substantial financial damage among livestock populations. Warble flies (Hypoderma spp.) together with nasal bots (Oestrus ovis) cause damage to animal hides and lower productivity levels, and also lead to respiratory problems throughout cattle and sheep populations (Chhabra and Pathak, 2009). Horses suffer from gastric problems due to Gasterophilus larvae infestation, and Chrysomya bezziana creates traumatic myiasis in multiple animal species (Regasa and Seboka, 2021). The parasites cause three major problems in animals, which include decreased feed consumption and problems in nutrient absorption, resulting in a compromise in performance (Polat et al., 2024). Billions of dollars in economic expenses develop annually throughout the world due to parasitic infestation. In Australia alone, parasitic diseases in sheep and cattle result in losses of one billion dollars annually (Pal and Chakravarty, 2020). Myiasis, together with associated diseases, causes economic losses amounting to 20% of turnover in developed countries and up to 35-50% in the developing world, according to Pal and Chakravarty (2020). These economic losses can be mitigated through antiparasitic treatments and constant veterinary services practice (Touré, 1994).

Warble flies

Warble flies (Hypoderma bovis and Hypoderma lineatum) (Class: Insecta; Order: Diptera; Family: Oestridae) function as major ectoparasites that damage livestock as well as wild ruminants throughout the Mediterranean area, the Indian subcontinent, and China (Yadav et al., 2017; Otranto et al., 2004). Adult flies survive up to one week before which they lay eggs on their host’s coat (Yadav et al., 2017). After skin penetration, the larvae move through body tissues for multiple months until they develop beneath the skin surface (Reina et al., 2000). The Hypoderma spp life cycle follows different yearly patterns because H. lineatum develops before H. bovis (Reina et al., 2000; Khan et al., 2007). In Pakistan egg-laying season begins in June, before larval migration, which starts in July, and warbles reach their peak appearance in mid-December (Khan et al., 2007). Hypoderma lineatum damages both milk production and leather worth, hence loss to the economy of India (Jaiswal et al., 2016). Warble fly infestations originating from Hypoderma bovis and H. lineatum larvae inflict major harm to both cattle health and animal productivity. The path of migrating larvae results in tissue necrosis and inflammatory tissue damage according to Wolfe (1959). The parasites create skin warbles that result in breathing holes. The immune response pattern also changes because plasma cells dominate the area surrounding healthy larvae while macrophages become more prominent during the death of larvae (Cabanelas et al., 2015). Milk production, together with the leather manufacturing industry, experienced significant financial damage from infestations (Jaiswal et al., 2016). The programs of anti-parasitism create long-lasting advantages for livestock producers, as well as maintaining environmental quality and benefiting consumers (Boulard, 2002). The stress caused by infestations results in low fertility along with delayed puberty because of hormonal imbalances (Crowe and Williams, 2012; Wrzecińska et al., 2021). Uterine infections prevail more frequently in high-yielding cows, which deteriorates their fertility level (Crowe and Williams, 2012). Under heavy insect infestation, milk production decreases by 15-25%, and the connection between insect counts and milk output is negatively correlated (Renčínová et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2012). The combination of stress from insects along with udder irritation leads to an increased chance of mastitis. The continuous stress of flies causes cows to develop huddling behaviors and increases their kicking motions during the milking process (Renčínová et al., 2021).

Table 4: Major insect pests of livestock sector.

Pest	Scientific Name	Effects on Livestock	References
Ticks	Hyalomma anatolicum, Rhipicephalus microplus, Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes dammini	Blood loss, anemia, reduced weight gain, decreased milk production, transmission of protozoan, rickettsial, and viral diseases	(Jongejan and Uilenberg, 1994; Rajput et al., 2006; Eskezia, 2016)
Mosquitoes	Anopheles spp., Aedes spp., Culex spp.	Vector of arboviruses (Rift Valley fever virus, West Nile virus, Japanese encephalitis virus), decreased milk production, weight loss	(Bird and Nichol, 2012; Linthicum et al., 2016; Kaufman et al., 2006)
Stable flies	Stomoxys calcitrans	Painful bites, stress, reduced feed intake, decreased weight gain, lower milk yield.	(Taylor, 2020; Taylor et al., 2012; Wieman et al., 1992)
Horn flies	Haematobia irritans	Blood loss, reduced weight gain, decreased milk production, irritation, increased heart rate	(Votýpka and Mihalca, 2020; Kaufman and Weeks, 2012; Tomberlin, 2023)
Bot flies	Oestrus ovis, Hypoderma spp., Gasterophilus spp., Chrysomya bezziana	Tissue damage, respiratory distress, reduced feed intake, impaired nutrient absorption, and hide damage	(Colwell et al., 2006; Angulo-Valadez et al., 2010; Touré, 1994)
Warble flies	Hypoderma spp.	Subcutaneous warbles, hide damage, reduced meat quality, weight loss	(Chhabra and Pathak, 2009; Sykes, 1994)

Effects on animal health and productivity

Impact of insect pests on meat, milk, and hide production

Biting flies among livestock pests create major economic damage in cattle business operations. Stable flies lead to annual milk output up to 139 kg in dairy cows, as well as body weight gain between 6-26 kg in beef cattle. The U.S. cattle industries face yearly economic losses of almost $2.21 billion due to stable fly population (Taylor et al., 2012). The combined yearly economic impact of six major cattle parasites, consisting of flies in Mexico, amounts to $1.41 billion, which equals $43.57 for each head of cattle (Rodríguez-Vivas et al., 2017). The evaluation revealed that hematophagous flies cause feeder cattle to lose 8.0 ± 1.5 kilograms of weight per month, resulting in a complete body weight gain reduction of 40.0 ± 5.5 kilograms over five months. A feedlot containing 100 calves can face a total economic loss of $16,000 throughout five months because of pests, according to Boonsaen et al. (2024).

