Research Article

Integrated In silico and In vitro Evaluation of the Antiviral Potential of Hibiscus sabdariffa Ethanolic Extract Against Tobacco Mosaic Virus

Amira M. Abo Saif1, Alshaymaa I. Ahmed1, Atef S. Sadik2, Allam A. Megahed3* and Shimaa K. Ali1

1Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Beni-Suef University (62511), Egypt; 2Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Laboratory of Virology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, P.O. Box 68, Hadayek Shobra, Cairo, Egypt; 3Agricultural Botany Department (Plant Pathology), Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, New Damietta (P.B.34517), Egypt.

Abstract | Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is a major plant pathogen causing significant agricultural losses. Roselle-derived phytochemicals, including flavonoids and phenolic acids, are recognized for their broad-spectrum antiviral properties. This study aimed to evaluate the antiviral potential of Hibiscus sabdariffa ethanolic extract against TMV using integrated in silico and in vitro approaches. In addition, the bioactive compounds gallic acid, hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin were investigated through molecular docking and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity (ADMET)/pharmacokinetic profiling against TMV coat, movement, and replicase proteins. Molecular docking was performed to assess binding affinities and interaction patterns of selected compounds with TMV proteins. ADMET analysis (Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity analysis) evaluated drug-likeness, absorption, and toxicity profiles relative to acyclovir. Gallic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin complied with Lipinski’s Rule of Five and exhibited a favorable absorption, whereas hesperidin showed poor gastrointestinal absorption and potential toxicity risks. Docking revealed that hesperidin had the strongest binding affinity (replicase BA = −9.1 kcal/mol), followed by quercetin (−8.5 kcal/mol), and kaempferol (−7.7 kcal/mol), indicating potential inhibition of viral RNA synthesis and systemic spread. Gallic acid displayed moderate affinity (−6.5 kcal/mol), while acyclovir exhibited the weakest binding. Interaction analysis showed extensive hydrogen bonding, π-interactions, and hydrophobic contacts for Roselle compounds, particularly hesperidin, which formed multiple bonds with the catalytically relevant residues. Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) values of zero confirmed stable docking conformations. ADMET profiling highlighted possible CYP enzyme inhibition by kaempferol and quercetin, suggesting a caution for drug–drug interactions. Overall, Roselle compounds demonstrated stronger and more diverse interactions than acyclovir, indicating multi-target antiviral potential. In vitro, the ethanolic Roselle extract showed a strong, dose-dependent antiviral effect against TMV on Datura metel leaves, supporting its potential as a natural source of bioactive compounds for plant viral control. Roselle-derived phytochemicals, especially hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin, exhibited a promising antiviral activity against TMV through stable, multi-type interactions with the viral coat, movement, and replicase proteins. Their favorable pharmacokinetic profiles (except hesperidin) and superior docking performance compared to acyclovir support their development as natural antiviral agents for plant protection. Further in vivo validation, formulation, optimization, and toxicological studies are recommended to confirm the efficacy, safety, and bioavailability of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds as potential antiviral agents against TMV under field conditions.


Received | April 12, 2026; Revised | May 17, 2026; Accepted | May 25, 2026; Published | June 04, 2026

*Correspondence | Allam A. Megahed, Agricultural Botany Department (Plant Pathology), Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, New Damietta (P.B.34517), Egypt; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Abo Saif, A.M., A.I. Ahmed, A.S. Sadik, A.A. Megahed and S.K. Ali. 2026. Integrated in silico and in vitro evaluation of the antiviral potential of Hibiscus sabdariffa ethanolic extract against Tobacco mosaic virus. Novel Research in Microbiology Journal, 10(3): 286-310.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.nrmj/2026/10.3.286.310

Keywords | ADMET profiling, Roselle-derived phytochemicals, Tobacco mosaic virus, Molecular docking, Natural antiviral agents, Plant protection

Copyright: 2026 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Plant viruses, particularly Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), present remarkable challenges to global agriculture, causing substantial yield losses in crops such as tobacco, tomatoes, and peppers (Megahed et al., 2019; Jones, 2021; Petrov et al., 2024; Angira et al., 2025). TMV is a single-stranded RNA virus that encodes several proteins essential for its replication and systemic movement within the plant tissues (Peña and Heinlein, 2012). Among these, the coat protein (CP), movement protein (MP), and replication proteins are critical for viral infectivity and represent prime targets for antiviral interventions (Dorokhov et al., 2020; Schlicksup and Zlotnick, 2020).

While the chemical pesticides have traditionally been used to manage plant viral infections, concerns over their environmental impact and the development of resistance have driven the search for alternative eco-friendly solutions (Souto et al., 2021; Chowdhury et al., 2024). Phytochemicals derived from plants have emerged as promising candidates due to their bioactivity, biodegradability, and sustainability (El-Dougdoug et al., 2013; Megahed et al., 2023; Beyari, 2025; Hamden et al., 2026). Hibiscus species, particularly H. sabdariffa (roselle) and H. rosa-sinensis, are rich sources of bioactive compounds, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, and anthocyanins (Jabeur et al., 2017; Duque-Soto et al., 2023; Mejía et al., 2023; Raza et al., 2025). These compounds are known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral potentials (El-Shiekh et al., 2020; Bala et al., 2022; Alharbi et al., 2024).

Recent studies suggest that Hibiscus extracts can modulate plant-pathogen interactions and enhance plant defense mechanisms, making them potential natural agents for managing viral infections (Calefi et al., 2025). For instance, aqueous extracts of H. sabdariffa calyces have been shown to substantially reduce viral titers in various plant viruses, with bioactive compounds such as ferulic acid, protocatechuic acid, and malic acid playing key roles in these antiviral effects (Davidova et al., 2024). Different natural plant extracts reduced TMV activity, likely through direct interactions between their phytochemicals and the viral proteins (Jing et al., 2012; Islam et al., 2018). In line with this, Abdelkhalek et al., (2021) demonstrated that the methanol extract of Paronychia argentea effectively reduced TMV accumulation by 77.88% in tomato plants under greenhouse conditions. Moreover, this extract induced systemic resistance, as reflected by increased activities of antioxidant enzymes and upregulation of defense-related genes. Collectively, these findings highlight the potential of plant-derived extracts as safe and effective sources of bioactive compounds for the management of viral infections in plants, offering a promising alternative to chemical control strategies.

Given the promising antiviral potential of H. sabdariffa (Roselle) phytochemicals, this study aimed to evaluate their potential anti-TMV activity through integrated in silico and in vitro approaches. Molecular docking and ADMET analyses were performed to predict the interactions of selected phytochemicals with TMV coat, movement, and replication proteins, while experimental in vitro assays were conducted to validate their antiviral activity. This integrated approach may contribute to the development of novel plant-based antiviral strategies for the sustainable management of plant viral diseases.

Materials and Methods

All experiments included in this study were conducted during the period 2025–2026 at the Virology Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, and the Plant Clinic, Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University.

Molecular docking analysis

Selection of bioactive ligands

A literature survey was conducted to identify bioactive compounds from H. sabdariffa with reported antiviral activity, with the aim of selecting promising candidates for subsequent in silico studies (Hassan et al., 2017; Jabeur et al., 2017; El-Shiekh et al., 2020). Based on these findings, five compounds were selected: Gallic acid, hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin-derived from H. sabdariffa along with acyclovir, which was included as a reference antiviral drug. These compounds were selected due to their documented antiviral, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties.

Prediction of pharmacokinetics and ADMET profiles

The pharmacokinetic and ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) properties of the selected compounds were evaluated using the SwissADME web server (http://www.swissadme.ch). SMILES codes from PubChem were used as input. Parameters assessed included molecular weight, number of rotatable bonds, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, gastrointestinal absorption, blood-brain barrier penetration, Cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibition (CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4), compliance with Lipinski’s Rule of Five, and predicted toxicity. Results were compiled to compare drug-likeness, oral bioavailability, metabolic stability, and safety profiles. All compounds met Lipinski’s criteria and were predicted to be non-toxic.

