A Systematic Review of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Caprine Pituitary Transcription Factor 1 Gene and their Association with Economic Important Traits
Masixole Maswana1, Dikeledi Petunia Malatji1 and Thobela Louis Tyasi2*
1Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, South Africa.
2Department of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa.
ABSTRACT
The pituitary transcription factor 1 (POU1F1) plays a crucial role in the transactivation of genes responsible for prolactin, growth hormone, and thyroid-stimulating hormone production. Traditional goat breeding methods have primarily emphasized external characteristics ignoring the internal gene information resulting in that external expression, whereas contemporary techniques utilize marker-assisted selection, which focuses on identifying candidate genes, responsible. To date, there has been no comprehensive review addressing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the POU1F1 gene in goats. This systematic review aims to investigate the SNPs present in the POU1F1 gene and to elucidate their relationships with important goat traits. A thorough evaluation of four databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science yielded twelve eligible studies using the search key words. From the reviewed literature, a total of 85 SNPs were identified, with 32 resulting from the T > G transition and 19 from the T > C transition. Among the twelve articles included in this review, 83 % of articles reported associations between their identified SNPs and traits such as cashmere production, litter size, and milk yield, while only 16 % articles did not find any associations. The findings of this study indicate that the SNPs in the POU1F1 gene are significantly linked to economically important traits in goats. Therefore, POU1F1 gene might be used as a candidate gene for economically important traits of goats during breeding.
Article Information
Received 20 January 2025
Revised 05 June 2025
Accepted 20 June 2025
Available online 20 February 2026
(early access)
Published 20 June 2026
Authors’ Contribution
MM and TLT initial development and designing of the study. MM drafted the initial version of the manuscript. DPM and TLY revised the article. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Key words
Goats, Candidate gene, Meat traits, Growth traits, Milk yield, Litter size
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20250120133106
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
0030-9923/2026/0004-1927 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2026 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
The pituitary transcription factor 1 (POU1F1) is a POU-homeo domain transcription factor that is specific to the pituitary gland (Zhang et al., 2019). It is instrumental in the differentiation and proliferation of the lactotroph, somatotroph, and thyrotroph lineages, as well as in the transactivation of the genes for prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), and the beta subunit of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSHb) (Zhang et al., 2019). The goat (Capra hircus) is recognized as the most prolific of the domesticated ruminants. Its proficiency in surviving within low-input production systems and its adaptability to harsh environmental conditions contribute to its popularity among a wide array of farmers (Olasege et al., 2020).
Conventional approaches to the selection of breeding goats are often inadequate, as breeders primarily rely on phenotypic assessments (Zhu et al., 2019). In contemporary practices, genomic selection employs a comprehensive array of single nucleotide polymorphisms markers that span the entire genome to calculate genomic estimated breeding values (Zhu et al., 2019). To adequately respond to the needs of an ever-growing human population, it is crucial to emphasize high-production breeds. Presently, marker-assisted selection, which entails the selection of candidate genes, is regarded as a precise and efficient technique for advancing the economic traits of livestock (Zhang et al., 2019).
This review aids in the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms as genetic markers and examines their impact on economically significant traits in goat production. Currently, no systematic reviews have been conducted on single nucleotide polymorphisms within the POU1F1 gene of goats. The objective of this systematic review was to examine single nucleotide polymorphisms found in the POU1F1 gene and to gain a comprehensive understanding of their correlation with goat traits considered significant in diverse countries. This research seeks to enhance the understanding of genetic markers of POU1F1 gene in goats and their effect on traits of economic importance. The information will provide the current trend of POU1F1 gene for goat breeding.
Materials and Methods
Eligibility criteria
In accordance with the framework established by Bettany-Saltikov (2010), the identification of the population, exposure, and outcomes (PEO) components relevant to the research question was conducted prior to the systematic review. The population was specified as “goats,” the exposure was identified as “polymorphisms,” and the outcomes were defined as “traits of economic importance.” A preliminary search of these PEO components was performed on the Google Scholar database before the decision to undertake the systematic review.
Literature search
All the authors performed a systematic search for research publications using the databases of Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science, with the search period extending from 16 July to October 28, 2024. The keywords employed in this search included: Single nucleotide polymorphisms or polymorphisms or genetic polymorphisms or genetic effects or genetic diversity and pituitary specific transcription factor-1 or caprine pituitary specific transcription factor-1 or POU1F1 - POUF1 - Pit1 or Pit-1 and goats or Capra hircus.
The criteria for the eligibility of all selected articles were established based on the following requirements: (1) the studies must investigate the POU1F1 gene; (2) they should encompass the polymorphisms associated with any traits of economic importance; and (3) they must involve the species of interest, specifically goats.