Disease transmission risks

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) depicts a mosquito-carried viral pathogen that produces extensive outbreaks among livestock populations, as well as victimizes humans throughout the African continent and Arabian countries (Linthicum et al., 2016). The transmission of RVFV to cattle results in abortion rates exceeding 90-100% and causes 70% death of newborns, which leads to total loss in expenses up to $500 million (Bird and Nichol, 2012). Rift Valley fever virus affects livestock more than any other group since these species, including cattle, sheep, goats, and camels, act as amplifying hosts (Linthicum et al., 2016). The mortality rate in humans after infections remains between 10-20%, while the disease typically leads to brief illness or serious complications (Bird and Nichol, 2012). The World Health Organization classifies RVFV as a possible weapon for bioterrorism while it presents major health issues to worldwide populations, together with agricultural concerns (Linthicum et al., 2016). New habitats for RVFV infection emerge gradually because of climate change, along with the increasing globalization effects (Pagès and Cohnstaedt, 2018).

Economic consequences of infestations

Sadie and Mike operate Cattle Fly Traps that adversely impact livestock production globally. Stable flies result in $2.211 billion worth of losses every year throughout dairy and cow-calf operations in pastured and feeder cattle farms within the United States, according to Taylor et al. (2012). Stable flies lead to economic losses because they decrease milk outputs from dairy cows, combined with performance reductions in beef cattle. The economic impact of stable fly infestation on dairy cows results in a seasonal milk loss of 139 kg per year, whereas pastured stockers suffer a body weight reduction of 26 kg in a single season (Taylor et al., 2012). The United States livestock industry suffers more than $3 billion in yearly expenses due to attacks by stable flies, together with horn flies. The pests result in direct economic losses for livestock operations and spread multiple infectious diseases in animals and people, which shows the necessity of implementing practical pest management methods (Zhu and Wang, 2024).

Control of livestock pests

Customers who want to manage pests now initiate integrated pest control that uses biological and chemical methods alongside cultural control strategies (Table 6). Stable fly control includes various insecticides, arthropod predators, and biopesticides, as well as cultural practices such as farm hygiene and physical barriers (Cook, 2020). The complete management of sheep flystrike incorporates efforts that combine insecticide resistance control strategies

Table 5: Economic impact of livestock arthropod pests.

Pest	Region	Economic losses	References
Ticks	USA and mexico	$3 billion (USA), $573 million (Mexico)	(Zhu and Wang, 2024; Rodríguez-Vivas et al., 2017)
Mosquitoes	Africa	Losses due to Rift Valley fever outbreaks up to $500 million	(Bird and Nichol, 2012
Stable flies	USA and mexico	$2.21 billion (USA), $1.41 billion (Mexico)	Taylor et al., 2012; Rodríguez-Vivas et al., 2017)
Horn flies	USA	$1 billion annually	(Zhu and Wang, 2024
Bot flies	Global	Significant losses in cattle production	Various sources)
Warble flies	Europe	Losses in hide and meat production	(Various sources)

Table 6: Control strategies for livestock pests.

Pest	Control strategies	References
Stable flies	Insecticides, Arthropod predators, Biopesticides, Farm hygiene, Physical barriers	(Cook, 2020)
Sheep flystrike	Insecticide resistance management, Therapeutic delivery methods, Breeding for flystrike resistance	(Kotze and James, 2021)
Various livestock pests	Entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana), Combination with reduced insecticides or botanical products (neem)	(Borges and Vila Nova, 2011; Islam and Omar, 2012; Weeks et al., 2018; Shaurub, 2022)

with innovative therapeutic methods and selective sheep breeding for natural flystrike resistance (Kotze and James 2021). The implementation success of such pest management strategies relies on the partnerships between researchers and both extension personnel and growers alongside industry stakeholders to manage pests effectively and minimize the usage of traditional insecticides. Recent scientific research demonstrates that B. bassiana entomopathogenic fungi present a suitable biological control mechanism against different livestock and agricultural pests. Tests have confirmed that these fungal species succeed in controlling fly populations, providing a viable option for synthetic insecticide products (Weeks et al., 2018). Laboratory experiments show that B. bassiana controls pests through minimized feeding performance while restricting their mobility (Weeks et al., 2018). When entomopathogenic fungi are used in conjunction with lower quantities of insecticides or botanical products such as neem, they become more potent and less harmful to the environment (Islam and Omar, 2012; Borges and Vila Nova, 2011). Success rates for implementation depend on the formulation accuracy, together with the identified susceptibility of hosts and ideal environmental conditions. Biological and chemical pest management approaches in combination with agricultural strategies result in lower insecticide usage which is helpful to protect environment, and increase biodiversity (Borges and Vila Nova, 2011).

Conclusions and Recommendations

The future of worldwide food security, together with economic stability, can be linked to the poultry and livestock sectors because insect pests threaten both sectors with financial loss as well as health threats. The chosen review investigates all leading insect pests affecting these industries by studying their life cycle behaviors together with their destruction potential, followed by a systematic analysis of existing pest control techniques. Research results make it clear that sustainable pest control approaches founded in science must gain priority status because they ensure the continued success of these agricultural sectors. The widespread use of chemical pesticides as controls results in two main issues: insects developing pesticide resistance, besides creating environmental contaminations that endanger human and animal wellbeing. The present age depends on integrated pest management (IPM) for sustainable pest control. Gradual improvements from biotechnology applied to pest control have led to higher management accuracy, but scientists must continue research on biological control methods and pest-host relationship comprehension for better detection and management techniques. Policies for practical field adoption of scientific innovations require improved cooperation among entomologists with livestock producers, their veterinarians, and government officials. Sustainable pest management strategies that utilize technological developments allow both poultry and livestock sectors to guard against long-term arthropod pest threats and to optimize productivity as well as animal health, and stabilize agricultural structures with improvement in the economy in this sector.

