Research Article
Occurrence of Common Pigeon Diseases in Sylhet, Bangladesh
Sukesh Lal Das1, Md. Kamruzzaman Akimul2, Sazzad Islam Bappy3*, Md. Sabbir Ahmed Shuvo4
1Department Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh; 2Department of Microbiology and Public Health, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Babuganj, Barishal-8210, Bangladesh; 3Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jhenaidah Campus, Bangladesh; 4Instructor - Tech (Animal Treatment & Production) Krishi Karigori College, Jamtoil, Kamarkhand, Sirajganj.
Abstract | Pigeon farming is an emerging sector in Bangladesh, but its development is limited by high disease prevalence and poor management practices. Farmers often lack adequate knowledge of standard health protocols and preventive measures. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of common pigeon diseases and evaluate farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, and treatment practices. Primary data were collected through interviewee-assisted surveys, while secondary data were obtained from the Upazila Livestock Office and local veterinary hospitals. Pigeon Pox was the most prevalent disease (35%), followed by parasitic infections (20%) and Newcastle Disease (12.7%). Other conditions included fowl cholera (8.4%), nutritional deficiencies (8%), and salmonellosis (6.4%). Only 20% of farms followed complete vaccination schedules, and Newcastle Disease antibody titers were monitored in just one farm. Most farmers relied on symptomatic treatment using antibiotics such as oxytetracycline, doxycycline, and sulfachloropyridazine sodium with trimethoprim, with minimal use of laboratory diagnostics. The study highlights a high burden of disease and inadequate preventive practices in pigeon farming. Enhancing farmer awareness, improving vaccination coverage, and promoting diagnostic-based treatment are essential to improve productivity and sustainability.
Keywords | Pigeon, Prevalence, Diseases, Prevention, Bangladesh
Editor | Muhammad Nauman Zahid, Quality Operations Laboratory, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Received | April 14, 2026; Accepted | May 11, 2026; Published | June 26, 2026
*Correspondence | Sazzad Islam Bappy, Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jhinaidah Campus, Bangladesh; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Das SL, Akimul MK, Bappy SI, Shuvo MSA (2026). Occurrence of common pigeon diseases in Sylhet, Bangladesh. S. Asian J. Life Sci. 14: 29-33.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sajls/2026/14.29.33
ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331
Copyright © 2026 Das et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
INTRODUCTION
For centuries, Pigeons (Columba livia) have long been integral to human society, historically serving as cultural symbols of peace and spirituality while today flourishing as popular domestic pets. In Bangladesh, where the poultry sector is the most accessible source of animal protein, commercial broilers and layers currently meet the bulk of public demand. However, rising consumer interest in meat variety and health-conscious alternatives has positioned pigeon farming as a critical substitute for future protein security. Unlike industrial chicken, which many find monotonous, pigeon meat known as squab is prized for its delicate flavor, nutritional density, and status as one of the safest meat sources available.
The economic and biological landscape of pigeon rearing in Bangladesh offers a unique opportunity for development. According to the Paul et al. (2015), the country supports 10.8 million pigeons, with approximately 11% already managed in commercial settings. The ancestral rock pigeon’s adaptability to human proximity makes it an ideal study subject and a low-cost livestock option. Furthermore, a significant technical advantage exists in the use of native pigeons as foster parents; while high-value foreign breeds like King and Pouter often fail to hatch their own eggs, hardy native breeds can successfully brood and rear these exotic varieties allowing farmers to scale high-value production with minimal extra effort.
Beyond its biological potential, pigeon farming is a powerful socio-economic tool for poverty alleviation and financial independence. Traditionally managed by women in backyard systems, the practice has evolved to include students financing their education and employed individuals seeking a secondary income stream. As the price of commercial chicken feed rises, the lower feed intake and minimal rearing costs of pigeons make them an alluring alternative for farmers seeking higher profit margins. In regions like Sylhet and the coastal belts, pigeon farming presents a viable solution to unemployment, offering a high-income, low-labor opportunity that can discourage unnecessary migration abroad and contribute directly to the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Despite these prospects, the sector faces critical hurdles. A lack of specialized knowledge regarding vaccination and medication leaves many farms vulnerable to diseases such as Newcastle disease and Pigeon Pox, which can compromise both production rates and the safety of the meat for human consumption. Because the profitability of a farm is inextricably linked to its health status, understanding the prevalence of common diseases and the efficacy of available treatments is paramount. This research aims to evaluate the current disease landscape and the management practices of local farmers to ensure that pigeon farming can fulfill its role as a secure, sustainable cornerstone of Bangladesh’s livestock industry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area and study period
The study was conducted across various pigeon farms in Sylhet district (Figure 1). This study was conducted from March 2022 to November 2022.
