Research Article

Response of Wheat to Tillage and Nitrogen Application in a Cotton-Based Cropping System

Khalid Usman, Aziz-Ur-Rehman

Department of Agronomy, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan - Pakistan

Abstract | Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and yield components are inﬂuenced by tillage and time of nitrogen application as well as soil type and cropping system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response of spring wheat seeded in three tillage systems viz., zero (ZT), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) to split application of N fertilizer [50 kg N at sowing + 100 kg N ha-1 at first irrigation (T 1); 50 kg N at first irrigation + 100 kg N ha-1 at second irrigation (T 2); 50 kg N at sowing + 50 kg N at first irrigation + 50 kg N ha-1 at second irrigation (T 3); and 50 kg N at first + 50 kg N at second + 50 kg N ha-1 at third irrigation (T 4)] in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) based cropping system. The experiment was conducted on a silty clay soil at Agricultural Research Institute, Ratta Kulachi, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, during 2010–2011. The effects of three tillage systems as main plot factor and four split N fertilizer application timings as subplot factor were studied in a randomized complete block design with split plot application. The results revealed that zero tillage had higher spikes m-2, 1000 grain weight and biological yield compared to other tillage systems. However, N agronomic efficiency, grain yield and net benefit were similar for all three tillage systems. Regarding N application timing, T 3 had highest values for N agronomic efficiency, grain yield and yield components. Results also suggested that application of N in three splits particularly in T 3 is more productive and economical strategy for wheat production following cotton. It is concluded that wheat seeded in zero tillage following cotton did not decrease stand or yield compared to conventional tillage and wheat grain yield and N agronomic efficiency increased with application of 150 kg N ha-1 in three equal splits viz. at sowing, first irrigation, and second irrigation.

Editor | Tahir Sarwar, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan

*Correspondence | Usman, K. Gomal University, Pakistan; E-mail | marwat7862003@yahoo.com

Citation | Usman, K., Ur-Rehman, A. 2014. Response of wheat to tillage and nitrogen application in a cotton based cropping system. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 30(4): 386-392.

Keywords | Zero tillage, reduced tillage, yield, NUE

Introduction

Wheat and cotton grown in sequence impact the amount of nutrients available for subsequent plant growth (Gan et al., 200 3). Although cropping system inﬂuences crop nutrient availability, it mostly affects N, which is probably most affected by management practices. Nitrogen is extensively deficient in alkaline and calcareous soils of Pakistan (Shah et al., 2010). Nitrogen management plays a key role in crop productivity and N management will be affected by crop species and cropping system (Campbell et al., 1995). Some researchers reported lower wheat yield and N use efficiency (NUE) when grown in zero tillage after exhaustive crops such as cotton compared to continuous conventional tillage wheat (Knowles et al., 1993). The lower NUE in wheat may be attributed to N immobilization due to previous crop residues. Nitrogen application at proper time is important to ensure proﬁtable wheat production (Howard et al., 2002). Many studies have shown that split application of N fertilizer results in higher NUE and higher grain yield than under single applications (Khan et al., 2011; López-Bellido et al., 2012). However, current N recommendations developed for conventional tillage system may be insufficient for optimizing wheat production under zero tillage (McConkey et al., 2002) and need reconsideration due to potential effects of crop residues on soil surface on N transformations and crop development (Weisz et al., 2001). Growing wheat in rotation can enhance yield by inﬂuencing crops insect pests, diseases, weeds, water and nutrients uptake (Campbell et al., 1990). A sustainable cropping system is essential for agronomic, economic, and environmental safety (Camara et al., 2003). Cotton followed by wheat is one of the common cropping systems prevailing in D. I. Khan, Pakistan.