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Dr. Abu Bakar Muhammad Raza (Department of Entomology, University of Sargodha) for advising on the technical structure of the review paper and for guiding the students during the preparation of the draft.

Novelty Statement

This review paper consolidates the scientific literature regarding different ectoparasitic insect and arthropod pests of poultry and livestock animals with an emphasis on the prevailing incidence and control practices being practically implicated combating these veterinary pests.

Author’s Contribution

Muhammad Zeeshan Majeed: Conceived the idea and supervised the work.

Asghar Ali: Performed the research work and prepared the initial draft.

Laiba Idrees: Helped in technical revision of the draft, and financially supports the manuscript.

Muhammad Usman: Technically revised the draft.

Muhammad Tayyab Raza: Helped in literature-based data collection and curation.

Adeela Manzoor: Assisted in data analysis and financially supports the manuscript.

Generative AI or AI assisted technology statement

The authors declare that no generative AI was used to conceive, analyze, or interpret the research data.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

Abbas, N., S.A. Shad and R.M. Shah. 2015. Resistance status of Musca domestica L. populations to neonicotinoids and insect growth regulators in Pakistan poultry facilities. Pak. J. Zool., 47(6): 1663–1671.

Acharya, K.P. and S. Phuyal. 2024. To vaccinate or not against highly pathogenic avian influenza? Lancet Microbe., 5(9): 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00107-1

Acharya, N., E.G. Rajotte, N.E. Jenkins and M.B. Thomas. 2014. Potential for biocontrol of house flies, Musca domestica, using fungal biopesticides. Biocont. Sci. Technol., 25(5): 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2014.992862

Alizadeh, M., B. Shojadoost, N. Boodhoo, J. Astill, K. Taha-Abdelaziz, D.C. Hodgins, R.R. Kulkarni and S. Sharif. 2021. Necrotic enteritis in chickens: a review of pathogenesis, immune responses and prevention, focusing on probiotics and vaccination. Anim. Health Res. Rev., 22(2): 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146625232100013X

Angulo-Valadez, C.E., P.J. Scholl, R. Cepeda-Palacios, P. Jacquiet and P. Dorchies. 2010. Nasal bots a fascinating world! Vet. Parasitol., 174(1–2): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.011

Arévalo-Cortés, A., Y. Granada, D. Torres and O. Triana-Chavez. 2022. Differential hatching, development, oviposition, and longevity patterns among Colombian Aedes aegypti populations. Insect., 13(6): 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13060536

Awerbuch, T.E. and S. Sandberg. 1995. Trends and oscillations in tick population dynamics. J. Theor. Biol., 175(4): 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1995.0158

Axtell, R. 1990. Ecology and management of arthropod pests of poultry. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 35(1): 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.000533

Bera, A.K., D. Bhattacharya, D. Pan, A. Dhara, S. Kumar and S. Das. 2010. Evaluation of economic losses due to coccidiosis in poultry industry in India. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 23(1): 91–96.

Bergmann, V., B. Köhler and K. Vogel. 1980. Staphylococcus aureus infection in chickens in industrialized poultry units. 1. Manifestations of Staphylococcus aureus infection in chickens. Pub. Med., 34(6): 891–903.

Bhawa, S., J.C. Morêki and J.B. Machete. 2023. Poultry management strategies to alleviate heat stress in hot climates: a review. J. World Poult. Res., 13(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2023.1

Bird, B.H. and S.T. Nichol. 2012. Breaking the chain: Rift Valley fever virus control via livestock vaccination. Curr. Opin. Virol., 2(3): 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2012.02.017

Bitam, I., K. Dittmar, P. Parola, M.F. Whiting and D. Raoult. 2010. Fleas and flea-borne diseases. Int. J. Infect. Dis., 14(8): e667–e676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.11.011

Boonsaen, P., A. Nevot, S. Onju, C. Fossaert, P. Chalermwong, K. Thaisungnoen, A. Lucas, S. Thévenon, R. Masmeatathip, S. Jittapalapong and M. Desquesnes. 2024. Measurement of the direct impact of hematophagous flies on feeder cattle: an unexpectedly high potential economic impact. Insect., 15(10): 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100735

Borges, L.R. and M.X.V. Nova. 2011. Associação de inseticidas químicos e fungos entomopatogênicos no Manejo Integrado de Pragas–uma revisão Association of chemical insecticides and entomopathogenic fungi in Integrated Pest Management–a review. Ambiência, 7(1): 179-190.

Borji, H. and S. Parandeh. 2010. The abattoir condemnation of meat because of parasitic infection, and its economic importance: results of a retrospective study in north–eastern Iran. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 104(8): 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1179/136485910X12851868780261

Boulard, C. 2002. Durably controlling bovine hypodermosis. Vet. Res., 33(5): 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2002032

Boxler, D.J. 1911. The horn-fly. Sci., 14(354): 335–337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-14.354.335

Brewer, G.J., D.J. Boxler, L.N. Domingues, R.T. Trout Fryxell, C. Holderman, K.M. Loftin et al. 2021. Horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae)—biology, management, and future research directions. J. Integr. Pest Manag., 12(1): 42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmab042

Burgos, S. and S.A. Burgos. 2007. Influence of exotic bird and wildlife trade on avian influenza transmission dynamics: animal-human interface. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6(7): 535–538. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2007.535.538

Byford, R.L., M.E. Craig and B.L. Crosby. 1992. A review of ectoparasites and their effect on cattle production. J. Anim. Sci., 70(2): 597–602 https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.702597x.