The exclusion criteria consisted of (1) duplicate records; (2) studies that did not provide evidence linking POU1F1 polymorphisms to economically important traits in goats; and (3) research that inferred associations without conducting an association analysis concerning goat traits.
A total of five hundred and ten (n = 510) articles were initially retrieved, as illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1. The search was conducted across four databases: Google Scholar (n = 245), PubMed (n = 12), ScienceDirect (n = 216), and Web of Science (n = 37). After removing one hundred duplicates, the remaining number of articles for screening was four hundred and ten (n = 410). From this pool, three hundred and eighty-six articles were excluded due to their titles not aligning with the research topic of interest. Subsequently, twenty-one articles were screened for their abstracts, resulting in the removal of two articlesdue to insufficient information. This left nineteen articles (n = 19) for eligibility assessment, of which seven (n = 7) were excluded after a full-text review, culminating in a final selection of twelve articles for inclusion in this systematic review.
Data extraction
Content extraction was performed independently by the authors. The extracted information from the articles consists of the first author’s name, the year of publication, the country, the species, the breed, the population size, and the observed genotypes.
Results
Characterization of included articles
Table I presents the characteristics of the articles included for this systematic review. The results showed that all the articles included (n = 12) studied POU1F1 polymorphisms in different traits. Specifically, five articles were related to milk production (Lan et al., 2008, 2015; Daga et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2016; Isik and Bilgen, 2019), four articles pertained to cashmere (Lan et al., 2008, 2009; Li et al., 2016), four articles were linked to litter size (Feng et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019; Olasege et al., 2020) two articles focused on growth (Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019) and one article was associated with meat (Lan et al., 2008). For population size used, the results indicated that three publications used population (sample sizes) N > 500 (Lan et al., 2008; Li et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019).
The year 2019 recorded the highest number of published articles, 3 out of the twelve articles (Isik and Bilgen, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019). Only two articles approved each in the year 2008 and 2016.
Table I shows that China is the leading contributor, with a total of nine articles (n = 9) authored out of twelve included articles. In contrast, only a single article approved from each of the following countries: Turkey, Sardinia, and Nigeria.
Table I. General characteristics of studies included in the review.
|
Genotyping method |
Trait |
N |
Breed |
Country |
Authors |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Cashmere |
847 |
Inner Mongolia White Cashmere goats |
China |
Lan et al., 2008a |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Meat, Cashmere and milk |
394 |
Shaanbei white cashmere, Goat, Boer, Haimen goat and Xuhuai Goat/s |
China |
Lan et al., 2008b |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Litter size |
183 |
Jining grey, Guizhou White, Boer, Wendeng Dairy, and Liaoning Cashmere goat/s |
China |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Milk |
349 |
Xinong Sannen, Guanzhong dairy, Laoshan, Leizhou, Guizhou black, Guizhou white, Banjiao and Matou goat/s |
China |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Cashmere |
709 |
Nanjiang, Xinjiang, Shaanbei White, Boer goat, Haimen and Xuhuai goat/s |
China |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Milk |
235 |
Guanzhong goat/s |
China |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Milk |
108 |
Saanen |
Turkey |
Isık and Bilgen, 2019 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Litter size and growth |
653 |
Shaanbei white cashmere goat/s |
China |
Zhang et al., 2019 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Litter size and growth |
609 |
SBWC goat/s |
China |
Zhu et al., 2019 |
|
PCR-RFLP |
Litter size |
366 |
West African Dwarf, Kalahari red and Red Sokoto |
Nigeria |
Olasege et al., 2020 |
|
PCR–SSCP |
Cashmere |
452 |
Inner Mongolia White Cashmere goat |
China |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
CR-SSCP |
Milk |
129 |
Sarda goat/s |
Sardinia |
Daga et al., 2012 |
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SSCP, single strand conformation polymorphism; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism.
Figure 1 shows that ten articles (n= 10) out of the twelve articles used the PCR-RFLP method while only two articles (n = 2) used PCR-SSCP (Table I).
Identified SNPs and their positions
Table II shows presents the SNPs variations of the POU1F1 gene along with their respective positions. All the included articles (n = 12) reported SNPs of POU1F1 gene and their positions. A total of 85 SNPs were identified from the reviewed literature, with 32 occurring at the T > G transition, followed by 19 at the T > C transition. The position with the highest frequency of SNPs was position 102, which recorded 14 occurrences.