Preparation of ligand structures

2D chemical structures were retrieved from PubChem and converted to 3D models using Open Babel (GitHub, openbabel.org). Energy minimization was performed with the MMFF94 force field to optimize the geometry. The ligands were saved in PDBQT format for molecular docking analysis (Daina et al., 2017; Abdel Razek et al., 2025).

Modeling of TMV target proteins

Three TMV proteins were selected as targets: Replicase (WCO04976.1), Movement protein (WCO04978.1), and Coat protein (WCO04977.1). Sequences were obtained from NCBI and 3D structures, and were generated via homology modeling using SWISS-Model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org) and AlphaFold (https://alphafold.com). Structural quality was validated through Ramachandran plots and PROCHECK to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Molecular docking procedure

Molecular docking simulations were performed using AutoDock Vina. Protein structures were prepared by removing water molecules, adding polar hydrogen atoms, and assigning Kollman charges using AutoDock Tools. Ligands were prepared by assigning Gasteiger charges and defining rotatable bonds to ensure conformational flexibility. The docking grid boxes were generated based on the predicted active sites of the target proteins, with coordinates and dimensions selected to fully encompass the catalytic or ligand-binding regions. Active-site residues were identified based on reported literature and structural analysis of the conserved functional domains. All docking calculations were performed using default AutoDock Vina parameters, and binding affinities (kcal/mol) were recorded for each ligand–protein complex.

Assessment of docking performance

Docking results were analyzed by comparing binding affinities and interaction profiles of all tested compounds against the TMV proteins. RMSD values were used to evaluate the reliability and the reproducibility of the docking poses. RMSD values ≤ 2.0 Å were considered indicative of stable and consistent binding conformations, while lower values reflected higher docking precision.

Visualization and interaction analysis

Docking poses were visualized using PyMOL (https://pymol.org) and Discovery Studio Visualizer (https://discover.3ds.com/discovery-studio-visualizer-download) to analyze ligand orientations and interaction patterns within the binding pockets. Hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and other non-covalent interactions were identified, and the key interacting amino acid residues were recorded to highlight the most promising antiviral candidates.

In vitro evaluation of anti-TMV activity of H. sabdariffa ethanolic extract

Plant material

Dried leaves of H. sabdariffa were obtained from a locally authenticated market (Cairo, Egypt). The plant material was thoroughly washed with distilled water, shade-dried at room temperature, and ground into a fine powder using a sterile electric grinder. The powdered material was stored in airtight containers at room temperature until further use.

Preparation of ethanolic extract

The dried powdered material was homogenized in 70% ethanol (1:5, w/v) under aseptic conditions using a mortar and pestle. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 48 h with occasional stirring, followed by filtration through sterile gauze and centrifugation at 800 xg for 5 min. The supernatant was concentrated by evaporation at low heat using a ventilated setup to remove ethanol. The resulting crude extract was reconstituted in 10 ml sterile distilled water and stored at 4 °C until further use (Elhalag et al., 2025).

Preparation of extract dilutions

Serial two-fold dilutions of the ethanolic extract were prepared (1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, and 1:64) by mixing equal volumes of the extract and sterile distilled water in a stepwise manner under aseptic conditions.

Virus inoculum preparation

Tobacco mosaic virus infected sap was obtained from the Virology Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University. The inoculum was prepared 14 days post-inoculation as previously described by Ahmed et al. (2024), and maintained at 4 oC until use.

Treatment preparation

Equal volumes (750 µl) of TMV-infected sap were mixed with each extract dilution and incubated at 4°C for 24 h to allow interaction between the viral particles and the plant extract constituents prior to inoculation.

Leaf inoculation and experimental design

For bioassay evaluation, 250 µl of each treatment mixture were mechanically applied to the surface of Datura metel leaves cultivated in the greenhouse of the Virology laboratory, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Egypt, a local lesion host for TMV. Young Datura metel plants at the 4–5 leaf stage were used to ensure uniform physiological age and consistent susceptibility to the viral infection. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design with three biological replicate per treatment. Inoculated plants were maintained under controlled greenhouse conditions and the development of necrotic local lesions was recorded daily for 10 days (Megahed et al., 2013a).

Data collection and statistical analysis

The number of developing necrotic local lesions (NLL) per leaf was recorded for each treatment and mean values were calculated. Percentage inhibition of TMV infection was determined relative to the untreated infected control (Megahed et al., 2013b). Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software (version XX; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Prior to analysis, data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance to ensure that the assumptions of parametric testing were satisfied. Differences among treatment means were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant differences were observed (P ≤ 0.05), Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was applied for post-hoc pairwise comparisons among treatment groups. Dose–response relationships were analyzed using probit analysis. Inhibition percentages were converted into probit units and concentrations were log-transformed. A linear regression model (Y= a + bX) was applied, where Y represents the probit response and X represents the logarithm of concentration, a= the intercept (constant term), and b= the slope (regression coefficient). Effective doses (ED₅₀ and ED₉₀) were estimated from the regression equations and the goodness of fit was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²). All statistical tests were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Selection of bioactive ligands from H. sabdariffa

The literature survey presented in Table 1 highlights the broad-spectrum antiviral potential of the selected bioactive compounds derived from H. sabdariffa, particularly gallic acid, hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin. These compounds have been previously reported to exhibit antiviral activities against a diverse range of RNA and DNA viruses, including human pathogens such as influenza A (H1N1) (You et al., 2018), hepatitis C virus (HCV) (Govea-Salas et al., 2016), herpes simplex virus (HSV) (Ürményi et al., 2016; Alhemaly and Sofy, 2024), and Zika virus (ZIKV) (Wong et al., 2017), along with plant viruses such as TMV (Malhotra et al., 1996; Chojnacka et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2021). This diversity in antiviral targets suggests that these phytochemicals may act through conserved or multi-target mechanisms, enhancing their potential as antiviral agents. Overall, the integration of literature-based evidence with molecular docking findings strengthens the hypothesis that these bioactive compounds can act as effective antiviral agents. Their structural diversity, multi-target potential, and favorable binding characteristics make them promising candidates for further experimental validation, including in vitro or in vivo studies. Accordingly, these compounds were selected as potent antiviral candidates and subsequently utilized in the present study to evaluate their potential inhibitory activity against the target viral protein using in silico molecular docking approaches.

Computational assessment of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds targeting TMV proteins

ADMET analysis and antiviral potential of H. sabdariffa compounds

The ADMET and pharmacokinetic profiles presented in Table 2 highlight the potential drug-likeness characteristics of several H. sabdariffa-derived phytochemicals, compared to the reference antiviral compound acyclovir, which was used as a standard control for benchmarking binding affinity and interaction profiles in the molecular docking studies. Although acyclovir is primarily active against plant RNA (Ahmed et al., 2024; Mahmoud et al., 2025; Megahed et al., 2025) and DNA (Abdel Razek et al., 2025; Elshaer et al., 2025) viruses, it had been widely employed in docking-based studies as a reference compound to provide a consistent comparative framework for evaluating the ligand–protein interactions across the different viral systems (Lipinski, 2004; Daina et al., 2017). Among the tested compounds, gallic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin demonstrated compliance with Lipinski’s Rule of Five (Kitchen et al., 2004) and exhibited favorable predicted absorption properties, suggesting their potential suitability for oral administration. In contrast, hesperidin showed less favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, including high molecular weight and an increased number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, which may contribute to its predicted poor gastrointestinal absorption and potential toxicity risk (Meng et al., 2011). Overall, these findings provide preliminary insights into the pharmacokinetic behavior and safety profile of the investigated compounds, supporting their further evaluation as potential antiviral agents in the plant-based therapeutic strategies.

 

Table ١: Antiviral activities of selected bioactive compounds from H. sabdariffa against various human and plant viruses based on literature survey.