Growing wheat in sequence with cotton has the potential for increasing farmers’ income. However, in cotton–wheat cropping system, late sowing of wheat can be a problem due to delayed harvest of late maturing cotton. This leaves very narrow time for land preparation to sow wheat. However, conventional tillage is waning in wheat production systems (Carr et al., 2003) and zero tillage that reduce the turn-around time for wheat cultivation after cotton have been developed (Sheikh et al., 2003). Zero tillage wheat is useful in terms of timeliness, low cultivation cost, less use of machinery and hence less diesel consumption, and appears to be a good alternative to conventional tillage. However, sowing wheat in zero tillage following cotton requires some specific crop management and may present problems such as late wheat sowing and managing previous crop residues (Staggenborg et al., 2003). Crop residues can adversely affect wheat yield, thereby creating an obstacle to the adoption of zero tillage technology that effectively controls soil erosion (Rasmussen et al., 1997). Zero tillage may reduce wheat germination and stand establishment due to poor seed–soil contact and less uniform seedbed conditions compared with conventional tillage. However, Hunt et al. (1997) reported that wheat grain yield from zero tillage and reduced tillage was similar to conventional tillage. In recent years, cotton production has considerably increased in Southeast Asia, but the effect of zero tillage and reduced tillage wheat in cotton based cropping system has not been adequately investigated (Hunt et al., 1997). A suitable tillage in combination with N fertilizer application time needs to be developed for sustainable crop production without jeopardizing the soil and environmental quality. Few studies have been conducted on the response of wheat to tillage and N application time in cotton based cropping system. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of different tillage systems and time of N application on wheat grown after cotton.

Material and Methods

The study was carried out at Agricultural Research Institute, Ratta Kulachi, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, during 2010–2011. The experiment was conducted on a field previously occupied by cotton crop. Three tillage systems viz., Zero tillage (ZT), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) as main plot factor and four split N fertilizer application [50 kg N at sowing + 100 kg N ha-1 at first irrigation (T1), 50 kg N at first irrigation + 100 kg N ha-1 at second irrigation (T2), 50 kg N at sowing + 50 kg N at first irrigation + 50 kg N ha-1 at second irrigation (T3) and 50 kg N at first + 50 kg N at second + 50 kg N ha-1 at third irrigation (T4)] as subplot factor in randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement replicated four times. The subplot size was 3 × 10 m2. The cultivar used was Hashim-8, a short-cycle, spring wheat of medium height. The cultivar showed good productivity and adaptability, even if grown late in a season. The preceding cotton crop was also supplied with N and P fertilizer at a rate of 120 kg N and 90 kg P ha-1, respectively. Soil available K was adequate. Wheat was sown on December 4, 2010 at a seed rate of 120 kg ha-1 with 30 cm wide rows soon after cotton harvest. Zero tillage wheat was sown with zero tillage drill without land preparation. Reduced tillage plots were prepared with tiller followed by rotavator, while conventional tillage plots were prepared with disc plow, tiller, rotavator and after leveling wheat was sown with seed drilling machine. Nitrogen and Phosphorus fertilizers were applied at the rate of 150 kg N and 60 kg P ha-1 in the form of Urea and Triple super phosphate, respectively. All of the P fertilizer was applied at sowing while N was applied according to subplots treatments as mentioned earlier. Wheat crop was irrigated 5 times during the growing season. First irrigation was given 20 days after crop emergence, while subsequent irrigations were given at one month intervals. Wheat was harvested in last week of May. Data were recorded on spikes m-2, spike length (cm), grains spike-1, 1000 grain weight (g), biological yield (kg ha-1), grain yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%), cost of production (Rs. ha-1), nitrogen agronomic efficiency [(grain yield of the N fertilized plot - grain yield of control) / amount of N applied)] and net benefit (Rs. ha-1) (gross income– total cost of production) (Usman et al., 2012). Data were then subjected to statistical analysis of variance appropriate to randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement and least significant difference test was applied for mean comparison using MSTATC software (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

Results and Discussion

Number of Spikes per m2

Number of spikes per m2 was significantly affected by tillage and nitrogen timing and splitting (Table 1). There were more spikes m-2 in zero tillage (270) and reduced tillage (263) compared to conventional tillage (260). However, Khan et al. (2011) reported lower spikes under zero tillage compared to other tillage systems while studying rainfed wheat. The difference in research findings may be due to variations in soil, moisture, and weather conditions during growing season. The data further revealed that T3 showed the highest number of spikes m-2 (314), while control plot produced the lowest spikes m-2 (193). The higher spikes in T3 plots may be ascribed to efficient use of N fertilizer and distribution of more resources to crop plants compared to other treatments (Laghari et al., 2010; Youseftabar et al., 2012). Mean values for N timing and splitting displayed highest number of spikes in T3 (314) followed by T4 (297), while the control showed lowest spikes m-2 (193). The tillage × N interaction was not significant.