Table II shows that the genotypic frequences of SNPs varied from 0.008 to 1.00 with the maximum value reported in three articles (Feng et al., 2011; Lan et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2019). A cumulative total of 134 alleles were identified in the reviewed articles. The lowest (0.024) and highest (1.00) frequency of alleles were identified in one article each (Lan et al., 2009; Feng et al., 2011).
All the included articles (n = 12) showed the ages of the used goats which ranged from two to five years. Three articles used goats that were two years old (Lan et al., 2008; Lan et al., 2009; Olasege et al., 2021), while nine articles used animals that were older than two years (Fig. 2).
Table II. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genotypic and allelic frequencies.
|
SNP |
Region |
Genotypic frequencies |
Gene frequencies |
Breed |
Author |
|
110 T>C |
Exon 3 |
CT (0.041-0.959) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goats |
Lan et al., 2008a |
|
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
TT/TC/CC (0.718/0.282/0.000) |
T (0.859) |
Shaanbei white cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2008b |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
TT/TC/CC (0.952/0.048/0.00) |
T (0.976) |
Boer goat |
Lan et al., 2008b |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
TT/TC/CC (0.572/0.371/ 0.057) |
T (0.757) |
Xuhuai goats |
Lan et al., 2008b |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
TT/TC/CC (0.820/0.131/0.049) |
T (0.885) |
Haimen goat |
Lan et al., 2008b |
|
+ 10 G > T |
IVS |
GG (0.409) |
G (0.690), T (0.310) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
113 G> T |
Exon 3 |
GG (0.847) |
G (0.920), T (0.024) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
114 G> T |
Exon 3 |
GG (0.847) |
G (0.920), T (0.024) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
+ 8 C > T |
IVS3 |
CC (0.847) |
C (0.920), T (0.024) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
+ 41 T >G |
IVS3 |
TT (0.847) |
T (0.920), G (0.024) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
+41_ 42insT |
IVS3 |
TT (0.847) |
T (0.920), G (0.024) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
+ 175 T >A |
IVS3 |
TT (0.847) |
T (0.920), G (0.024) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
53 del A |
Exon 4 |
AA (0.668) |
A (0.834), (0.166) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
+ 710 T >A |
IVS4 |
TT (0.774) |
T (0.887), A (0.113) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
14 G>A |
Exon 5 |
GG (0.774) |
T (0.887), A (0.113) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
34 G>A |
Exon 5 |
GG (0.774) |
T (0.887), A (0.113) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
59 G>A |
Exon 5 |
GG (0.774) |
T (0.887), A (0.113) |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goat |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
256 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (0.896) and CT (0.104) |
C (0.948), T (0.052) |
Jining grey goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
53 T>C |
Intron 3 |
CC (0.011), TC (0.415) and TT (0.57) |
C (0.219), T (0.781) |
Jining grey goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
123 T>G |
Intron 3 |
TT (0.574), TG (0.415) and GG (0.011) |
T (0.781), G 0.219 |
Jining grey goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
682 G>T |
Exon 6 |
GG (0.914) and GT 0.086 |
G (0.957), T (0.043) |
Jining grey goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
723 T >G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.632), TG (0.331) and GG (0.037) |
T (0.798), G (0.202) |
Jining grey goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
837 T >C |
Exon 6 |
CC (0.242), CT (0.511) and TT (0.247) |
C (0.497), T 0.503 |
Jining grey goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
256 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (0.967) and CT (0.033) |
C (0.983), T (0.017) |
Guizhou white goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
53 C >T |
Intron 3 |
TC (0.133) and TT (0.867) |
C (0.067), T (0.933) |
Guizhou white goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
123 T>G |
Intron 3 |
TT (0.867) and TG (0.133) |
T (0.933), G (0.067) |
Guizhou white goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
682 G>T |
Exon 6 |
GG (1.000) |
G (1.000) |
Guizhou white goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
723 T >G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.712) and TG (0.288) |
T (0.856), G (0.144) |
Guizhou white goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
837 T >C |
Exon 6 |
CC (0.224), CT (0.569) and TT (0.207) |
C (0.509), T (0.491) |
Guizhou white goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
Table continues on next page............... |
|||||
|
SNP |
Region |
Genotypic frequencies |
Gene frequencies |
Breed |
Author |
|
256 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (0.957) and CT (0.043) |