Cabanelas, E., R. Panadero, M. Fuertes, M. Fernández, J. Benavides, C. López, A. Pérez-Creo, P. Díaz, P. Morrondo, P. Díez-Baños and V. Pérez. 2015. Histological and immunohistochemical characterization of Hypoderma lineatum (Diptera: Oestridae) warbles. Vet. Parasitol., 212(3–4): 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.06.017

Campbell, M.M. and D.S. Kettle. 1976. Number of adult Culicoides brevitarsis Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) emerging from bovine dung exposed under different conditions in the field. Aust. J. Zool., 24(1): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9760075

Capelle, K.J. 1966. The occurrence of Oestrus ovis L. (Diptera: Oestridae) in the bighorn sheep from Wyoming and Montana. J. Parasitol., 52(3): 618. https://doi.org/10.2307/3276337

Catts, E.P. 1982. Biology of New World bot flies: Cuterebridae. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 27(1): 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001525

Chauve, C. 1998. The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): current situation and future prospects for control. Vet. Parasitol., 79(3): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00167-8

Chhabra, M. and K. Pathak. 2009. Myiasis of domestic animals and man in India. J. Vet. Parasitol., 23(1): 1–7. Chicken lice | VeterinaryEntomology. n.d. Chicken lice. VeterinaryEntomology. Available at: www.veterinaryentomology.org/chicken-lice

Collett, S.R. 2013. Principles of disease prevention, diagnosis, and control. Chapter 1. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/69142709/Principles_of_Disease_Prevention_Dhapter_1_Introduction https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421481.ch1

Colwell, D.D., M.J. Hall and P.J. Scholl. 2006. The Oestrid Flies: Biology, Host-Parasite Relationships, Impact and Management. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996844.0078

Colwell, D.D., M.J.R. Hall and P.J. Scholl. 2006. The Oestrid Flies: Biology, Host-Parasite Relationships, Impact and Management. CABI Publishing. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Oestrid_Flies.html?id=2REIpZwu51kC https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996844.0078

Cook, D. 2020. A historical review of management options used against the stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae). Insects, 11(5): 313.

Crippen, T.L., C.L. Sheffield, S.V. Esquivel, R.E. Droleskey and J.F. Esquivel. 2009. The acquisition and internalization of Salmonella by the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis., 9(1): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2008.0103

Crowe, M.A. and E.J. Williams. 2012. Triennial lactation symposium: Effects of stress on postpartum reproduction in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci., 90(5): 1722–1727. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4674

D’Souza, P.E., M.S. Jagannath and K.M.S. Murthy. 2001. Feather mite infestation in a broiler breeder farm. Vet. Rec., 149(25): 777. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.149.25.777-a

Dahourou, L.D., C. Ndayikeza, M. Savadogo and O.B. Gbati. 2019. Prevalence and economic losses resulting from parasitic zoonosis on swine and ruminants in Ouagadougou abattoir (Burkina Faso). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 12(5): 2226. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v12i5.23

de Castro, J.J. 1997. Sustainable tick and tickborne disease control in livestock improvement in developing countries. Vet. Parasitol., 71(2–3): 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00033-2

Del Mar Labrador, M., J. Doña, D. Serrano and R. Jovani. 2021. Feather mites at night: an exploration of their feeding, reproduction, and spatial ecology. Ecology, 103(1). Available at: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:7f3b7f3 https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3550

Despins, J.L., E.C. Turner and P.L. Ruszler. 1987. Construction profiles of high rise caged layer houses in association with insulation damage caused by the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) in Virginia. Poult. Sci., 66(2): 243–250. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660243

DeVaney, J.A. 1979. The effects of the northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum, on egg production and body weight of caged White Leghorn hens. Poult. Sci., 58(1): 191–194. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0580191

Dikmen, S., J. Cole, D. Null and P. Hansen. 2012. Heritability of rectal temperature and genetic correlations with production and reproduction traits in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 95(6): 3401–3405. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4306

Doggett, S.L., D.M. Miller and C.Y. Lee (Eds.). 2018. Advances in the Biology and Management of Modern Bed Bugs. John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171539

Due, C., W. Fox, J.M. Medlock, M. Pietzsch and J.G. Logan. 2013. Tick bite prevention and tick removal. BMJ, 347: f7123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7123

Eladl, A.H., H.R. Hamed and R.A. El-Shafei. 2018. Prevalence of mites and their impact on laying hen (Gallus gallus domesticus) farm facilities in Egypt, with an analysis of deltamethrin residues in eggs and tissue. Avian Pathol., 47(2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2017.1388500

Eskezia, B.G. 2016. Review on the impact of ticks on livestock health and productivity. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc., 6(22): 1–7. External parasites of poultry – Small and backyard poultry. n.d. Available at: https://poultry.extension.org/articles/poultry-health/external-parasites-of-poultry/

Fao. 2019. The state of food and agriculture 2019: moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. UN. Available at: https://www.fao.org/interactive/state-of-food-agriculture/2019/en/

Faucitano, L. 2018. Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality. J. Anim. Sci., 96(2): 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx064

Flochlay, A.S., E. Thomas and O. Sparagano. 2017. Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) infestation: a broad impact parasitological disease that still remains a significant challenge for the egg-laying industry in Europe. Parasit. Vector., 10(1): 357 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2292-4.

Flores-Díaz, M., E. Barquero-Calvo, M. Ramírez and A. Alape-Girón. 2016. Role of Clostridium perfringens toxins in necrotic enteritis in poultry. In: Spring. Book., pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6725-6_15-1

Foil, L. and J. Hogsette. 1994. Biology and control of tabanids, stable flies and horn flies. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE., 13(4): 1125–1158. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.13.4.821

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2019. Livestock solutions for climate change. FAO. Available at: https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1634679/

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2019. World livestock: transforming the livestock sector through sustainable food systems. FAO. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4060/ca1201en https://doi.org/10.4060/ca1201en

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2021. Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM). FAO. Available at: https://www.fao.org/gleam/en/

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2021. Livestock and poultry: statistical yearbook. FAO. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4477en

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2021. The state of food and agriculture report. FAO. Available at: https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/437c1215-556b-4161-9af6-68163f5a1f84

Foster, W.A. and E.D. Walker. 2019. Mosquitoes (Culicidae). In: Medical and Veterinary Entomology, pp. 261–325. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814043-7.00015-7