Bioactive compounds

Antiviral activities

References

Gallic-acid

Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) 

Choi et al. (2010)

Influenza A (H1N1) virus

You et al. (2018)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)

Govea-Salas et al. (2016)

Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)

Chojnacka et al. (2021)

Hesperidin

Herpes simplex virus (HSV)

Alhemaly and Sofy (2024)

Feline Calicivirus

Choi et al. (2025)

Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)

Sun et al. (2021)

Kaempferol

HSV-1 and HSV-2

Ürményi et al. (2016)

Murine norovirus (MNV)

Shahrajabian et al. (2022)

Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)

Li et al. (2021)

Quercetin

Zika virus (ZIKV)

Wong et al. (2017)

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV)

Kim et al. (2020)

Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)

Malhotra et al. (1996)

 

Table 2: ADMET, pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds vs. acyclovir.

Property

Gallic acid

Hesperidin

Kaempferol

Quercetin

Acyclovir (Control)

Molecular weight (g/mol)

170.12

610.56

286.24

302.24

225.20

Rotatable bonds

1

7

1

1

4

H-Bond acceptors

5

15

6

7

5

H-Bond donors

4

8

4

5

3

GI absorption

High

Low

High

High

High

BBB permeability

No

No

No

No

No

CYP1A2 inhibition

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

CYP2C19 inhibition

No

No

No

No

No

CYP2C9 inhibition

No

No

No

No

No

CYP2D6 inhibition

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

CYP3A4 inhibition

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Lipinski compliance

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Toxicity

Non-toxic

Toxic

Non-toxic

Non-toxic

Non-toxic

 

From a plant protection perspective, these ADMET predictions also provide valuable preliminary insights into the potential environmental safety and practical applicability of the investigated compounds. Phytochemicals exhibiting favorable drug-likeness properties, such as gallic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin, may also be associated with lower environmental persistence and reduced phytotoxic risk, supporting their suitability for sustainable agricultural applications. Conversely, compounds with less favorable pharmacokinetic profiles may display limited bioavailability under field conditions, although their environmental behavior requires further investigation. These observations may further assist in guiding the future formulation strategies for the development of safe and effective plant-based antiviral agents. From the metabolic interaction standpoint, the inhibitory potential of kaempferol and quercetin towards CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 enzymes raises considerations for drug-drug interactions that should be developed further. This is consistent with previous studies indicating that flavonoids such as kaempferol may interfere with viral life cycles partly via modulation of host metabolic or signaling pathways (Castro e Silva et al., 2022; Periferakis et al., 2023; Elshaer et al., 2025). For example, kaempferol has been shown to inhibit reactivation of the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) by down-regulating Sp1 promoter activity, and accordingly, the viral lytic gene expression (Wu et al., 2022). Similarly, gallic acid has demonstrated virucidal and replication-blocking activities against a range of DNA and RNA viruses in vitro (Uozaki et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2010; Megahed et al., 2025). Moreover, quercetin has been reported to exert antiviral effects by modulating host immune responses, such as induction of type I interferon signaling in fish infected with iridovirus (Huang et al., 2022). These findings support the notion that natural phenolic compounds may exert multifaceted antiviral mechanisms, including direct viral inhibition, interference with viral protein synthesis, and modulation of host defenses (Nasr-Eldin et al., 2019; Abozaid et al., 2025), which align with our molecular docking rationale study targeting viral proteins of TMV. The predicted safety profiles further supported the potential of the tested compounds, with all compounds except hesperidin, shown expected low toxicity and favorable drug-likeness characteristics.

Hence, gallic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin emerge as promising leads worthy of further experimental interrogation in the context of viral infections (You et al., 2018; Periferakis et al., 2023). Hesperidin, in contrast, may require formulation improvements (e.g., pro-drug approach, nanocarrier delivery) or structural modification to overcome its absorption and toxicity limitations. Finally, the comparative performance of acyclovir in this study serves as a valuable benchmark, attributed to its full compliance with Lipinski parameters, high predicted oral bioavailability, and minimal Cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition, reflecting its well-established pharmacological reliability. The fact that the H. sabdariffa -derived compounds have shown similar or near-similar drug-like profiles are encouraging for their future development.

In conclusion, our ADMET/pharmacokinetic profiling supports the advancement of H. sabdariffa-derived compounds, particularly gallic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin, as prospective antiviral agents, deserving further in vivo validation, formulation optimization, and toxicological studies. Hesperidin may still hold potential but requires more careful optimization before use.

Molecular docking of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds against TMV proteins

The current molecular docking of H. sabdariffa -derived bioactive compounds, mainly gallic acid, hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin-against key TMV proteins (i.e., coat protein, movement protein, and replicase) revealed distinct differences in their binding affinity and potential antiviral activity (Table 3). The polar surface area (PSA) of these compounds ranged from 97.99 Ų (gallic acid) to 234 Ų (hesperidin), reflecting differences in size and polarity that can influence both binding interactions and bioavailability. Hesperidin displayed the strongest binding affinity across all the tested TMV proteins, particularly with replicase (BA = -9.1 kcal/mol; DS = -9.5), suggesting its potential inhibitory effect on viral RNA replication. Quercetin and kaempferol also demonstrated notable binding affinities, especially toward replicase (BA= -8.5 and -7.7 kcal/mol, respectively), indicating their potential to interfere with viral replication and systemic spread. Gallic acid showed moderate interactions (BA= -6.5 kcal/mol with replicase), whereas the reference antiviral acyclovir exhibited lower binding affinities across all the tested proteins, underscoring the promising potential of the H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds. RMSD values were 0 for all ligand-

 

Table 3: Molecular docking of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds against TMV proteins (i.e., coat, movement, and replicase).

Ligands

Polar surface area (Å)

Virtual screening and docking score

Coat-protein

Movement

Replicase

RMSD/ub

RMSD/lb

BA

DS

BA

DS

BA

DS

Gallic-acid

97.99

-5.0

X

-5.1

X

-6.5

-6.5

0

0

Hesperidin

234

-7.8

-7.9

-6.9

-7.0

-9.1

-9.5

0

0

Kaempferol

111.13

-7.0

-6.7

-6.2

-6.2

-7.7

-8.5

0

0

Quercetin

127

-7.1

-6.8

-6.3

-6.3

-8.5

-8.6

0

0

Acyclovir

119

-5.0

-5.2

-5.2

-4.8

-5.4

-6.4

0

0

 

BA: Binding affinity, DS: Docking score, RMSD/ub: Root mean square deviation/ Upper bound, RMSD/lb: Root mean square deviation/Lower bound.

 

protein interactions, indicating stable and consistent docking conformations. These obtained results suggest that strong binding to replicase, coat, and movement proteins could disrupt multiple stages of TMV infection, including viral RNA synthesis, virion assembly, and cell-to-cell movement. While hesperidin’s high PSA (234 Ų), which refers to polar surface area and was associated with reduced passive membrane permeability, may limit its ability to cross biological membranes; however, its strong binding interactions suggested its potential efficacy if suitable delivery methods are employed. In contrast, gallic acid, with a lower PSA, may exhibit better bioavailability but relatively weaker antiviral interactions. The observed docking patterns align with a previous study demonstrating the antiviral potential of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds against several viral pathogens (Hassan et al., 2017). Kaempferol has been reported to inhibit Epstein–Barr virus reactivation and other viral infections by modulating viral replication and host signaling pathways (Lu et al. 2024; Hassan, 2025). Quercetin has demonstrated antiviral efficacy against grouper iridovirus through activation of host defense mechanisms (Huang et al., 2025), while gallic acid exhibits broad-spectrum antiviral potency, including inhibition of human viruses (Naithani et al., 2008; Choi et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2020). Collectively, these findings indicate that hesperidin, quercetin, and kaempferol possess favorable binding characteristics toward TMV proteins, potentially outperforming acyclovir in this context. This supports their development as natural antiviral agents for plant protection, although in planta validation and formulation optimization are recommended to confirm their efficacy and bioavailability.