C (0.978), T (0.022) |
Boer goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
53 C >T |
Intron 3 |
TC (0.435), TC (0.304) and TT (0.261) |
C (0.587), T (0.413) |
Boer goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
123 T>G |
Intron 3 |
TT (0.261), TG (0.304 and GG (0.435) |
T (0.413), G (0.587) |
Boer goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
682 G>T |
Exon 6 |
GG (1.000) |
G (1.000) |
Boer goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
723 T >G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.734), TG (0.133) and GG (0.133) |
T (0.800), G (0.200) |
Boer goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
837 T >C |
Exon 6 |
TT (1.000) |
T (1.000) |
Boer goat |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
256 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (1.000) |
C (1.000) |
Wendeng dairy goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
53 C >T |
Intron 3 |
CC (0.146) TC (0.479) and TT (0.375) |
C (0.385), T (0.615) |
Wendeng dairy goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
123 T>G |
Intron 3 |
TT (0.375), TG (0.479) GG (0.146) |
T (0.615), G (0.385) |
Wendeng dairy goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
682 G>T |
Exon 6 |
GG (0.750) and GT (0.250) |
G (0.875), T (0.125) |
Wendeng dairy goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
723 T >G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.775), TG (0.125) and GG (0.100) |
T (0.838), G (0.162) |
Wendeng dairy goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
837 T >C |
Exon 6 |
CC (0.064), CT (0.468) and TT (0.468) |
C (0.298), T (0.702) |
Wendeng dairy goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
256 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (0.896) and CT (0.104) |
C (0.948), T (0.052) |
Liaoning Cashmere goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
53 T>C |
Intron 3 |
CC (0.011), TC (0.415) and TT (0.57) |
C (0.219), T (0.781) |
Liaoning Cashmere goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
123 T>G |
Intron 3 |
TT (0.574), TG (0.415) and GG (0.011) |
T (0.781), G 0.219 |
Liaoning Cashmere goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
682 G>T |
Exon 6 |
GG (0.914) and GT 0.086 |
G (0.957), T (0.043) |
Liaoning Cashmere goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
723 T >G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.632), TG (0.331) and GG (0.037) |
T (0.798), G (0.202) |
Liaoning Cashmere goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
837 T >C |
Exon 6 |
CC (0.242), CT (0.511) and TT (0.247) |
C (0.497), T 0.503 |
Liaoning Cashmere goats |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
61 G >C |
Exon 1 |
GG (0.992) and GC (0.008) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
108 G >A |
Exon 1 |
GG (0.016) and GA (98.4) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
42 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (0.992) and CT (0.008) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
92 C >T |
Exon 3 |
CC (0.705), CT (0.248) and TT (0.047) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
110 A >G |
Exon 4 |
AA (0.729), AG (0.225) and GG (0.047) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
34G >A |
Exon 5 |
GG (0.977) and GA (0.023) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
17 G >T |
Exon 6 |
GG (0.713), GT (0.256) and TT (0.31) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
58 G >T |
Exon 6 |
GG (0.550), GT (0.411) and TT (0.039) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
172 T >C |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.891) and CT (0.109) |
Not mentioned |
Sarda goat |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.770), D1D2 (0.230) |
D1 (0.885) |
Xinong Sannen dairy |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.200), D1D2 (0.800) |
D1 (0.600) |
Guanzhong dairy |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.694), D1D2 (0.306) |
D1 (0.847) |
Laoshan dairy |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (1.00) |
D1 (1.00) |
Leizho |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.455), D1D2 (0.545) |
D1 (0.727) |
Guizhou black |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.840), D1D2 (0.016) |
D1 (0.920) |
Guizhou white |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.355), D1D2 (0.645) |
D1 (0.706) |
Banjiao |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
D1D1 (0.418), D1D2 (0.588) |
D1 (0.777) |
Matou |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
174 T > C |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.336), TC (0.524), CC (0.030) |
T (0.708), C (0.292) |
Guanzhong goat/s |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
174 T > C |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.716), TC (0.265), CC (0.019) |
T (0.848), C (0.152) |
Guanzhong goat/s |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
174 T > C |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.953), TC (0.047), |