Data collection
Data were collected using a bimodal approach combining active field research and passive institutional review. Primary data were obtained through direct, interviewee-assisted interviews with farmers. This semi-structured approach utilized closed-ended questions with fixed response categories for quantitative consistency, alongside open-ended questions to capture qualitative insights without predefined constraints.
Conversely, secondary data were acquired through passive collection methods by sourcing existing administrative records and clinical reports from the Upazila Livestock Office and local veterinary hospitals (Table 3). This integration of primary field data and secondary institutional data ensured a robust and contextualized dataset.
Table 1: General information about 10 pigeon farms in the study area.
|
Serial No |
Name of the owner |
Profession |
Farm size |
Status of vaccination |
Common diseases |
|
01 |
Md. Alamgir |
Day labourer |
60 |
Not vaccinated |
Newcastle diseases, Pox |
|
02 |
Rahat Basit |
Businessman |
200 |
Pigeons are Vaccinated |
Common cold, Salmonellosis |
|
03 |
Syed Mortuza |
Students |
90 |
Only against ND |
Coccidiosis, worm infestation. |
|
04 |
Jobbar Mia |
Pigeon farming |
40 |
Not vaccinated |
Pox, paralysis, ND |
|
05 |
Mamun Abdullah |
Teacher |
140 |
Pigeons are Vaccinated |
Common cold, CRD, Nutritional deficiency |
|
06 |
Bijit Das |
Students |
80 |
Only Against pox |
Malaria, Fowl cholera |
|
07 |
Rima Begum |
Housewife |
30 |
Not vaccinated |
Coryza, salmonellosis |
|
08 |
Azmol Hussen |
Driver |
46 |
Not vaccinated |
Pox ,ND, Canker |
|
09 |
Malek Mia |
Businessman |
100 |
Only against ND |
Nutritional deficiency, Pox, Fowl cholera |
|
10 |
Rezaul Islam |
Pigeon farming |
70 |
Not vaccinated |
Coccidiosis, Salmonellosis, Infectious Coryza |
Procedure
Data were gathered through active, interviewee-assisted surveys during farm-to-farm visits. The researcher interviewed pigeon rearers directly to collect information on farmer demographics, flock size, rearing duration, breed diversity, age-specific disease occurrence, mortality rates, vaccination status, feed and water quality, ventilation, living space, squab care, and general hygienic conditions. In addition to interviews, the researcher performed on-site clinical observations of active disease cases present in the farms at the time of the visit to validate farmer reports. To supplement field findings, a passive data collection approach was used at the Upazila Livestock Office and Veterinary Hospital, Sadar, Sylhet. Historical records and clinical reports regarding pigeon diseases and treatments were retrieved to provide a broader regional context. The raw data collected from both the field and institutional sources were compiled and cleaned. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel to calculate the prevalence rates of different diseases and to categorize the management practices prevalent in the Sylhet District.
RESULTS
The study identified several pigeon breeds reared by farmers in the Sylhet. While rearing is primarily conducted on a small scale, there is a notable variety of both indigenous and exotic breeds. Based on the active data collection from farm-to-farm visits, the following findings were established regarding pigeon health and husbandry (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 2: Categories of farms based on flock size. In this study 3 categories of farms were observed on the basis of size
|
Categories of farms |
Flock size |
No. of farms |
|
Small |
<50 |
3 |
|
Medium |
50-100 |
5 |
|
Large |
>100 |
2 |
According to age, pigeons were classified into 3 categories.