Table 1. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on spikes m-2 in wheat.

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 196 | 195 | 188 | 193 e
T1 | 242 | 242 | 236 | 240 d
T2 | 281 | 278 | 273 | 277 c
T3 | 324 | 312 | 306 | 314 a
T4 | 305 | 290 | 296 | 297 b
Tillage mean | 270 a | 263 ab | 260 b |

LSD 0.05 for tillage= 6.614, Nitrogen = 14.53

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Spike Length (cm)

Spike length was significantly affected by N fertilizer timing and splitting, however, both the tillage and tillage × N interaction effects were not significant (Table 2). Mean values for N timing and splitting revealed that longest spikes were recorded in T3, i.e., when 50 kg N fertilizer was applied at sowing, 50 kg at first irrigation, and 50 kg N ha-1 at second irrigation. Spikes length recorded in T2 and T4 were statistically similar. The shortest spikes (5.5 cm) were recorded in T0 where no fertilizer was applied. The increase in spike length with T3 may be attributed to better synchronization between N availability and plant demand (Afridi et al., 2010).

Table 2. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on spike length (cm) in wheat.

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 5.5 d
T1 | 8.8 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 7.8 c
T2 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.8 | 8.3 b
T3 | 9.0 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.3 a
T4 | 9.0 | 8.8 | 8.5 | 8.8 b
Tillage mean | 8.2 | 7.9 | 7.8 |

LSD 0.05 for Nitrogen = 0.4342

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Grains per Spike

Data on grains spike-1 was significantly affected by tillage, N, and tillage × nitrogen interaction (Table 3). Mean values for tillage revealed that reduced tillage had higher number of grains spike-1 (44.3) compared to zero tillage (42.7) and conventional tillage (42.0). In N fertilizer timing and splitting, T3 had highest number of grains spike-1 (51.9) among all other treatments. In tillage × nitrogen interaction, T3 showed highest number of grains spike-1 in zero tillage (55.5) followed next by reduced tillage (50.8) and conventional tillage (49.5). The data also revealed that minimum number of grains spike-1 (29.3) was recorded in T0 irrespective of the tillage intensity. The increase in grains spike-1 with split application, i.e., with T3 may be attributed to prolonged period for nutrients availability to crop growth as reported by some researchers (Mandal et al., 2005; Melaj et al., 2003).

1000-Grain Weight (g)

The 1000-grain weight was significantly affected by tillage, nitrogen and tillage × nitrogen interaction (Table 4). Heavier grains were recorded in zero tillage (37.5 g) compared to conventional tillage (34.4 g). Reduced tillage gave statistically an identical grain weight to zero tillage and conventional tillage. Mean values for nitrogen timing and splitting showed highest (41.6 g) and lowest 1000-grain weight (28.0 g) in T3 and T0, respectively. Similarly in interaction effects, T3 showed higher 1000-grain weight under zero tillage compared to reduced tillage and conventional tillage.

Table 3. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on grains spike-1 in wheat.

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 29.3 i | 29.3 i | 29.3 i | 29.3 e
T1 | 39.5 h | 45.5 ef | 41.0 gh | 42.0 d
T2 | 43.5 fg | 47.5 cde | 43.5 fg | 44.9 c
T3 | 55.5 a | 50.8 b | 49.5 bc | 51.9 a
T4 | 45.8 ef | 48.5 bcd | 46.5 de | 46.9 b
Tillage mean | 42.7 b | 44.3 a | 42.0 b |

LSD 0.05 for tillage= 1.597, Nitrogen =1.513, Tillage × N=2.620

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

The results reveal that both zero tillage and reduced tillage were superior to CT in producing heavier grains particularly when N fertilizer was either applied with T3 or T4. Analogous results were communicated by Hassan et al. (2010) and Hirzel et al. (2011) who reported that split application of nitrogen significantly enhanced all plant traits except crop emergence.