Fraser, D. 2008. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet. Scand., 50(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1

González, M.A., G. Duvallet, D. Morel, I. De Blas, E. Barrio and I. Ruiz-Arrondo. 2024. An integrated pest management strategy approach for the management of the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Insect., 15(4): 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040222

González-Morales, M.A., A.E. Thomson, O.A. Petritz, R. Crespo, A. Haija, R.G. Santangelo and C. Schal. 2022. Systemic veterinary drugs for control of the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, in poultry farms. Parasit. Vect., 15(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05555-6

Grisi, L., R.C. Leite, J.R. De Souza Martins, A.T.M. De Barros, R. Andreotti, P.H.D. Cançado, A.A.P. De León, J.B. Pereira and H.S. Villela. 2014. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet., 23(2): 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612014042

Guglielmone, A.A., R.G. Robbins, D.A. Apanaskevich, T.N. Petney, A. Estrada-Peña, I.G. Horak, R. Shao and S.C. Barker. 2010. The Argasidae, Ixodidae and Nuttalliellidae (Acari: Ixodida) of the world: a list of valid species names. Zootax., 2528: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2528.1.1

Gustafsson, D.R., J.M. Allen, K.C. Bell, S.E. Bush, L.A. Durden, K.P. Johnson and J.D. Weckstein. 2025. Phthiraptera systematics: past, present, and future. Insect Syst. Div., 9(5): 34.

Harper, D.G. 1999. Feather mites, pectoral muscle condition, wing length and plumage coloration of passerines. Anim. Behav., 58(3): 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1154

Hassan, M.S.H. and M.F. Abdul-Careem. 2020. Avian viruses that impact table egg production. Anim., 10(10): 1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101747

Herrero, M., P.K. Thornton, P. Gerber and R.S. Reid. 2009. Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 1(2): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.003

Horn, T.B., J. Granich, J.H. Körbes, G.L. Da Silva and N.J. Ferla. 2018. Mite fauna (Acari) associated with the poultry industry in different laying hen management systems in Southern Brazil: a species key. Acaro., 58(1): 140–158. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20184233

Hurtado, O.J.B. and C. Giraldo-Ríos. 2019. Economic and health impact of the ticks in production animals. In: Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens. IntechOpen eBooks. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/63777

Ikpeze, O., I. Amagba and C. Eneanya. 2009. Preliminary survey of ectoparasites of chicken in Awka, south-eastern Nigeria. Anim. Res. Int., 5(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/ari.v5i2.48745

Ioriatti, C., G. Anfora, M. Tasin, A. De Cristofaro, P. Witzgall and A. Lucchi. 2011. Chemical ecology and management of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 104(4): 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10443

Islam, M.T. and D.B. Omar. 2012. Combined effect of Beauveria bassiana with neem on virulence of insect in case of two application approaches. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 22(1): 77–82.

Jackman, J.A. and J.K. Olson. 2002. Mosquitoes and the diseases they transmit. Environmental Science, Medicine, Biology. Available at: httpa://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/87148

Jaiswal, A.K., V. Sudan, P. Kumar, A. Srivastava and D. Shanker. 2014. Bovine hypodermosis in indigenous cattle herd and its successful therapeutic management. J. Parasit. Dis., 40(1): 166–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-014-0470-2

Japp, A.K., C. De Lima Bicho and A.V.F. Da Silva. 2010. Importância e medidas de controle para Alphitobius diaperinus em aviários. Ciênc. Rural., 40(7): 1668–1673. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782010005000114

Jarrett, R., M. Erasmus, A. Murillo, K. Scoles, C. Robison, Jones and D. Karcher. 2022. Laying hen production and welfare in a cage-free setting is impacted by the northern fowl mite. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 31(4): 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2022.100290

Jones, P.J., J. Niemi, J. Christensen, R.B. Tranter and R.M. Bennett. 2019. A review of the financial impact of production diseases in poultry production systems. Anim. Prod. Sci., 59(9): 1585. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18281

Jongejan, F. and G. Uilenberg. 1994. Ticks and control methods. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE, 13(4): 1201–1226. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.13.4.818

Jongejan, F. and G. Uilenberg. 2004. The global importance of ticks. Parasitol., 129(S1): S3–S14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005967

Kaufman, P.E. and E.N.I. Weeks. 2012. Horn fly management. EDIS, 2012(10). Available at: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN952 https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-in952-2012

Kaufman, P.E., P.G. Koehler and J.F. Butler. 2006. External parasites on beef cattle. Entomol. Nematol. Dept., Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/IG130 (accessed on 10 November 2013). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ig130-2006

Khan, M.N., M.S. Sajid, Z. Iqbal and M. Anwar. 2007. Emergence season of Hypoderma lineatum warbles in southern Punjab, Pakistan. Anim. Sci. J., 78(2): 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00426.x

Kinzer, H.G. and J.M. Reeves. 1974. Dispersal and host location of the horn fly. Environ. Entomol., 3(1): 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/3.1.107

Knežević, S., M. Pajić, A. Petrović, S. Vidaković, J. Babić, M.Ž. Baloš, I. Pušić, S. Savić and I. Stojanov. 2017. Dermanyssus gallinae – overview: life cycle, morphology, prevalence and control measures in poultry farms. Arch. Vet. Med., 10(2): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.46784/e-avm.v10i2.73

Kotze, A. and P. James. 2021. Control of sheep flystrike: what’s been tried in the past and where to from here. Aust. Vet. J., 100(1–2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13131

Krishan, G. and A. Narang. 2014. Use of essential oils in poultry nutrition: a new approach. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 1(4): 156. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2014.a36

Kuramochi, K. 2000. Survival, ovarian development and bloodmeal size for the horn fly Haematobia irritans irritans reared in vitro. Med. Vet. Entomol., 14(2): 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00224.x

Labrador, M.d.M., J. Doña, D. Serrano and R. Jovani, R. 2021. Quantitative interspecific approach to the stylosphere: Patterns of bacteria and fungi abundance on passerine bird feathers. Microb. Ecol., 81(4): 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01634-2

Lambkin, T.A., R.A. Kopittke, S.J. Rice, J.S. Bartlett and M.P. Zalucki. 2007. Distributions of lesser mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in litter of a compacted earth floor broiler house in subtropical Queensland, Australia. J. Econ. Entomol., 100(4): 1136–1146.