T (0.977), C (0.023) |
Guanzhong goat/s |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
PD1D1 (0.324), PD1D2 (0.514), PD2D2 (0.162) |
D1 (0.561) D2 (0.419) |
Nanjiang |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
PD1D1 (0.663), PD1D2 (0.262), PD2D2 (0.074) |
D1 (0.794). D2 (0.206) |
Xinjiang |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
Table continues on next page............... |
|||||
|
SNP |
Region |
Genotypic frequencies |
Gene frequencies |
Breed |
Author |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
PD1D1 (0.460) PD1D2 (0.140), PD2D2 (0.140) |
D1 (0.660)). D2 (0.340) |
Shaanbei |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
PD1D1 (0.774), PD1D2 (0.226) |
D1 (0.887). D2 (0.113) |
Boer |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
PD1D1(0.576), PD1D2(0.333), PD2D2 (0.091) |
D1 (0.758). D2 (0.242) |
Haimen |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
102 T>G |
Exon 6 |
PD1D1(0.700), PD1D2(0.300) |
D1 (0.850). D2 (0.150) |
Xuhuai |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
172 T >C |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.494), TC (0.419) CC (0.087) |
T (0.70), C (0.30) |
Saanen |
Isık and Bilgen, 2019 |
|
110 C >T |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.648), TC (0.306) CC (0.037) |
T (0.80), C (0.20) |
Saanen |
Isık and Bilgen, 2019 |
|
838 T > G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.933), TG (0.067), |
T (0.966), G (0.034) |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
Zhang et al., 2019 |
|
682 G > T |
Exon 6 |
GG (0.884), GT (0.108), TT (0.008) |
G (0.938), T (0.062) |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
Zhu et al., 2019 |
|
723 T > G |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.581), TG (0.371), GG (0.048) |
T (0.767), C (0.233) |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
Zhu et al., 2019 |
|
837T > C |
Exon 6 |
TT (0.750), TC (0.220), CC (0.030) |
T (0.860), C (0.140) |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
Zhu et al., 2019 |
|
876 + 110 T > C |
Exon 6 |
TT (1.00) |
T (1.00) |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
Zhu et al., 2019 |
|
306 G>A |
Intron 1 |
GG (0.01) GA (0.29) AA (0.70) |
A (0.84), G (0.16) |
West African Dwarf |
Olasege et al., 2020 |
|
306 G>A |
Intron 1 |
GG (0.12) GA (0.31) AA (0.58) |
A (0.73), G (0.27) |
Red Sokoto |
Olasege et al., 2020 |
|
11236 C>T |
Intron 3 |
CC (0.67) CT (0.28) TT (0.04) |
C (0.81), T (0.19) |
West African Dwarf |
Olasege et al., 2020 |
|
11236 C>T |
Intron 3 |
CC (0.33) CT (0.41) TT (0.26) |
C (0.54), T (0.46) |
Red Sokoto |
Olasege et al., 2020 |
|
11236 C>T |
Intron 3 |
CC (0.67), CT (0.23) |
C (0.83), T (0.17) |
Kalahari red |
Olasege et al., 2020 |
Sequences of the primers used, product size and annealing temperatures
Table III shows different primer sequences, product sizes, and the annealing temperatures. The primer sequence pair F: 5’-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-30 and R: 50-AATGTACAATGTGCCTTCTGAG-3’ was used in two articles (Lan et al., 2008), while different sequences were used by all other articles. The product size results indicated that the minimum size recorded was 106 bp in the research conducted by Feng et al. (2011) and the maximum size was 943 bp as indicated by Olasege et al. (2020). The annealing temperatures in these studies spanned from 50 °C being the lowest used in the article by Zhang et al. (2019) and the highest was 63 °C (Lan et al., 2009).
Targeted genomic regions
The genomic regions associated with the polymorphisms of the POU1F1 gene are shown in Figure 3. The results of all the twelve included articles showed the genomic regions that were locate in the fifty-six experiments. Twenty-three experiments, derived from the 56 experiments identified the polymorphisms within exon 6, while eight experiments pinpointed their location to intron 3. Additionally, only two experiments were found to occur in intron 1, both of which were part of the research conducted by Olasege et al. (2020).
SNPs of POU1F1 gene and its association with traits
The associations between SNPs and various traits are comprehensively presented in Table IV. Out of twelve included articles, ten articles associated their identified SNPs with traits such as cashmere, litter size and milk yield, and only two articles did not associate their SNPs with any traits. The POU1F1 genotype association was found to be statistically significant with cashmere traits in two articles (Lan et al., 2008, 2009), also in three articles associations with milk yield were found (Lan et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2016; Daga et al., 2017) and then other three articles found association in litter size (Feng et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019).
Table III. Primer sequence, product size, amplified region and annealing temperature used in analyses of the goat POU1F1 gene.