Amino acid interactions of H. sabdariffa compounds with TMV coat protein

Table 4 and Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the amino acid interactions and bonding patterns of selected H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds (i.e., hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin) along with the control drug acyclovir with the TMV-CP. The diversity and nature of these interactions such as hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and electrostatic forces- provide valuable insights into the stability and specificity of the ligand–protein binding, which are crucial for the antiviral activity (Ferreira et al., 2015). Among the tested H. sabdariffa compounds, hesperidin formed the highest number of interactions with the TMV-CP, including multiple conventional hydrogen bonds (with ARG:A42, GLN:A39, GLN:A37, ASN:A92, and THR:A112) and alkyl interactions (ILE:A95, PRO:A103, VAL:A97), along with a π-anion interaction with GLU:A96. This extensive bonding network indicates strong stabilization of the ligand within the active pocket of the viral coat protein (Du et al., 2016), suggesting potential interference with the capsid assembly or stability. The presence of multiple hydrogen bonds may also contribute to the hesperidin’s high docking affinity observed earlier (BA= –9.1 kcal/mol), supporting its role as a potent inhibitor candidate. Kaempferol and quercetin, both are flavonoids, also exhibited remarkable binding interactions.

 

Table 4: Amino acid interactions and bonding patterns of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds and acyclovir with TMV-CP.

Amino acids

Sites

Type of bonds

Hesperidin

ARG

A:42

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLN

A:39

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Pi- Donor Hydrogen Bond

GLN

A:37

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ASN

A:92

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

THR

A:112

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLU

A:96

Pi-Anion

ILE

A:95

Alkyl

PRO

A:103

Alkyl

VAL

A:97

Alkyl

Kaempferol

GLU

A:96

Attractive Charge, Pi-Anion

ASN

A:92

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLN

A:39

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Positive-Positive, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

ARG

A:42

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Positive-Positive, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

Quercetin

GLU

A:96

Attractive Charge, Pi-Anion

ARG

A:42

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ASN

A:92

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

ARG

A:91

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLN

A:39

Unfavorable Donor-Donor, Pi-Door Hydrogen bound

Acyclovir

GLU

A:96

Attractive charge, Pi-Anion

GLN

A:39

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ASN

A:92

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

THR

A:38

Carbon Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:91

Unfavorable Positive-Positive

 

ARG: Arginine, ASN: Asparagine, GLN: Glutamine, GLU: Glutamic Acid, ILE: Isoleucine, PRO: Proline, THR: Threonine, VAL: Valine.

 

 

 

Kaempferol formed key hydrogen bonds with GLN:A39, ASN:A92, and ARG:A42, as well as π-anion, and attractive charge interactions with GLU:A96. Similarly, quercetin showed strong hydrogen bonding with ARG:A42, ARG:A91, and ASN:A92, alongside an electrostatic (π-anion) interaction with GLU:A96. These results indicate that both flavonoids stabilize through polar and charged interactions, which may inhibit the coat protein-mediated viral assembly. Comparable binding residues among these compounds suggest a shared binding site, possibly at the active or the allosteric region of the CP. The control compound, acyclovir, showed fewer interactions, forming conventional hydrogen bonds with GLN:A39 and ASN:A92 and a carbon hydrogen bond with THR:A38. Although acyclovir had also interacted electrostatically with GLU:A96, its overall interaction network was less complex, consistent with its lower binding affinity values (BA = –5.4 kcal/mol). This contrast underscores the stronger potential of H. sabdariffa -derived phytochemicals as natural antiviral agents against TMV. The present findings are consistent with earlier studies that highlighted the antiviral potential of several plant-derived phytochemicals (Di Petrillo et al., 2022; Alhemaly and Sofy, 2024; Kowalczyk, 2024; Choi et al., 2025). Kaempferol, for example, has been documented to suppress Epstein–Barr virus reactivation and other viral infections by influencing viral gene regulation and strengthening host immune defense mechanisms (Wu et al., 2022). Likewise, quercetin manifests a wide antiviral spectrum, disrupting viral replication in influenza and irido viruses through its affinity for viral proteins and ability to enhance antioxidant enzyme activity in the host cells (Mehrbod et al., 2020). Hesperidin has also demonstrated a strong tendency to bind with viral polymerases and structural components, thereby impairing the replication process of several RNA viruses (Agrawal et al., 2021). Although gallic acid is not included in the present interaction analysis, earlier reports confirmed its efficacy against both DNA and RNA viruses, mainly through mechanisms associated with redox balance and oxidative stress regulation (Choi et al., 2010; Govea-Salas et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017).

Overall, the interaction patterns observed for hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin with TMV-CP residues suggest the formation of stable, multi-type bonds, primarily hydrogen and those electrostatic in nature, which could interfere with virion assembly or stability. These molecular behaviors emphasize the potential of H. sabdariffa derived compounds as promising natural antiviral candidates that might exhibit superior protein-binding efficiency compared to conventional synthetic antivirals such as acyclovir.

Interaction analysis of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds with TMV movement protein

Molecular docking analysis of H. sabdariffa-derived bioactive compounds with the TMV movement protein revealed diverse binding interactions involving hydrogen bonds, π-interactions, and hydrophobic contacts (Table 5 and, Figures 3 and 4). Among the tested ligands, hesperidin displayed the strongest binding affinity, characterized by multiple conventional hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions with residues TYR(A:109), ALA(A:111), and CYS(A:84). The presence of π–sulfur and π–π stacking interactions with PHE(A:117) and CYS(A:84) further enhances the structural stability of the hesperidin protein complex (Salentin et al., 2015). These multifaceted interactions suggest that hesperidin may effectively block or destabilize the movement protein’s functional conformation; thereby, impeding viral cell to cell translocation. Kaempferol and quercetin also formed stable interactions with key amino acid residues in the movement protein’s binding pocket. Kaempferol displayed hydrogen bonding with ARG(A:116) and GLY(A:87) and π-interactions with aromatic residues TRP(A:78) and LYS(A:114), suggesting strong affinity and potential to interfere with the viral RNA binding or the transport functions. Quercetin showed a similar interaction profile, forming hydrogen and π–π interactions with residues THR(A:110), SER(A:89), and TRP(A:78), implying that its binding may inhibit the protein’s structural flexibility required for efficient viral movement. In contrast, acyclovir, the standard antiviral control, exhibited a comparatively weaker binding, involving a few hydrogen bonds with LYS(A:95), ASP(A:94), and VAL(A:93), accompanied by unfavorable donor–donor and electrostatic repulsions with GLU(A:98) and MET(A:97). This observation supports the hypothesis that the plant-derived flavonoids and polyphenols may express stronger, more stable molecular interactions with the TMV proteins than the traditional antiviral compounds. These results corroborate earlier reports that flavonoids such as hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin can exert antiviral effects by binding to key viral proteins and obstructing their replication or movement mechanisms (Khazdair et al., 2021; Di Petrillo et al., 2022; Shahrajabian et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2025).

Furthermore, the involvement of aromatic residues and π-interactions aligns with previous docking and biochemical studies highlighting the role of these interactions in stabilizing the protein–ligand complexes of the viral targets (Castro e Silva et al., 2022; Periferakis et al., 2023). Overall, these findings suggest that H. sabdariffa derived phytochemicals, particularly hesperidin and kaempferol, possess promising antiviral potential through strong, multi-type interactions with the the TMV movement

 

Table 5: Amino acid interactions and bonding patterns of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds and acyclovir with TMV movement protein.

Amino acids

Sites

Type of bonds

Hesperidin

TYR

A:109

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Alkyl

CYS

A:84

Pi-Sulfur

PHE

A:117

Pi-Pi Stacked

ALA

A:111

Alkyl

Kaempferol

GLY

A:87

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:116

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

LYS

A:114

Pi-Alkyl

TRP

A:78

Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Pi T-Shaped

SER

A:89

Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond

Quercetin

THR

A:110

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

SER

A:89

Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond

TRP

A:78

Pi-Pi T-Shaped

Acyclovir

LYS

A:95

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Positive-Positive

ASP

A:94

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

VAL

A:93

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLU

A:98

Unfavorable Positive-Positive, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

MET

A:97

Unfavorable Positive-Positive, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

 

ALA: Alanine, ARG: Arginine, ASP: Aspartic Acid, CYS: Cysteine, GLU: Glutamic Acid, GLY: Glycine, LYS: Lysine, MET: Methionine, PHE: Phenylalanine, SER: Serine, THR: Threonine, TRP: Tryptophan, TYR: Tyrosine, VAL: Valine.