Biological Yield (kg ha-1)

Biological yield was significantly affected by tillage and N timing and splitting (Table 5). The interaction between tillage and N was non-significant. Zero tillage had higher biological yield (14053 kg ha-1) compared to reduced tillage (12958 kg ha-1) and conventional tillage (12753 kg ha-1). Analogous results were communicated by López-Bellido et al. (2012) who reported higher yield for zero tillage compared to other tillage systems. Under zero tillage crop residues decompose slowly, however, in the long run residues may provide a longer, more continuous supply of nutrients than a single fertilizer application. Slowly released N would be less susceptible to gaseous and leaching losses. The organic matter may also be vital to supply energy to the soil microbial biomass and formation of stable soil aggregates (Carefoot and Janzen, 1997). Regarding N timing and splitting, highest biological yield (18177 kg ha-1) was recorded when one third (50 kg N ha-1) of total N fertilizer (150 kg N ha-1) was applied each at sowing, at first irrigation and at second irrigation (T3). The higher biological yield with T3 may be attributed towards optimum time and split application of N fertilizer among all other treatments (Jan et al., 2010). The crop might have higher N uptake and efficient N utilization in case of T3 compared to all other treatments.

Table 4. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on 1000- grains weight (g).

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 29.3 hi | 27.0 j | 27.8 ij | 28.0 e
T1 | 36.3 fg | 31.3 h | 30.0 h | 32.5 d
T2 | 39.0 cde | 38.3 def | 36.0 g | 37.3 c
T3 | 42.8 a | 41.5 ab | 40.5 bc | 41.6 a
T4 | 40.3 bcd | 40.3 bcd | 37.8 efg | 39.4 b
Tillage mean | 37.5 a | 35.7 ab | 34.4 b |

LSD 0.05 for tillage=2.290, Nitrogen =1.253, Tillage × N=2.170

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Table 5. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on biological yield (kg ha-1).

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 3209 | 3425 | 4750 | 3795e
T1 | 13818 | 12193 | 11867 | 12626d
T2 | 16355 | 14932 | 13875 | 15054c
T3 | 19518 | 17688 | 17325 | 18177a
T4 | 17364 | 16551 | 15950 | 16622b
Tillage mean | 14053a | 12958b | 12753b |

LSD 0.05 for tillage= 717.1, Nitrogen = 1128

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Grain Yield (kg ha-1)

Split application of nitrogen significantly affected wheat grain yield, while the tillage and tillage × split application of nitrogen interaction were not statistically significant (Table 6). Maximum grain yield (6250 kg ha-1) was recorded when N fertilizer (150 kg N ha-1) was applied in three splits i.e. 50 kg N ha-1 each at sowing, at first irrigation, and second irrigation (T3). The lowest grain yield (1393 kg ha-1) was recorded in control where no N fertilizer was applied. The data also revealed that application of N fertilizer in three equal splits such as T3 (with sowing, first irrigation and second irrigation) and T4 (with first, second and third irrigation) produced higher grain yield than N fertilizer application in two splits i.e T1 (1/3rd with sowing and 2/3rd with 1st irrigation) and T2 (1/3rd with 1st irrigation and 2/3rd with 2nd irrigation). The higher grain yield obtained from T3 may be attributed to higher spikes m-2, grains spike-1 and 1000-grain weight which contributed to higher grain yield. The applied N in three equal splits viz., sowing, first irrigation (20 days after emergence), and second irrigation may have lower chances of N losses, higher NUE, and hence might have resulted in higher grain yield. The T4 application was not as efficient as T3 because late season N application may prompt increase in grain protein concentration rather than increase in grain yield (Gooding and Davies, 1997; Garrido-Lestache et al., 2004).