|
Squab |
0 – 4 weeks of age |
|
Young |
5-13 weeks of age |
|
Adult |
More than 13 weeks |
DISCUSSIONS
The findings of this study highlight significant variations in disease prevalence and management practices among pigeon farmers in Sylhet compared to other regions of Bangladesh. The study recorded a 35% prevalence of Pigeon Pox (Table 4; Figure 2), which is substantially higher than the 18.92% reported by Paul et al. (2015) in Khulna Sadar. This disparity suggests a critical lack of knowledge regarding vaccination among farmers in Sylhet. Since Pigeon Pox is a vaccine-preventable viral disease, the high occurrence indicates a failure in prophylactic measures and a lack of awareness. Furthermore, the risk is compounded by the disease’s ability to spread via direct contact and mosquito vectors. Given that the wet pox form can result in mortality rates as high as 50–60%, it represents an alarming threat to the local pigeon population. Improved environmental hygiene, such as clearing surrounding jungles and stagnant water, is essential to reduce vector populations.
Table 3: List of pigeon diseases found in Upazila Livestock Office and Veterinary Hospital, Sadar, Sylhet (from March to November 2022):
|
Study peroid |
Pox |
ND |
Salmo nellosis |
Fowl cholera |
Cocci diosis |
Cory-za |
CRD |
Para- lysis |
Parasitic infe station |
Vitamin, mineral deficiency |
||
|
March |
465 |
28 |
40 |
- |
- |
- |
40 |
420 |
120 |
|||
|
April |
330 |
90 |
- |
150 |
40 |
60 |
- |
50 |
- |
|||
|
May |
160 |
- |
40 |
- |
- |
- |
50 |
- |
175 |
- |
||
|
June |
500 |
120 |
80 |
90 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
|
July |
- |
60 |
- |
40 |
60 |
80 |
- |
- |
- |
90 |
||
|
August |
250 |
80 |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
100 |
- |
100 |
- |
||
|
September |
180 |
- |
60 |
120 |
- |
- |
- |
40 |
150 |
- |
||
|
October |
130 |
100 |
130 |
85 |
20 |
- |
- |
- |
120 |
- |
||
|
November |
- |
200 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
190 |
250 |
||
|
Total |
2015 |
730 |
370 |
485 |
120 |
140 |
190 |
90 |
1155 |
460 |
||
Table 4: Determination of percentage of disease occurrence.
|
Name of disease |
Number of cases |
Percentage of occurrence |
|
Pox |
2015 |
(2015 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 35% |
|
Newcastle Disease (ND) |
730 |
(730 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 12.7% |
|
Salmonellosis |
370 |
(370 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 6.4% |
|
Fowl Cholera |
485 |
(485 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 8.4% |
|
Coccidiosis |
120 |
(120 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 2.1% |
|
Infectious Coryza |
140 |
(140 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 2.4 |
|
Chronic Respiratory Disease |
190 |
(190 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 3.3% |
|
Paralysis |
90 |
( 90 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 1.6% |
|
Parasitic infestations |
1155 |
(1155 ÷5755) × 100 = 20.1% |
|
Vitamins and minerals deficiency |
460 |
(460 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 8% |
|
Total |
5755 |
= 100% |
Table 5: Occurrence of diseases on the basis of types of causal agents.
|
Types of causal agents |
Number of cases |
Percentage of occurrence |
|
Viral diseases |
(2015+730) = 2745 |
(2745 ÷ 5755) × 100= 47.7% |
|
Bacterial diseases |
(370+485+140) = 995 |
(995 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 17.3% |
|
Parasitic diseases (protozoan, worms, mite and ice) |
(120+1155) = 1275 |
(1275 ÷ 5755) × 100 =22.2% |
|
Others diseases |
(460+90) = 740 |
(740 ÷ 5755) × 100 = 12.9% |
In contrast, parasitic diseases accounted for 20% of cases in this study (Table 5; Figure 3), a notable decrease from the 31.67% observed in Khulna Sadar (Paul et al., 2015). This lower percentage indicates that farmers in Sylhet are becoming more proactive regarding loft cleanliness and the administration of anthelmintic. However, the persistence of these parasites suggests that while awareness is growing, regular deworming schedules are not yet fully optimized. Achieving a further reduction in parasitic load will require stricter adherence to periodic anthelmintic dosages.