 

protein. Such interactions may inhibit the intercellular spread of the virus, providing a molecular basis for their use as natural antiviral agents in plant protection controls.

Molecular interactions of H. sabdariffa compounds with TMV replicase protein: Insights potential

Molecular docking of the H. sabdariffa derived bioactive compounds (i.e., gallic acid, hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin) with the TMV replicase protein (Table 6 and Figures 5 and 6) revealed diverse interaction networks, primarily dominated by hydrogen bonding, π–cation, and hydrophobic interactions. These bonds are essential for stabilizing the ligand–protein complexes (Du et al., 2016) and indicate strong binding potential at catalytically relevant residues of the viral replicase. Hesperidin exhibited the most extensive binding network among all the tested compounds, forming multiple conventional hydrogen bonds with residues such as GLN936, GLU1045, THR1046, and ARG868, along with π–cation interactions with LYS839 and ARG968. These findings suggest that hesperidin interacts at multiple functional domains of the replicase, possibly disrupting the enzyme’s catalytic activity and viral RNA synthesis. The compound’s strong electrostatic and hydrogen bonding profile supports its high binding affinity (−9.1 kcal/mol), observed earlier in docking simulations. Kaempferol and quercetin also demonstrated robust interactions with key amino acid residues, including ARG868, ARG968, THR840, and CYS837, through hydrogen and π–sulfur bonds. These interactions likely interfere with the active site configuration, reducing the efficiency of the viral polymerase complex. Both of these flavonoids are known to possess antiviral activity by targeting viral replication enzymes or modulating the host defense mechanisms (Wu et al., 2022; Periferakis et al., 2023).

 

 

Gallic acid, though smaller in structure, engaged in π–alkyl and π–π T-shaped interactions with hydrophobic residues such as PHE888 and CYS898, along with multiple hydrogen bonds (e.g., GLY893, ARG897). These interactions reveal a moderate but stable affinity, consistent with its antioxidant and antiviral potential previously reported against several RNA and DNA viruses (Uozaki et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2010). In comparison, acyclovir formed fewer and less diverse bonds, primarily hydrogen bonds with GLN936, GLY836, and ARG868, along with limited π–alkyl interactions at LYS839. Although acyclovir maintains a known antiviral mechanism through viral DNA polymerase inhibition, its relatively lower docking score and interaction diversity indicate that H. sabdariffa flavonoids may provide stronger or complementary inhibitory effects on the TMV replicase activity. Overall, these results highlight the potential of hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin as potent natural inhibitors of the TMV replicase protein. Their multifunctional binding behaviors spanning hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, and electrostatic interactions underscore their ability to disrupt the viral replication pathways. These findings align with previous reports confirming the broad-spectrum antiviral actions of flavonoids via interference with viral enzymatic functions, inhibition of genome replication, and induction of host defense responses (Castro e Silva et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022; Di Petrillo et al., 2022).

 

Table 6: Amino acid interactions and bonding patterns of H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds and acyclovir with TMV replicase protein.

Amino acids

Sites

Type of bonds

Gallic-acid

CYS

A:898

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Alkyl

GLY

A:893

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

PHE

A:888

Pi-Pi T-Shaped

LYS

A:883

Unfavorable Donor-Donor

ARG

A:897

Carbon Hydrogen Bond

Hesperidin

GLN

A:936

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:968

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Pi- Cation

THR

A:1046

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLU

A:1045

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLU

A:907

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

THR

A:840

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:868

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

LYS

A:839

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Pi- Cation, Pi-Alkyl

GLY

A:833

Carbon Hydrogen Bond

GLY

A:836

Carbon Hydrogen Bond

PRO

A:835

Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond

CYS

A:837

Pi-Sulfur

ILE

A:865

Alkyl

ALA

A:861

Alkyl

VAL

A:856

Alkyl

Kaempferol

ARG

A:968

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Positive-Positive

ARG

A:868

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

THR

A:840

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Donor-Donor

LYS

A:839

Unfavorable Donor-Donor, Pi-Cation

Table continues on next column......

Amino acids

Sites

Type of bonds

CYS

A:837

Pi-Sulfur

GLY

A:836

Carbon Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Alkyl

Quercetin

LYS

A:841

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:868

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

THR

A:840

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

LYS

A:839

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Cation

GLN

A:936

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

VAL

A:834

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:968

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Cation, Unfavorable Positive-Positive

GLY

A:836

Carbon Hydrogen Bond, Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond

CYS

A:837

Pi-Sulfur

Acyclovir

ARG

A:1076

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLN

A:936

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

GLY

A:836

Conventional Hydrogen Bond

ARG

A:968

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Positive-Positive, Pi-Cation

ARG

A:868

Conventional Hydrogen Bond, Unfavorable Positive-Positive

LYS

A:839

Pi-Alkyl

 

ALA: Alanine, ARG: Arginine, CYS: Cysteine, GLN: Glutamine, GLU: Glutamic Acid, GLY: Glycine, ILE: Isoleucine, LYS: Lysine, PHE: Phenylalanine, PRO: Proline, THR: Threonine, VAL: Valine.

 

 

 

In vitro anti-TMV activity of H. sabdariffa ethanolic extract

The findings presented in Table 7 and Figure 7 indicate that the ethanolic extract of H. sabdariffa exhibited substantial in vitro antiviral activity against TMV, as demonstrated by a marked reduction in the number of necrotic local lesions (NLL) with increasing the extract concentration. This dose-dependent antiviral effect is consistent with previous observations that plant extracts rich in bioactive compounds can inhibit plant virus infection by interfering with viral replication or entry mechanisms (Uozaki et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2010; Joseph et al., 2023; Ahmed et al., 2024). For example, aqueous and ethanolic extracts from other medicinal plants, such as licorice and green tea, considerably reduced the TMV lesion formation in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that the phenolic and flavonoid constituents may play a key role in antiviral activity against TMV and similar plant viruses (Joseph et al., 2023; Ahmed et al., 2024). Although specific studies on Hibiscus activity against TMV are limited, a previous study conducted on Hibiscus extracts against a range of human and animal viruses supports the general antiviral potential of this species (Shaheen et al., 2023). H. sabdariffa extracts have shown inhibitory effects against influenza A virus, feline calicivirus, murine norovirus, and hepatitis A virus, likely due to its high content of organic acids and phenolic compounds, including protocatechuic acid and anthocyanins, which can disrupt viral particles or interfere with the infection processes (Joshi et al., 2015; Mohammed et al., 2023). Additionally, fractionated Hibiscus components were found to reduce viral titers and inhibit replication of H5 avian influenza strains in vitro, indicating that multiple bioactive constituents may contribute to the observed antiviral effects (Baatartsogt et al., 2016). The antiviral mechanisms of such plant extracts are thought to involve multiple pathways, including direct inactivation of viral particles, inhibition of viral binding to host cell receptors, suppression of viral replication, and modulation of host defense responses (Musarra-Pizzo et al., 2021). For instance, the phenolic compounds and flavonoids can bind to viral proteins, destabilize viral envelopes, or modulate oxidative states unfavorable for viral proliferation (Chojnacka et al., 2021). Although the precise mechanism of H. sabdariffa extract activity against TMV was not elucidated in the present study, the observed reduction in lesions number and high inhibition percentage at higher concentrations support the hypothesis that H. sabdariffa bioactive compounds disrupt TMV infectivity or early stages of infection. The high coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9601) currently obtained from probit analysis further underscores the robustness of the relationship between extract concentration and antiviral impact, reinforcing the potential of H. sabdariffa extracts to act as natural antiviral agents in plant pathology research. Collectively, these obtained results align with a growing body of evidence suggesting that phenolic-rich plant extracts have broad-spectrum antiviral properties, and they warrant further investigations into specific active compounds, mechanisms of action, and potential field applications against TMV and other plant viruses (Denaro et al., 2020; Davidova et al., 2024).