Table 6. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on grain yield (kg ha-1).

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 1253 | 1375 | 1550 | 1393 e
T1 | 3561 | 3744 | 3704 | 3669 d
T2 | 4383 | 4524 | 4305 | 4404 c
T3 | 6741 | 6142 | 5866 | 6250 a
T4 | 5468 | 5485 | 5319 | 5424 b
Tillage mean | 4281 | 4254 | 4149 |

LSD 0.05 for Nitrogen = 418.4

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Harvest Index (%)

Harvest index was significantly affected by N timing and splitting while tillage and its interaction with N timing and splitting were not significant (Table 7). The mean H.I. was higher in T0 (37.5%) and T3 (34.4%) compared to other treatments. The lowest H.I. was recorded in T2 where 50 kg N was applied at first irrigation and 100 kg N ha-1 at second irrigation. The lowest H.I. in T2 may be attributed to lower partitioning of dry matter to grains which resulted in lower H.I. The variation in H.I. for different N application timings may be related to the relative increase in both grain and biomass yield due to N application as communicated by other researchers (Andersson and Johansson, 2006; Afridi et al., 2010).

Table 7. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on H.I (%).

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 39.5 | 40.3 | 32.7 | 37.5 a
T1 | 26.5 | 32.0 | 32.3 | 30.3 bc
T2 | 27.0 | 30.5 | 31.8 | 29.8 c
T3 | 34.5 | 34.8 | 34.0 | 34.4 ab
T4 | 31.3 | 33.0 | 33.5 | 32.5 bc
Tillage mean | 31.8 | 34.1 | 32.9 |

LSD 0.05 for Nitrogen =4.171

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Nitrogen Agronomic Efficiency (kg grain kg- 1 N applied)

Nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE) indicates increase in grain yield per unit amount of N applied. The NAE was significantly affected by N timing and splitting, while tillage and tillage × N had no significant influence on NAE (Table 8). Mean values for N timing and splitting revealed highest NAE (32.4 kg kg-1) with T3 followed by T4 (26.8 kg kg-1). The data further indicate that NAE was higher in N fertilizer applied in three equal splits such as T3 and T4 than two unequal splits such as T1 and T2. The higher NAE with T3 may be attributed to higher N uptake and subsequent higher grain yield (Jan et al., 2010; López-Bellido et al., 2012). The lower NAE in T1 and T2 may be attributed to too early N application which might have resulted in significant N losses (Carefoot and Janzen, 1997).

Net Benefit (Rs. ha-1)

Tillage and tillage × N timing and splitting did not influence gross margin or net benefit (NB), however, N timing and splitting significantly affected NB (Table 9). Mean values revealed that T3 had the highest NB (Rs. 107044 ha-1) while T0 had lowest NB (Rs. 3333 ha-1). Since grain yield was higher when N fertilizer was applied in three equal splits compared to N application in two unequal splits, similar pattern was observed in NB. The T3 and T4 had higher NB than T1 and T2. These results suggest that N fertilizer application in three equal splits i.e. 1/3rd of total N at sowing (drilling in soil), 1/3rd at first irrigation (side dressing), and 1/3rd at second irrigation (side dressing) is not only productive but highly economical and environmentally safe. Because higher N uptake and lower N losses may enhance N use efficiency, which in turn lead to higher production and higher income without jeopardizing environmental quality (López-Bellido et al., 2005).

Table 8. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on N agronomic efficiency.

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | - | - | - | -
T1 | 15.5 | 15.8 | 14.3 | 15.2 d
T2 | 20.8 | 21.0 | 18.3 | 20.0 c
T3 | 36.8 | 31.8 | 28.8 | 32.4 a
T4 | 27.8 | 27.5 | 25.0 | 26.8 b
Tillage mean | 25.2 | 24.0 | 21.6 |

LSD 0.05 for nitrogen=2.493

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Table 9. Effect of tillage and nitrogen application timing on net benefit (Rs. ha-1).