|
Primer sequence |
Product position |
Product size |
Annealing temperature |
Author |
|
F: 5’-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3’ R: 5”- AATGTACAATGTGCCTTCTGAG-3” |
Exon 6 |
450 bp |
54.5 oC |
Lan et al., 2008 |
|
F: 5’-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3” R: 5”-AATGTACAATGTGCCTTCTGAG-3’ |
Exon 6 |
450 bp |
54.5 oC |
Lan et al., 2008 |
|
F:5’-TGAAAGTAGAAACACTCGCTAT-3’ R: 5’-GCAACTCATTCCCACAA-3’ |
5’-UTR |
292 bp |
52.0 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F:5’-GATGAGTTGCCAACCTTTTAC-3’ R:5’-CAAAGCACCCATCCTGAC-3’ |
Exon 1 and partial inron 1 |
204 bp |
60 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F: 5’-CTT ACC AGT CCC GTC TAT T-3’ R: 5’-TTC TTA CCT GCC ATC ACG-3’ |
Exon 2 and partial 1 and 2 |
165 bp |
51.3 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F:5’-TTCTTGTTGTTACAGGGAGC-3’ R: 5’-AAGGATAAGCAGAGGGA-3’ |
Exon 3 and partial intron 3 |
567 bp |
54.0 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F:5’-AGGATACACCCAGACAAATG-3’ R:5’-TACTGATTGTTGTTCTCCGT-3’ |
Exon 4 and intron 4 |
326 bp |
58.9 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F: 5’-AGT GTA GCC AGA CCA TTC G-3’ R:5’-TACTGATTGTTGTTCTCCGT-3’ |
Exon 5 and partial intron 4 |
455 bp |
53.4 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F:5’-CCTCTGTCCATGGGATTTTC-3’ R: 5’-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3’ |
Partial intron 5 |
341 bp |
63.0 oC |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
F: TGAAAGTAGAAACACTCGCTAT R: GCAACTCATTCCCACAA |
Promoter regiona |
292 bp |
52.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: ATGAGTTGCCAACCTTTTAC R: CAAAGCACCCATCCTGAC |
Partial exon 1 and flanking |
204 bp |
55.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: CTTACCAGTCCCGTCTATT R: TTCTTACCTGCCATCACG |
Exon 2 and flanking |
106 bp |
53.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: TTCTTGTTGTTACAGGGAGC R: AAGGATAAGCAGAGGGA |
Exon 3 and flanking |
563 bp |
55.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: AGGATACACCCAGACAAATG R: CACTTTCGCTGGCCTTGC |
Exon 4 and flanking |
343 bp |
62.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: AGTGTAGCCAGACCATTCG R: CTGATTGTTGTTCTCCGT |
Exon 5 and flanking |
455 bp |
60.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT R: AATGTACAATGTGCCTTCTGAG |
Partial exon 6 and flanking |
450 bp |
54.0 oC |
Feng et al., 2011 |
|
F: 5′-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3′ R: 5′-AATGTACAATGTCCTTCTGAG-3′ |
Exon 6 |
450 bp |
54.5 oC |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
F: 5'-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3' R: 5'-AATGTACAATGTGCCTTCTGAG-3' |
Exon 6 |
450 bp |
54.5 oC |
Li et al., 2016 |
|
F: 5’-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3’ R: 5’-AATGTACAATGTGCCTTCTGAG-3’ |
Exon 3 and partial intron 3 |
450 bp |
54.0 oC |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
F:5’-ATGTGGTCTGGGATGGATG-3’ R:5’-CTGGTGAAGGTTTGGGTTAG-3’ |
Exon 4 and intron 4 |
414 bp |
58.9 oC |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
F:5’-CCAAGCGTGAGACAGAATAC-3’ R:5’-AGGAGGGATAGGAGCAAGTT-3’ |
Exon 5 and partial intron 4 |
655 bp |
53.4 oC |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
F:5’-CCATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3’ R:5’-AATGTACAATGTCCTTCTGAG-3’ |
Exon 6 |
450 bp |
54.0 oC |
Isık and Bilgen 2019 |
|
Table continues on next page.............. |
||||
|
Primer sequence |
Product position |
Product size |
Annealing temperature |
Author |
|
F:5’-AGGAGCCTACATGAGACAAGC-3’ R: 5’-AATGTACAATATGCCTTCTGAG-3’ |
partial intron 5 and whole exon 6 |
600 bp |
50.0 oC |
Zhang et al., 2019 |
|
F:5’-CGATCATCTCCCTTCTT-3’ R: 5’-AATGTACAATATGCCTTCTGAG-3’ |
Exon 6 and 3’UTR. |
450 bp |
54.0 oC |
Zhu et al., 2010 |
|
TTGCCTTCATTCCCTACCCA |
Promoter region and exon 1 |
837 bp |
58’62 oC |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
|
ACGAATGTGTCTTGAATCCTCAT |
Exon 2 + introns |
493 bp |
58.93 oC |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
|
GCTTCAGAAAACCGAATGTC |
Exon 3 + introns |
943 bp |
59.50 oC |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
|
TGAATGGCAGATGTTCCTATCTG |
Exon 4 + introns |
682 bp |
58.29 oC |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
|
GGAAACGGAGAACAACTATC |
Exon 5 + introns |
802 bp |
57.52 oC |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
|
GCTTGGAAGGTGTTTGCAGA |
Exon 6 + introns |
788 bp |
59.89 oC |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
Table IV. Association between POU1F1 gene SNPs and traits.