A common constraint identified was vitamin and mineral deficiency. Observations revealed that most farmers focus solely on providing basic feed, neglecting the specific micronutrient requirements of the birds. This “feed-only” approach hampers overall production and growth performance. Educating farmers on the importance of supplements is vital for improving the physiological health and reproductive success of the pigeons.
The study underscores a significant gap in biosecurity measures. The lack of quarantine protocols for newly introduced birds creates a high risk for the introduction of pathogens into unaffected flocks. Additionally, unrestricted visitor access acts as a potential pathway for indirect disease transmission. Implementing strict entry barriers and mandatory isolation periods for new stock is necessary to safeguard farm biosecurity.
Conclusion
This study highlights that while pigeon rearing in Sylhet is a resilient practice due to the birds’ naturally robust immune systems, significant gaps in scientific management and biosecurity remain. The high prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases, such as Pigeon Pox (35%), underscores an urgent need for increased farmer awareness regarding systematic vaccination and vector control. Furthermore, while improvements in sanitation and anthelmintic use have reduced parasitic burdens to 20%, the neglect of micronutrient supplementation (vitamins and minerals) remains a primary constraint to maximizing production. Transitioning from traditional “feed-only” methods to evidence-based husbandry incorporating quarantine, balanced nutrition, and professional veterinary consultation is vital for the sustainable growth of pigeon farming in Bangladesh.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and cooperation of the pigeon farmers and bird owners of Sylhet, Bangladesh, who participated in this study. We also express our sincere thanks the individuals who provided technical and logistical support throughout the study.
Novelty Statement
This study provides a detailed assessment of pigeon health by simultaneously evaluating disease prevalence, farmer knowledge, preventive practices, vaccination status, and treatment pattern. Unlike previous studies that primarily focused on disease occurrence, the present research identifies critical management and bio-security gaps contributing to disease load in pigeon farms of Bangladesh. The findings provide baseline evidence for developing targeted disease control and farmer education programs in the emerging pigeon farming sector.
Author’s Contribution
Data collection: SLD, MSAS. Data analysis: SLD, MKA. Writing the original draft: SLD, MKA, SIB. Review and editing: MKA, SIB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors and was conducted voluntarily.
Generative AI and AI assisted technology statement
The authors declare that no generative AI and AI assisted technology was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Ali MH, Bunyan MKJ, Alam MM (2011).Retrospective epidemiologic study of diseases in ruminants in Karachi Hill Tract District of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Vet. Med., 9: 145-153. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v9i2.13457
Asaduzzaman M, Mahiuddin M, Howlider MAR, Hossain MM, Yeasmin T (2012).Pigeon farming in Gouripur Upazilla of Mymensingh District. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 38: 142-150. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v38i1-2.9923
Azrug A, Magzoup E, Salman A (2018). Incidence of pigeon’s infectious coryza in a farm in Bahrain and the associated risk factors. J. Vet. Sci. Technol., 9: (Conference Proceedings), DOI: 10.4172/2157-7579-C2-039.
Basit MT, Pervez K, Avais M, Rabbani I (2006). Prevalence and chemotherapy of nematodes infestation in wild and domestic pigeons and its effects on various blood components. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 16: 24-27.
Bulbul K.H., Shahardar, R.A., Allaie, I.M., Wani, Z.A., Tramboo, S.R., Ashraf, A., Maqbool, I., Ganaie, Z.A., Sheikh, I.U., Shubeena, S (2015). Avian trichomonosis with special reference to pigeon. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb., 3(5): 11-13.
Dolberg F (2008). FAO animal production and health division, Poultry sector country review, Bangladesh Walker DC (2014). Australian Pigeon Company.
Harlin R, Wade L (2009). Bacterial and parasitic diseases of Columbiformes. Vet. Clin. Exotic Anim. Pract., 12(3): 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2009.07.001
Kabir MA (2014). Symptomatic treatments of some common diseases of fancy Pigeons in Bangladesh. Acme J. Anim. Sci. Livest. Prod. Anim. Breed. 1(1): 1-4.
Paul T, Amin M, Alam M, Rahman M, Sarkar Y, Riaz M (2015). Occurrence of pigeon diseases at Khulna Sadar, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Med., 13(2): 21-25. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v13i2.26616