 

Table 7: In vitro effect of different dilutions of H. sabdariffa ethanolic extract on the number of local necrotic lesions and percentage inhibition of TMV on Datura metel leaves.

Dilutions

Concentration (%)

Log con.

Inhibition (%)

Probit

ED50 %

ED90 %

Y = a + bX

R2

1/4

0.25

-0.60

82.67

4.05

1.57

2.82

y = 1.0275x + 3.3861

R² = 0.9601

1/8

0.13

-0.90

78.67

4.19

1/16

0.06

-1.20

65.33

4.61

1/32

0.03

-1.51

52.00

4.95

1/64

0.02

-1.66

38.67

5.28

1/128

0.01

-2.11

32.67

5.44

Control

00.00

 

Y: Probit values of the mean inhibition percentage (%), X: Log-transformed values of the mean dilutions of the aqueous extracts tested, ED50: Half-maximal effective dilution, ED90: Effective dilution at 90% inhibition, Coeff. of determination (r²): Indicates the regression model’s goodness of fit.

 

 

Overall, the molecular docking findings of this study should be interpreted as predictive computational insights rather than definitive evidence of antiviral mechanisms. The observed binding affinities and interaction profiles provide a theoretical indication of the potential affinity of H. sabdariffa-derived phytochemicals toward TMV proteins. However, these results do not confirm inhibition of viral replication, assembly, or movement, but rather suggest possible molecular interactions that require further experimental validation. The integration of docking with ADMET analysis offers a useful preliminary framework for prioritizing the plant’s bioactive compounds for future manipulation in in vitro and in vivo studies aiming to plant virus management.

Conclusions and Recommendations

This study highlights that H. sabdariffa (Roselle)-derived phytochemicals-particularly hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin exhibit a promising antiviral activity against TMV through multi-target interactions with key viral proteins, potentially disrupting RNA synthesis, virion assembly, and cell-to-cell movement. Molecular docking showed strong and diverse binding patterns, while ADMET analysis supported the drug-likeness of kaempferol and quercetin. Although hesperidin demonstrated high binding affinity, its limitations suggest the need for optimized formulations. Notably, these compounds outperformed acyclovir in docking performance, indicating their potential as natural antiviral agents. Further future studies are recommended to validate these findings through in vivo experiments, optimizing compound formulations, investigating the mechanisms of action, and ensuring environmental safety for sustainable agricultural use.

Acknowledgment

We extend our heartfelt thanks to Miss El-Shymaa Tarek Abdel-Aziz for her exceptional support in conducting the molecular docking analysis. We are truly grateful for her insightful guidance throughout the study.

Novelty Statement

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically evaluate the potential of H. sabdariffa-derived phytochemicals, mainly hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin against multiple functional proteins of TMV, including coat and movement proteins, and replicase, using an integrated molecular docking and ADMET/pharmacokinetic approach. Unlike the previous studies that focused primarily on general antiviral properties of flavonoids, this study provides detailed insights into multi-target binding mechanisms, interaction networks with catalytically relevant residues, and comparative efficacy relative to a standard antiviral agent (acyclovir). The current findings highlight hesperidin, kaempferol, and quercetin as promising natural inhibitors with superior docking performance and favorable drug-likeness profiles, offering a novel plant-based strategy for TMV management and sustainable crop protection.

Authors’ Contributions

AMA: Methodology, data collection, analysis, and drafting the manuscript.

AIA: Study design.

ASS: supervision, review, and validation.

AAM: Data analysis, validation of results, and revision of the manuscript.

SKA: Supervision, and review. All authors contributed to the final review and approved of the manuscript.

Ethical approval

As this research did not include human or animal subjects, formal ethical approval was not required. All experimental work adhered to established institutional policies and internationally recognized guidelines for safe laboratory practice and scientific integrity.

Funding source

This research was conducted without any specific financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit funding bodies.

Generative AI and AI assisted technology statement

The authors declare that no generative AI and AI assisted technology was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing interests that could have influenced the work reported in this study.

References

Abdel Razek, F.S., Ibrahim, S.D., Megahed, A.A., Sadik, A.S. and El-Masry, S.S.A., 2025. In Silico molecular docking analysis of green tea bioactive compounds targeting Banana bunchy top virus proteins. Discov. Appl. Sci., 7(1232): 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07466-4

Abdelkhalek, A., Al-Askar, A.A., Alsubaie, M.M. and Behiry, S.I., 2021. First report of protective activity of Paronychia argentea extract against Tobacco mosaic virus infection. Plants, 10(11): 2435. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112435

Abozaid, A., Ali, M.K., Sadik, A.S. and Megahed, A.A., 2025. Conserved epitope mapping of Potato virus Y for broad-spectrum antigen design: Implications for plant immune. Nov. Res. Microbiol. J., 9(4): 332-348. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.NRMJ/2025/9.4.332.348

Agrawal, P.K., Agrawal, C. and Blunden, G., 2021. Pharmacological significance of hesperidin and hesperetin, two citrus flavonoids, as promising antiviral compounds for prophylaxis against and combating COVID-19. Nat. Prod. Commun., 16(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X211042540

Ahmed, A.T., El Dougdoug, K.A., Amin, L.M. and Sadik, A., 2024. In silico and in vitro assessment of antiviral activities of licorice and green tea extracts against Tobacco mosaic virus. Arab Univ. J. Agric. Sci., 32(1): 41-51.

Alharbi, A.E., AlHussaini, A.M. and Alshami, I., 2024. A comprehensive review of the antimicrobial effects of Hibiscus species. Cureus, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73062

Alhemaly, M.A. and Sofy, A.R., 2024. Anti-herpes effect and mode of action of hesperidin as a safe and promising alternative antiviral. J. Biosci. Appl. Res., 10(3): 560-577. https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2024.308249.1059

Angira, A., Suresh, S. and Choudhary, N., 2025. Understanding of research milestones embedded within the history of plant viruses especially Tobacco mosaic virus. Appl. Microbiol. Theory Technol., 6(1): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.37256/amtt.6120256190

Baatartsogt, T., Bui, V.N., Trinh, D.Q., Yamaguchi, E., Gronsang, D., Thampaisarn, R., Ogawa, H. and Imai, K., 2016. High antiviral effects of hibiscus tea extract on the H5 subtypes of low and highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 78(9): 1405-1411. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0124

Bala, R., Kaur, R., Kaur, B. and Kaur, P., 2022. Hibiscus rosa sinensis Linn.: A phytochemical and pharmacological review. Int. J. Health Sci., 6(S3): 5165-5193. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.7050

Beyari, E.A., 2025. Alternatives to chemical pesticides: The role of microbial biocontrol agents in phytopathogen management: A comprehensive review. J. Plant Pathol., 107(1): 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01808-8

Calefi, G.G., Silva, N.B., Alhatlani, B.Y., Abdallah, E.M. and Martins, C.H., 2025. Harnessing nature’s arsenal: Sustainable plant-based strategies for phytopathogen control. Front. Microbiol., 16: 1588462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1588462

Castro e Silva, J.H., Souza, J.T., Schitine, C., Júnior, A.D.F.S., Bastos, E.M.S. and Costa, S.L., 2022. Pharmacological potential of flavonoids against neurotropic viruses. Pharmaceuticals, 15(9): 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091149

Choi, H.J., Song, J.H., Bhatt, L.R. and Baek, S.H., 2010. Anti-human rhinovirus activity of gallic acid possessing antioxidant capacity. Phytother. Res., 24(9): 1292-1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.3101

Choi, S.S., Lee, S.H. and Lee, K.A., 2025. Antiviral activity of glucosyl hesperidin against feline Calicivirus. Microorganisms, 13(10): 2332. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102332

Chojnacka, K., Skrzypczak, D., Izydorczyk, G., Mikula, K., Szopa, D. and Witek-Krowiak, A., 2021. Antiviral properties of polyphenols from plants. Foods, 10(10): 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102277

Chowdhury, S.K., Banerjee, M., Basnett, D. and Mazumdar, T., 2024. Natural pesticides for pest control in agricultural crops: An alternative and eco-friendly method. Plant Sci. Today, 11(1): 433-450.