Lara, L. and M. Rostagno. 2013. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animal., 3(2): 356–369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3020356

Linthicum, K.J., S.C. Britch and A. Anyamba. 2016. Rift Valley fever: an emerging mosquito-borne disease. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 61(1): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023819

Makkar, H.P. and P. Ankers. 2014. Towards sustainable animal diets: a survey-based study. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 198: 309–322.

Malhi, K.K., N.U. Durrani, A. Kamboh, A. Lakho, S.H. Abro, N. Soomro, E. Sanjay, K. Singh and K. Malhi. 2015. Prevalence of septic arthritis caused by Staphylococcus aureus in poultry birds at Tandojam, Pakistan. J. Anim. Health Prod., 3(3): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.3.73.77

Masters, S.W., K.J. Knapek and L.V. Kendall. 2020. Rearing Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in a laboratory setting. Lab. Anim. Sci. Prof., 55(6): 42–45.

Mays, A.R., M.A. Brown, D.L. Von Tunglen and C.F. Rosenkrans. 2014. Milk production traits of beef cows as affected by horn fly count and sire breed type. J. Anim. Sci., 92(3): 1208–1212 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7147.

Melo, L.R.B., M.A. Medeiros, L.A.F. Beserra, A.T.M. Barros, F. Riet-Correa, S.S. Azevedo and V.L.R. Vilela. 2020. Development and number of generations of Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae) in bovine fecal masses in the semiarid region of Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep., 20: 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2020.100411

Miles, D., D. Rowe and T. Cathcart. 2011. High litter moisture content suppresses litter ammonia volatilization. Poult. Sci., 90(7): 1397–1405.

Mottet, A. and G. Tempio. 2017. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World Poult. Sci. J., 73(2): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071

Mullen, G.R. and L.A. Durden (Eds.). 2019. Medical and veterinary entomology. Acad. Press., Available at: https://archive.org/details/isbn_2900123725003

Murillo, A.C., M.A. Chappell, J.P. Owen and B.A. Mullens. 2016). Northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) effects on metabolism, body temperatures, skin condition, and egg production as a function of hen MHC haplotype. Poult. Sci., 95(11): 2536-2546.

Murillo, A.C. 2024. Bedbugs of poultry. In: MSD Veterinary Manual. Available at: https://www.msdvetmanual.com/poultry/ectoparasites/bedbugs-of-poultry

Murillo, A.C., A. Abdoli, R.A. Blatchford, E.J. Keogh and A.C. Gerry. 2024. Low levels of chicken body louse (Menacanthus stramineus) infestations affect chicken welfare in a cage-free housing system. Parasit. Vect., 17(1): 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06313-6

Nava, S., A.A. Guglielmone and A.J. Mangold. 2009. An overview of systematics and evolution of ticks. Front. Biosci., 14: 2857–2877. https://doi.org/10.2741/3418

Oliveira, D., L. Alves and Sosa-Gómez. 2014. Advances and perspectives of the use of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae for the control of arthropod pests in poultry production. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 16(1): 01–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2014000100001

Otranto, D., D. Traversa, D.D. Colwell, G. Guan, A. Giangaspero, C. Boulard and H. Yin. 2004. A third species of Hypoderma (Diptera: Oestridae) affecting cattle and yaks in China: molecular and morphological evidence. J. Parasitol., 90(5): 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-232R

Otte, J., J. Rushton, E. Rukambile and R.G. Alders. 2021. Biosecurity in village and other free-range poultry—trying to square the circle? Front. Vet. Sci., 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.678419

Pagès, N. and L.W. Cohnstaedt. 2018. Mosquito-borne diseases in the livestock industry. In: Pests and Vector-Borne Diseases in the Livestock Industry, pp. 195–219. Wageningen Academic https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-863-6_8.

Pal, A. and A. Chakravarty. 2019. Disease-resistant livestock populations—their development and impact on farm economics. In: Genetics and Breeding for Disease Resistance of Livestock, pp. 351–358. Elsevier. Available at: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/genetics-and-breeding-for-disease-resistance-of-livestock/pal/978-0-12-816406-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816406-8.00022-X

Parr, H.C.M. 1962. Studies on Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) in Uganda, East Africa. II.—Notes on life-history and behaviour. Bull. Entomol. Res., 53(2): 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300048239

Patel, T.K. 2023. Entomopathogenic fungi: nature’s secret weapon against agricultural pests. J. Ravishankar Univ., (Part-B), 36(2): 109–125. https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUB.2023-36-2-8

Pavlicevic, A., I. Pavlovic and S. Kulic. 2021. Farmers’ economic interest in Dermanyssus gallinae control. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 37(3): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH2103171P

Pepper, C. and M.W. Dunlop. 2021. Review of litter turning during a grow-out as a litter management practice to achieve dry and friable litter in poultry production. Poult. Sci., 100(6): 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101071

Pereira, R.M., A.S. Taylor, M.P. Lehnert and P.G. Koehler. 2013. Potential population growth and harmful effects on humans from bed bug populations exposed to different feeding regimes. Med. Vet. Entomol., 27(2): 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01057.x

Polanco, A.M., C.C. Brewster and D.M. Miller. 2011. Population growth potential of the bed bug, Cimex lectularius L.: a life table analysis. Insect., 2(2): 173–185.