|
Traits |
Breed |
SNP |
Genotypes |
Significant |
Authors |
||
|
Cashmere |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goats |
110 T>C |
TT |
TC |
- |
* |
Lan et al., 2008 |
|
Cashmere |
Inner Mongolia white Cashmere goats |
113 G> T |
GG |
GH |
- |
* |
Lan et al., 2009 |
|
Milk yield |
Sarda goat |
61 G >C 108 G >A 42 C >T 92 C >T 110 A >G 34 G >A 17 G >T 58 G >T 172 T >C |
GG GG CC CC AA GG GG GG TT |
GA GC CT CT AG GA GT GT CT |
- - - - - - - - - |
ns ns ns * * ns ns ns ns |
Daga et al., 2012 |
|
Milk yield |
Xinong Sannen dairy Guanzhong dairy Laoshan dairy Leizho Guizhou black Guizhou White Banjiao Matou |
102 T>G 102 T>G 102 T>G 102 T>G 102 T>G 102 T>G |
D1D1 D1D1 D1D1 D1D1 D1D1 D1D1 |
D1D2 D1D2 D1D2 D1D2 D1D2 D1D2 |
- - - - - - |
* * * * * * |
Lan et al., 2015 |
|
Milk yield |
Gauzhong goat |
174 T > C |
TT |
TC |
- |
* |
Zhou et al., 2016 |
|
Litter size |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
682 G > T 723 T > G 837 T > C |
GG TT TT |
GT TG TC |
TT GG CC |
ns ns * |
Zhu et al., 2019 |
|
Growth traits |
Shaanbei white cashmere |
838 T > G |
TT |
TG |
- |
* |
Zhang et al., 2019 |
|
Milk yield Growth |
Sannen |
172 T >C 172 T >C |
TT TT |
TC TC |
CC CC |
* ns |
Isik and Billgen 2019 |
|
Litter size |
West African Dwarf Red Sokoto West African Dwarf Red Sokoto Kalahari Red |
306 G>A 11236C>T |
GG GG CC CC TT |
GA GA CT CT CC |
AA AA TT - CT |
ns ns ns ns ns |
Alasege et al., 2020 |
Discussion
Comprising six exons and five introns, the POU1F1 gene encodes a protein that is 291 amino acids in length and variations in this gene have been correlated with traits that hold considerable economic importance in the field of livestock production (Olasege et al., 2020). The objective of this systematic review was to review articles that identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the POU1F1 gene and their association with traits of economic importance in goats. During this systematic review, twelve articles were identified and the majority of them were originating from China (n = 9) and most (25%) of them were published in 2019 (Isik and Bilgen, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019), while the least of them were published in 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015 and 2020 (8 %) (Lan et al., 2009, 2015; Feng et al., 2011; Daga et al., 2012; Olasege et al., 2020). Approximately thirty-three SNPs in the POU1F1 gene were discovered through the experiments detailed in the twelve reviewed articles, with the majority situated in exon 6 (n = 23), followed by a smaller number in intron 3 (n = 8). The genotypes of the identified SNPs were found to influence cashmere production, litter size, and milk yield and the greater emphasis on milk yield was observed in four articles (Daga et al., 2012; Lan et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2016; Isik and Billgen, 2019). The goat milk has superior benefits over the milk of other species in relation to various parameters, highlighting its particular significance for human nutrition and food security (Zhou et al., 2016). The systematic review confirms the influence of POU1F1 gene on goat traits of economic importance. Based on authors’ knowledge, there is not systematic review of SNPs in the POU1F1 gene for the comparison of the present results. The strength of this review is to showcase the limitations of literature around the SNPs of POU1F1 in traits of economic important in goats. The review contributes to the identification of SNPs as genetic markers and their influence in traits of economic importance in goat production. Among the reviewed literature, only a single study represents the African continent (Olasege et al., 2020), which makes it difficult to conclude for the continent. The systematic review suggests that there is insufficient evidence on SNPs of POU1F1 gene and their effects on traits of economic importance of goats for meta-analysis. It is recommended that African continent conduct studies in SNPs of POU1F1 gene in goats and their association with traits of economic importance in the African context.
Conclusion
This study concludes that single nucleotide polymorphisms of the POU1F1 gene were located at more than three regions and were found to be associated significantly with traits of economic importance in goats coming from different countries. A further conclusion is that exon 6 is the mostly identified region where POU1F1 gene polymorphism occurs.