N timing | Tillage | Nitrogen mean
Zero | Reduced | Conventional
T0 | 2125 | 2925 | 4950 | 3333 e
T1 | 47192 | 49401 | 46481 | 47690 d
T2 | 66115 | 67352 | 60303 | 64590 c
T3 | 120349 | 104566 | 96218 | 107044 a
T4 | 91070 | 89444 | 83626 | 88046 b
Tillage mean | 65370 | 62737 | 58316 |

LSD 0.05 for Nitrogen = 3043

Mean values in each category followed by same letter do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Zero tillage in combination with T3 (50 kg N at sowing + 50 kg N at 1st irrigation + 50 kg N at 2nd irrigation) resulted in more grains spike-1 and heavier 1000-grain weight. Zero tillage also produced higher spikes m-2 and higher biological yield. Application of N fertilizer in three equal splits at sowing, at 1st irrigation (20 days after emergence), and at 2nd irrigation (30 days after 1st irrigation) resulted in highest yield and yield components, N agronomic efficiency, and highest net economic return. Hence zero tillage in combination with T3 is recommended for optimizing yield and economics of spring wheat in cotton based cropping system on silty clay soil of Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

References

- Afridi, M.Z., M.T. Jan, M. Arif and A. Jan. 2010. Wheat yielding components response to different levels of fertilizer-N application time and decapitation stress. Sarhad J. Agric. 26(4):499–506.
- Andersson, A. and E. Johansson. 2006. Nitrogen partitioning in entire plants of different spring wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 38: 1203–1209.
- Camara, K.M., W.A. Payne and P.E. Rasmussen. 2003. Long-term effects of tillage, nitrogen, and rainfall on winter wheat yields in the Paciﬁc Northwest. Agron. J. 95: 828–835.
- Campbell, C.A., R.J.K. Myers and D. Curtin. 1995. Managing nitrogen for sustainable crop production. Fertil. Res. 42: 277–296.
- Campbell, C.A., R.P. Zentner, H.H. Janzen and K.E. Bowren. 1990. Crop Rotation Studies on the Canadian Prairies. Publ. 1841/E. Res. Branch, Agric. Can, Ottawa, ON.
- Carefoot, J.M. and H.H. Janzen. 1997. Effect of straw management, tillage timing and timing of fertilizer nitrogen application on the crop utilization of fertilizer and soil nitrogen in an irrigated cereal rotation. Soil Till. Res. 44: 195-210.
- Carr, P.M., R.D. Horsley and W.W. Poland. 2003. Tillage and seeding rate effects on wheat cultivars. I. Grain production. Crop Sci. 43(1): 202–209.
- Gan, Y.T., P.R. Miller, B.G. McConkey, R.P. Zentner, F.C. Stevenson and C.L. McDonald. 2003. Inﬂuence of diverse cropping sequences on durum wheat yield and protein in the semiarid Northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 95: 245–252.
- Garrido-Lestachea, E., R.J. López-Bellido and L. López-Bellido. 2004. Effect of N rate, timing and splitting and N type on bread-making quality in hard red spring wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Field Crop Res. 85: 213–236.
- Gooding, M.J. and W.P. Davies, 1997. The production and utilization of wheat, system, quality and the environment, 352 pp. Oxford. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.
- Grant, C.A., G.A. Peterson and C.A. Campbell. 2002. Nutrient considerations for diversiﬁed cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 94: 186–198.
- Hassan, S.W.U., F.C. Oad, S. Tunio, A.W. Gandahi, M.H. Siddiqui, S.M. Oad, and A.W. Jagirani. 2010. Effect of N application and N splitting strategy on Maize N uptake, biomass production and physic-agronomic characteristics. Sarhad J. Agric. 26(4): 551–558.
- Hirzel, J. A. Pedreros, and K. Cordero. 2011. Effect of Nitrogen Rates and Split Nitrogen Fertilization on Grain Yield and its Components in Flooded Rice. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 71 (3):437-444.