Polat, B., A. Cengiz, S. Koc, S.K. Kokten, Z.N. Gultekin, C. Caliskan, S.K. Cenkci, T. Yildirim, O. Tufan-Cetin and H. Cetin. 2024. Efficacy of Steinernema feltiae nematode against lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus) populations from poultry farms in Türkiye. Vet. Sci., 11(11): 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11110567

Potter, M.F. 2011. The history of bed bug management. Am. Entomol., 57(1): 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/57.1.14

Poudel, U., U. Dahal, N. Upadhyaya, S. Chaudhari and S. Dhakal. 2020. Livestock and poultry production in Nepal and current status of vaccine development. Vaccin., 8(2): 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8020322

Puvača, N., I. Čabarkapa, A. Petrović, V. Bursić, R. Prodanović, D. Soleša and J. Lević. 2019. Tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) and its essential oil: antimicrobial, antioxidant and acaricidal effects in poultry production. World Poult. Sci. J., 75(2): 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933919000229

Quilicot, A.M.M., Ž. Gottstein, E. Prukner-Radovčić and D.H. Tomić. 2020. Plant-derived products for the control of poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae De Geer, 1778) – a review. World Poult. Sci. J., 76(3): 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1764461

Rajput, Z.I., S. Hu, W. Chen, A.G. Arijo and C. Xiao. 2006. Importance of ticks and their chemical and immunological control in livestock. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B., 7(11): 912–921. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.B0912

Regasa, A. and M. Seboka. 2021. Review on fasciolosis, its effect on meat quality/hazards and economical importance. Environ. Sci. Agric. Food Sci. Med., 10(6): 1–9.

Rehman, A., A.M. Nijhof, C. Sauter-Louis, B. Schauer, C. Staubach and F.J. Conraths. 2017. Distribution of ticks infesting ruminants and risk factors associated with high tick prevalence in livestock farms in the semi-arid and arid agro-ecological zones of Pakistan. Parasit. Vector., 10(1): 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2138-0

Reid, H. 1987. Controlling tick-borne diseases of sheep in Britain. In Pract., 9(5): 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.9.5.189

Reina, D., F.J. Martínez-Moreno, P. Gutierrez-Palomino, P.J. Scholl, S. Hernández-Rodríguez and I. Navarrete. 2000. Experimental bovine hypodermosis in Spain. J. Med. Entomol., 37(2): 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-37.2.210

Renčínová, V., E. Voslářová, I. Bedáňová and V. Večerek. 2021. Pest flies on dairy farms affect behaviour and welfare of dairy cows during summer season. Acta Vet. Brno., 90(3): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202190030255

Rodríguez-Vivas, R.I., L. Grisi, A.A.P. De León, H.S. Villela, J.F. De Jesús Torres-Acosta, H.F. Sánchez, D.R. Salas, R.R. Cruz, F. Saldierna and D.G. Carrasco. 2017. Potential economic impact assessment for cattle parasites in Mexico. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu., 8(1): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i1.4305

Rueda, L. and R.C. Axtell. 1996. Temperature-dependent development and survival of the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus. Med. Vet. Entomol., 10(1): 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00085.x

Rust, M.K. 2017. The biology and ecology of cat fleas and advancements in their pest management: a review. Insect., 8(4): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8040118

Sadiq, M. and B. Mohammed. 2017. The economic impact of some important viral diseases affecting the poultry industry in Abuja, Nigeria. Sokoto J. Vet. Sci., 15(2): 7. https://doi.org/10.4314/sokjvs.v15i2.2

Sammarco, B.C., N.C. Hinkle and M.S. Crossley. 2023. Biology and management of lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in broiler houses. J. Integr. Pest Manag., 14(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmad003

Saxena, A.K., S. Kumar, N. Gupta and R. Singh. 2007. Population expansion of the poultry fluff louse, Goniocotes gallinae (De Geer, 1778) (Ischnocera, Phthiraptera). Zool. Sci., 24(4): 327–330. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.24.327

Schwinghammer, K.A., F.W. Knapp, J.A. Boling and K.K. Schillo. 1986. Physiological and nutritional response of beef steers to infestations of the horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 79(4): 1010–1015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/79.4.1010

Shaikh, F., S. Naz and N.A. Birmani. 2022. New record of chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Insecta) on guinea fowls (Aves: Galliformes) from Sindh, Pakistan. J. Innov. Sci., 8(2): 160–166 https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jis/2022/8.2.160.166

Singh, N., S. Shukla, V. Gupta, N. Tandia and P. Singh. 2015. Mosquito borne zoonotic diseases: a review. J. Livest. Sci., 6: 65–72. Available at: http://livestockscience.in/volumes/ (accessed on 20 June 2021).

Smith, R., R. Hauck, K. Macklin, S. Price, T. Dormitorio and C. Wang. 2021. A review of the lesser mealworm beetle (Alphitobius diaperinus) as a reservoir for poultry bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. World Poult. Sci. J., 78(1): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2022.2003172

Soulsby, E.J.L. 1982. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. 7th ed. CAB International. Available at: https://archive.org/details/helminthsarthrop0000soul_6edi

Sparagano, O., A. Pavlićević, T. Murano, A. Camarda, H. Sahibi, O. Kilpinen, M. Mul, R. Van Emous, S.L. Bouquin, K. Hoel and M.A. Cafiero. 2009. Prevalence and key figures for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae infections in poultry farm systems. In: Springer eBook., pp. 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2731-3_2

Sparagano, O.A.E. and J. Ho. 2020. Parasitic mite fauna in Asian poultry farming systems. Front. Vet. Sci., 7: 400 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00400

Sparagano, O.A.E., D.R. George, D.W.J. Harrington and A. Giangaspero. 2014. Significance and control of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 59: 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162101

Steinfeld, H., P. Gerber, T. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales and C. De Haan. 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Issue 1. Available at: https://www.fao.org/4/a0701e/a0701e00.htm

Stockdale, H.J. and E.S. Raun. 1965. Biology of the chicken body louse, Menacanthus stramineus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 58(6): 802–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/58.6.802