Daina, A., Michielin, O. and Zoete, V., 2017. Swiss ADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep., 7(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717

Davidova, S., Galabov, A.S. and Satchanska, G., 2024. Antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral activity, and mechanisms of action of plant polyphenols. Microorganisms, 12(12): 2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122502

Denaro, M., Smeriglio, A., Barreca, D., De Francesco, C., Occhiuto, C., Milano, G. and Trombetta, D., 2020. Antiviral activity of plants and their isolated bioactive compounds: An update. Phytother. Res., 34(4): 742-768. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6575

Di Petrillo, A., Orrù, G., Fais, A. and Fantini, M.C., 2022. Quercetin and its derivates as antiviral potentials: A comprehensive review. Phytother. Res., 36(1): 266-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7309

Dorokhov, Y.L., Sheshukova, E.V., Byalik, T.E. and Komarova, T.V., 2020. Diversity of plant virus movement proteins: What do they have in common? Processes, 8(12): 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121547

Du, X., Li, Y., Xia, Y.L., Ai, S.M., Liang, J., Sang, P., Ji, X.L. and Liu, S.Q., 2016. Insights into Protein–Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17(2): 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17020144

Duque-Soto, C., Exposito-Almellon, X., Garcia, P., Pando, M.E., Borras-Linares, I. and Lozano-Sanchez, J., 2023. Extraction, characterization, and bioactivity of phenolic compounds-a case on Hibiscus genera. Foods, 12(5): 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12050963

El-Dougdoug, Kh.A., Megahed, A.A., Othman, B.A., Lashin, S.M., Ibrahim, M.A. and Attitalla, I.H., 2013. Induction of salicylic acid in cucumber plants against Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus using biotic inducers. Am. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 3(2): 248-255. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbmb.2013.248.255

Elhalag, K.M., Al-Anany, M.S. and Megahed, A.A., 2025. Efficacy of plant extracts and bio-fertilizers for the control of bacterial wilt and soft rot agents in potato. J. Plant Pathol., 107(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01825-7

Elshaer, N.A., El-Masry, S.S., Rabiee, M.S., Sadik, A.S. and Megahed, A.A., 2025. In silico prediction of the potential of some bioactive compounds from Licorice to target Banana bunchy top virus. Egypt. J. Phytopathol., 53(1): 194-224. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejp.2025.436169

El-Shiekh, R.A., Abdelmohsen, U.R., Ashour, H.M. and Ashour, R.M., 2020. Novel antiviral and antibacterial activities of Hibiscus schizopetalus. Antibiotics, 9(11): 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110756

Ferreira, L.G., dos Santos, R.N., Oliva, G. and Andricopulo, A.D., 2015. Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies. Molecules, 20(7): 13384–13421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713384

Govea-Salas, M., Rivas-Estilla, A.M., Rodríguez-Herrera, R., Lozano-Sepúlveda, S.A., Aguilar-Gonzalez, C.N., Zugasti-Cruz, A., Salas-Villalobos, T.B. and Morlett-Chávez, J.A., 2016. Gallic acid decreases hepatitis C virus expression through its antioxidant capacity. Exp. Ther. Med., 11(2): 619-624. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2923

Hamden, S., Hanbal, S.E., El-Kot, G.A., Elmahalawy, S.S., and Megahed, A.A., 2026. Eco-friendly strategies for controlling Fusarium ear rot and mycotoxins in maize: A multi-year field and greenhouse study. J. Plant Pathol., 108(2): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-026-02167-2

Hassan, S.T., 2025. Anti-Epstein–Barr virus activities of flavones and flavonols with effects on virus-related cancers. Molecules, 30(5): 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051058

Hassan, S.T., Švajdlenka, E. and Berchová-Bímová, K., 2017. Hibiscus sabdariffa L. and its bioactive constituents exhibit antiviral activity against HSV-2 and anti-enzymatic properties against urease by an ESI-MS based assay. Molecules, 22(5): 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050722

Hu, C., Shen, D., Qiu, Y., Tian, F., Hu, Q., Pan, X., Yang, Y., Peng, W., Ruan, X. and Xue, W., 2025. Flavonol derivatives containing pyrazole oxime ether: Design, synthesis, and anti-TMV activity. Mol. Divers., 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-025-11318-z

Huang, L., Kuang, J., Yu, J., Yu, Q., Xu, W., Liu, M., Wei, Y., Han, S., Huang, Y. and Li, P., 2025. Antiviral activity of epicatechin against Singapore grouper iridovirus in vitro and in vivo. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 162: 110331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2025.110331

Huang, L., Li, M., Wei, H., Yu, Q., Huang, S., Wang, T., Liu, M. and Li, P., 2022. Research on the indirect antiviral function of medicinal plant ingredient quercetin against grouper iridovirus infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 124: 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2022.04.013

Islam, W., Qasim, M., Ali, N., Tayyab, M., Chen, S. and Wang, L., 2018. Management of Tobacco mosaic virus through natural metabolites. Rec. Nat. Prod., 12(5): 403. https://doi.org/10.25135/rnp.49.17.10.178

Jabeur, I., Pereira, E., Barros, L., Calhelha, R.C., Soković, M., Oliveira, M.B.P. and Ferreira, I.C.F.R., 2017. Hibiscus sabdariffa L. as a source of nutrients, bioactive compounds and colouring agents. Food Res. Int., 100: 717-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.073

Jing, B., Ma, Z., Feng, J., Liang, H., Li, C. and Zhang, X., 2012. Evaluation of the antiviral activity of extracts from plants grown in the Qinling region of China against infection by Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). J. Phytopathol., 160(4): 181-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2012.01880.x

Jones, R.A., 2021. Global plant virus disease pandemics and epidemics. Plants, 10(2): 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020233

Joseph, J.N., Shrivastava, A., Benny, B., Baig, M.Y., Georgine, S.A. and Saral, A.M., 2023. Antiviral properties of various bioactive components present in the root of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci., 19(2): 166-175. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573401318666220411125333

Joshi, S.S., Dice, L. and D’Souza, D.H., 2015. Aqueous extracts of Hibiscus sabdariffa calyces decrease hepatitis A virus and human norovirus surrogate titers. Food Environ. Virol., 7(4): 366-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-015-9209-1

Khazdair, M.R., Anaeigoudari, A. and Agbor, G.A., 2021. Anti-viral and anti-inflammatory effects of kaempferol and quercetin and COVID-2019: A scoping review. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 11(8): 327-334. https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-1691.319567

Kim, C.H., Kim, J.E. and Song, Y.J., 2020. Antiviral activities of quercetin and isoquercitrin against human herpesviruses. Molecules, 25(10): 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102379

Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R. and Bajorath, J., 2004. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3(11): 935-949. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1549

Kowalczyk, A., 2024. Hesperidin, a potential antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2: The influence of citrus consumption on COVID-19 incidence and severity in China. Medicina, 60(6): 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060892

Li, Y., Ye, S., Hu, Z., Hao, N., Bo, X., Liang, H. and Tian, X., 2021. Identification of anti-TMV active flavonoid glycosides and their mode of action on virus particles from Clematis lasiandra Maxim. Pest Manage. Sci., 77(11): 5268-5277. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6569

Lipinski, C.A., 2004. Lead-and drug-like compounds: The rule-of-five revolution. Drug discovery today: Technologies, 1(4): 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007

Lu, S., Wang, Z. and Yang, D.J., 2024. Kaempferol inhibits the proliferation and migration of Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells. Trop. J. Pharm. Res., 23(2): 257-262. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v23i2.4