- Howard, D.D., M.A. Newman, M.E. Essington and W.M. Percell. 2002. Nitrogen fertilization of conservation-tilled wheat. I. Sources and application rates. J. Plant Nutr. 25 (6): 1315–1328.
- Hunt, P.G., P.J. Bauer and T.A. Matheny. 1997. Crop production in a wheat-cotton double crop rotation with conservation tillage. J. Prod. Agric. 10 (3): 462–465.
- Jan, M.T., M.J. khan, A. Khan, M. Arif, M. Shafi, and Farmanullah. 2010. Wheat nitrogen indices response to nitrogen source and application time. Pak. J. Bot. 42(6): 4267-4279.
- Khan, M.I., A. Jan, N. Hussain, M.T. Jan and M. Qadoos. 2011. Rainfed wheat response to tillage and nitrogen. Sarhad J. Agric. 27 (4): 519–523.
- Knowles, T.C., B.W. Hipp, P.S. Graff and D.S. Marshall. 1993. Nitrogen nutrition of rainfed winter wheat in tilled and no-till sorghum and wheat residues. Agron. J. 85: 886–893.
- Laghari, G.M., F.C. Oad, S. Tunio, A.W. Gandahi, M.H. Siddiqui, A.W. Jagirani and S.M. Oad. 2010. Sarhad J. Agric. 26(4):489–497.
- López-Bellido, L., R.J. Lo´pez-Bellido and R. Redondo. 2005. Nitrogen efficiency in wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions as affected by split nitrogen application. Field Crop Res. 94: 86–97.
- López-Bellido, L., V. Mùnoz-Romero, J. Benítez-Vega, P. Fernández-García, R. Redondo, R. J. López-Bellido. 2012. Wheat response to nitrogen splitting applied to a Vertisols in different tillage systems and cropping rotations under typical Mediterranean climatic conditions. Europ. J. Agronomy. 43: 24–32.
- Mandal, K.G., K.M. Hati, A.K. Misra, K.K. Bandyopadhyay and M. Mohanty. 2005. Irrigation and nutrient effects on growth and water-yield relationship of wheat in Central India. J. Agron. & Crop Sci. 191: 416–425.
- Melaj, M.A., H.E. Echeverría, S.C. López, G. Studdert, F. Andrade, and N.O. Ba´rbaro. 2003. Timing of Nitrogen Fertilization in Wheat under Conventional and No-Tillage System. Agron. J. 95:1525–1531.
- McConkey, B.G., D. Curtin, C.A. Campbell, S.A. Brandt and F. Selles. 2002. Crop and soil nitrogen status of tilled and no-tillage systems in semiarid regions of Saskatchewan. Can. J. Soil Sci. 82 (4): 489–498.
- Rasmussen, P.E., R.W. Rickman and B.L. Klepper. 1997. Residue and fertility effects on yield of no-till wheat. Agron. J. 89 (4): 563–567.
- Shah, S.A., S.M. Shah, W. Muhammad, M. Shafi, H. Nawaz, S. Shehzad and M. Amir. 2010. Effect of irrigated use of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources on wheat yield. Sarhad J. Agric. 26(4): 559–563.
- Sheikh, A.D., T. Rehman and C.M. Yates. 2003. Logit models for identifying the factors that inﬂuence the uptake of new ‘no-tillage’ technologies by farmers in the rice-wheat and the cotton–wheat farming systems of Pakistan’s Punjab. Agric. Syst. 75 (1): 79–95.
- Staggenborg, S.A., D.A. Whitney, D.L. Fjell and J.P. Shroyer. 2003. Seeding and nitrogen rates required to optimize winter wheat yields following grain sorghum and soybean. Agron. J. 95: 253–259.
- Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA.
- Usman, K., S.K. Khalil and S. Ghulam. 2012. Tillage and N impact on wheat production and N efficiency under rice-wheat cropping system in Northwestern Pakistan. Philipp. Agric. Scientist. 95 (1): 33-42.
- Weisz, R., C.R. Crozier and R.W. Heiniger. 2001. Optimizing nitrogen application timing in no-till soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 93: 435–442.
- Youseftabar, S., A. Fallah and J. Daneshiyan. 2012. Effect of split application of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of hybrid rice. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci., 6(6): 1-5.