Declarations
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Tutimomo Farm for supplying the tools necessary for the formulation of this research, as well as to the University of South Africa for granting the permission to conduct the study.
Funding
Funding was provided by University of South Africa Doctoral bursary 2025 and TUTIMOMO Farm Continuous Development.
Ethical considerations
The authors examined a range of ethical issues, specifically focusing on plagiarism, misconduct, informed consent, data falsification, and fabrication.
There is supplementary material associated with this article. Access the material online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20250120133106
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Bettany-Saltikov, J., 2010. Learning how to undertake a systematic review: Part 2. Nurs. Stand., 24: 47-56. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2010.08.24.51.47.c7943
Daga, C., Paludo, M., Luridiana, S., Mura, M.C., Bodano, S., Pazzola, M., Dettori, M.L., Vacca, G.M. and Carcangiu, V., 2012. Identification of novel SNPs in the Sarda breed goats POU1F1 gene and their association with milk productive performance. Mol. Biol. Rep., 40: 2829-2835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2298-0
Feng, T., Chu, M.X., Cao, G.L., Tang, Q.Q., Di, R., Fang, L. and Li, N., 2011. Polymorphisms of caprine POU1F1 gene and their association with litter size in Jining Grey goats. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39: 4029-4038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1184-5
Isık, R. and Bilgen, G., 2019. Associations between genetic variants of the POU1F1 gene and production traits in Saanen goats. Arch. Anim. Breed., 62: 249-255. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-249-2019
Lan, X.Y., Shu, J.H., Chen, H., Pan, C.Y., Lei, C.Z., Wang, X., Liu, Q. and Zhang, Y.B., 2008. A PstI polymorphism at 30UTR of goat POU1F1 gene and its effect on cashmere production. Mol. Biol. Rep., 36: 1371–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-008-9322-4
Lan, X.Y., Li, M.J., Chen, H., Zhang, L.Z., Jing, Y.J. Wei, T.B., Ren, G., Wang, X., Fang, X.T., Zhang, C.L. and Lei, C.Z., 2008. Analysis of caprine pituitary specific transcription factor-1 genepolymorphism in indigenous Chinese goats. Mol. Biol. Rep., 36: 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-008-9232-5
Lan, X.Y., Pan, C.Y., Chen, H. and Lei, C.Z., 2015. A DdeI PCR-RFLP detecting genetic variation of goat POU1F1 gene. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 87: 13–14.
Lan, X.Y., Pana, C.Y., Li, J.Y., Guoa, Y.W., Hua, S., Wanga, J., Liua, Y.B., Hua, S.R., Lei, C.Z. and Chena, H., 2009. Twelve novel SNPs of the goat POU1F1 gene and their associations with cashmere traits. Small Rumin. Res., 85: 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.08.002
Li, M.J., Zhang, C.M., Lan, X.Y., Fang, X.T., Lei, C.Z and Chen, H., 2016. Analysis of POU1F1 gene DdeI polymorphism in Chinese goats. Genet. Mol. Res., 15: 15017747. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15017747
Olasege, B.S., Bemji, M.N., Ibeagha-Awemu, E.M., Mani Isa, A., Wheto, M, Sulaimon, G.D., Ayinde, M.O., Sodimu, B.O., Ogunniyi, D.A., Okwelum, N. and Oluwatosin, B.O., 2020. Genetic polymorphism in the POU1F1 gene in Kalahari Red and two Nigerian goat breeds and their relationship with litter size. Genet. Biodiv. J., 5: 42-59. https://doi.org/10.46325/gabj.v5i1.166
Zhang, Y., Cui, W., Yang, H., Wang, M., Yan, H., Zhu, H., Liu, J., Qu, L., Lan, X. and Pan, C., 2019. A novel missense mutation (L280V) within POU1F1 gene strongly affects litter size and growth traits in goat. Theriogenology, 135: 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.06.021
Zhou, F., Yanga, Q., Lei, C., Chen, H. and Lan, X., 2016. Relationship between genetic variants of POU1F1, PROP1, IGFBP3genes and milk performance in Guanzhong dairy goats. Small Rumin. Res., 140: 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.05.015
Zhu, H., Zhang, Y., Bai, Y., Yang, H., Hailong, Y.H., Liu, J., Shi, L., Song, X., Li, L., Dong, S., Pan, C., Lan, X. and Qu, L., 2019. Relationship between SNPs of POU1F1 gene and litter size and growth traits in Shaanbei white cashmere goats. Animals, 9: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030114