Mahmoud, A.E.E.R., Sadik, A.S. and Mahdy, A., 2025. Predicting the potential of black seed bioactive compounds against potato virus X using in silico molecular docking. Novel Res. Microbiol. J., 9(2): 63-81. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.NRMJ/2025/9.2.63.81

Malhotra, B., Onyilagha, J.C., Bohm, B.A., Towers, G.H.N., James, D., Harborne, J.B. and French, C.J., 1996. Inhibition of tomato ringspot virus by flavonoids. Phytochemistry, 43(6): 1271-1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(95)00522-6

Megahed, A.A., Barakat, A., Embaby, A.A., Mohamed, S.H., Sadik, A.S. and Elshaer, N.A., 2025. Antiviral activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa) against potato virus Y: In silico molecular docking analysis. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 14(97): 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-025-00686-y

Megahed, A.A., El-Dougdoug, Kh.A., Othman, B.A., Lashin, S.M., Ibrahim, M.A. and Sofy, A.R., 2013a. Induction of resistance in tomato plants against Tomato mosaic tobamovirus using beneficial microbial isolates. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 16: 385-390. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.385.390

Megahed, A.A., El-Dougdoug, N.K., Bondok, A.M. and Masoud, H.M.M., 2019. Monitoring of co-infection virus and virus-like naturally in sweet pepper plant. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 52(3-4): 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2019.1620512

Megahed, A.A., Lashin, S.M., El-Dougdoug, Kh.A., Othman, B.A. and Ibrahim, M.A., 2013b. Potential of biotic inducers on disease severity and variation of Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus in cucumber plants. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 46(2): 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2012.736280

Megahed, A.A., Masoud, H.M.M., Helmy, M.S., Ibrahim, M.A., El-Mougy, N.S. and Abdel-Kader, M.M., 2023. Efficiency of some abiotic and biotic agents on Vicia faba L. rust and chocolate spot diseases. Plant Prot., 07(03): 449-463. https://doi.org/10.33804/pp.007.03.4798

Mehrbod, P., Hudy, D., Shyntum, D., Markowski, J., Łos, M.J. and Ghavami, S., 2020. Quercetin as a natural therapeutic candidate for the treatment of influenza virus. Biomolecules, 11(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010010

Mejía, J.J., Sierra, L.J., Ceballos, J.G., Martínez, J.R. and Stashenko, E.E., 2023. Color, antioxidant capacity and flavonoid composition in Hibiscus rosa-sinensis cultivars. Molecules, 28(4): 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041779

Meng, X.Y., Zhang, H.X., Mezei, M. and Cui, M. 2011. Molecular docking: A powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, 7(2): 146-157. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340911795677602

Mohammed, F.S., Uysal, I. and Sevindik, M., 2023. A review on antiviral plants effective against different virus types. Prospects Pharm. Sci., 21(2): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.56782/pps.128

Musarra-Pizzo, M., Pennisi, R., Ben-Amor, I., Mandalari, G. and Sciortino, M.T., 2021. Antiviral activity exerted by natural products against human viruses. Viruses, 13(5): 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050828

Naithani, R., Huma, L.C., Holland, L.E., Shukla, D., McCormick, D.L., Mehta, R.G. and Moriarty, R.M., 2008. Antiviral activity of phytochemicals: A comprehensive review. Mini Rev. Med. Chem., 8(11): 1106-1133. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955708785909943

Nasr-Eldin, M., Messiha, N., Othman, B., Megahed, A. and Elhalag, K., 2019. Induction of potato systemic resistance against the Potato virus Y (PVYNTN), using crude filtrates of Streptomyces spp. under greenhouse conditions. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control, 29(62): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0165-1

Peña, E.J. and Heinlein, M., 2012. RNA transport during TMV cell-to-cell movement. Front. Plant Sci., 3: 193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00193

Periferakis, A., Periferakis, A.T., Troumpata, L., Periferakis, K., Scheau, A.E., Savulescu-Fiedler, I., Caruntu, A., Badarau, I.A., Caruntu, C. and Scheau, C., 2023. Kaempferol: A review of current evidence of its antiviral potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24(22): 16299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216299

Petrov, N.M., Stoyanova, M.I. and Gaur, R., 2024. Viruses as stress factors and their management in vegetable crops. In: Shahid, M. and Gaur, R. (eds) molecular dynamics of plant stress and its management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1699-9_14

Raza, H., Sultan, M.T., Khalid, S., Khalid, M.U., Chaudhary, K., Zafar, S., Noman, A.M., Raza, A. and Onyeaka, H., 2025. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis extracts for the development of functional tea. Ultrason. Sonochem., pp. 107628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107628

Salentin, S., Schreiber, S., Haupt, V.J., Adasme, M.F. and Schroeder, M., 2015. PLIP: Fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler. Nucl. Acids Res., 43(W1): W443-W447. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv315

Schlicksup, C.J. and Zlotnick, A., 2020. Viral structural proteins as targets for antivirals. Curr. Opin. Virol., 45: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.07.001

Shaheen, S., Khalid, S., Siqqique, R., Abbas, M., Ifikhar, T., Ijaz, I., Sarwar, S., Abdul Razak, S., Riaz, M.H., Aljowaie, R.M., Mohamed, S., Elshikh, M.S. and Kamal, A., 2023. Comparative taxonomical, biological and pharmacological potential of healthy and geminivirus infected leaves of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L.: First report. Microb. Pathog., 185: 106428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106428

Shahrajabian, M.H., Sun, W. and Cheng, Q., 2022. The importance of flavonoids and phytochemicals of medicinal plants with antiviral activities. Mini Rev. Org. Chem., 19(3): 293-318. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570178618666210707161025

Souto, A.L., Sylvestre, M., Tölke, E.D., Tavares, J.F., Barbosa-Filho, J.M. and Cebrián-Torrejón, G., 2021. Plant-derived pesticides as an alternative to pest management and sustainable agricultural production: Prospects, applications and challenges. Molecules, 26(16): 4835. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164835

Sun, Z.G., Li, Z.N., Miao, X.W., Li, S. and Zhu, H.L., 2021. Recent advances in natural products with antiviral activities. Mini Rev. Med. Chem., 21(14): 1888-1908. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557521666210304110824

Uozaki, M., Yamasaki, H., Katsuyama, Y., Higuchi, M., Higuti, T. and Koyama, A.H., 2007. Antiviral effect of octyl gallate against DNA and RNA viruses. Antiviral Res., 73(2): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2006.07.010

Ürményi, F.G.G., Saraiva, G.D.N., Casanova, L.M., Matos, A.D.S., de Magalhaes Camargo, L.M., Romanos, M.T.V. and Costa, S.S., 2016. Anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 flavonoids and a new kaempferol triglycoside from the medicinal plant Kalanchoe daigremontiana. Chem. Biodivers., 13(12): 1707-1714. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201600127

Wong, S.J., Furuya, A., Zou, J., Xie, X., Dupuis, A.P., Kramer, L.D. and Shi, P.Y., 2017. A multiplex microsphere immunoassay for Zika virus diagnosis. EBioMedicine, 16: 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.008

Wu, C.C., Lee, T.Y., Cheng, Y.J., Cho, D.Y. and Chen, J.Y., 2022. The dietary flavonol kaempferol inhibits Epstein–Barr virus reactivation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Molecules, 27(23): 8158. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238158

Wu, Y.H., Zhang, B.Y., Qiu, L.P., Guan, R.F., Ye, Z.H. and Yu, X.P., 2017. Structure properties and mechanisms of action of naturally originated phenolic acids and their derivatives against human viral infections. Curr. Med. Chem., 24(38): 4279-4302. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170815102917

You, H.L., Huang, C.C., Chen, C.J., Chang, C.C., Liao, P.L. and Huang, S.T., 2018. Anti-pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus potential of catechin and gallic acid. J. Chin. Med. Assoc., 81(5): 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.007