Strother, K.O., C.D. Steelman and E.E. Gbur. 2005. Reservoir competence of lesser mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) for Campylobacter jejuni (Campylobacterales: Campylobacteraceae). J. Med. Entomol., 42(1): 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/42.1.42

Sychra, O., P. Harmat and I. Literák. 2008. Chewing lice (Phthiraptera) on chickens (Gallus gallus) from small backyard flocks in the eastern part of the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol., 152(3–4): 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.001

Sykes, A.R. 1994. Parasitism and production in farm animals. Anim. Sci., 59(2): 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100007649

Tabar, M.M., S.M. Peighambari and S. Bagheri. 2024. Lameness caused by Staphylococcus aureus in poultry: a review. J. Poult. Sci. Avian Dis., 2(1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jpsad.2.1.3

Tariku, F. and T. Rebuma. 2024. A review of Rift Valley fever: its epidemiology and economic impact on livestock. Open Access J. Vet. Sci. Res., 9(2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23880/oajvsr-16000267

Taylor, D.B. 2020. Stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans, Muscidae). In: Elsevier eBooks, pp. 903–913. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article/12/1/38/6412693

Taylor, D.B., R.D. Moon and D.R. Mark. 2012. Economic impact of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy and beef cattle production. J. Med. Entomol., 49(1): 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1603/ME10050

Thornton, P.K. and M. Herrero. 2010. Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107(46): 19667–19672. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912890107

Tomberlin, J.K. 2023. Protecting cattle from horn flies. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/200483

Touré, S.M. 1994. Les myiases d’importance économique. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE, 13(4): 1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.13.4.812

Turner, E.C. 1986. Structural and litter pests. Poult. Sci., 65(4): 644–648. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0650644

Udhayavel, S., K. Senthilvel, T.R.G. Murthy and V. Gowthaman. 2019. Sticktight flea (Echidnophaga gallinacea) infestation in desi chicken—a case report. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 7: 484–485.

Ulrichs, V.C. and I. Mewis. 2000. Behandlung von Reis mit Neem und Diatomeenerde zur Bekämpfung der vorratsschädlichen Coleopteren Sitophilus oryzae und Tribolium castaneum. Anz. Schädlingskd., 73(2): 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00037.x

Vaughan, J., E. Turner and P. Ruszler. 1984. Infestation and damage of poultry house insulation by the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer). Poult. Sci., 63(6): 1094–1100. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0631094

Vezzoli, G., A.J. King and J.A. Mench. 2016. The effect of northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) infestation on hen physiology, physical condition, and egg quality. Poult. Sci., 95(5): 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew027

Votýpka, J. and A.D. Mihalca. 2020. Horn flies (Haematobia and Haematobosca). In: N. Rezaei (ed.), Encyclopedia of Infection and Immunity, Vol. 2, pp. 895–902. Oxford, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818731-9.00021-5

Wahjono, T.E., Y. Yuliani and N. Hadiyanto. 2024. Beauveria bassiana; insect pathogen and biopesticide producer as an effective and environmentally friendly alternative for biological control. J. Ilmiah Agrineca, 24(1): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.36728/afp.v24i1.2885

Wang, C.M. 1964. Laboratory observations on the life history and habits of the face fly, Musca autumnalis (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 57(5): 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/57.5.563

Weeks, E.N., E.T. Machtinger, D. Leemon and C.J. Geden. 2018. Biological control of livestock pests: entomopathogens. In: Pests and vector-borne diseases in the livestock industry, pp. 337–387. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-863-6_12

Wieman, G.A., J.B. Campbell, J.A. Deshazer and I.L. Berry. 1992. Effects of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and heat stress on weight gain and feed efficiency of feeder cattle. J. Econ. Entomol., 85(5): 1835–1842. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/85.5.1835

Wolf, J., A. De Gouvea, E.R.L. Da Silva, M. Potrich and A. Appel. 2014. Métodos físicos e cal hidratada para manejo do cascudinho dos aviários. Ciênc. Rural, 44(1): 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782014000100026

Wolfe, L.S. 1959. Observations on the histopathological changes caused by the larvae of Hypoderma bovis (L.) and Hypoderma lineatum (De Vill.) (Diptera: Oestridae) in tissues of cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 39(2): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas59-020

Wrzecińska, M., E. Czerniawska-Piątkowska and A. Kowalczyk. 2021. The impact of stress and selected environmental factors on cows’ reproduction. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 49(1): 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1960842

Xu, Y., L. Ma, S. Liu, Y. Liang, Q. Liu, Z. He and F. Song. 2024. Chromosome-level genome of the poultry shaft louse Menopon gallinae provides insight into the host-switching and adaptive evolution of parasitic lice. Giga. Sci., 13: giae004. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giae004

Yadav, A., R. Panadero, R. Katoch, R. Godara and E. Cabanelas. 2017. Myiasis of domestic and wild ruminants caused by Hypodermatinae in the Mediterranean and Indian subcontinent. Vet. Parasitol., 243: 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.07.007

Yang, H., S.K. Dey, R. Buchanan and D. Biswas. 2014. Pests in poultry, poultry product-borne infection and future precautions. In: Agric. Food Sci., pp. 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474563.ch26

Yitbarek, M.B., B.T. Mersso and A.M. Wosen. 2016. Disease management and biosecurity measures of small-scale commercial poultry farms in and around Debre Markos, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health., 8(10): 136–144. https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2016.0515

Yuval, B. and A. Spielman. 1990. Duration and regulation of the developmental cycle of Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol., 27(2): 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/27.2.196

Zhou, Z., B. Shen and D. Bi. 2020. Management of pathogens in poultry. In Elsevier Book., (pp. 515–530). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00030-6

Zhu, J.J. and H.J. Wang. 2024. Semiochemicals and natural repellents in biting fly management. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci., 64: 101223. Available at: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/38908821 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2024.101223